New evidence has emerged that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are routinely injuring the heart of all vaccine recipients, raising further questions about their safety and their role in the recent elevated levels of heart-related deaths.
The latest evidence comes in a study from Switzerland, which found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people, with 2.8% showing levels associated with subclinical myocarditis.
The official line on elevated heart injuries and deaths, where they are acknowledged, is that they are most likely caused by the virus as a post-Covid condition rather than the vaccines.
However, expert group HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has pointed to Australia as a “control group” on this question. HART notes that even though Australia had not had significant Covid (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-Covid deaths beginning in June 2021 (see below). HART notes that Australia “did not have prior Covid as a reason for seeing this rise in mortality and hospital pressure from spring 2021”. Instead, “the results from this control group indicate that the cause of this rise in deaths, particularly in young people, must be something in common with Australia, Europe and the USA”.
In New Zealand, economist John Gibson found a temporal association between boosters and excess deaths, estimating “16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses” (see below). He noted that the age distribution of the deaths corroborated the hypothesis: “The age groups most likely to use boosters show large rises in excess mortality after boosters are rolled out.”
In Japan, Guy Gin reports that Professor Seiji Kojima of Nagoya University found the same correlation during the booster rollout in January to March 2022 (see below) – a time when most excess deaths were not with Covid.
In Israel, a study in Nature observed a similar trend for 16-39 year-olds, with cardiac arrest emergency calls rising and falling with the first and second doses and then rising and falling again after doses for recovered individuals.
Dr. Eyal Shahar looked at the Israeli deaths data for all ages and estimated “a plausible range of the booster fatality rate in Israel in August 2021” of eight to 17 deaths per 100,000 vaccinees. In the Netherlands, vaccinologist Dr. Theo Schetters estimated a booster fatality rate in the over-60s as high as 125 per 100,000 vaccinees.
As to cause, Dr. Michael Palmer and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi at Doctors for Covid Ethics have set out what they deem “irrefutable proof of causality” that mRNA vaccines are causing vascular and organ damage. From studies and autopsy evidence the medical experts show:
- mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site but instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs;
- mRNA-based Covid vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs;
- Vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation;
- Vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome.
They explain that autopsy evidence shows that “the strong expression of spike protein in heart muscle after vaccination correlates with significant inflammation and tissue destruction”. They add that “vaccine-induced vascular damage will promote blood clotting, and clotting-related diseases such as heart attack, stroke, lung embolism are very common in the adverse events databases”.
A recent case report in Vaccines of an autopsy conducted on a 76-year-old man who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination confirms the role of the vaccine. It found the presence of spike protein but not the nucleocapsid protein in the deceased man’s brain and heart, proving that the vaccine (which unlike the virus only produces the spike protein) was the cause of the deadly inflammation.
In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.
A case report of the autopsy of a 55-year-old patient who died four months after receiving a Pfizer jab as a second dose (his first dose was AstraZeneca) made similar findings.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, but not nucleocapsid protein was sporadically detected in vessel walls by immunohistochemical assay. The cause of death was determined to be acute myocardial infarction and lymphocytic myocarditis. These findings indicate that myocarditis, as well as thrombo-embolic events following injection of spike-inducing gene-based vaccines, are causally associated with a injurious immunological response to the encoded agent.
A recent meta-analysis claimed to find that the risk of myocarditis is “more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine”. It claims this supports “the continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons per CDC and WHO recommendations”.
However, critics have pointed out the numerous flaws in this meta-analysis and highlighted that it is at odds with a major Nordic study of 23 million people that found the risk of hospitalisation post-vaccination in 16-24 year old males was up to 28 times higher than the risk post-Covid. At the Daily Sceptic we have written about this Nordic study as well as a number of other studies with similar findings, including ones from France, England and the U.S. (alongside critiques of studies that purport to show otherwise). A study from Israel confirms the elevated risk from vaccination and states: “We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.” A study from Italy found a similar absence of elevated myocarditis during the pre-vaccination pandemic period.
We should also note that vaccination does not prevent Covid infection so the risks are additive and the comparison between vaccination risk and infection risk is false. Cardiovascular injury also is not the only serious adverse event associated with these vaccines. A recent study by researchers from Harvard, Oxford and Johns Hopkins University (among others) found that the mRNA vaccines are up to nearly 100 times more likely to cause a person of student age serious injury than prevent him or her from being hospitalised with COVID-19.
Most of these studies only look at clinical adverse events, i.e., events serious enough to warrant medical assistance. Studies are now emerging which show these clinical events to be just the tip of the iceberg of a far larger number of subclinical injuries. A study in Thailand found cardiovascular adverse effects in around a third of teenagers (29.2%) following Pfizer vaccination and subclinical heart inflammation in one in 43 (2.3%).
The Swiss study mentioned above was recently highlighted by Dr. Vinay Prasad and comes from the European Society of Cardiology. It confirms the Thai result, finding at least 2.8% with subclinical myocarditis (possibly more as the researchers excluded half the cases as possibly from another cause). Dr. Prasad observes that this means subclinical myocarditis is hundreds of times (“two orders of magnitude”) more common than clinical myocarditis. The rates were highest in women at 3.7%, which is one in 27 vaccinated. (Dr. Prasad notes this is different to the Thai study, which found the usual higher rates in males; he suggests this may be related to how the researchers excluded cases.)
Crucially, the study found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people (see chart above, where the dark lines being shifted to the right of the fainter control group lines implies elevated levels throughout the vaccinated population). This indicates the vaccine is routinely injuring the heart (an organ which does not heal well) and that the known injuries are just the more severe instances of a far larger number occurring right across the board.
These injuries are not necessarily short and over with quickly. Studies have shown that spike protein is still being found in the blood of many vaccinated people at least four months after vaccination, suggesting it is still being produced in some way. The mechanism of this long-term production of spike protein by the body has not been identified (is the genetic code being incorporated into the cell’s DNA?). But if cells in the cardiovascular system and elsewhere are still producing this pathogenic and inflammatory protein for months on end, the risk of auto-immune injury as identified in the autopsies above greatly increases. Such an auto-immune injury may be triggered by re-challenge by the virus ramping up the immune response to the spike protein, which may explain why excess non-Covid deaths often accompany Covid waves.
There is now considerable evidence that mRNA vaccines are routinely injuring the heart, with raised troponin levels across the board and subclinical myocarditis in up to one in 27 cases or more. These are not rare events, as is often claimed by medical authorities and in the media. They are alarmingly common.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I wrote a story today about Pfizer becoming a “corporate sponsor” of the Southeastern Conference (14 well-known colleges). In the story, I mention how ridiculous it is this sports league continues to push vaccines for student-athletes. I linked to two myocarditis studies (one showing 1-in-1000 risk, the other as low as 1 in 3000). I guess I need to go back into the story and add a link to this story/study.
I don’t think the 14 colleges of the SEC have thought enough about what this partnership could mean to them in the future. The potential liability is vast and they are not doing anything to improve their credibility with prospective future students.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/the-southeastern-conference-is-now
So, is the mRNA technique flawed across the board, for any “vaccine” drug, or just the Covid-19 one? Does anyone actually understand the biology of it (yet)? It wouldn’t be the first time that the company involved made serious mistakes.
What are the other mRNA drugs?
Genuine question.
You can find drug research reports on TrialSite News, SciTechDaily, Cnet Science, and sometimes even Interesting Engineering, to name but four…
Thank you. One has become far more curious of late…
They had ones to treat things like cancer a while back. But there were apparently a lot of problems with it.
Far more likely to cause cancer it seems….
Funny how that works. Whether it’s cancer or covid, mRNA gene therapy really seems to be gasoline on the fire!
Robert Malone has gone into detail about this. He asserts that the mRNA technology is sound, but the problem less with the genetically engineered spike protein and the delivery mechanism (e.g. lipid nanoparticles for Pfizer).
Personally, I have a fundamental problem with the idea of genetic treatment. Prefer nature to take its course and what will be will be.
So other than the delivery mechanism and the stuff inside the delivery mechanism, it’s sound?
The delivery mechanism and the spike protein inside it is pretty much the whole thing, isn’t it?
What else is there left?
Th delivery mechanism into the cell, not the delivery mechanism from the cell into the body i.e. the translation of the mRNA. Listen to Robert Malone.
Hey, I’m not promoting this sh*t, I’m just repeating what I’ve read/heard.
“What else is there left?”
The 5G chemicals?
Aside from ‘unknown’ substances related to the adjuvants, the information for which is currently withheld for commercial reasons, it contains yummy things like:
Polyethylene glycol: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8251011/
Incomplete RNA which is still biologically active – and with unknown effects: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/mrna-vaccines-the-cia-and-national?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email#play
Mould: https://khn.org/news/article/pfizer-new-vaccine-plant-persistent-mold-issues-history-of-recalls/
Metal fragments: https://www.riotimesonline.com/brazil-news/modern-day-censorship/international-research-groups-find-sharp-metal-objects-in-covid-vaccines-very-frightening/
Toxic metals: https://rumble.com/v1npo1k-dr.-mark-trozzi-toxic-metals-in-covid-shots.html
Other particulate contaminants: https://www.trialsitenews.com/a/failure-to-scale-covid-19-injection-vials-must-be-independently-tested-for-conformity-to-label.-9a77eba4
Others report such wonderful things as E coli, glass fragments, fibres, other diverse fragments – and a fly leg. Dr Hughes summarises some of the data here: https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/52/96
To quote Alexandra Latypova – it really is a toxic garbage soup. https://rumble.com/v1p69bf-c-19-injections-regulatory-and-manufacturing-fraud-tessa-lena-tallks-to-ale.html
Thank you for submitting all these links.
Do you remember the scene from Disney’s Fantasia where the apprentice sourcerer is mixing up a spell? The list above shows that it is still about witch craft but using a lab rather than a cave, a white coat rather than a black cloak and pointy hat…
Good comparison: most people will remember The Sorcerer’s Apprentice scene in Fantasia.
Nature, by way of our immune system, is definitely not keen on any foreign body hijacking our body cells and rearranging their chemistry and function which is what virus and thecmRNA junk do. At the first sign, it sends T cells and cytotoxic agents to kill such cells. (And if those cells are in muscles, like the heart…)
That alone should tell us not to do it deliberately.
As I understand matters, and I do so in simple terms only, mRNA gene therapy was initially and still is used as a delivery system for cancer treatment by way of immunotherapy. Basically it seeks to turn on, or off, and thereby amplify, the activities of targeted cancer seeking cells, to enable them to destroy cells which have become cancerous. Look at CTLA-4, Jim Allison and Coley….Books, not google!
Used in this manner mRNA has great potential, but the downside is that it has to turn off elements of the immune system in order to work.
It didn’t take long for bigphama’s vaccinators/genetic engineers to realise mRNA would be the perfect delivery system for a new generation of “vaccines”.
However, the problem is they know next to nothing about how the immune system actually works (mind you, no one does) and, disastrously for the jabbed even less about the long term effects.
This paper gives a clue though:-
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X
The paper also explains the inevitable blood clot risks.
Thanks for your response (and those from the others as well). The linked article is interesting, and I’m glad I didn’t accept the offer in March 2021. Then I said that I might change my mind when it becomes as established product. Not much chance of changing my mind now, given the emerging evidence.
Dr Palmer and Dr Bhakdi think it is. A quote from the article linked above: –
‘We note that the damage mechanism is which emerges from the autopsy studies is not limited to COVID-19 vaccines only but is completely general—it must be expected to occur similarly with mRNA vaccines against any and all infectious pathogens. This technology has failed and must be abandoned.’
Dr Bhakdi said at a recent MD4CE meeting that the human immune system is already perfect & adding anything to it will displace the balance. Good health, good diet, clean water, sunshine, fresh air & exercise are the best things to promote a healthy immune system.
And now they are trying to make mRNA flu jabs and RSV jabs and God only knows what else?
If it is getting into the bloodstream and producing an immune response there, that would suggest it’s a flaw in the design, clearly other vaccinations into the arm are not triggering a response like this.
Or a flaw in the administration of the stabs – the individuals who have been fast tracked into the role of “stabber” have not been aspirating the needle to check for blood to ensure the tip has not entered a vessel.
Probably both. The spike protein itself is toxic, and the mRNA technique goes everywhere in the body and makes it produce whatever protein it is designed to produce, ad infinitum.
Professor Sukharit Bhakdi posted on his Telegram group that it is now possible to distinguish the spike protein generated via the jab and the spike protein from the virus. He calls it a game changer.
Why is it a game changer?
Pathology.
The dead can’t lie… Hence the push & rush to destroy the evidence via cremation.
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/10/1651
The autopsy in Dresden of the 76yr old which Will described seems to be the first instance where this method was applied and this result obtained.
Hence a game-changer to Bhakdi.
Not sure whether he doesn’t know about the one of the 55yr old, or whether that was later, then used the same method etc..
As I understand it SARS Cov-2 is a respiratory tract infection therefore the only exposure is ‘air side’ so it’s not clear to me how it would get into the blood stream. The disease attacks the lungs not the circulatory system.
The injection on the other had goes into the shoulder, it was supposed to remain local but we now know for a fact that it does not, so it’s reasonable to assume it is reaching the blood supply (unless there is some plausible other route around the body that bypasses the bloodstream).
So given the above two statements, it’s not clear how a natural infection in the respiratory tract would cause an immune response in the circulatory system (it’s this immune response which causes the clots I believe), however it is very clear how a jab would cause this.
It seems too obvious to be true in all honesty, would anyone like to comment on my reasoning?
You are right. It is idiotic to inject someone in the deltoid for a virus which attacks your respiratory system. Blood poisoning is the only result. Akin to cutting off your hand to save your foot from gangrene.
All of these quacksines contain poisons, that most people can’t pronounce or spell. They don’t do anything against a virus, hence the quacksinated making up the 90% death rate ‘from’ rona. Follow the money is what they mean by follow the science. The speed of science means the velocity of money which can be made.
Indeed, there is no plausible mechanism for how an injection in the deltoid can induce mucosal immunity in the respiratory tract. That is why a nasal vaccine would theoretically make more sense than an injectable one, but so far no successful one has emerged yet.
“The speed of science means the velocity of money which can be made.”
I do hope John Campbell calls in here because he really did not understand ‘the speed of science’ and I am sure your explanation will help him and many others. It has certainly enlightened me.
Many thanks.
Look at any development project. The balance between development itself and testing, fixing, certification, obtaining approvals etc is probably in the ratio of 20%:80%. The “speed of science” was only possible because they didn’t follow all the testing and certification stuff.
The virus can sometimes enter the circulatory system VIA the lungs, of course, but usually it does not do so in quantities anywhere near large enough to even approach the level of spike protein from the jabs.
Wow, just lovely. But it couldn’t be the “safe and effective” jabs, no. It MUST be the virus, climate change, working too hard (per Billy Joel), or maybe even karma. But not the jabs!
There’s even some blaming artificial sweeteners!
There are swathes of people I believe who should definitely take the booster without delay; yup!
Does that make me a good person or a bad one?
Blessed are the unvaccinated, for they shall inherit the earth. Or at least the west.
Peace of mind – not having to worry about every little twinge: blessedness indeed.
I’m feeling pretty blessed at the moment
Does anyone know why MPs continue to,think the covid vaccines are safe and effective when the data says otherwise. I continue to get responses from our Mp Simon Jupp to say the vaccines are safe and effective. Isn’t it the responsibility of the MPs to be current on their information about covid vaccines as they are being doled out to every Uk citizen despite not having an efficacy or safety data and certainly no long term data.
I have to admit, if I were an MP I sure would like to be on the right side of this debate when certain people are dragged into court and found guilty of criminal negligence, wouldn’t you?
Just lovely. Today I found out that one of my FB friends has congestive heart failure and was told she could die suddenly. She just turned 38. Kinda young to have something like that. Sure enough, she was jabbed about a year ago, then got a really bad case of Omicron shortly after that put her in the hospital. And now this. So much for “safe and effective”, right?
Why hasn’t anyone addressed the fact that the very nature of mRNA vaccines means that they will cause automatic damage to the body?
Consider this, the mRNA vaccines function by causing healthy cells to present pathogenic spike proteins on their surface so that the immune system will respond. What is the immune response? The destruction of that cell!
Therefore, ANY cell that takes in that mRNA material and starts to make spike proteins will be targeted for destruction by the immune system! Whether it is heart calls, blood vessel cells, organ cells, or nerve cells, if they present the spike protein, they will be destroyed!
So at BEST these shots make your immune system target arm muscle cells, and at worst your own immune system will be targetting what would normally be healthy cells all through out your body!