Parents will be able to sign up for jabs for their five to 11 year-olds within weeks amid a rise in Covid infections. MailOnline has more.
It comes after the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advised last month that healthy children in this age range should be offered a vaccine on a “non-urgent” basis.
The rollout, which is expected next month, will involve a special ‘paediatric formulation’ for young children, who will receive a lower dose of the vaccine, and be given two jabs 12 weeks apart.
Among at-risk children, who already receive the jab, adverse reactions are extremely rare. The Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) said “it is a very safe vaccine”.
HART has done a useful summary of the 28 child deaths reported to the U.S. vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS), which (even leaving to one side serious injuries) would raise questions about how safe the vaccines are for young people, particularly given the statistically zero risk to young children from COVID-19.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
JESUS FUCKING CHRIST. Just stop. You will damage perfectly healthy children who are at zero risk. It is not a sterilising vaccine, it is not long lasting and there is no benefit. JUST FUCKING STOP.
They just can’t let it go. They are mentally ill and can’t shake off the obsession.
No chance – this psychosis is nowhere near close to burning out. Bizarre beyond belief, but believe it. When it is plainly obvious, that currently, covid is little more than a cold (if that or ever) and has always been a very low risk to the young, then what possible point is there to vaccinating the young? Well you can only leave the answer to the so called conspiracy theorists or those that believe in supreme idiocy.
I don’t think they can stop. Have you ever tried to reason with a psychopath? Don’t bother. Just get your kids out of harms way and don’t let anyone approach them with a syringe. Sooner or later this small coterie of mad people will outlive their welcome on this planet. Natural selection has no room for them.
“Kind hearts and coronets”? For some, perhaps. For most, bow down to Poisoning For Profit.
Latest data shows that efficacy drops to 12% within 28 days for this age group.
https://youtu.be/lzMCstQ5VJw
I’m still hacked off that the Scottish Government are actively promoting the vaccine in this age cohort by sending out appointment letters. It makes no sense to me.
The fact this is not part of the conversation when people sign up to this now tells you everything you need to know. Informed Consent, wha?
As we know, admittedly understating adverse event collections are showing that the “side effects” are significantly less rare than those resulting from vaccines which have previously been withdrawn on safety grounds.
Even if these adverse events were as rare as the authorities like to pretend, they make the existence of any form of “vaccine” mandate or privileges of any kind for the “vaccinated” entirely improper.
It’s very difficult to decide whether consent is informed or not. But it is quite definitely not “free” by any legal understanding of the term, when those who do not consent are subjected to negative consequences and those who do consent receive any form of reward.
Parents who consent on behalf of their children need to consider their position very carefully. They are all exposing their child to a degree of risk. If they have made no effort to determine that risk (as measured against the risk to the child as a result of being infected with COVID), they are open to question.
Their position is made all the more difficult, if there is available evidence that the injections do not prevent COVID infection.
It makes some sort of sadistic sense if you accept that the “vaccines” are deliberately harmful.
Don’t think of this as people safeguarding the health of the citizens.
Think of this as people safeguarding the payment of their mortgages.
Parents who would consider signing their child up for the “trial”need to ask themselves if this is an acceptable path to go down, I would argue it isn’t as statistically there would be far more risk of the jab than of a virus for children in this age range.
Its quite depressing reading this article
It’s a crime.
Unlike the rest of the government employees, it’s always good to see that the Downticking Tosser does Saturdays.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10627157/Covid-UK-Marketing-executive-45-died-stroke-caused-AstraZeneca-jab.html
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-60757293
rare they say…
You need to be aware of the usage of rare and very rare when looking at adverse events associated with medication. Common means 1 in 10 to 1 in 100; uncommon means anywhere between 1 in 100 to 1 in 1000; rare means anywhere between 1 in 1000 to 1 in 10000. Very rare is 1 in 10000 to 1 in 100000.
see https://bnf.nice.org.uk/guidance/adverse-reactions-to-drugs.html
If there have been 50000 doses administered then there could be up to 50 adverse events or as few as 5. If there have been 50000000 doses administered there could be between 5000 and 50000 adverse events (from anaphylaxis to swelling and pain, note that these two extremes are recipient immune system mediated).
This will not save a single child (or adult) and yet may well injure or indeed kill an unknown number of children.
It is evil and there is no other word for it.
They have to empty the warehouse somehow.
Adults won’t take the shots, so try guilting the parents into doing it for their children.
Does anyone know what the dosage is for little children? There’s obviously a great deal of difference between a 5-year-old and an 11-year-old – but they appear to be categorised in the same way.
The dosage of spike protein for any mRNA test subject is totally unpredictable. It’s not like a traditional vaccine dose, in that the actual quantity of generated pathogenic spike protein has many unknowable variables.
Had some time – so I found the answer to my own questions (at least for Australia):
According to the Australian government: Children aged 5-11 receive a 2-dose, 10 microgram Pfizer vaccine; children aged 6-11 whose parents prefer Moderna receive a dose that is the same as the booster dose for adults.
Side effects following the Moderna vaccine are mild to moderate and do not last long, but may be more common than those following Pfizer vaccine.
So that’s okay then.
Current figures show that although about 50% of Australian children aged 5-11 have received their first dose (rising to as high as 62.63% in Tasmania), about only 16% have received the second (22.4% in Tasmania).
https://www.foxnews.com/media/ohio-woman-daughter-covid-vaccine-reaction-wheelchair
Don’t ever let them say they didn’t know.
Considering it’s optional I suggest pre-jab waivers to the 120k death or serious injury payments. I’m sick of subsidising other peoples stupidity.
“amid a rise in Covid infections. MailOnline”
a virus so deadly that a child needs a jab knocked out in 6 months but not sufficiently dangerous enough to stop boris having a party or apparently for russia and ukraine to have a ding dong. I’m not saying the media think the general population are stupid, but?
Well, here is one Papa Bear who is saying,
“Come anywhere near my children with that shit and I will kill you.”
Did you kill the air hostess who insisted you wear a face mask on her plane?
No. Why do you ask?
My thoughts on this, thinking of my two young children you understand, is this:
Stick your gunk up your hole.
Moms missed the memo. It’s “Do it FOR the Children!” not “Do it TO the children!”
Utterly disgusting. Any person at whatever level in the medical profession that supports this should hang their heads in fucking shame.
Anyone in JCVI who voted for this should be in prison.
This is just awful. The only reason that I can think of is that it is to do with some clause in the supply agreements and money. This is unbelievably cruel to the children who will be adversely impacted.
Jessica Rose in her substack “Unacceptable Jessica” reported today that the latest release of Pfizer clinical trial documents show that there were no genotoxicity or carcinogenicity studies done (Genotoxicity is descriptive of chemically-induced damage to genetic information that causes mutations¹ (a change in DNA sequence) and may lead to cancer.
Carcinogenicity is descriptive of the ability to induce cancer). These test were not carried out on the basis that previous vaccines did not result in these effects. However as she quite rightly points out mRNA injections are not vaccines and the formulations are novel in humans.
The Pfizer toxicology reports in animal studies show that there is a build up of spike protein in the ovaries between 0 and 48 hours. They did not look past 48 hours so no one knows what happens after that.
Consider the fact that when baby girls are born their ovaries already contain all the eggs that will be produced as they become adults, the long term implications are potentially catastrophic. Who in power is stand up to this – no one … not the media, not the politicians not the regulators. I am so sad.
“The only reason that I can think of is that it is to do with some clause in the supply agreements and money”
I have read that, if you can get a vaccine authorised for use in children, you are automatically indemnified against any later prosecution? If that’s true, it would seem to be a pretty decent reason to change the definition of a vaccine and push for what you are peddling to be given the green light, I think?
So why aren’t you raising and attempting to answer these (and many more) questions linked to this misguided EGT treatment for healthy kids, Will? This is a an investigative online journal, isn’t it – or is it?
Many appalling vaxx death and injury statistics were also beyond question 12 months ago, when it was already clear that at least 1 in 24,000 (possibly up to 1 in 2,400) were dying shortly after receiving the EGT. At that point no children had been vaxxed – there was a chance to change events. Today we might know a little more (including from the recent revelations from the the Pfizer documents) about long term impacts including inter-generational impacts on fertility, but not substantially more – and certainly not that much more than the deeply troubling vaxx stats available in March 2021. Unfortunately 12 months on millions of healthy kids have now been unnecessarily vaxxed.
Vaxxing 10 million schoolchildren always meant over 400 deaths (possibly up to 4,000, using the government’s own caveats) as sure as shooting them; but H.M.Gov kept rolling the vaxx out. H.M.Gov also knew (or should have known) the chances of kids under 10 dying from the EGT shot was up to 1000 times greater than dying from Covid; but it still kept rolling the vaxx out. As for LS – many BTLs had been posting and linking to damning info – but in Spring 2021 the 3 Monkey editorial policy applied.
When it comes to Ukraine 2022 we see Will, Noah, Toby and Ian tripping over each other to have a say (and endless rights of reply) despite their woeful lack of research or often the most basic grasp of the complex geopolitical, cultural, historical, legal and theoretical issues underpinning the conflict. Recent (almost daily) ATL polemics have been at best embarrassingly naive, and most could still have been so described even if penned by an O level politics student.
Yet when it comes to the ongoing, deliberate and calculated Pro-Pharma/Gatesian inspired slaughter and long term life changing injuries being dutifully inflicted on British kids for almost a year by the UK Government – SILENCE! Not one of these intrepid Pulitzer wannabes fighting the good fight for Ukraine dares venture anything resembling an opinion ever since Toby issued his gagging order in May 2021, confirming that this rag does not have either a pro or anti vaxx stance. You see Toby doesn’t want to upset his chum Boris, and this avowedly sceptical online mouthpiece is therefore content (on this most pressing moral, ethical and existential issue of our age) to fail time and again to uphold any semblance of principled journalistic (or even compassionate human) standards.
I can only hope when there is a Covid Public Inquisition (and there must be) the whole DS editorial team will be called to account. Given what they collectively knew, given what readers were telling them, and given their open advocacy for ‘free speech’ (sic) why did LS/DS choose to sit on the fence and simply report on the carnage rather than making a principled stand against government policy? Moreover, why does DS still fail to do so in March 2022 when there is absolutely no justification for the continued fence sitting as evidenced by this latest article? How many lives might have been saved if this LS/DS had embraced open vaxx-scepticism – and how many young lives are still to be unnecessarily lost because it hasn’t?
And if you honestly think it wouldn’t have made any difference one way or another, then that in itself is a very, very sad admission of the state of media affairs in 2022. Clearly the days when crusading journalists could change (or wanted to change) political or cultural landscapes have long gone, and they are now (for the most part) merely passive commentators and/or fully paid up government/corporate shills.
Meanwhile, look forward to another bland cut and paste from the Mail article in the coming days on the continuing EGT roll out – but not before several more lengthy op-eds telling us just how b’b’BAD to the bone Putin really is!
This is incredibly unfair. Will Jones in particular has done more here than any journalist in the mainstream media, putting himself at huge risk at times. Toby has had death threats. The DS has trodden a fine line, successfully, in disseminating a huge amount of data (eg via the Vaccine Safety roundup). Of course it has had to be careful and the result is that it’s one of the very few sites that has credibility with those in power. If it had been more openly ‘anti-vax’, we wouldn’t be reading your words here now. There’d BE no DS any more. Paypal would have withdrawn its facilities, as it has done to sites like The Expose. The DS is basically a group of volunteers, some of whom are now paid a small amount due to the contributions of those who send them 20 quid a month/whatever (do you?). The BTL comments here also allow individuals to say exactly what they think, and to supply more information. Could you manage to do that without criticising the site and biting the hand that feeds you?
Very diplomatically put, Deborah T.
I agree that Jones has been particularly good at getting crucial information out.
How is he putting himself at ‘huge risk’?
What has any of this to do with Finlayson’s points?
Good heavens. I understand that Young might like to have ‘credibility with those in power’, but what bearing does this have on truth and the potential harm being done to children and the jabbed in general? Who give a brass farthing whether this illegitimate regime ‘likes’ DS or ‘finds it credible’? These are criminals.
Why are you framing it this way? It would have been morally and rationally correct to be more openly anti this novel and experimental technology for a virus with a neglible infection fatality rate (not ‘anti-vax’).
I’m afraid this situation does not afford us the luxury of worrying about the likes of bloody Paypal. And why would there be no DS without the mighty Paypal? Other sites manage without poxy Paypal. There’s still an Expose, isn’t there? At least there was last time I looked.
Your post reads like an apology for cowardice.
This ‘donation shaming’ really is quite repugnant. With respect, it’s none of your bloody business.
Agreed.
Hold on a minute, Deborah. You just praised the DS for allowing individuals to say ‘exactly what they think’, then in the next breath you ask Finlayson to stop criticising the site. So which is it? Do you want freedom of expression or do you want to do away with dissent.
Moreover, do you understand the concept of loyal dissent and the value thereof? Or would you prefer everyone be in complete lockstep with no dissenting voices allowed? That’s a recipe for disaster.
“These are criminals.”
Well, they’re only criminals once found guilty of the crime of which they are accused.
So far, they haven’t even been accused of anything, never mind put on trial, or found guilty.
Let’s not get ahead of ourselves.
But yes, to you and me, they are “criminal” in every other sense. And in our court, they would already be in prison…
No, objectively speaking, they are criminals.
Yes, they have been accused of many things. Would you like me to remind you of their many crimes?
Irrelevant to the question of whether or not they are criminals. On a very basic level, if you catch someone robbing your house, but they evade trial and thus sentence, are they a criminal? Of course they are.
You’re confusing criminals with convicted criminals.
It’s okay, we’re doing fine. Truth and Objective moral norms exist, therefore we can know by their actions that they are guilty.
This assumes you ‘know’ something about their criminal activity. I agree with you. We have an objected standard by which to judge them by their actions and behaviour.
Again, you appear to be confusing criminals with convicted criminals.
Priceless! Toby feeds no-one but himself and his Tory chums. And who needs to take an ethical editorial stance when Deb T et al are around to defend the indefensible, eh? I remember you did the same last thing year as well, along with many other Toby acolytes on here who put preserving their little Social Media circle of fence sitters above journalistic integrity – and moreover the saving of young lives in the face of Toby’s editorial decision not to condemn the vaxx roll out to kids.
No I don’t. These were the righteous funders who slagged me last year, along with others (who presumably have more money than sense), demanding I stop criticising poor Toby (an old hack who knows fine well that BTL disagreement is what feeds to site’s hits) lest they lose ‘their’(sic) site. Such is the level of the uncritical naivety and ultimately selfishness sometimes displayed by some BTL. Toby had a chance to do the right thing in March 2021, and he blew it – or did he? Maybe his site was always about monitoring the lengths to which self proclaimed sceptics would be pushed until they eventually toed the line. Great daily fodder for government psy-ops, and possibly a nice source of side income? Who knows? All I do know is it failed when it mattered.
Thankfully other sources with more integrity didn’t desert journalistic ethics and took an informed stance that saw them thrown off platform after platform. Old fashioned ethics drove their output regardless of consequences, their articles well researched and hard hitting (a far cry from the second hand token gestures and graph wars of LS), and above all their policy DID make a difference. Website’s like Dr Vernon Coleman (who has received death threats and co-ordinated establishment slurs such as the hacking of his Wiki profile – and who works for free), like 21st Century Wire and like UK Column from which LS often shamelessly stole much of its info for its belated ’Vaccine Roundup’, which only appeared after BTL criticism anyway.
DS/LS original and often apologetic ATL output meanwhile remained way behind the curve (not as much as TCW, but that’s no complement) as if to prove ‘Tory Scepticism’ was the ultimate oxymoron. LS certainly did nothing pro-active to compare with UKC’s excellent MHRA database that placed the poorly presented Yellow Card figures into a searchable spreadsheet format updated every week now for over 13 months – but Toby is an opportunist, so such a concept is alien to him, he’d rather frolic with Delingpole.
As such LS will doubtless survive the upcoming Online Safety Act cull, and I guess that is the reward for operating a de facto controlled opposition in the interim. Now watch the under 5s drop like flies, and read about it later in vaccine roundup.
Two words come to mind: “Blind” and “Panic”.
Absolutely unbelievable. I thought this had been dropped.
Everybody involved in giving just one of these kids this poison , including the parents, is guilty of child abuse. Pure and simple.
We have surely lost the plot.
So we all did. Conveniently, the whole world is looking the other way and the agenda has been quietly brought back, through the back door. Like Winston Churchill famously/allegedly said, one can deal only with one sh… at a time, so while we were looking the other way, the back door was left unchecked. Et voila, it’s all here again.
“We” haven’t. Neither have they. They know what they are doing ands we know too. Depopulation. Do Not Comply is the watch-word.
Beyond evil – one runs out of words to describe this. Our daughter-in-law has already had a text about vaccinating our six-year-old grandson. To me, this is all incontrovertible evidence for the Great Reset (and its depopulation and transhumanism agenda).
It’s just Javid making some more money for himself and his ‘Government approved’ mates.
The jabbing of the 5-11 year olds has been on the cards for many months already. I’ve said it was coming, but, oh no… “the wheels of the bus are falling off” and “it’s all over!”
Stay tuned.. next week Tony Blair gets sent to prison.
Disgusting. Utterly, appallingly disgusting.
And, even worse, some contemptible parents (no doubt for money) have already handed over their children to be used in ”studies”.
There really are no words to describe………..
ABSOLUTELY NOT!
Any parent who allows this product to be given to their child and the child is injured or dies as a result is culpable along with the manufacturers and the Government in that childs injuries. There is now no excuse of ignorance regarding the nature of these products the information is available if you look. Any Parent allowing this to go into their child does so out of self interest not the health of the child
Yes, but you’re not taking the selfies for Facebook argument into account. Parents can take a ‘selfie’ with their children, add a ‘We’re all vaccinated’ caption, and sit back with a pinot grigio and watch as the likes and the hearts roll in.
In Scotland the appointment letters are out with a date and time for the child’s vax. No leaving it up to the parents to decide and book, nope, all done for you. I sincerely hope most don’t attend.
Who sent the appointment letters out? This is what people need to concentrate on, the heart of the matter. Who are the people arranging all this? They may live on your street.
How about having a protest/demo down at the JCVI/MHRA’s offices instead of Parliament Square for a change?
How about identifying the people making these decisions? There can’t be that many of them? Names, addresses….
As one of the Johnsons in ‘Blazing Saddles’ said ‘praire shit’!!