J.K. Rowling has vowed to continue “calling a man a man” in defiance of controversial new SNP hate crime laws, which she branded “ludicrous”. The Telegraph has more.
The Harry Potter author said she would not delete her social media posts, in which she has regularly argued that trans women are not women, to avoid being taken to court “under this ludicrous law”.
She said she would instead “do some more accurate sexing” after the legislation takes effect at the start of next month, despite predictions that LGBT campaigners plan to use it to target her. Rowling lives in Edinburgh.
Humza Yousaf oversaw the passage of the Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act at Holyrood in 2021, when he was Justice Secretary in Nicola Sturgeon’s Government.
It will come into force on April 1st after Police Scotland said it needed time for “training, guidance and communications planning”.
The legislation creates a criminal offence of “stirring up of hatred”, expanding on a similar offence based on racist abuse that has been on the statute book for decades.
Offences are considered “aggravated”, meaning they could lead to stiffer sentences, if they involve prejudice on the basis of age, disability, race, religion, sexual orientation or transgender identity.
But concerns have been expressed that the legislation’s definition of a hate crime is too ambiguous, potentially leading to a “chilling” effect on freedom of speech and a torrent of vexatious complaints being made to police.
Joanna Cherry KC, an SNP MP and feminist who has been highly critical of the Scottish Government’s gender policies, has said she had “no doubt” that the new laws “will be weaponised against women exercising their right to freedom of speech”.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Well done to J.K. Rowling for her courageous stance.
She also managed to write fascinating, world-famous books, later made into films, without any sex scenes, unlike the trash written by Jilly Cooper, or the disgusting performances of so-called comedian Sarah Silverman.
I think Jackie Chan also said he refused to do any sex scenes in his films, and yet still became world-famous. More actors and actresses ought to refuse.
Unfortunately, after the Harry Potter film stars finished the series, they were forced to do B-movies with nude scenes, and the girl Emma Watson chopped off all her hair, as if obeying some Hollywood “rules” about paying for their success. Agents assure actors that they need to “expand their range” of acting skills in that way, but it’s all a lie to degrade them.
Supposedly the young cast of the Harry Potter films were well protected from the Jewish ‘MAPs’ in Hollywood, so that they could complete the film series relatively unscathed, and therefore make pots of money for the Hollywood producers.
But once the film series had finished…
It’s only what everyone should be doing. And if everyone did it then nobody would be ‘cancelled’ and the nasty totalitarian imbeciles behind this would have no power.
Yes well done to the woman for not being bludgeoned by ideologues trying to silence everyone and force us to accept their garbage.
“This is nonsense, 99.9% of the world knows it’s nonsense. The emperor is naked. He may be wearing lipstick, but his balls are swinging in plain sight.” JK Rowling.


https://www.globalresearch.ca/france-already-conducts-combat-training-its-battalion-group-assigned-ukraine/5852205
Worrying news – Le Micron looks as if he is going to send French soldiers to their deaths in Ukraine.
Short version: Putin still suffering from nuclear erectile dysfunction.
Did Rowling actually say that? —-Jeez that is so great.
She did, because she’s all kinds of awesome.
“The word ‘transphobic’, as used here, does not mean an irrational fear or dislike of trans people,” Rowling wrote. “It means refusing to use gender identity ideology’s jargon, refusing to parrot its slogans, refusing to accept that sex doesn’t matter when it comes to sport and single-sex spaces, refusing to believe a bearded heterosexual man becomes a lesbian when he declares himself one, and refusing to believe an abusive, misogynistic male is a woman because he likes to wear mini-dresses and pout in selfies.”
“This is nonsense,” Rowling added. “99.9% of the world knows it’s nonsense. The emperor is naked. He might be wearing lipstick, but his balls are swinging in plain sight.”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/2909538/jk-rowling-shrugs-off-accusations-of-hate-crime-over-misgendering/
Bloody Marvelous innit?
https://twitter.com/jk_rowling/status/1765822003246768198?lang=en
A fine, brave and courageous lady.
The law tends not to apply equally to those who can afford the best wordsmiths. Being a high-profile popular figure can also help due to the spontaneous support they receive and the negative publicity this can bring to any case against them – which can also be good for sowing division (solve et coagula?).
Of course this law will result in vexatious complaints. Isn’t that the intention? However, some will no doubt be hoping for another “white, white, white…” rant from the so-called “First Minister”.
It will come into force on April 1st after Police Scotland said it needed time for “training, guidance and communications planning”.
Is this law really a priority?
The number of people dying from drug misuse in Scotland has fallen for the first time in five years but remains well above every other country in Europe.
Figures released by National Records of Scotland (NRS) show that in 2022,1 even with the decrease, Scotland’s drug deaths were still 3.7 times higher than in 2000.
Accordingly most of the 1051 deaths recorded last year were due to accidental drug overdoses.
Meanwhile Scotland’s most feared drug criminals are battling for control of the underworld from their prison cells after a wave of convictions shattered their criminal networks.
Among the ruthless thugs serving time in nicks all over the country is Glaswegian Christopher Hughes, 33, who has links to deadly cartels in Colombia and Morocco as well as the Italian Mafia.
Will the Hate Crime Laws stop or protect the Scottish, or British citizen from the nihilism of international crime?
“Will the Hate Crime Laws stop or protect the Scottish, or British citizen from the nihilism of international crime?”
No
Totalitarians, Communists, Marxists, Socialists or whatever is your preferred term for the Central Planners, are always determined you won’t have an opinion. —–Their pathetic “Hate Crime” garbage should really be called “Different Opinion Crime”. They hate you having an opinion, because you might not choose theirs.
Everyone in Scotland who voted the SNP into power because either a) they hate the English because we shower them with such a lot of taxpayers’ money or b) they thought gaining independence from the UK in order to lose their independence to the EU was a great idea . . .
should remember the old adage: ‘Be careful what you wish for.’
[PS Won’t be taking any more trips to Bonnie Scotland until rational thinking resurfaces.]
Scots (not me) traditionally always voted Labour. It was a largely working class population that thought Tories were for the toffs. The SNP was a quaint little party that no one took seriously. What changed was Scots fell out of love with New Labour and turned to the only other bunch of socialists available —The SNP. ——They promised to get back into the EU so they could cut out the middleman at Westminster and bring “Independence”. But the dictionary version of Independence is “Free from the authority or jurisdiction of others”. But having your laws all made in Brussels, your central bank in Frankfurt and Euros in your wallet isn’t independence. In this new “Independence” the Scottish government would simply be local administrators implementing orders. But the SNP remind me of one of those desert cactus that might flower once in 100 years when the conditions are just right. Then they die. ——The SNP had their flowering, the conditions were just right, and now they are going to die. —–Thank god.
Thank you, Varmint, for confirming there are intelligent and rational Scots still in Scotland (not in the Scottish Parliament, obviously). No one can blame anyone in the UK for rejecting ‘New’ Labour or any of the members of the Uniparty, past or present.
I do hope that you are right about the imminent death and disappearance into history of the SNP.