Dua Lipa’s “Banned” Books Are a Joke

Not only are Dua Lipa's "banned" books not banned, most of them are the opposite, says Nick Dixon: approved literature pushing regime propaganda. They sit uncomfortably next to some true classics.

5 min read

The moment I heard Dua Lipa was curating a list of “banned” books, the first thing I knew for certain was that these books would definitely not be, in fact, banned.

For a start it’s a tautology to point out that if they were banned she couldn’t easily get hold of them and display them in a famous bookshop (Livraria Lello in Porto).

Secondly, there’s zero chance a famous mainstream pop star would decide to obliterate her career with anything genuinely controversial. ‘The Dua Lipa David Irving Collection’ would make a funny meme — as when dense and edgy political viewpoints are jokingly attributed online to Sydney Sweeney or Lana Del Rey — but it would likely not be much of a career boost.

And thirdly, I am dimly aware of similarly-named sections in high street bookshops, which invariably contain the least banned books on the planet.

Hence I was able to guess much of Lipa’s list without even seeing it (A Clockwork Orange, 1984 etc.), yet it turned out to be even more mainstream than I imagined. These are books I studied at school (The Handmaid’s Tale) and university (Invisible Man, Things Fall Apart).

Which doesn’t mean they’re all bad, nor do I really mind that they weren’t all literally banned. As Vogue Adria explains: “The collection also includes books that may never have been formally banned but have nevertheless questioned existing structures of power or the suppression of individual and collective voices.”

What I do mind is that the list borrows the cachet of works that are bold artistic achievements, some published in genuinely hostile circumstances, and segues into books that uphold the current ideological orthodoxy.

This is most notable in the ‘Voice’ section, which, we’re told, “amplifies voices that have historically or systematically been marginalised, excluded or underrepresented”.

Here we have Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, but also works like Gender Queer by Maia Kobabe and Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You by Jason Reynolds and Ibram X. Kendi. Thus Lipa, or whoever has helped her come up with this list, attempts a sleight of hand. The implication is that the liberal era of individual genius and freedom of expression leads naturally to the woke era of radical Leftism, aggressive conformity and cancel culture.

Of course there are postliberal thinkers who would agree with this, but they would mean it in the negative sense that liberalism’s inherent logic guaranteed its own demise in the form of Woke. Others, like Andrew Doyle, believe Woke is a hard break with liberalism — a hostile force attacking it from the outside.

Lipa’s list falls within the first camp, with the key distinction that she is implicitly claiming this progression into Woke is a good thing. Just as few woke ideologues even now will admit to being against free speech, Lipa knows that there is something good and important about the literary achievements of the past, and tries to harness that energy to bolster the oppressive contemporary ideology her list ultimately advocates.

We can see this hypocrisy in, for example, the fact that publishers have relentlessly weeded out the Salingers of today. Catcher would be instantly dismissed as the narcissistic ramblings of a privileged white male, and would not have a hope of being published. In that sense it really is ‘banned’ in spirit, but that is certainly not what Lipa means by the term.

William Burroughs also features, yet he would definitely be cancelled today, and probably be in jail (the latter perhaps a reasonable outcome from shooting your wife in the head). Burroughs’s Naked Lunch is in the “Control” section, along with Kafka’s The Trial. These are apparently works that “explore the mechanisms of control, both visible and invisible, including surveillance, propaganda, technological influence and ideological conditioning”.

It’s hard not to laugh at the last part, in a list stuffed with works on decolonisation, ‘antiracism’ and gender ideology. But there is also little evidence the woke authors on this list offer a real critique of bureaucracy or technocracy, and typically the woke were the most fierce enforcers of state tyranny during the Covid era (along with Piers Morgan).

The Handmaid’s Tale also appears in this section, and is the perfect representative of the whole list. It imagines an oppressive Christian patriarchy which in many ways resembles the real Islamic patriarchies that are in operation in parts of the world right now. As with Lipa’s list, it is far safer to create a straw man opponent and pretend you’re ‘banned’.

This is why the one genuinely brave choice on the list is Salman Rushdie’s The Satanic Verses. One key distinction between the liberal and woke eras has been the latter’s tendency to ignore Islamic oppression in favour of viewing all Muslims as victims of the West. Rushdie exists on the faultline between these two worldviews, and it would have been typical for a list like this to duck controversy by not including him. This almost makes me think he is there by mistake, or perhaps it’s because Lipa’s library is in Portugal, where they may not have got the latest woke memo, much in the way that Michel Houellebecq is still allowed to be a literary star in France.

Rushdie’s horrific stabbing in 2022 proves that this book is still highly dangerous. The rest are largely classics that are no longer considered controversial, or, to the extent that they are, it is at the hands of the kinds of people behind the more recent works on the list. It is they who love to tear apart the canon and let loose ‘sensitivity readers’ upon the very giants on display here.

Lipa doesn’t look like she eats a great deal of cake, and that is to her credit, but here she is trying to have her cake and eat it. You either celebrate beauty, individual expression and artistic risk, or ‘identity’, ideological conformity and activism posing as art. You can’t have both.

Subscribe to Nick’s Substack here and follow him on X here. Check out his new website, Nick Reads: “For people who think books still matter. Literary analysis, cultural criticism and author deep dives.”

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

7 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Heretic
Heretic
2 months ago

English Patriot Paul Joseph Watson has done a 3-minute video about this on Rumble:

This Is Funny

stewart
stewart
2 months ago

It must be pretty stressful trying to stay at the very top of fame and relevance. I guess in the anxious probing around to be edgy and cool and interesting sooner or later you do some dumb things.

st27
st27
2 months ago

“Burroughs’s Naked Lunch is in the “Control” section, along with Kafka’s The Trial. These are apparently works that “explore the mechanisms of control, both visible and invisible, including surveillance, propaganda, technological influence and ideological conditioning”.”

Intrigued me enough to follow the link. Nah, not an Imipolex-scented whiff of Gravity’s Rainbow, neither under “Control” nor anywhere else. The unofficial Bible of anyone interested in the subject of “control”, with its weird sex and silly songs, must be too edgy for our Dua.

Which, were this even needed, casts doubt on the whole list.

Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
2 months ago

I must be old, I’ve only heard of a minority of the books mentioned.

Dua Lipa, a recent artist that I have heard of but like most similar people I listen to the music they create rather than follow their lives/politics/romances. I gather she married someone recently but I have forgotten who already.

Yes, I’m really feeling old these days.

FerdIII
FerdIII
2 months ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

Never heard of 2 hearts. Books mentioned – read quite a few including Rushdie’s which is a cryptic commentary on the political agreement mad Muhammad the military leader and sex jihadist made with the other pagans in Mecca. You worship your celestial bodies. I worship mine (the moon idol). Muhammadans kill over such blasphemy (after raping your wife and daughter).

No idea why anyone would listen to 2 hearts.

Free Lemming
Free Lemming
2 months ago

Looking at the image, I’m not sure whether Lipa wants to eat the books or have sex with them. I always thought you just read books, not paraded them around as if they’re dildos.

Heretic
Heretic
2 months ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

100% !!!

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.