I write this from the Baltic coast of Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, just north of Rostock. In three months we’ll have state elections here, and Alternative für Deutschland is far and away the strongest party. The last poll pegged its numbers at 36%. The centre-Right Christian Democrats, meanwhile, are weaker here than in any other German state; they’ll be lucky if they scrape by in September with 10% of the vote.
Now, the CDU has never been that strong in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, but it owes its particular and present weakness largely to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Since the 2024 election campaign, Merz has taken the party in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern on a steady march down from a high of nearly 20% into the depths of its present misery. Along the way, Merz completed a process begun by his predecessors, Merkel and Scholz, namely the full and total social normalisation of the AfD across East Germany.
This past weekend – as it stares down an impending electoral embarrassment unprecedented in its history – the Meck-Pomm division of the CDU held its state party congress. Things are already bad enough for the poor Union blighters, but to make them worse Merz swooped in to deliver yet another of his bizarre gaffe-ridden speeches. He let slip various strange statements over the course of 40 minutes, but one passage of his speech in particular has me thinking that maybe I have had Merz wrong this whole time, and that maybe the man is actually not the most bumbling clown Chancellor the Federal Republic has ever had, but rather a deep-cover operative on a secret mission from the AfD to crash and burn the Union with no survivors.
In the middle of a standard lament about the demise of the “political middle”, Merz spent a few words deploring the ex-communists in Die Linke (presently polling at 13% in Meck-Pomm), before turning his ire to the Evil Nazi Hitler Fascists in the AfD:
And there is… a party… that stands in the tradition of the worst injustice our country has ever known in its history [emphasis mine]. A party that not only wants to return to the days before Helmut Kohl and Konrad Adenauer, but a party that questions everything that has made our country great and successful. We must engage more forcefully with this party. This phenomenon did not appear overnight and will not vanish by day’s end; rather, it poses the fundamental question of where the Federal Republic of Germany should move in the coming years and decades. And not everyone will be pleased when I quote a former prominent Green politician. But not everything has to be wrong simply because it comes from a Green. A few days ago, Joschka Fischer said on a talk show that this AfD wants to take Germany back to the time before Adenauer. Ladies and gentlemen, the time before Adenauer was a time of nationalism, a time of the worst excesses of that nationalism. With Konrad Adenauer, we left nationalism behind in Germany and we never want to go back there, which is why we will not leave our country to the extremists.
So, in order of ascending craziness: 1) Merz claims that the AfD wants to take us back to a pre-Adenauer nationalism, which is a roundabout allusion to National Socialism. Then, 2) as support for this claim, Merz cites a leading politician from the Greens, apparently forgetting that the Greens are among the most absolutely loathed parties in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern (presently polling at around 4%). And because that is not enough, he additionally 3) claims that the AfD “stands in the tradition of the worst injustice our country has ever known in its history”, which is a veiled way of saying that the AfD “stands in the tradition of” the Holocaust.
Set aside the fact that careless comparisons like this are a terrible idea, because they always entail the risk of legal consequences, many AfD supporters in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern are former CDU voters. It is a very bold strategy to set about winning these people back by calling them a bunch of genocidal Nazis. Then we must remember, as I said above, that the AfD has become a totally normal party in the East, and that talking in this way about the AfD here just makes you look out of touch or crazy (or both). And finally, I would just like to know practically what Merz thinks is supposed to happen after the September vote. He spent his party congress speech railing against Die Linke and the AfD, two parties which between them are almost certain to win over half the seats in the state parliament. The Union with its morally ambitious firewalls is on the verge of walling itself off from most of the Eastern electorate, railing against phantom Nazis the whole time.
Merz is a secret AfD agent, that’s the only way to explain this. He’s working hard to get the Evil Fascist Nazi Hitler party an outright majority by September. It’s not an easy task, but if anyone can do it he can.
This article originally appeared on Eugyppius’s Substack newsletter. You can subscribe here.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It is so curious, is it not, that AfD and in this country, Reform are meant to be at worst supporters of Putin, at least apologists, mainly because they don’t accept the EU destabilisation of Ukraine when it was more pro-Moscow than Brussels and are worried about endless, unconditional support for Zelenskyy. But Putin said he went into Ukraine to de-Nazify the country, especially units like the Azov Battalion, that traces its roots to the SS Ukrainian units, and is the defacto Ukrainian national guard and was working in the pro-Russian Donbas region pretty brutally. So, AfD and Reform are far right neo-Nazis, but opposed to potential real Nazis, please make it make sense.
Nah. Putin and his people went into Ukraine to nick the resources of the Donbass, particularly the frackables. As for his published reasons – well -propaganda is Russian, innit?
Nothing to do with the fact that the people there are ethnically Russian, speak Russian and wanted to be part of Russia?
And had been banned from speaking Russian?
Nope.
You can speak Welsh and still want to be British. And they voted
One of the advantages of being signed up to the Universal Davos Policy was that it came with a universal playbook. People who opposed your politics were barbarians, or extremists, or even ‘gammons’.
Some politicians have not yet realised that the Universal Davos Policy was just a passing fashion and that the playbook no longer has the power it once had.
Here in a little holiday village in Crete I ask one of my German neighbours, who is from Augsburg, what he thinks of Merz. “I like him. He knows how to be a leader.”
Oh, good.
Seriously though, is Alternativ as pro-Putin as our press makes out?
Whenever the self regarding elites or their friends in the media tell you an opponent is evil it is likely to be fabricated.
Yes, fabricated, and probably projection, i.e. an attempt to distract your attention from the fact that they are guilty of the very same.
Accuse your enemy of that of which you are guilty. Göbbels
All “pro-Putin” means is being sceptical about western propaganda, much of which is absurd, egregious and mendacious in the extreme.
Merz is the spit of Himmler, isn’t he?
So in Germany, if you are Merz and accuse people of being Nazi’s, even though they aren’t at all, that is fine.
But if you are an author like C J Hopkins and suggest that the government during covid have acted in ways that are reminiscent of things the Nazi’s did, which they did, then you are hounded down by the judiciary, potentially sent to prison and your life destroyed.
I’m just wondering whether there is any place left where the establishment isn’t resorting to wholesale gaslighting.
Tricky one, that. The day of the week?
Accuse, or just lay out the facts, like Reiner Fuellmich?