News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the 'climate emergency', public health 'crises' and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

5 min read
Subscribe to Listen

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

19 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 month ago

Ofcom faces accusations of curbing free speech after censuring the BBC for airing a joke on a satirical radio show, says the Telegraph.

Isn’t that what Ofcom is for? If not, what? Isn’t having a “chilling effect” on free speech the whole point of legislation and regulations and state bodies with power to regulate speech?

Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
1 month ago

Andy Burnham: Peter Lynch’s death is a tragedy
Andy Burnham: Henry Nowak’s death is a tragedy
Andy Burnham: Charlie’s Kirk’s death is a tragedy
Andy Burnham: Iryna Zarutska’s death is a tragedy
Andy Burnham: Ann Widdecombe’s death is a tragedy

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
1 month ago

“The UK’s quest to make nuclear fusion a reality is approaching the scale of the Manhattan Project as Britain competes with rivals across the globe, reveals Andrew Orlowski in the Telegraph.”

this will be a cash sink.

We already know how to build nukes but failed to do so for decades. The o es under construction are years late and £billions over budget.

Small nukes are in limbo awaiting bureaucratic sign off under health and safety laws. Perhaps it will take a decade and cost more than a mini nuke.

Meanwhile a poor and shrinking country try is to spent untold billions in a on speculative research. No doubt the proponents will say the input materials are cheap or free like wind and sunlight but to deliver juice will be hideously expensive.

Such a scheme, run by the government, will never yield a return snd like HS2 it will over run on all metrics

JXB
JXB
1 month ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Nuclear fission is unaffordable – it can only be built with massive (taxpayer) subsidies and guaranteed above wholesale market prices to ensure adequate return for private investors. And nuclear fission is well known technology.

So nuclear fusion which requires much more complex engineering and safeguards will be exorbitant.

Nuclear fusion has been “just a decade away” for the last 75 years. It is the fuel of the future… and always will be.

What problem do “small nukes” solve that full size coal and gas generation does not?

JohnK
JohnK
1 month ago
Reply to  JXB

It is real time – 150 million km away. We’ve got a bit of long term storage of it’s output, which some seem to worry about.

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 month ago

Burnham’s BBQ phone alert sparks chaos as 999 is swamped with calls

Mr Burnham said on Friday: ‘This evening, an emergency alert has been sent to people across England and Wales as the wildfire risk remains very high.

‘The request came directly from fire and rescue services… During this period of extreme heat, I’m asking everyone to take extra care.

Note his use of passive voice. It’s the difference between ‘It fell from my hands‘ and ‘I dropped it‘. Instead of ‘an emergency alert has been sent‘ how about ‘I authorised the emergency alert‘? Or perhaps even ‘I didn’t authorise it‘?

Note also him trying to shift the blame for the decision to broadcast the alert – again in passive voice: ‘The request came directly from fire and rescue services‘.

The alert text included: ‘Follow official updates and report signs of fire immediately by calling 999.‘ and then shock and surprise when people phone 999 to grass up the neighbour they hate for having another BBQ.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Apparently the current system was a Prime Ministerial initiative started in 2020

soundofreason
soundofreason
1 month ago

Yes, and I knew then that it would soon be abused.

JXB
JXB
1 month ago
Reply to  soundofreason

Of course having been inundated by alarmist media broadcasts, News reports of fires, it being all over the social media, but for the emergency alert we wouldn’t have known about it.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago
Reply to  JXB

Given that I don’t watch TV, that stupid alert was the only way they could contact me, short of sending round someone from TV Licensing.

Dinger64
Dinger64
1 month ago

“Water companies to charge more during droughts”

Oh, Thats a great!
Why bother fixing the leaking infrastructure or building new water storage when leaving it well alone will increase occurrences of drought and make the water companies richer, Fantastic idea by our illustrious government!

JXB
JXB
1 month ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Water company shareholders get richer as more profit is made. That means sell more water. Water that leaks into the ground doesn’t earn profit. Not supplying enough water to meet demand, ie in reading sales, does not earn profit. Putting prices up reduces consumption and therefore reduces profit.

All resources are scarce and must be rationed. The best and fairest way is the free market supply/demand/price mechanism. When demand exceeds supply, prices go up and demand falls. Or have no water – like there were no bog rolls during Covid because stores didn’t increase prices to stop panic buying, hoarding.

Alternatively we can have forced rationing – hosepipe bans, and/or water supply available only for so many hours a day.

Fixing leaks takes money. Price caps prevent water companies getting the revenue they need to cover costs. Yes, yes, filthy profits, CEOs salaries, blah, blah, blah.

The facts remain: regulation and price caps have a cost and are preventing water companies from being able to build infrastructure to separate surface drainage from sewage, replace 100 year old infrastructure, extract enough water – no new reservoirs allowed.

Monro
Monro
1 month ago

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/08/14/world/europe/russia-moldova-putin.html?searchResultPosition=2

‘Russian President Vladimir Putin told senior officials that Moscow’s goal for 2026 was the “collapse of NATO and the EU from within,” Putin outlined the goal during a secret briefing with senior Russian officials late last year.

Russia…spent hundreds of millions of euros looking to elect politicians dependent on the Kremlin and individuals linked to the criminal underworld. 

The operation…included training camps in Serbia, Bosnia and Russia, where Moldovans were recruited and, in some cases, trained to provoke unrest. Western intelligence officials linked some of the training to Russia’s GRU military intelligence service.

Moscow views Moldova as a potential foothold for operations against both Ukraine and Europe, while Putin still hopes to seize territory across southern Ukraine that would create a land bridge to the country.’

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

Why do you bother?

MajorMajor
MajorMajor
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

“Putin still hopes to seize territory across southern Ukraine that would create a land bridge to the country.”

What a great plan! Another five years of war, a few million corpses and he will have a land bridge to Moldova…!

Wow!

Clearly, this Putin guy is pure genius!

JXB
JXB
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

I don’t think the EU needs any help from Mr Putin it’s doing a fine job of self-immolation already.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago
Reply to  Monro

Can’t see why Putin would waste the energy, given that the EU is dismantling its worthwhile bits year on year.

stewart
stewart
1 month ago

Max Young on Guido Fawkes reveals the organisation-wide guide Cambridge University imposed to recruit more ‘diverse’ individuals – what critics call the “soft bigotry of low expectations”

Er, no. Not soft bigotry. Outright racism. Blatant discrimination.
If it was the other way around and white people were being favoured, we can be sure they wouldn’t be calling it “soft bigotry”

We need to abandon this moral bankruptcy quickly or we are gong to destroy our society.

We don’t accept this kind of behaviour in any other instance. We don’t think that the solution to bad behaviour is bad behaviour in response.

But it’s worse. There is no more racism against black people. All the things that are supposedly being corrected simply don’t exist. It’s a fantasy.

The current generation of white people are being punished for some wrongs of generations long gone. And the people receiving this positive discrimination haven’t suffered any wrong at all.

It’s madness and needs to stop.

stewart
stewart
1 month ago
Reply to  stewart

“There is no way to disarm any man except through guilt. Through that which he himself has accepted as guilt. If a man has ever stolen a dime, you can impose on him the punishment intended for a bank robber and he will take it. He’ll bear any form of misery, he’ll feel that he deserves no better.

If there is not enough guilt in the world, we must create it. If we teach a man that it’s evil to look at spring flowers and he believes us and then does it, we’ll be able to do whatever we please with him. He won’t defend himself. He won’t feel he’s worth it ”

From Atlas Shrugged.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.