I think I have identified a new version of the ancient anti-Jewish ‘Blood Libel’.
In case you are unaware, this age-old lie held that the Jews were once responsible for the ritual killing of innocent Christian children across medieval Europe, sometimes supposedly even drinking their blood or mixing it up with their sacred bread when baking it. The legend was genuinely believed in, and led to murderous pogroms taking place against the supposed perpetrators.
Today, however, this ghoulish old fable seems rather too far-fetched for most people to actually still believe in (albeit not necessarily Hamas itself, which has a long record of painting Jews as vampires, as I have previously demonstrated elsewhere). Instead, the Jews of Israel are now much more ‘plausibly’ blamed for killing innocent Palestinian Muslim children through the obviously far, far greater horrors of climate change, particularly via harmful, baby-slaughtering CO₂ emissions being belched out on a daily basis by the Israeli Defence Forces (IDF).
As a result, rather than an anti-Jewish Blood Libel, what we have being born before our eyes right now, I would like to suggest, would be better christened as an anti-Jewish ‘Carbon Libel’. In one simple phrase, the whole idea could be summed efficiently up as follows: “Save the planet, kill the Jews!”
Carbon Copies
The basic notion of the whole Carbon Libel predates the current war in Gaza, as demonstrated by an article which appeared on the Al Jazeera website on October 5th 2023, a mere two days before Hamas attacked Israel, entitled ‘Interwoven struggles: The green paradox meets the Palestine paradox’ by Marwan Bishara, a former professor of International Relations (so, not climate science, then) at the American University of Paris. According to Bishara’s analysis:
Israel’s own meteorological studies reveal that the Eastern Mediterranean is one of the most climate-vulnerable places on the planet. Whereas worldwide temperatures have increased by an average of 1.1°C since pre-industrial times, in Israel/Palestine average temperatures have risen by 1.5°C between 1950 and 2017, with a forecasted increase of 4°C by the end of the century.
Why could this be? Perhaps unsurprisingly, it was all down to those cunning, Machiavellian, Israeli Jews and their equally malign American and Western allies. Despite calling for global reduction in the use of gas and oil,
the United States will be responsible for over one-third of all planned fossil fuel expansion through 2050. … This hypocrisy perfectly mirrors the long-standing response of affluent, and powerful, Western nations to the Palestinian tragedy. … [T]he lofty promises of ‘climate justice’ from Western nations have regrettably proven as hollow as those about ‘Palestinian justice’. In both cases… they devised and implemented inadequate and counterproductive mechanisms to appear to be ‘helping’. On climate change, they came up with deceptive concepts like ‘carbon offset’ and ‘carbon credit’ to evade meaningful action and a just, swift transition to renewable energy. On Palestine, they devised unworkable ‘peace plans’ that only serve to deepen Palestinian oppression. … Equally cynical is Israel’s routine attempts to confiscate Palestinian lands under the pretext of ‘environmental conservation’. This tactic, known as ‘green colonialism’, exposes Israel’s appropriation of environmentalism to displace the indigenous population of Palestine and exploit its resources. Israeli green zones are primarily established to legitimise land seizures and prevent the return of displaced Palestinians, further entrenching a system of apartheid. … Israel’s uprooting of hundreds of thousands of Palestinian olive trees so that JNF [the Jewish National Fund, a regional land-purchasing NGO] could plant imported trees to efface all traces of Palestinian existence is not eco-friendly, it is ecocide, and utterly criminal.
In other words, whatever Israel does, it can’t win. If it doesn’t intervene environmentally within Palestinian affairs, it is leaving the area’s inhabitants to all sizzle and die from so-called global boiling. If it does intervene to try and help, however, it is merely another form of “green colonialism”.
From the River to the Sea, Palestine Shall Be Tree
Just how paranoid some of these accusations can sometimes be is well illustrated by a November 2021 submission made to the Office of High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) from the Palestinian advocacy NGO the Al-Haq association, ‘Climate Oppression: A Major Tool to Establish and Maintain Israel’s Apartheid Regime Over the Palestinian People and Their Lands’. This document aimed to “address the [uh-oh!] intersectional and multidimensional impacts of Israel’s apartheid colonisation and military occupation on the comprehensive human rights of the Palestinian people within the context of climate change”.
Speaking of “climate oppression” as just one more tool within Israel’s imperialist “matrix of control”, Al-Haq also focused upon the JNF’s tree-planting campaign within the region as a chosen means for effecting a kind of ‘Great Replacement’ of the region’s Muslims.
Supposedly, argued Al-Haq, the JNF was presenting its “afforestation projects” in Palestine as a benign means to combat global warming. However, this false foliage was really being used to cover over the remains of ancient, Jew-ruined old settlements, so their original inhabitants would never be able to return back to live in them ever again: “Since 1948 [when Israel was founded], 4,300,000 trees have been planted by the Jewish National Fund, 67% of which [were sown] on the ruins of some 89 Palestinian villages [whose inhabitants were] forcibly displaced in 1948 [by Israeli troops].”
Bizarrely, just like so many of the 1940s Jewish colonisers themselves, these trees were (analogously speaking) of ‘white European’ stock, mere alien invaders who sought to force out the native non-white local species via a kind of racially supremacist tree-racism. Yet this arboreal Great Replacement also had unfortunate environmental consequences, probably intentional in their nature: “Most of the preferred species sown were conifers to provide a European cover to a new alien landscape, and their lack of adaptive capacities to the dry and hot climate of Palestine renders them highly vulnerable to climate change-related wildfires.”
Therefore, whilst cunningly posing as environmentally friendly items, the white-European invader trees in question were really little more than big green Mossad agents, whose true aim was to “primarily function as a green camouflage to war crimes”, namely the war-crime of ethnic cleansing.
The overall secret plan, said Al-Haq, was for Israel to appear to be making Palestine more well-adapted to climate change, whilst actually making it more vulnerable to the phenomenon, thereby forcing its people to flee: “By strengthening a climate-related coercive environment, Israel uses climate oppression over Palestinians to drive Palestinian forcible transfer” to nations elsewhere, something “unequivocally prohibited under Article 49(1) of the Fourth Geneva Convention”.
The brilliance of this sinister Zionist scheme, of course, was that, if the Israelis had openly forced the Palestinians out at the point of a gun, they would immediately have been exposed as war criminals: if they engineered a localised climate catastrophe so severe that the Palestinians upped sticks and left of their own accord as so-called ‘climate refugees’, however, then Tel Aviv could feign innocence and disavow all responsibility for their wicked tree-based crime.
(Deliberately) Eyeless in Gaza
Following Hamas’s October 7th attacks, this Carbon Libel narrative went into overdrive. In January 2024, the Guardian carried exclusive coverage of a new scientific report, purporting to prove that “The planet-warming emissions of the first two months of the war in Gaza were greater than the annual carbon footprint of more than 20 of the world’s most climate-vulnerable nations”, as “the first 60 days of Israel’s military response was equivalent to burning at least 150,000 tonnes of coal” due to “CO₂ from aircraft missions, tanks and fuel from other vehicles, as well as emissions generated by making and exploding the bombs, artillery and rockets”.
The IDF’s chief allied imperialist lackey running-dogs did not escape responsibility for such sins against the planet either: “Almost half the total CO₂ emissions were down to U.S. cargo planes flying military supplies to Israel.”
A sceptical response to this might be “Well, Hamas shouldn’t have provoked the emission of all this nasty CO₂ by attacking Israel in the first place”. As the Israeli Government’s official X account had previously put it in a tweet aimed female Gollum lookalike Greta Thunberg, who had previously blindly spoken out against Israeli actions in the region whilst simultaneously leaving their enemies’ own crimes strangely unmentioned, “Hamas doesn’t use sustainable material for their rockets”.
Yet the 2024 report’s authors had already anticipated such an obvious response, providing a convenient counterargument of their own: “Hamas rockets fired into Israel during the same period generated about 713 tonnes of CO₂, which is equivalent to approximately 300 tonnes of coal [compared to Israel’s 150,000 tonnes] – underscoring the asymmetry of each side’s war machinery.” What a plucky little underdog Hamas is, in CO₂ as in everything else!
The clear implication of such research is that, even if distant Western readers don’t care about the IDF killing Palestinian kids, they should care about the IDF killing their own kids by proxy, via a kind of global warming-based whole-planetary climate genocide. “The military’s environmental exceptionalism allows them to pollute with impunity, as if the carbon emissions from their tanks and fighter jets don’t count. This has to stop, to tackle the climate crisis we need accountability,” argued one of the researchers responsible for the report.
Yet it seems as if “accountability” is only to be apportioned one way. Building Israel’s Iron Wall of (hoped-for) protection against Hamas was estimated to have generated about 274,000 tonnes of CO₂. Yet the Iron Wall is clearly needed to protect Israel’s population against further October 7th-style Hamas attacks.
By contrast, Hamas’ own ‘Gaza Metro’ network of underground tunnels – which are needed only to protect Hamas terrorists from being taken out by the IDF before they can perpetrate any further pogroms – was guessed to have generated perhaps 176,000 tonnes of greenhouse gas emissions. One of these two major construction projects is sadly necessary; the other is not (unless by ‘necessary’ here, you mean “necessary to facilitate the planning of yet more acts of mass antisemitic rape and murder”).
Poisonous Narratives
The Israeli Government was even blamed in the Guardian’s report for its engineers’ likely future actions in rebuilding Gaza and its homes and infrastructure once the assault is eventually over, something which will “generate at least 30 million metric tonnes of warming gases”, something “on a par with New Zealand’s annual CO₂ emissions”.
Maybe the Israelis should just leave it all unbuilt forever then, and make the Palestinians inhabit perpetual tents like Bedouins, in order to save our vulnerable planet? Next these people will be blaming the Jews for the intolerably high CO₂ emissions from the smokestacks at Auschwitz.
For what it’s worth, I do not dispute that wars emit CO₂ – “an idiotic way to spend our shrinking carbon budget”, according to one UN spokesman cited – but simply note the blatant double standards involved in such reporting.
Other outlets picked up on the Guardian’s initial story and ran with it; even the Jerusalem Post spoke of an “emissions asymmetry” between the two warring parties (eco-friendly paragliders are just so much less polluting than fighter-jets, aren’t they?) Meanwhile, Al Jazeera went with the following truly laughable angle on matters: “Israeli bombing has damaged or destroyed thousands of buildings, many of which were roofed with solar panels.” No doubt a windmill or two were damaged at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but that was hardly the most significant part of the tragedy. Maybe an eco-friendly heat-pump got trashed somewhere on 9/11, too?
Where are all the equally anguished articles about the presumably equally huge amounts of CO₂ being emitted by, amongst others, current conflicts in Ukraine, Nagorno-Karabakh, Sudan, Yemen and Myanmar? Nowhere, because, in those wars, Jews aren’t the ones primarily responsible for doing the polluting.
There is even a large subsidiary aspect of this whole narrative which blames Israel (not entirely without reason, to be fair, although Hamas shares much responsibility for the issue too) for the pollution of Gaza’s water supply, rendering much of it undrinkable and unusable, even for agricultural purposes. Yet, in many accounts, these tales appear to slip uneasily into a resurrection of the false medieval myth of evil Jews deliberately poisoning Christians’ wells across Europe to kill off their religious enemies en masse, a time-honoured variant of the Blood Libel specifically spread in the past by Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian leader in the West Bank, during a 2016 speech to the European Parliament.
The Gaza Strip’s water-table is indeed in a very poor state, but the fact that, for example, other states than Israel are also partially responsible for this, with Muslim Egypt having flooded Hamas-controlled tunnels with crop-killing seawater from 2013 themselves, is also usually conveniently ignored.
The true wells which are being poisoned here, I think, are those of contemporary public discourse.
Steven Tucker is a journalist and the author of over 10 books, the latest being Hitler’s & Stalin’s Misuse of Science: When Science Fiction Was Turned Into Science Fact by the Nazis and the Soviets (Pen & Sword/Frontline), which is out now.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Paul Thorpe interviewed Andrew Bridgen , it’s a real eye opener !
Also was Dan Andrews regime a dry run for Starmers tyranny?
Got a link?
Sorry for delay , it was on YouTube
Israel and Ukraine are defending us too: why don’t Western moralisers recognise this?
‘I do not say the French cannot come, I only say they cannot come by sea’
Lord St Vincent 1803
England, Britain, as illustrated by the amusing graphic at the beginning of ‘Dad’s Army’ has, for centuries, since seeing off the Spanish Armada, understood the merits a forward defence strategy, even if, every so often, the gallant warriors of ‘Dad’s Army’ have still been required.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bF6qElf9GJ8
What is the point of a ‘forward defence’ strategy?
‘In a modern strategy the Atlantic army must provide for the West a sense of security to a degree that will encourage it to act and react in respect to global events with confidence. That forecloses to (Russia) the options of intimidation, blackmail, and political leverage.’
Forward defence is not just about not having to fight a bloody war on your own soil but very much also about not having to fight a war at all; deterrence, particularly conventional deterrence.
Which country is one of the leading exponents of forward defence today?
That would be a country that means us no good: Iran
What do they think is really going on?
‘Iranian commentators have long fixated over the prospect of a new world order in which the hegemony of the United States is diluted through a shift to multipolarity in the three regions of the Eurasian world-island: Europe, through the efforts of Russia; Asia, through the efforts of China; and the Middle East, through the efforts of Iran. At the outset of the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Iranian officials welcomed the attack as the opening of “a new front against American arrogance.’
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0030438724000322
Which is the foremost contemporary and powerful enemy of this country, having recently murdered a British citizen on British soil and, earlier this year, sponsored a terrorist attack in East London?
Russia.
The enemy of our enemy is our friend, Mr Lammy.
It doesn’t get much simpler than that.
Postscript:
‘Iran…..act(s) in concert with organised criminal entities, conduct assassinations and kidnappings abroad, and participate(s) in the international drug trade.
In the last 15 months, (the) MI5 Director and (the) Counter-terrorism Policing lead have identified 12 to 15 cases of Iranian plots within the UK against British citizens or Iranian dissidents.
These statements are in line with those of the Director of the FBI, Christopher Wray, pointing to more intense Iranian intelligence activity in the past two years.’ July 2023
https://policyexchange.org.uk/publication/the-iran-question-and-british-strategy/#contents__accordion
Oh dear, are we now going to get daily updates on how Iran is planning to take over the world?
It may be difficult to understand that the rest of the world, outside Europe, is pretty fed up with US hegemony, meaning you either do as we (USA) tell you and take your loans from the IMF, etc., or else your country will be undermined by our NGOs, eventually leading to a voluntary or involuntary change in government.
It is interesting that the development of a multi-polar world – USA, Russia, China – is almost entirely due to Joe Biden’s terrible presidency. The very dubious 2020 election results, his completely open southern border, the politicization of the judicial system including the frenzied and continual attacks against his main political opponent, the dubious business concerns of his immediate family, his refusal to provide funds to Ukraine unless the chief prosecutor was fired (who happened to be investigating corruption in Burisma, the company employing Hunter Biden), his probable destruction of Nord Stream, as well as his sanctions against Russia resulting in a world-wide ‘dedollarization’. BRICS has pretty well exploded with applicants during his presidency.
Well done, Joe Biden!
Of course many countries are disenchanted with the U.S., particularly within the EU and, most particularly, France.
Mr Trump was no more popular than Mr Biden.
But, in a Middle Eastern popularity contest between China proxy, Iran and U.S. proxy, Israel, this country and its government should be clear that Iran, intent on the destruction of Israel, is no friend of Britain.
‘2023 – A terror suspect escaped from Wandsworth prison in London while awaiting trial for offences, including; collecting information useful to the enemy, alleged to be Iran; eliciting information about members of the armed forces likely to be useful to a person preparing an act of terrorism; and perpetrating a bomb hoax. The individual was later recaptured and is currently awaiting trial. Prosecutors have claimed that the individual passed sensitive material to Iranian intelligence
On 22 December 2023, another individual was sentenced to three-and-a-half years in prison for attempting to collect information useful to a terrorist. The individual conducted hostile reconnaissance at the headquarters of Iran International, a dissident Iranian television station, in West London. Reporting suggests that the individual recorded security arrangements at the venue on his phone as part of a plot to conduct a terrorist attack.’
Unless Iran conducts further criminal activities in this country, it is unlikely that I will comment.
My comments, in any case, simply reflect, quote the views of experts in any particular arena.
With regard to Iran taking over the world, that is certainly its intention with regard to the Islamic world:
‘Iran considers itself the Islamic world’s natural leader, and seeks to export the Islamic Revolution first to areas with major Shia populations like Iraq, Lebanon, and parts of Syria, and then to the Islamic world more broadly.
By uniting the Islamic world under the Iranian banner, Tehran hopes to preserve the Islamic revolutionary regime indefinitely. Insulated by a buffer of friendly Islamic states, and directly or indirectly controlling the majority of the world’s oil reserves, Iran would be immune to long-term economic pressure.
This Iran, likely armed with nuclear weapons, could expand conventional and advanced military capabilities to expand its influence in the Mediterranean and Indian Ocean.
A united Islamic world under Iranian leadership, meanwhile, would be a bona fide great power, the first Islamic great power since the Ottoman Empire, and the first Middle Eastern actor capable of projecting power beyond the region since the early 19th century.
An emboldened, empowered Iran would be able to negotiate with Russia and China, the other Eurasian authoritarians, on reasonably equal terms.
It would also be able to extend its influence throughout Eurasia and even gain allies in the Americas, likely first turning to Venezuela and Cuba, and then to other Latin American states hostile to the Anglo-Euro-American international system.
In short, then, Iran’s long-term strategic objective is great-power status.’
Sir John Jenkins, Air Marshal Edward Stringer, Harry Halem
You seem to be looking for enemies under the bed, seeing everywhere countries we must militarily discipline and prevent from conquering the world.
Iran is no friend of Britain, you maintain. Should it be? Is Britain a friend of Iran? Hardly.
How about we just stop parading around the world, pretending we are God’s gift to mankind, and simply develop friendly relationships with all the countries we come across? That means not preaching our way of life to them, not forcing them to do this or that, but just lending a sympathetic ear and helping them develop. Because that is what China and Russia do and it is obviously very successful.
All USA does (and UK trots along like an obedient poodle) is apply military might whenever its current leader thinks anyone needs a lesson in discipline.
You will argue that China and Russia take advantage of other countries but it works both ways. And offering assistance to anyone who needs it is a good way of developing a business relationship.
Do I think Iranian religious zealots are ideal leaders? No, but the fact is they are governing the country so they are the people our diplomats should be addressing. And helping Iran means helping the Iranian people, who possibly suffer as much from their leaders as we do from ours.
You asked about Iran taking over the world.
They certainly do want to take over the Islamic world, in the view of some regional experts.
I have no need to look for enemies.
Iran has, just last year, had agents in Britain arrested for scoping out acts of terrorism.
Russia has recently conducted acts of terrorism in Britain, killing one British citizen on British soil.
Both are totalitarian fascist dictatorships intent on destroying this country and our way of life, plain for all to see.
The only way to prevent that is through the strengthening of our national defences.
That, in my view, bears endless repetition.
We know what to do. We’ve done it before. It works.
You don’t, by any chance, manage a hedge fund like Labour’s biggest donor, with investments in arms manufacturers?
Ukraine has been invaded twice in ten years. Israel has been invaded. Red sea shipping is being interdicted from Yemen. Wars smoulder on in Syria and Iraq. Iran is on the cusp of possessing nuclear weapons. China rattles spears at Taiwan and terrorises the South China Sea. Mali, Bourkina Faso, Sudan are aflame. Serbia, Kosovo, Bosnia are at daggers drawn. Venezuela is on the brink of civil war…..and so on and so forth…..
No need to talk up defence stocks….
Friday morning Rackstraw Rd & Acacia Ave,
Owlsmoor Sandhurst
David Lammy has cost Britain a crucial ally against Putin
Intelligent and integrated foreign affairs and defence strategy saves lives and money. Foreign policy debacles like the Falklands and now Ukraine are extremely expensive.
‘The costs of the war in Ukraine so far could fund the equivalent of 175,000 US troops on NATO’s eastern front for 40 years which would deter Russia from threatening NATO allies and attacking its neighbors.’
‘By 2013, the last US Army tank departed Europe, something celebrated as an “historic moment” Just a year later, in another historic moment, American Army tanks returned to Europe after Russia’s first invasion of Ukraine.’
CEPA June 2022
‘Words matter as Foreign Secretary, especially when opining on conflict. Contradicting long standing UK policy in a vanity blog is totally inappropriate…’
Alicia Kearns
Investment in an active and informed (through enhanced overseas intelligence) foreign policy, allied to a sound, efficient and cost effective defence spend on deterrence, conventional and the rest, although expensive in the short term, saves money (and, more importantly, blood) over the long haul in a number of different ways.
‘Loose talk (and a tight purse) costs lives’
I doubt the US cares much what Lammy says about anything. They have their own reasons for what is happening in Ukraine – reasons you have mentioned often.
‘What is happening in Ukraine’ is that Russia has invaded, twice.
I make no apologies for labouring that point.
No idea or interest in the U.S. view of Lammy.
The taxpayer here, however, should care that they will have to pick up the tab for his incompetence in alienating allies in Europe and the Middle East.
I make no apologies for labouring that point.
Over and over and over again …
Makes you wonder it he’s being paid to do it.
There is a great deal of uninformed bigotry on here.
I provide an alternative view, as sceptics do.
If you are looking for an echo chamber, of those there is no shortage.
This site, however, is for daily sceptics.
I tend to treat what politicians say as largely theatre. My suspicion is that they also view the whole thing as theatre. They are all professionals at spin.
“Running an electric car is twice as expensive as a petrol one”
Ah well I can only guess that the forthcoming October Budget will fix that anomaly and it is unlikely to be by electricity becoming cheaper!
This is bizarre. I thought it was bad enough that Germany were bribing migrants to go home by offering them 1000 euros rather than just booting them out, but then when Sweden came out with their offer of 31,000 euros *per person* I thought this is absolutely crazy. However, when you consider what the annual wage is in somewhere like Afghanistan or Syria, wouldn’t you expect more people to jump at the chance and accept this overly generous bribe?
”Despite being offered €31,000 to remigrate by the Swedish government, polling shows that very few migrants would accept the offer.
As Remix News previously reported, the Swedish government is making a significant monetary offer of 350,000 Swedish kroner to foreigners living in Sweden to voluntarily return home. It is also important to note that this amount would be paid out per person, which means a family of four could receive €124,000.
Still, these foreigners are so desperate to live in Sweden, a majority White country, that the vast majority of them said they would reject the offer, according to a poll conducted by the website Alkompis.
The poll showed that 77 percent of those questioned in the survey said that they were not even interested in the increased amount, and only 15 percent said that they would be interested in the offer. The others are uncertain.”
https://rmx.news/article/very-few-migrants-interested-in-swedens-remigration-offer-worth-e31000/
A very good new short film ( 15mins ) by Matt Goodwin, ‘How To Stop An Invasion’. He’s absolutely right, the government could stop this if they really wanted to, after all, look at the feats the Tories were capable of during the scamdemic, and how people realised they didn’t have actual rights at all, just privileges that could be taken away on a whim. It’s the government’s responsibility, at the end of the day, they’re hardly powerless, but they don’t want to stop the mass, relentless immigration, that much is apparent to anyone who isn’t a complete muppet;
https://x.com/GoodwinMJ/status/1837003034632540179
“Why LSE is the Sunday Times University of the Year 2025”
Ostensibly a change from the late 1960s, when students chanted:
“Free, free, LSE
Free it from the bourgeoisie.”
Can a ‘woman’ be charged with ‘indecent exposure’ if she flashes her penis in public?? I swear to God, Germany is done for. When your country embraces the woke mind virus *plus* uncontrolled immigration from countries where people hate you for many years, your country naturally goes to sh*t over time. One does not need a PhD in Sociology to have foreseen this happening. Stop the world, I want to get off;
”A trans-identified male from Troisdorf, Germany, is facing charges after attacking multiple women in two disturbing incidents involving knives and exhibitionism. But a debate is now raging in court as legal experts weigh whether the man, who identifies as a “woman,” can be charged with exposing his penis, a crime only males can be prosecuted for.
The man, 56, is scheduled to stand trial in Bonn for threats and grievous bodily harm related to two incidents, one from 2021 and one from 2022. Due to Germany’s strict privacy laws, the man’s full name has not been released, but he will be referred to as “Klaus” for the purposes of this article.
In August of 2021, Klaus followed a woman home and attacked her while she was at her front door. Klaus is alleged to have grabbed her from behind and held a knife to her throat while he wrangled her boots off. The woman fought back, suffering cuts to her neck and hands, and was able to send her attacker fleeing thanks to her loud cries for help. Klaus was wearing women’s clothes at the time of the attack, and is said to be a women’s shoe fetishist.
The next year, in December, Klaus exposed his penis to two women on a train. The regional court in Bonn must now decide whether this was a sexual offense, as Section 183 of the German Criminal Code only imposes a fine or a prison sentence to men for exhibitionistic acts. Because Klaus is legally considered “female,” he may avoid this charge entirely.
The uncertainty is the result of Germany’s recently-passed gender self-identification law, which is considered by many to be the most relaxed legislation of its kind in the world. In 2022, well-known criminal defense attorney Udo Vetter warned about the impact the law would have on criminal proceedings, writing on social media that: “Section 183 of the Criminal Code only applies to men. If a man uses self-ID to become a woman, he can no longer commit a criminal offense for exhibitionism.”
https://reduxx.info/germany-violent-transgender-shoe-fetishist-could-avoid-charges-of-exposing-his-penis-to-women-because-hes-legally-female/
“We’ll stop taking free clothes, say Starmer and Rayner”
Too late she cried! Your values are revealed
“I took cash for clothes too, admits Rachel Reeves”
What the f#@k is this? a fecking desperate charity shop or a party of leadership (he said gagging!)
Kier Starmer- Wardrobe by Waheed Alli
Victoria and kier, the poor mites can’t afford their own clothes, give the prime minister a pay rise, I cannot bare the thought of them having to live in poverty, why!…I’ll donate some of my cast offs too!
Presumably they have to put on a good show to all the other world politicians who are fitted out at other people’s expense to impress the other grifters whose clothes come from corruption. Can’t be seen to be second rate con-men.
“Britain is spending beyond its means”
Never!? Well slapper my thigh
(Not spending it on the right things of cause)
The politicians are spending beyond the people’s means. Beggaring us is the main part of The Agenda. So they can’t have us getting anything worthwhile for our money.
“The politicians are spending beyond the people’s means.”
Correct. And at some point the country will be declared bankrupt and effectively we will be sold to the IMF, BIS and the Blackrock mob.
Is Starmer’s decision to refuse cash for clothes an admission that he did wrong or simply to distract from all the other things he will still continue to accept bungs for.
“Jess Phillips: I’m ‘apoplectic’ domestic abusers were freed without tags”
Well, I’m apoplectic about this:
Teenager jailed for 18 months after McDonald’s fight still in prison 18 years later under indefinite jail term (msn.com)
“A desperate mother has spoken of her anguish after her teenage son was jailed for 18 months but is still trapped in prison 18 years later under a cruel indefinite jail term.
Luke Ings was handed a controversial imprisonment for public protection (IPP) sentence for robbery and a fight in McDonalds aged just 17.
The jail terms were scrapped in 2012 amid human rights concerns, but not retrospectively – leaving almost 3,000 people languishing in prison with no release date.
His devastated mother Samantha, 57, said Luke, now 36, is trapped with “monsters” inside maximum security HMP Wakefield, which is home to some of Britain’s most serious criminals, HAVING SPENT HIS ENTIRE ADULT LIFE INSIDE.
She fears unless the government takes urgent action he will not survive amid soaring rates of suicide and self-harm among IPP prisoners.”
“Jess Phillips: I’m ‘apoplectic’ domestic abusers were freed without tags”
Well, I’m apoplectic about this:
Teenager jailed for 18 months after McDonald’s fight still in prison 18 years later under indefinite jail term (msn.com)
“The jail terms [created by Lord David Blunkett], were scrapped in 2012 amid human rights concerns, but not retrospectively – leaving almost 3,000 people languishing in prison with no release date.
His devastated mother Samantha, 57, said Luke, now 36, is trapped with “monsters” inside maximum security HMP Wakefield, which is home to some of Britain’s most serious criminals, having spent his entire adult life inside.
She fears unless the government takes urgent action he will not survive amid soaring rates of suicide and self-harm among IPP prisoners.”
“IPP sentences do not fall under the government’s SDS40 early release scheme, which is expected to see 5,500 prisoners walk free by the end of October, despite more than 700 IPP prisoners having served at least 10 years longer than their minimum sentence.”
“We’ll stop taking free clothes,” say Starmer and Rayner. “Buy us something else next time.”
“Why is he so bad at this?” He’s like the rest of the WEF/Common Purpose brigade. Promoted for their adherence to The Agenda, not for competence.
Great video on New Culture Forum today, discussing the newly released figures on the economics of mass immigration: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMhLUiqrHco