Argentina’s Foreign Minister called Falklands Islanders an “artificially implanted” population in an essay demanding Britain hand over the territory. Which is rich coming from a country of European setters which massacred its indigenous population. The Telegraph has more.
Pablo Quirno said the 2013 referendum held on the archipelago, in which islanders chose to remain British, was illegitimate and called for negotiations over the Falklands’ future.
“Time does not transform an illegitimate occupation into sovereignty. Nor will it divide the territorial unity of the Argentine Republic,” Quirno argued in La Nacion, Argentina’s leading conservative paper.
He said that the 1982 war and the 2013 vote had failed to resolve the Falklands dispute, and added that sovereignty of the archipelago should not be decided by a “population artificially implanted by the occupying power”.
The essay, published ahead of a clash between the two countries in the World Cup on Wednesday, insists that the issue of the Falkland Islands will remain a priority of the Government.
It lays out Argentina’s legal claim over the Falklands, citing international law and regional bodies that have demanded peaceful negotiations to resolve the dispute.
“This commitment is coupled with an unwavering certainty: our claim will not be relinquished, resigned or abandoned,” Quirno writes.
“The Falkland Islands are history, territory, sea, memory and destiny. They are a promise between generations. They are the voice of a nation that knows how to wait without giving up and knows how to demand without surrendering.”
The essay represents the long-standing views of the Argentine Government. But it comes after the Falklands debate was reignited this year by reports that the Trump administration had discussed changing US policy on the islands.
The row over the islands was reinvigorated by members of the Argentine football team filmed singing last week that they would win the World Cup “for the Malvinas”.
In his essay, Quirno describes the Falkland Islands dispute as a “special and particular colonial situation, originating in the violation of Argentina’s territorial integrity”.
In 2013, 99.8% of Falklanders voted in favour of remaining a British Overseas Territory in an independence referendum. Argentina views the vote as a sham.
Quirno disputed any future referendums, saying that none “organised unilaterally by the UK can have legal effect” and that only negotiations between Argentina and Britain can decide its future. “We must not fall into the referendum trap,” he wrote.
A leaked Pentagon memo in April suggested the US was reviewing its position on the UK’s claim of sovereignty in retaliation for Britain’s stance on the Iran war.
Javier Milei, the Argentine President and a close ally of Donald Trump, insisted then that the islands “were, are and will always be Argentine”.
His deputy, Victoria Villarruel, went further, to say all Britons living on the island should “go back to England”.
The memo and statements from Argentinian leaders were heavily criticised by Downing Street, while veterans of the 1982 Falklands War accused Trump of “bullying”.
Worth reading in full.
Argentina of course is a country that consists almost entirely of European colonists and settlers, with the indigenous population today just 2.4%.
According to Genocide Watch:
Colonial Spain forced indigenous peoples off their lands to make way for Spanish settlers. After independence in 1816, successive governments continued this forced displacement of indigenous peoples. In the 1870s, President Julio Argentino Roca enacted the ‘Conquest of the Desert’, a military campaign that subjugated and enslaved Mapuche people living in the Pampas region and committed genocide against them. Some Argentines still view Roca as a ‘civilising figure’, and the Government continues to deny the Mapuche access to their land and cultural rights.
In the late 19th century, during the Tierra del Fuego Gold Rush, European settlers, in concert with the Argentine and Chilean governments, systematically exterminated the Ona, Yaghan and Haush peoples. The decimation of these indigenous populations is known today as the Selk’nam Genocide.
Which means the Argentine Government doesn’t have a leg to stand on in accusing another population of being “artificially implanted”. The British claim to the Falkland Islands, meanwhile, dates back to 1690.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Well according to the Falkland Islands government in our history – The first recorded landing on the uninhabited islands took place on West Falkland on 27 January 1690, when the English sea captain John Strong came ashore. Strong named the passage between the two Islands ‘Falkland’s Sound’ and Lord Falkland’s name later became attached to the entire main islands.
I may be wrong, but I think the year 1690 was before 1816.
Maybe Argentinians believe Argentina was founded in 1816 BC
It would not be regretted at all by the Uniparty if they could blame the US for handing over all the BOTs to country tries with no right to it.
on the matter of law, territory gained or won back through war become the property of the victor. If that rule were to be overturned all sorts of small and large disputes would arise.
Falklands and all other BOTs are ours until and unless we and the residents want to change that. And we don’t. Mid school politics has no place at the Cabinet table.
The Argentines define themselves as coming from the sea. Which is how the Falkland Islanders come to the Islands.
Contrast Argentine with Paraguay. The first Paraguayan dictator, Francia, a disciple of Rousseau, enacted laws to compel the Spanish population to marry the indigenous. This was to break Spanish power.
Well, they’ve avoided mentioning the Sea Lion Oil Field; I wonder why (a cynic might say).
Odd how a nation of colonial immigrants can claim sovereignty on land that has belonged to another nation since before it even existed and was never inhabited before that.
The islands were uninhabited. Then they were French and British occupied islands a full 30 years before Argentina existed as a country. Argentina has no claim over them.
Right in front of a football match you plums at the Telegraph.
*rolls-eyes
To which the appropriate response is: Foxtrot Oscar.
Timed for maximum exposure and also possibly probing for signs of weakness from Starmer, Burnham or whatever other international socialist puppet is pretending to be in charge.
ToF you are probably right. If Starmer’s big give-away was Chagos, maybe Burnham’s can be Las Malvinas. Las Malvinas seems to be trotted out there whenever a nationalistic political distraction is needed.
At a dinner towards the end of a liquid gas project I was involved in there in 2011, some British oaf asked if it was OK to talk about the 1982 war. ” Of course, ” replied our gracious Argentine ex-naval officer host, ” Our people in power were foolish enough to take on a nation that had a few hundred years’ history of fighting sea battles and winning. But go ahead, neither of us have any ships now, so there is no possibility of trying it again !”
The conversation from that point was quite polite until someone else mentioned the 1986 World Cup and Diego Maradona’s “Hand of God” …!