We’re publishing this article by Dr. Benjamin Jones, the Free Speech Union’s Case Management Director, to mark International Apostasy Day. Dr. Jones recently completed a PhD on the experiences of ex-Muslims and their increasingly precarious position in Britain. It was first published by the National Secular Society, which part-funded Dr. Jones’s research. You can join the National Secular Society here.
By the time I spoke to her, Zainab was safe, for the most part. But it had been a close-run thing. And she was still far from ‘free’.
Zainab, aged 19, had been in a lesbian relationship. When her parents found out, they beat her. Then they seized her phone and tried to cut off her every connection with the outside world. “I couldn’t contact any of my friends and I couldn’t talk to my girlfriend,” she said. They even took her laptop, depriving her of the material she needed to study for her exams. “I had to pretend that I turned straight,” she told me of these long, oppressive months.
But when her sister betrayed her and revealed that she was still in a covert same-sex relationship, the situation escalated rapidly. Zainab managed to alert a friend who contacted the police, but despite numerous police visits and the involvement of the Crown Prosecution Service, she remained in her parents’ house.
She had no choice but to begin planning her escape. Her parents monitored and shut down her internet access, inspected her room, and would regularly burst in to see what she was doing. She had no privacy at all. But carefully, covertly, she began to hide packed bags, hoping that her parents would not find them or realise what she was doing. Despite the restrictions on her, Zainab had managed to make a plan with a friend: when she made a run for it, her friend would have a taxi waiting to collect her. She did make a run for it, but her parents realised what was happening and tried to stop her. The police returned, just in time, and finally they took Zainab to the relative safety of a women’s refuge, where she would remain for the duration of the summer before she planned to start university.
Zainab was far from alone in going through an experience like this, and she knew other gay or lesbian former Muslims were in virtually identical situations: living a doubly closeted life, unable to be open about either her relationship, or the fact she no longer believed in Islam. Her thoughts quickly turned to speaking out about what had happened. She spoke to the police officer who was with her about her concerns: “I feel like if I speak up about this then the Muslim community will attack me.”
The police had arrived in time to rescue Zainab, but very quickly the state reached the limit of what it would do for her: “You should just consider not speaking about it at all,” the police officer replied.
Zainab eventually made it to university. She notified her institution about the situation she was in and was reassured by the security available on campus and in the halls of residence where she lived at the time I spoke to her. But even after escaping a hellishly controlling childhood and parental abuse, she was still not free. Not really.
I asked if she could be open about being an ex-Muslim. She replied: “Absolutely not, because half my year group, which is 87 people, are Muslims so it would just not be a good idea for me to be out at all. Because even if they’re not going to like attack me… it would still just spread gossip and rumours and drama and I just don’t want to be involved in something like that; I’m already under too much stress as it is.”
Zainab was one of 25 ex-Muslims living in Britain I interviewed as part of a three year research project. I wanted to explore how they were beginning to doubt Islam, escaping, organising to try and tell their stories, and campaigning for acceptance, protection and better lives for other ex-Muslims.
Taking part in my study was the only way Zainab could speak openly about what had happened to her. Indeed, as above, the police had advised her not to speak about it.
That former Muslims face persecution across the world, including in Britain, will not be news to anyone who has followed the work of the National Secular Society or the Council of ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB), or read the books of Ayaan Hirsi Ali. But the extent of the persecution they face in Britain is poorly understood, as is the extent of apostasy from Islam: I lost count of the number of times I explained what my research was about, to a reaction of incredulity than anybody left, or was able to leave, Islam.
Yet research suggests that as many as 7% of children raised in the United Kingdom as Muslims will leave the religion by adulthood. This is a small figure compared with other religions, which shed followers at devastating rates: Islam and atheism are uniquely successful at transmitting belief and values from parent to child. But that 7% is equivalent to hundreds of thousands of former Muslims living in Britain today.
Of that number, some have become high profile public activists, some for secular atheism like the CEMB, or for Christianity. The latter include street preacher Hatun Tash, who was lucky to escape with her life after a knife attack and a separate plot to buy a gun to murder her. In in a dark irony, her would-be assassin Edward Little was a convert to Islam.
But many more ex-Muslims are like Zainab or the other young men and women I spoke to, living secret double lives.
Farah, also 19, compared her situation as a secret apostate to that of Winston Smith in 1984:
I live in a very Muslim area and it’s impossible to detect other ex-Muslims since you can’t just go up to people and ask them if they’re ex-Muslim.
The process of finding other apostates in real life parallels 1984. It’s like when Winston observes other characters looking for signs of ‘unorthodoxy’ that would prove that they’re against the party. Maybe, that hijabi who is too passionate about women’s rights is an apostate or that guy who attends every Friday prayer, you don’t really know.
And the consequences of getting it wrong, and outing yourself to the wrong person, could be disastrous.
Despite this, ex-Muslims have built up a vast network of support. Sometimes this takes the form of organised groups like CEMB or Faith to Faithless, or sometimes it is organised around informal social groups that gather to trade stories and compare notes. Organisers of the latter groups told me how dangerous that could be, and about the precautions needed to vet people and ensure the groups were not infiltrated.
It is a safe assumption that the vast majority of ex-Muslims in Britain are not able to meet openly with other ex-Muslims. Social media therefore plays a substantial part of course, and by far the biggest and most important node in this network is the Reddit forum r/exmuslim. Here, ex-Muslims from across the world anonymously share memes and in-jokes, discuss scripture, talk about their life experiences, disparage Islam and Muhammad, and speak with complete candour about the religion they have left, and why they left it.
All these forums, in person or online, provide a rare lifeline for people trapped in stifling conditions, oppressed by their parents, forced to pretend to believe, and fasting during Ramadan so they are not suspected as apostates. The exact number of people living like this in Britain is unknowable, and in many cases these people will be unreachable. What’s more, it might not have occurred to them to look for others like themselves. In many cases interviewees told me the same thing: “I thought I was the only one on the planet [to ever leave Islam],” in the words of Eira, 40.
This expansive, rapidly growing network of moral support and activism allows people like Farah, Eira or Zainab to have some precious contact with the world beyond their own communities – communities that are so isolated from mainstream Britain that some Muslim pupils were found to believe that Britain’s population is 90% Asian, such is their experience of life.
But increasingly this network is under attack, and ex-Muslims’ precarious access to the rights of freedom of speech, belief and association, tentative at best, are imperilled even further.
The threats are myriad. They include the proliferation of loosely drafted hate speech laws in western countries. They include the bizarre calls to end online anonymity which emerged following the very much offline murder, by a jihadist, of Sir David Amess MP. They include increasingly heavy-handed internet regulation by governments, coupled with the ruthless, unthinking algorithmic censorship of social media platforms. All of this risks combining to form a perfect storm for ex-Muslims.
But by far the most dangerous threat on the horizon for ex-Muslims (and many other people besides) is the definition of ‘Islamophobia’ being advanced by the All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslims. This definition, among other things, brands as Islamophobic anyone who makes “mendacious, dehumanising, demonising, or stereotypical allegations about Muslims”.
How does that leave the ex-Muslim who draws a link between the treatment they suffered and the treatment suffered by tens of thousands of others? Would drawing an adverse inference about the entire religion from this overwhelming data be branded as Islamophobic on the basis of stereotyping? If translated into law, as seems possible under a new government, ex-Muslims’ strident criticisms of Islam and elements of the Muslim communities they grew up in could well be criminalised as hate crimes.
The definition would also prohibit “claims of Muslims spreading Islam by the sword”. Which again, if translated into law, could easily criminalise Iranian dissidents who celebrate and mourn pre-Islamic Persia, or mainstream historians like Tom Holland who have written about the early Islamic conquests and the wars of Muhammad’s followers against the Eastern Roman Empire. Indeed, the definition is so inimical to freedom of speech that it has united no two more disparate figures in opposition than one of religion’s staunchest critics, Richard Dawkins, and Tim Dieppe of Christian Concern.
Ex-Muslims are in the unenviable position of being canaries in the coal mine for the rest of us: if ex-Muslims cannot speak freely then none of us can. If they cannot criticise or satirise religion, nobody else is safe to. Their warnings should be heeded most urgently.
Yet the encroachment of hate crime laws, internet and social media censorship, and now the APPG definition of Islamophobia risk creating a situation where women like Zainab are treated not as victims, but as hate-mongers, merely for speaking out about their own traumatic past and their experiences of abuse.
All names of ex-Muslims referred to in this article have been changed in order to protect their safety.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Blimey Charlie.
That’s what I thought
The Creed Of Slaves
“Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMBRnO1gpfw
― William Pitt the Younger
Stand for freedom against the argument of tyrants Yellow Boards By The Road
Friday 1st July 4pm to 5pm
Yellow Boards
Junction B3430 Nine Mile Ride &
New Wokingham Road
Wokingham RG40 3BA
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am
make friends keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn RG12 7PA
Henley
Mills Meadows (bandstand) RG9 1DS
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
It’s a sad day. Dr Zev Zelenko lost his battle with cancer last night. He developed the Zelenko protocol early in March/April 2020 & spoke out vociferously about the toxic bioweapon injections & the need to protect our children.
RIP
A video of Dr Zev speaking about how to resist.
https://t.me/robinmg/21090
http://redvoicemedia.com/video/2022/06/exposing-medical-fraud-and-the-great-reset-agenda-rest-in-peace-dr-vladimir-zev-zelenko-video/ref/8/
If viruses/bacteria don’t exist then why do we have an immune system?
If we have an immune system why do we have vaccines?
It’s a reasonable question. The perceived need for vaccines grew out of a time when we were poorly nourished, personal hygiene virtually non-existant, parasite infestation rife, raw sewage flowed down the gutters, there was no clean water.
The immune system would be weak and subject to multiple assaults and no antibiotics or antivirals and other treatments.
The ‘success’ of vaccines correlates with vast improvements in our standards of living, and correlation doesn’t prove causality.
Of course the high priests of science have plenty of ‘data’ to prove their claims about vaccines and big pharma has plenty of money make sure ‘data’ are favourable to their money-making cause.
And we have all learned to trust data, experts and big pharma of late, haven’t we.
So worth asking just how much do we need vaccines?
If we have an immune system why do we have vaccines?
A inherently nonsensical question. Without immune system, vaccination couldn’t accomplish anything.
New York Times yesterday
A U.N. report took a close look at climate change, and gave a bleak warning.
Let’s say net zero objectives were met and the climate still moves in the wrong direction. What then? What would it be blamed on? What if there’s another ice age, would we start burning everything in a desperate attempt to warm up the Earth?
The worry for me is that if people start believing they can control things that are outside of their control, like eradicating a coronavirus, that’s all they will ever spend their time trying to do when all their efforts may well amount to very little effect in the grand scheme of things.
The climate isn’t moving anywhere according to the meteorological data averaged out over the last Century.
The only ‘movement’ is in models and hyperbole predicting the future.
Thinking about it, we have a perfect illustration of what happens when experts think they can control something simply by looking at how our economies are run.
That’s a cracker!
The UN eh? That will be “The Science” then.
Muppets.
But…but…but…two days ago he was dying and the Government had to ‘do’ something…..LOL!
Adam Brooks @EssexPR
·6h
It’s a f****** miracle !
He’s back in work.
If ever there was an advert for Covid being over as a serious threat to the population, Jeremy Vine has just made it.
He’s a Chunt of the highest order ! Up there with Saint Lineker
“Much belatedly now that there’s a seemingly endless US weapons pipeline going into Ukraine, the Pentagon is worried they might end up in the “wrong hands” and is seeking to take steps to do something about it. It now wants to track serial numbers of US weaponry on the ground as the fight for Ukraine continues.
As early as April US officials began admitting that once advanced systems like Javelin anti-tank weapons cross into Ukraine they have no idea where they go from there. There’s speculation that some percentage of Western-supplied arms will be resold on the black market, or even make there way to other conflicts outside Ukraine, such as in the Middle East.”
https://www.zerohedge.com/military/pentagon-agency-wants-arms-monitors-ground-ukraine-track-billions-hardware-sent
Do ya think? Both Europol and Interpol were warning of this very thing several weeks ago…..where do you think domestic terrorists get their weapons??
Couldn’t they give all the weapons the so called vaccine passports + track & trace & 5G facial recognition etc etc ? Oh hang on …. that’s for us cos we’re dangerous
Pandemic Logic
The masks (N95 or above) only work if there’s no virus around…
https://twitter.com/cjsnowdon/status/1542914836396355584
“I got COVID. While wearing an N95 on a plane.”
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/the-shameful-truth-about-pride
I haven’t read the article – it is of no interest to me – but the word ‘pride’ jarred and ‘reawoke’ my ongoing total disdain and revulsion of government and Parliament and how the true meaning of pride – good pride, representing dignity and self respect – has been lost.
How wretched and misguided our society has become was nowhere more evident than in the U.K. House of Commons on the afternoon of Thursday, 30th June 2022.
The last but one debate was about 50 years of Pride. A well attended lengthy, boring (to me) session with many lively interjections and statements from the many who were present.
This was followed by a mass exodus for the relatively short adjournment debate to discuss the recently released – 20/06/2022 – CSE Child Sexual Exploitation and Safeguarding report from Oldham. Shamefully, the council repeatedly failed to protect the young and vulnerable over several years. The report seems to have done a better job of ‘protection’ by safeguarding and protecting the abusers – and enablers – of the horrific events.
Two of the town MPs in the chamber were vilifying those in the town who have long questioned the disdainful actions of the council and who also vocalised sheer contempt of the long awaited report, especially during a heated extraordinary council meeting of the evening of 27/06/2022. The MPs were mudslinging – another ‘cover up’ attempt?
The chamber for this debate was woefully empty, only a handful of people present. That begs the question of does this show a total lack of interest in the subject matter? Is the protection and safeguarding of children of no concern? Really?
Where is the ‘pride’ in looking after, caring and nurturing, our young and vulnerable?
Shame on all those who ‘sit’ there in the ‘chamber’ or ‘the other place’, at great public expense, who obviously rate the welfare of children and vulnerable as of lesser importance.
Shame on the public who allow – and enable – government to get away with it.
Pride? Pfft!
Hansard
50 Years of Pride in the UK – Hansard – UK Parliament
Child Sexual Exploitation and Safeguarding in Oldham – Hansard – UK Parliament
https://www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/media/6198/final-oldham-assurance-report-8-june-2022-14-digital-version.pdf