There was consternation among many when Baroness Hallett’s team announced in January 2024 that Module 4 (Vaccines and Therapeutics) of the COVID-19 Public Inquiry, due to be held in July 2024, was inexplicably being postponed until January 2025, after the General Election. In addition, in the recent Module 4 preliminary hearing on May 22nd (which can be viewed here and here) there was an update on the scope of the module, clarifying that there would be no investigation into the efficacy of the Covid vaccines and that a detailed investigation of safety concerns regarding specific vaccines was not within the scope of the inquiry. The new Module 4 dates are January 14th-30th 2025 – a total of 13 working days.
In response to the news of the postponement, several expert groups who had been invited to submit witness statements to the COVID-19 Public Inquiry Module 4 (under a Rule 9 request from the inquiry solicitors), and others with relevant expertise, took matters into their own hands and decided to convene a People’s Vaccine Inquiry, to be launched as soon as possible and before any General Election.
Having already personally written and submitted a 50-page, fully referenced witness statement to the Covid Inquiry Module 4, documenting the work of the U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance since 2020 in challenging unethical Covid vaccine policies and highlighting the multiple ethical violations of the Covid vaccine rollout and serious safety concerns, I was delighted to be involved in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry. I was keen to get this and other important evidence into the public domain under one umbrella, to educate and inform the public and healthcare professionals.
The professionals who have taken part in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry believe it is in the public interest to urgently facilitate access to expert opinion and relevant clinical observations to allow informed consent and protect patient safety. The main groups and spokesmen involved in the People’s Vaccine Inquiry are:
- HART co-chairs Dr. Clare Craig and Dr. Jonathan Engler
- Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Council (CCVAC) lead, Dr. Ros Jones
- UK Medical Freedom Alliance CEO, Dr. Elizabeth Evans
- Perseus Group spokesperson, Nick Hunt
- Doctors for Patients U.K. (DfPUK) spokesperson and consultant cardiologist, Dr. Dean Patterson
- Behavioural Science Consultant, lecturer and Sunday Times bestselling author Patrick Fagan
The participants have all submitted fully referenced witness statements to The People’s Inquiry and have recorded short video presentations to summarise the key points they have made in their statements. The central message of the People’s Vaccine Inquiry is that the Covid vaccines are neither safe nor effective, and serious harm has resulted from the unwise, rushed rollout of an inadequately tested new technology. There was also a failure of public health to ensure the public had a full picture of the potential known and unknown risks of the Covid vaccines to enable informed consent, and the insufficiently tested Covid vaccines were rolled out in a way that violated fundamental principles of medical ethics.
The People’s Vaccine Inquiry website is launched today, where you can read up-to-date, detailed and fully referenced statements from experts from the medical and scientific fields on many aspects of the Covid Vaccines, including; safety, efficacy, ethical violations, clinical observations from doctors of vaccine injuries in their patients, and the psychological and marketing techniques used by public health bodies to nudge people into accepting vaccines they may not have wanted or needed. The short video presentations contain evidence and data that have been heavily censored in the mainstream media, but which is in the public domain.
We are asking the public to get involved with several calls to action on the website. Firstly, please follow us on X (@PVI_2024) for important news and updates and retweet our material. Secondly, we are asking members of the public to send a letter to their GP using a template we have prepared to inform him or her of The People’s Vaccine Inquiry and raise awareness of this important public health resource. We are also asking doctors, other healthcare professionals and the public to sign the medical ethics-based Hope Accord, calling for an immediate suspension of the Covid mRNA vaccine rollout, a full investigation into the harms caused, and immediate recognition and support for those who have been harmed by the vaccines.
The People’s Inquiry is leading the way and we have been encouraged by several previously pro-vaccine public figures who have recently acknowledged that the Covid vaccines were not as safe or effective as previously claimed. These include Robert Redfield, the former CDC Director who oversaw the beginning of the Covid vaccine rollout in the U.S. In this interview with Chris Cuomo last week he made a number of startling admissions, including that there has been a lack of transparency from public health leaders and the pharmaceutical industry; that the shift from vaccination being focused on the vulnerable to covering everyone was driven by the “huge influence” of the pharmaceutical industry; that there are serious side-effects from the vaccines and he has seen many of his patient’s lives “turned upside down” as a result of vaccine damage; that up to two thirds of his Covid infected patients were vaccinated; and that the spike protein is immune-toxic but we do not know how much spike protein a vaccinated person will make or for how long. This public health scandal can no longer be ignored, the tide is turning, and the truth is coming out.
Endorsing the People’s Vaccine Inquiry, Professor Paul Goddard said:
Doctors against vaccination have been struck off or suspended when they have spoken out or refused to take part in the vaccination programme whilst those in favour have received vitriol online. That is not how science can progress. Pfizer wanted the data on reactions to be kept secret for many decades. If the vaccines cannot be tested, they are not science, they are simply untested and potentially dangerous technology.
This statement from concerned healthcare staff shows the bravery and deep compassion of the people taking part. They are in danger of losing their employment and damaging their futures but still they feel obliged to register their concern. Read on but do so with an open mind and please ignore the propaganda fed to you by the Government.
Watch the promo vids on X here and here.
— People's Vaccine Inquiry (@PVI_2024) June 8, 2024
COMING JUNE 10 – THE PEOPLE'S VACCINE INQUIRY
1. RETWEET
2. FOLLOW US
Censored Facts and Hidden Harms: Keeping you informed pic.twitter.com/snPRkmADwl
— People's Vaccine Inquiry (@PVI_2024) June 4, 2024
Bringing together experts called to give evidence in Covid Inquiry Vaccine Module
The Independent Inquiry has postponed the vaccine module until 2025
The public deserves to be kept up-to-date with the evidence NOW, not in 2025 pic.twitter.com/YoY8Ku0nET
Dr. Elizabeth Evans is CEO of the U.K. Medical Freedom Alliance. The People’s Vaccine Inquiry website can be found here.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
These idiots are fast approaching my debanking/defunding list. We are members, but I am sick of their morbid stupidity, endless simpleton wokisms, racisms, and climate bollocks. Just take care of the god damn buildings and heritage sites and shut the hell up. Or watch your membership dwindle.
Ferd I’m amazed you haven’t left yet. The NT has always frozen their property in aspic, a form of living death.
The problem is, whether or not I remain a member, The National Trust does own large swathes of coastline in the South West and it is this National Trust coastline that keeps us a members, otherwise I think I would leave.
I did not renew my membership after purchasing one of their leaflets describing walks around Hawkshead in the lake district.
In the leaflet they described Vikings as Scandinavian refugees.That was the last straw for me.Even the kids asked what on earth are they on about?
Presumably, that’s because they believe the refugees of today are repeating what the Vikings did in the past.
:->
Yep———-Ironically the Swedes today are now paying for their multicultural dogma as 20 times more sexual crimes are committed by the latter day rapists than by indigenous Swedes. —-But so determined are they that this isn’t true that they make it a crime to talk about it.
Yes I believe the Vikings were put up in castles at taxpayers expense, and I had always thought they were rapists and pillagers. Sorry I now admit I was wrong and that we should pay money for past injustices to all red haired people.
The NT has set its course and there is no rowing back for them now despite your displeasure or any number of members displeasure. There is no way that their proscribed agenda will be allowed to be perceived by the public to have been overturned by a members revolt. Money will be found either from lottery, government or billionaire funding sources to ensure that a popular revolt of this kind fails – God forbid, the people may apply the same democratic principle to all manner of things.
“Patrick Begg, outdoors and natural resources director at the trust”
Who the F. thinks these job titles up? Doubtless another waster on a couple of hundred grand a year. He belongs in the bottom block. A complete Next Tuesday.
Probably a relation of the useless lefty economist David Begg. He was one of the crazies desperate to bounce UK in to the euro. Essentially a useful idiot. Once yr in the woke aristocracy these sinecures become rather easier to obtain.
Thanks
I think there should be a competition for the most ridiculous job titles in the wake of the climate alarm, HP.
You are right Aethelred.
Former member of NT here. The main threat to ‘their’ properties is haemorrhaging support. They keep telling us about the slave-owning history of the builders and owners of the houses – so why don’t they burn them down to demonstrate their contempt more fully?
A Minister for Management of Civilisational Decline would be more useful.
Congratulations Minister. Yours is the only department to achieve its targets.
The Ministry for Silly Talks?
I suggest a Minister for Deaeration of Woke Windbags.
Thanks for then new word.
Maybe the droughts and wildfires will be offset by the floods. It just needs a longer term perspective than most marketing plans.
Make no mistake, this is marketing and not true concern for environments that have suffered all these “hazards” in past years.
Not yet another bloody government department about the climate alarm. We need that new Argentinian prez Javier Milei to do one of his – “Ministry of Climate Adaptation? OUT!” actions. Honestly, the NT are losing it…drought, heavy rain, wildfires? But not today or tomorrow but by 2060! For god’s sake, just get a deckchair and some wellies.
Why the hell are we worrying about 2060. The so-called Tory dupes have caused enough damage to this country these past fourteen years. It’s 2023, can we pay attention to NOW?
Apparently the planet might be a couple of degrees warmer by 2100. Well if anybody is still on this planet in 2100 lucky them, personally I would appreciate those two degrees NOW.
And I won’t be here in 2060 so actually I CGAF about effing global boiling, flooding, freezing or whatever other nonsense they come up with.
Today’s problems need today’s solutions. Tomorrow can look after itself.
https://documents.nationaltrust.org.uk/story/annual-report-2023/page/2/1
I haven’t had a good look yet but I am sure this will be interesting
Today’s problems need today’s solutions. Tomorrow can look after itself.
Tomorrow is something the people of tomorrow will have to deal with tomorrow. People who claim they are solving the problems of tomorrow by creating problems today just want to distract from the latter. They don’t know anything about the real problems of tomorrow and the people of tomorrow obviously haven’t appointed them as their representatives. Conveniently, they just cannot yet object to what’s supposedly being done in their name.
Excellent
It’s a shame that they appear to be jumping onto the bandwagon using “climate change” in lieu of normal extreme weather events and the need to maintain various structures, both old and new. I am actually a member of it. The original reason why I joined was doing the sums for parking at a number of their sites. In effect, paying up front, but less than non-members have to pay given the number of times I go to them.
I’ve often parked without paying. Don’t think their fines are enforcible anyway. I feel eternal shame that I belonged to this organisation for a couple of decades. I should be flayed like Henry the second was in Canterbury cathedral and be forced to sleep on the floor with no blanket.
..and lo the grift continues unabated.
….”“the single biggest threat” to the charity’s mission”, is your organisation’s woke-ism, Mr Begg.
I used to be a member. I looked at moving my subscription to the RSPB, but they’re almost as bad.
Do not support any of them.
I don’t. I want to support the wildlife, our heritage etc., but unfortunately, no organisation can be trusted it seems.
The charity […] said approximately 71% of the places it looks after could be at medium or high risk of climate hazards by 2060.
Attempt to translate this into English: Hazard means risk. Hence, the last bit is
climate risks in 37 years.
Combining this with the bit in front of it yields
above-average risk of climate risks in 37 years.
Then, we have the could, a subjunctive, ie, another risk. We’re now at
there’s a risk of above average risk of climate risks in 37 years
Filling in the last bit now gives the complete sentence:
Modelling has shown that there will be a risk of above average risk of climate risks for about 3/4 of the places the National Trust is currently administrating in 37 years.
What’s that’s supposed to mean – beyond No climate-related damage expected until at least 2060 – is anybody’s guess. Presumably, the point is to repeat risk combined with climate as often as possible to convey the impression of a serious danger. Someone demanding anything based on a statement like this should be unceremoniously shown door and told not to come back until he has at least managed to make up his mind about what he’s actually afraid of.
So far the evidence is the greatest danger to the fabric of the buildiungs and their contents arises from the incompetence of the NT which allows them to burn to the ground.
Interesting that they demand a minister for climate adaptation. In some ways I agreenm with adapting to changes in our environment. Stop wasting huge resources on trying to change the temperature, which is impossible but, as required, adapt to changes – which is what humans have always done. Is the National Trust finally bending to the obvious?
We need to “tackle” Climate change…..so give us some more money.
It’s hilarious how they use “adaptation” and not ‘mitigation’, as these clowns think we can control the weather.
Translation: Systems going well…. Send more money.
Where does this National trust gets its information from? ——-Do they ever question any of it? ——-Very unlikely. Rent seekers question nothing. After all if you need money for something, being alarmist about climate is a great way to get it. If you are a coral island in the pacific what better to get big sums of money from the eco socialist western world than claim you are going to vanish beneath the waves. If you are animal rights activists who think we should all eat vegetables and locusts, what better way to stop people killing animals for food than to claim the animals destroy the climate. If you build turbines or smart meters, what better way to farm all the subsidy than claim your products save the planet. etc etc etc………”Climate Change” —–The gift that keeps on giving. But the gifts are all paid for by us.——– And it is costing trillions.