Steve Kirsch has made a critical finding in the record-level data from Czechia obtained via Freedom of Information request.
First, let’s just toy with an idea.
If a widely given drug caused death in one in 1,000, what would the impact be?
For young people the impact would be astounding. There would be a huge number of extra deaths and a stunning number of total deaths compared to those who did not take the drug. For 100,000 people there would be only 55 background deaths and 100 extra deaths. Comparing two similar sized populations the overall mortality would be 155 ÷ 55 = 2.82 times more, i.e., 182% higher.
For old people the impact would be much more subtle. For example, around 2% of people aged 80-89 will die in a year. For 100,000 people there would be 2,000 background deaths and only 100 extra deaths. Comparing two similar sized populations the overall mortality would be 2,100 ÷ 2,000 = 1.05 time more, i.e., just 5% higher.
Ultimately any signal would be much clearer in the young.
The Czech Government has released record-level data for 10 million people. The clever analysis Steve has done is based on the assumption that the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine was harmless. It can then act as a ‘placebo’ group. It is an excellent ‘placebo’ group because confounders around health and socioeconomic variables are accounted for as the brands were distributed randomly. All that is needed is to compare the overall mortality rate in the year following the first dose in the Moderna group with the Pfizer group. Barely any Moderna doses were given in January and the sick were being prioritised still in February so the graph below shows only March onwards. The x-axis is year of age and the y-axis is how much higher (or lower) the Moderna mortality rate is than the Pfizer mortality rate at that year of age, where a value of 1 means the mortality rates are the same. At all ages there were more deaths in the Moderna group – around 50% more in the non-elderly and around 20% more for those in their 70s and 80s. The impact on the young was higher, in line with the dilution effect due to higher background deaths in the old described above.
Unless someone can show that Moderna was given to those more likely to die in every age group and throughout the time period (which is unlikely) then this is compelling evidence that Moderna really was more deadly.
It’s not just a difference in efficacy, i.e., Pfizer preventing more Covid deaths. If it had been there would have been periods when the difference should have disappeared entirely, such as June-October 2021 when Covid deaths were at a low, but the chart below shows that isn’t the case.
For completeness, here is the same graph for January-June when Covid rates were high – the pattern is similar.
A significant number of Czech citizens also had AstraZeneca and their mortality was similar to Moderna’s. The use of Pfizer as a ‘placebo’ group in the above analysis doesn’t mean the Pfizer vaccine was safe. It just shows the Moderna vaccine was less safe.
There is more that can be learnt from these data but this is the first big finding that needs addressing.
Dr. Clare Craig is a diagnostic pathologist and Co-Chair of the HART group. This article first appeared on her Substack. She is the author of Expired – Covid the untold story.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Life is tough. We should be teaching youngsters mental resilience. Instead we scare them with the fear of a virus, we isolate them with lockdowns, steal their education by shutting schools, make them feel guilty for their white privilege, even confuse them over their gender. We tell them there will be a climate catastrophe, their jobs will be taken by AI, and in any case the housing ladder has been kicked away. Any wonder there is a range of mental disorders. This is a shameful way to treat the population, and children in particular.
Mental resilience makes for resistance against the government. The policy will always be fear and threats with some superficial material incentives thrown in to periodically appease the masses..
The mental disorders are in the adults propagating all this nonsense, and thereby transferring them to the young.
The same lockdown pressures will have been experienced by boys. How has this manifested?
I know of 2 teenage boys, both slightly autistic, both geeky types, who have had trouble going out of the house since lockdowns ended. They would both rather stay in their rooms, living in the virtual world. Their fear on going outside was palpable, apparently.
Increased suicide.
To be fair, that does remove the mentally unstable from the gene pool.
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/verified-on-a-government-watchlist
An official United States list of baddies.
“why is the lesson the BBC draws always that Government needs to fund more services and never that maybe lockdown wasn’t such a smart move after all?”
More services is definitely not the answer, of course it does generate and reinforce a reliance on medical services which in turn leads to a dependence on Pharma products. For a lifetime of course. No matter how short that might be.
Win, win as the saying goes.
Look at this though. I find this seriously upsetting actually. I didn’t even know they were doing this. People dying in hospital but instead of allowing loved ones to sit with them for comfort in their final hours nurses tied gloves filled with warm water to the patients’ hands! I mean, WTAF has gone wrong in society if healthcare staff must stoop to this treatment, denying loved ones the chance to say goodbye to family members in person? I thought I couldn’t be any more ashamed of hospital staff but this has reached a new low. Absolutely unforgiveable.
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1670857716888371200?cxt=HHwWgIDQ1bWPirAuAAAA
https://off-guardian.org/2023/06/22/universal-basic-income-the-anti-human-agenda/
UBI. This is an interesting piece from a woman called Zoe Carter. She states that she is a writer but this article is so convoluted I would have to question her assertion. Anyways…
https://off-guardian.org/2023/06/21/a-global-digital-compact-un-promoting-censorship-social-credit-much-more/
Now this is from the brilliant Kit Knightly. Who can write.
“To sum up, the Digital Global Compact is a piece of globalist legislation serving the final aim of globalist policy: Control of all aspects of life, achieved by inserting a digital filter between people and reality.”
I love that final sentence.
It’s a veritable Dumpathon!
Don’t you feel a lot lighter for it though?
Well, if these articles reach a wider audience so much the better but they won’t get read in the NR. Kit Knightly is ALWAYS worth a read.
https://twitter.com/DrEliDavid/status/1671915995676409857
Eating disorders, to a certain extent, involve loathing or disgust of your body. To this extent they have a similarity with believing you’re transgender or trapped in the wrong body. Wanting to control your body e.g. by chest binding or taking puberty blockers also gives young people control over something when lockdown removed their control over so much of their lives. I wonder if any academic is brave enough to try and estimate the extent to which lockdown is responsible for the alarming rise in the number of young people identifying as trans, although the woke nonsense that is taught to kids from an early age obviously plays a large part in this.
Not my problem, I was always against lockdowns.
I wonder how much the continual obsession with ‘obesity’ and reducing meat consumption to appease the weather gods, have contributed to dietary choices made by young people?