News Round-Up

A summary of the most interesting stories in the past 24 hours that challenge the prevailing orthodoxy about the 'climate emergency', public health 'crises' and the supposed moral defects of Western civilisation.

8 min read
Subscribe to Listen

If you have any tips for inclusion in the round-up, email us here.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

33 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Heretic
Heretic
1 month ago

Burnham’s water nationalisation ‘risks costing taxpayers £140 billion’” 

What would people rather have: our water supplies owned by FOREIGN COMPANIES operating solely to profit their shareholders, or our water supplies owned by THE BRITISH TAXPAYERS?

Personally, I don’t care how much it costs to re-nationalise England’s water supply, because Scotland & Wales already have a nationalised water supply like EVERY OTHER NORMAL COUNTRY IN THE WORLD. Privatisation of basic human survival requirements like water was a stupid idea in the first place.

Here’s who owns Britain’s water supply now:

Failures of privatisation | We Own It

comment image

Heretic
Heretic
1 month ago
Reply to  Heretic

Pennon Group Plc: Shareholders, Shareholding Structure – MarketScreener

If you scroll down that page, you will see a pie-diagram showing exactly how much of the Pennon Group is owned by which country. Notice the “CH 4.1%” pie segment is strangely omitted from the list of countries later. I assume it means “China” owns 4.1% of Pennon Group, which owns Britain’s South West Water, the most expensive in the country.

Now, I ask you, since a few years ago there were reports that gigantic Chinese ocean-going barges were scooping up millions of tonnes of fresh water from the US Great Lakes and carting it all the way back to China, is it possible that some of England’s water is also being secretly carted away by foreign companies?
Just wondering…

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago

‘Cambridge to review its hiring processes…’
Presumably, they’ve just cottoned on to the necessity of checking out claims made about achievements, qualifications and the like?
Those dreaming spires must be conducive to sleeping on the job.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago

I was left wondering why Dawn French and Lenny Henry split up. Did they tire of trying to ‘out-progressive’ each other?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 month ago
Reply to  stillonlplates

She does appear to be frightful bore.

Arum
Arum
1 month ago
Reply to  stillonlplates

I think it may have been Julie Burchill who said ‘fancy living with Lenny Henry and still not being the funniest person in the house’

BillT
BillT
1 month ago

innit

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 month ago

In the Spectator, Ross Clark argues that while he will fight the nanny state on many fronts, Westminster’s stance on vertical drinking is not the hill to die on.”

Disagree completely based on the below. Slippery slope.

What is being proposed?
In the draft plans, WCC said it wanted to “discourage excessive drunkenness and encourage the provision of more seating in premises that serve alcohol for people to sit and enjoy a drink and order food by table service in place of open bar space that caters for high volume vertical drinking”.
One policy is to refuse pub, bar, fast food or music venue licences in an area known as the “West End cumulative impact zone”: an area roughly between Oxford Street and Trafalgar Square, taking in Leicester Square and Soho.

“The introduction of measures to reduce the extent of, or to remove opportunities for, vertical drinking could address the underlying reasons for the policy,” the document reads.
The guidance suggests applicants for new licences should aim for “a predominantly seated operation with fixed seating”, alongside waiter service replacing vertical drinking and restrictions on customers consuming alcohol while standing.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 month ago

Vertical drinking FFS !

Well it’s better than horizontal drinking which tends to make a mess of the shirt.

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 month ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

FFS indeed

Dinger64
Dinger64
1 month ago

Why are Jason Arday and Miatta Fahnbulleh never seen together?
Maybe he claims to be her!

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
1 month ago

Woke leftists like O’Brien never accept responsibility for anything so it must be forced upon him.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

I was surprised that he’d admitted to feeling like a ‘mug’, although the snippets I’ve seen of him suggests he often acts like one.

huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
1 month ago
Reply to  stillonlplates

O’brien is what’s known as a first class cnut.

Dinger64
Dinger64
1 month ago

“No, Westminster isn’t banning ‘vertical drinking”

I start off vertical drinking but usually end up horizontal!

Luddite
Luddite
1 month ago
Reply to  Dinger64

If you order from your table it will all be cashless. Hidden agenda maybe.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 month ago
Reply to  Luddite

Its the Wetherspoons serving model, and I haven’t heard anyone complain. Seriously though, there shouldn’t be anything to stop you from standing at the bar and boring everyone while getting steamed. You get to have all kinds of chats with all kinds of friends and strangers,.

Luddite
Luddite
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

You missed the point.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago
Reply to  Dinger64

Considering the restrictions imposed by my weekly allowance, I have not even bothered to look up what ‘vertical drinking’ is.

Dinger64
Dinger64
1 month ago

“The Swedish climate activist, 23, was quickly identified by fellow fans despite her disguise at the Belfast gig”

by the time I was 23 i was a fully qualified city and guilds carpenter and joiner, what exactly is Thunbergs trade/job title/training/student status/career? so she pays her way by being a “climate activist”..how?
Just like music bands fame doesn’t last for ever, what is she going to do for a real living when this craze is over?

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago
Reply to  Dinger64

I was wondering how she got to Belfast from Gaza. Did she swim, or hitch a cruise on a solar-powered yacht?
Also, what does she earn so as to buy concert tickets?
And, finally, why Kneecap and Bob Vylan?
She’s a very mixed-up girl/goblin.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 month ago

Labour looks to row back on Net Zero targets” 

The Secretary is a fully paid up Marxist Green Nutter in the mould of the previous incumbent. Toning down the Nett Zero nonsense will not sit well with her.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 month ago

Archbishop Sarah Mullally is making the same error as Justin Welby on slavery reparations

A foolish woman, who succeeded a foolish man, about to give away £100m to people who don’t deserve it, instead of using it to do good things in this country for people who do.

Mrs GHC
Mrs GHC
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

Well said – expecting dwindling congregations to carry out heroic fundraising in order to keep their historical church buildings from falling down.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

She’s wearing the same skirt, so why would the policy be different?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 month ago

90-second power failure triggers two days of rail chaos

I did hear from someone who knows something that the back up diesel generators had no diesel fuel in them, and that was just as well as they hadn’t been tested since before lockdown. He may be talking nonsense, of course. But then again…

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 month ago
EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

How much per annum would a nationalised water industry lose.

stillonlplates
stillonlplates
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

With that sort of money involved, wouldn’t it be cheaper if we all just bought, drank and bathed in the bottled stuff?

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 month ago
Reply to  stillonlplates

Its the sort of question Rory Sutherland would pose. Back in the days of the ONDigital ITV sports spin off, they reckoned that some of the lesser watched games were costing more than hiring coaches to take the viewers to watch it in real life, along with a slap up meal and a taxi home.

stewart
stewart
1 month ago

With almost two-thirds of Britons believing the social contract is broken and a third calling for communist revolution, Ed West in the Spectator argues that the deeper cause lies in the erosion of shared national identity.

I don’t think so. Back in the 1930s there was a very strong national identity and communism was thriving.

It’s not complicated. There are plenty of people who would rather have things given to them than have to work for them, who envy those who do better than them and who would rather do things by force than by voluntary agreement.

And from time to time they organise and become a force.

NeilParkin
NeilParkin
1 month ago
Reply to  stewart

It is as much about the incessant enfeebling of our nation. The rise of communism in the 1930’s came from the hangover of the Great War, and economic depression through the 1920’s to the Great Depression of 1931 and subsequent years. People who have the same feelings band together often around a simple solution (‘smash it up and start again’). When emotions are high, moderate considered voices are not heard.

EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
1 month ago
Reply to  NeilParkin

The British economic performance between the wars was not great snd in some industries, in some years it was dire. According to the internet:

Between 1928 and 1939, the UK economy experienced the turbulence of the Great Depression followed by a steady domestic-led recovery. Nominal GDP fluctuated roughly between £4.5 billion and over £5.5 billion. Unlike the US or Germany, Britain suffered a milder output drop (around 6%), bouncing back after abandoning the gold standard in 1931.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.