John Armstrong, a Reader in Financial Mathematics at King’s College London, has written an excoriating piece in the Spectator about the capture of Imperial College by the woke cult, with anyone who dissents from its agenda, however potty, being penalised by their peers and/or the university authorities. Even people aware of the the war on free speech in Britain’s elite universities will find this piece eye-opening. It begins:
We have become used to the erosion of academic freedom in the humanities and social sciences. It is no longer surprising to find that a Gender Studies department holds the institutional view that it is racist and colonialist to say that sex is binary, or promotes a student essay which fantasises about holding a knife to the throat of gender-critical women.
But attacks on academic freedom are not restricted to gender studies and anthropology departments anymore. Academics in all fields are now under pressure to conform to fashionable theories on gender and race. Indeed, science-focused institutions can, paradoxically, be especially susceptible to this, because of their lack of expertise when it comes to social issues.
Imperial College London, which specialises in science, engineering, medicine and business, is a case in point. Through their equality, diversity and inclusion (EDI) web pages, they urge staff to be LGBTQ+ allies. The word ‘ally’ is carefully chosen for plausible deniability (what kind of monster wouldn’t want to be an ally to a marginalised community?). But in reality what is being promoted is uncritical allyship with Stonewall, who are mentioned 10 times on just one page. This is not subtle: staff are even encouraged to donate to Stonewall.
Even the most senior staff at Imperial seem afraid of expressing opposing views. In 2019, an LGBT allyship network organised a letter criticising professor Simone Buitendijk, then Vice Provost of Education, for the crime of liking and linking to ‘transphobic’ material on Twitter. This included “a good piece on gender self-identification and women’s rights” in the Spectator. After meeting with professor Stephen Curry, Imperial’s Vice Provost (Equality, Diversity and Inclusion) Buitendijk issued an abject apology, stating: “I now realise that social media is not the correct forum for such sensitive debates.”
Buitendijk’s research expertise includes women’s health and diversity in education. The LGBT allyship network opposed her even following academically relevant Twitter accounts they disapproved of. If a Vice Provost can be censored in this way, how will a junior medic ever feel safe questioning practices such as the transitioning of children?
Some of Imperial’s allyship advice is merely comical: “Offer to accompany a trans or non-binary person to the bathroom, so they do not have to face any potential transphobia alone.” However, most of it appears to be carefully designed to promote Stonewall’s political agenda and to suppress any dissent from this view. For example, transphobia is defined as “denying [someone’s] gender identity or refusing to accept it”. Since “the College has a zero-tolerance approach to all forms of transphobia” this arguably discriminates against staff who hold the protected belief that sex is binary. Their allyship advice also includes wearing rainbow lanyards, telling people your pronouns in introductions, and calling out “transphobic” comments. While it is claimed that these measures will create an “environment where more people feel safe and comfortable to be themselves”, they seem better designed to create an environment where nobody dares express gender-critical views.
Imperial provide similar advice on being a white ally. This includes a video explaining that all white people are complicit in racism, and that pointing to black friends and partners as evidence you are not racist simply illustrates “white fragility”. Staff are encouraged to donate to Black Lives Matter in the US and instructed, “If you have friends or family who take a different stance on these issues… have a hard conversation with them and ask them to rethink their views.”
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Note to the moderator. My account has been hacked. My posting history has been deleted and when I try to access the “my content and setting” link at the head of the the post I get an insulting response. Please delete this message when you have read it and advise me what action to take other that change my password which I have done.
My posting history is similarly unavailable. When I try to access it I get the message “N0nc€ is invalid. Only it’s spelt correctly. I don’t remember using that word in a comment, perhaps I was infuriated by something someone at the BBC had done, they do seem to glorify pedophiles somewhat…
Try editing your post and see whether you are told that you are posting too quickly when you click Edit
Sorry, when you click Save – I couldn’t edit it to correct it.
That message crops up occasionally and I just log out and log back in.
Nonce is a technical term. Don’t worry, DS is not calling you a nonce. They’ve got their encryption in a mess…
Nonce: random or semi-random number that is generated for a specific use. It is related to cryptographic communication and information technology (IT). The term stands for “number used once” or “number once” and is commonly referred to as a cryptographic nonce.
Thanks for the clarification MAk, as does the “Posting too fast – slow down” message. Clearly abbreviations not intended to be seen by the public.
Okey dokey
Same here, Boomer, I don’t think it’s anything to do with your previous comments. Come on, DS, sort it out! By the way, I’ve never knew you could look at your posting history but mine doesn’t exist either!
I have also set up a completely new account and it is similarly afflicted so it is a site hack, not directed at me personally.
Did you email the DS team yet? Perhaps get back to us with their response, seeing as this is an issue that isn’t affecting you alone. I think this site also suffers from glitches on a regular basis. It’s obviously seen as a threat! lol
Yes. Response from Toby acknowledging that they are trying to sort it.
I’ve had a look, and your past comments are still in the database (2,286 of them), so it’s presumably some kind of UI bug. However, I’m not sure what you’re looking at – are you referring to My Account->Post View Stats, or somewhere else?
As to the comment rate limiting / flood prevention, I’ve turned that off.
Thanks for the response, Ian.
Ah, I see. I get the same error. Looks like a bug introduced in the latest version of the comments software, which was released earlier this week. I’ll file a bug report.
Software bugs have been the bane of my working life and seem to pursuing me into retirement!
I knew it wasn’t a scam. I got an email from a Nigerian Prince 2 weeks ago saying he was selling the bronzes and if I could give him my bank details he would deposit the money there for safe keeping…only happy to help!
Excellent! Never interrupt a fool.
Such nice people.
I think we need Diane Abbot piercing insight in all matters Black, to guide us through this tangled web.