Igor Chudov ran a fascinating piece this week where he looked at two studies on Covid vaccines and miscarriages. While the studies had a number of problems that make some of their conclusions hard to credit – for instance, in one the vaccinated were excluded at a rate 75 times greater than the unvaccinated (7.5% vs 0.1%) – Igor spotted that both studies give an estimate of the miscarriage rate in women after the sixth week of pregnancy. Notably, the figures are very different. In one study the miscarriage rate is 8% and in the other it is 14.1%, almost twice as high.
Importantly, the higher figure was from a study where all the women were vaccinated during the pregnancy itself, while the lower figure was from a study where not all the women were vaccinated and those who were were jabbed at any point before the miscarriage (some would probably have been vaccinated during the pregnancy but we don’t know how many).
Assuming the data in each study are reliable and comparable (one is a prospective cohort study and the other based on CDC V-Safe survey data) then this is strongly indicative that being vaccinated during pregnancy almost doubles the risk of miscarriage, at least after the sixth week.
We can’t be sure – there are always potential pitfalls in comparing data from different sources. However, these are two studies published in top journals where each gives an estimate of miscarriage risk after the sixth week of pregnancy, and the one where the women were all vaccinated during the pregnancy is nearly double the one where many of the women were unvaccinated or were vaccinated before pregnancy. That should ring alarm bells for anyone. Particularly when we know the vaccines have caused widespread menstrual abnormalities and were shown in animal biodistribution studies to accumulate in the ovaries and uterus.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Just look at the biomolecular evidence.
https://arkmedic.substack.com/p/5-ways-to-skin-a-genetically-modified?utm_source=cross-post&publication_id=413756&post_id=137412013&utm_campaign=579085&isFreemail=false&r=x6a6a&utm_medium=email
The Law of Unintended (?) consequences.
Unintended consequences or just Billy Boy doing what Billy Boy does?
The jabs made no sense unless they were intended to do harm: even if you’re gullible enough to believe the government it was clear that in 2020 there was nothing posing an unusual threat to anybody other than the ill elderly.
This was & is the so called “Elephant in The Jab Room” Even this is still escaping the scrutiny it deserves !..
How can the NHS still be calling us up for Convid 19 Jabs ? Just HOW ??.. TPTB are now taking The Michael in plain site ! When The WHO gets it’s treaty sorted we are going to get the whole 9 yards thrown at us ,See Palestinian protesters on war memorials policed by baby’s in high vis vests ! See us anti WHO indigenous citizens dragged from our homes to be jabbed etc by Robo Cops !
Spiked. Cancelled my sub on the spot…
https://www.spiked-online.com/2022/09/02/no-the-covid-jab-is-not-dangerous-for-pregnant-women/
I cancelled my sub after Fraser Myers “came out” as a jab-pushing authoritarian.
Surprised it’s taken you so long tbh. I cancelled 2021 when they wrote several vindictive articles about the choice made by the unvaccinated. One particularly nasty piece that paradoxically pretended to believe in freedom of choice whilst trying to shame people out of a choice. Horrible little rag run by disingenuous people unable to think critically.
According to Public Heath bureaucrats, it’s terribly dangerous for a woman to take paracetamol, eat soft cheese or drink ANY alcohol during pregnancy.
But it’s perfectly safe to allow someone to inject you with a poorly-tested, experimental pharmaceutical product which has no medium to long-term safety data.
I have no sympathy with a woman who suffers a miscarriage after allowing themselves to be experimented on.