Why Does Harry And Meghan’s Website Still Say the Queen is Alive?

Harry and Meghan's website appears to have been hacked by evil racists – it says the Queen is still alive, making it look like they’re such preening narcissist they can't be bothered to update their own website.

2 min read

Harry and Meghan’s official website appears to have been hacked by evil racists determined to discredit the couple. What other explanation could there be for the fact that it contains a massive faux pas?

Queen Elizabeth II died three months ago, yet as of today the website Sussex Royal still refers to her as ”sovereign” and says that: “The Duke and Duchess of Sussex deeply believe in the role of the Monarchy, and their commitment to Her Majesty The Queen is unwavering.”

Nowhere does the site acknowledge that the Queen passed away three months ago.

Evidently, this is yet another example of the kind of vicious trolling the beleaguered couple have to put up with from racist Britons, a subject covered with so much courage and sensitivity in their just released Netflix documentary. It seems the couple can’t even put up a website without hate-filled hackers – presumably at the behest of conniving royal courtiers, or even the King himself – taking it over and filling it with outdated content to make them look foolish. This appalling ‘prank’ gives the impression that the couple are such preening narcissists they can’t be bothered to update their website after the most consequential Royal event in decades.

It is precisely this kind of treatment that has driven the couple into exile, the main subject of their stunning and brave documentary.

Whoever is responsible for this cruel stunt should be ashamed of themselves.

Stop Press: Toby appeared on GB News to give his take on the Meghan and Harry documentary. For some bizarre reason, he doesn’t take their claim to be victims of oppression very seriously.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

“Nowhere does the site acknowledge that the Queen passed away three months ago.”

I prefer the straightforward explanation – this is a very thinly veiled insult to Charlie and uses cock-up -honestly- as the cover for not acknowledging his now elevated position.

JXB
JXB
3 years ago

I expect they’ve been too busy jetting round the World lecturing the peasantry about saving the planet, making self-pitying documentaries, and counting their spare bedrooms and bathrooms to get round to updating their website.

We shouldn’t be critical. The poor dears must be exhausted.

Covid-1984
Covid-1984
3 years ago

This B movie actress and her key grip helper will get roundly booed if they EVER set foot in the UK again. Order the popcorn 🍿

JohnK
JohnK
3 years ago

A cynic might suggest that the firm hosting their site has gone bust and it’s no longer maintained. With any luck, it will disappear eventually!

DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago

He must be really upset that Major Hewitt didn’t accept his paternal responsibilities and palmed him off to one of the wealthiest families in the UK. Such rejection can have a deep psychological impact don’t you know!

Brett_McS
Brett_McS
3 years ago

She’s alive in their hearts!
Sorry about that. If it’s any consolation, I just made myself sick.

GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
3 years ago

Like the metaphorical tree: if a rich couple suffer but don’t blog about it, then did the event really happen?

Matt Dalby
Matt Dalby
3 years ago

Harry and Meghan, the royals the country doesn’t want, whining like pathetic kittens about being victims of oppression yet again.

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 years ago

Now if I was a loony conspiracy theorist I’d comment on the fact he’s making quite the Masonic gesture in that photo.
I’m actually taking the Mick BTW. I see some seriously crazy comments and observations when I end up getting lost down various online rabbit warrens. 😳

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

But seriously, why would a bloke choose to walk or pose with their hand in their coat/shirt like that? Pocket, maybe, but I can’t imagine this being a very natural thing to do. Does anyone on here regularly stand around like this? This site may be total claptrap but I’ll let you be the judge. The ‘Hidden Hand’ eh? 👹😄
https://veritas-vincit-international.org/2015/01/18/hand-signals-of-freemasonry-explained/

GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
3 years ago
Reply to  Mogwai

She’d just punched him very hard in the collarbone. He tried to express his own views and ‘woke the dragon’

Harry: signal to us if you need rescuing. Two blinks followed by a nose-scratch…

Mogwai
Mogwai
3 years ago

Haha, he’s wearing an imaginary sling then. But harking back to my BBC-watching days of old, I do remember Harry constantly making this gesture. I think it’s just some weird mannerism but it does look really unnatural and daft. I just assumed born royalty were trained from an early age in deportment and how to present oneself in public as they’re being scrutinized and ‘papped’ left, right and centre their whole lives.

Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

Not sure who she is, but is he that polo player chap?

Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago

Pretty sure she’s something to do with Dunelm, and I think he’s the guy off the Sainsbury’s ad. I think.

WyrdWoman
WyrdWoman
3 years ago

Harry and Megan who?

amanuensis
amanuensis
3 years ago
Reply to  WyrdWoman

He’s the Queen’s grandson that wore the Nazi uniform.
She’s an actress on a popular TV drama — it is okay, not great.
Not sure why they’re in the news.

Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

They’re in the news because they’re just super and great at saving the planet.

JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago
Reply to  amanuensis

She is a feminist icon I’ll have you know.

Using your looks to bag a rich man and then ride his coattails to fame – feminism in the 21st century, same as feminism in the 1st century.

They’re in the news because being professional whingers can clearly be quite lucrative. I can’t believe there is someone even more pointless and vacuous than the Kardashians raking in lots of dosh for selling their empty lives to the highest bidder, but there you have it.

RW
RW
3 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

Using your looks to bag a rich man and then ride his coattails to fame – feminism in the 21st century, same as feminism in the 1st century.

Looks? The nicest thing one can say about the lady in this respect is that she’s plain-faced and seems to have been exposed to an explosion in a near-by make-up factory not that long ago. Considering that Harry – Rich man? Rather pampered forever yoof offspring of a rich familiy. – used to be notorious for his promiscuous sex life, the skills the lady presumably has who managed to convince him to swap all the others for just her (at least officially and for now) would seem to be of a more intimate nature.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

“Using your looks to bag a rich man and then ride his coattails to fame…” I am inclined to think she was riding more than his coattails.

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
3 years ago

Sorry Will, I couldn’t work out what you were saying. Perhaps you can take the tongue out of your cheek.

GroundhogDayAgain
GroundhogDayAgain
3 years ago

I read this as a huge diss to H&M. The retail brand must be furious

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.