Two mothers are suing the NHS, calling for equal safeguards and assessment protocols across adult gender clinics and those for minors, in order to safeguard vulnerable individuals seeking transgender healthcare. The Telegraph has the story.
NHS England (NHSE) is putting trans teenagers at “unreasonable risk of irreversible harm”, the head of a gender clinic will warn in a legal battle over treatment.
Two mothers are suing the health service over concerns that as soon as a teenager turns 17, they can transfer to adult gender clinics and be fast-tracked to surgery and sex-change drugs.
This is despite a recent crackdown on treatment for under-18s, including a ban on puberty blockers and a guarantee of assessment of underlying mental-health conditions and neurodevelopmental disorders such as autism before treatment is given for gender issues.
The mothers, who both have “vulnerable” teenage daughters seeking sex-change surgery, are now taking the case to the High Court in an attempt to force NHSE to guarantee the same protections at adult clinics.
Dr. Karl Neff, a consultant endocrinologist and the head of Ireland’s National Gender Service, will warn the judge that the treatment currently offered to adults in England “will not fully meet their needs or offer them adequate protection and thereby will place them at unreasonable risk of irreversible harm”.
The judge will hear that in 2019, 17 year-olds made up 18% of referrals to adult gender services, the largest single group by age. Since then, NHSE has written to all those of that age who were on the Tavistock waiting list telling them that instead they will go straight to the adult clinic. …
Anna Castle, one of the mothers bringing the case, said that “something needs to be done about the lack of evidence-based and multi-disciplinary care and the fact that our children and vulnerable people are being sent on a one-way pathway without having any of their other conditions considered”.
Ms. Castle, whose daughter suffers with ADHD, has autistic traits and decided she was a boy during lockdown, said that sex-change surgery ”is the most extreme decision anyone could make about their body”.
“But it has the least amount of safeguarding and preliminary investigation into whether it is actually necessary and then there is no evidence as to whether it actually helps,” she added.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I wonder if David McGrogan will read this?
Obviously as a conspiracy realist my only conclusion is that the FDA and CDC clearly have something to hide.
I wonder what that might be?
Well, on speculation, there was clearly something amiss with the methodology used by Pfizer trials in particular, that caused half the trial participants to quit before finishing! Around 50% of the participants did not complete the trials. Why might this have been? If it was illness, then can it be dismissed as coincidence that as much as half of them were too ill to continue after receiving the jab? These volunteers were surely being paid to put their health at risk for an unknown drug, so they would have been financially incentivized to continue!
Furthermore, the placebo group ended up being given the mRNA shot anyway. Is it any wonder they’re compelled to withhold such ridiculous methodologies and details?
For one, 14 y/o Maddie de Garay’s life was destroyed by that trial. They said it was all in her head and refused to pay for her treatment, despite promises made on the consent form.
Her parents should be prosecuted for child abuse. What kind of parent – who doesn’t have a serious ill or dying child who just might benefit from an experimental product – would volunteer their child to be experimented on?
“Bad Pfizer Vaccine Batches Account for 4.2% of doses but 71% of Serious Adverse Events
Explains Why Some Have Severe Side Effects and Others Do Not.”
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/bad-pfizer-vaccine-batches-account
“In conclusion, the results suggest the existence of a batch-dependent safety signal for the BNT162b2 vaccine, and more studies are warranted to explore this preliminary observation and its consequences.”
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eci.13998
“The FDA and Vaccine Manufacturers Still Refuse to Show Us Their Work”
Come on lads! What could they possibly have to hide?
Nothing at all….It will all be clear and transparent in 75 years time!
The mantra of bigpharme as regards ALL new drugsand genetic therapies ie the modified (not messenger RNA – that would not work as it would be destroyed by the immune system) MRNA jabs, they need to know the 3 D’s –
Dosage.
Distribution (as in where, how and why throughout the body).
Duration.
All were and still are, unknown.
I’ll add a 4th to the list of D’s-
Deadliness.
By God we badly need a whistleblower genetic engineer from high up the bigpharma food chain.
Why has this not happened yet, -fear of retribution, threats, being paid for omerta. or maybe they’re quite happy with their work…
Sock Puppet Sunak assures us the jabs are safe.
There’s no need for transparency; assured quality or any information about structure and molecular weight.
The entirely trustworthy midget WEF puppet and PM-with-no-mandate (no medical qualifications whatsoever, but his Mum was a Pharmacist don’cha know) has declared they’re OK.
What more reassurance could anyone want.
FDA not fit for purpose, and covering their arses and those of Big Pharma