Exposed: Starmer’s Misinformation Mafia

A new briefing by David Rose exposes a shadowy network of campaign groups with close links to Sir Keir Starmer and Morgan McSweeney that lobbied for censorship while circulating defamatory smears against journalists.

2 min read

The people demanding governments censor the internet to cleanse it of ‘fake news’ have been caught spreading disinformation of their own.

A new briefing by former investigative journalist David Rose for the Free Speech Union exposes a shadowy network of think tanks and campaign groups with close links to Sir Keir Starmer – and with Morgan McSweeney at its centre – that has spent years lobbying for online censorship while circulating defamatory smears against journalists and political opponents.

Josh Simons, an ex-Cabinet Office minister and former head of Labour Together, a think tank founded by McSweeney, commissioned a secret report from PR firm APCO Worldwide that falsely accused eight journalists who’d been critical of Starmer and his “extreme centrism” of being covert Russian “assets”. Simons passed the false claims to GCHQ. When Starmer’s “ethics adviser” was asked to investigate Simons, he exonerated him despite never reading key evidence submitted to him by one of Simons’s journalist victims. The adviser has since refused to reopen the inquiry in spite of calls to do so by Labour MPs.

McSweeney also founded The Center for Countering Digital Hate, which destroyed media outlets critical of Starmer by pressing advertisers to boycott them on the grounds they were “funding hate”. The CCDH enjoyed privileged access to the Biden White House and convinced US officials to “flag” inconvenient social media content as “misinformation” and press for its removal. CCDH’s head, Imran Ahmed, who once shared an office with McSweeney, currently faces deportation from the US for allegedly censoring American citizens and infringing the First Amendment.

Then there’s Christopher Steele, the ex-British spy behind the Trump Russiagate dossier, who has written smears about British public figures in return for cash. One such calumny, sent to Liam Byrne MP, was read out in the Commons under Parliamentary privilege, leading to an innocent man and business rival of one of Steele’s paying clients losing £8 million.

Morgan McSweeney. Josh Simons. Kate Forrester – who ran APCO’s London office. Imran Ahmed. Christopher Steele. Liam Byrne MP. Many of these people were behind the censorious Online Safety Act and are now lobbying Starmer to make it even more extreme.

Read David’s report, and you can hear him talking to former shadow Labour Chancellor John McDonnell about the sinister Labour hit squad behind Starmer’s rise to power in the latest FSU podcast.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

3 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
shred
shred
4 months ago

McSweeny’s Digital Hate or Hope/Hate outfit has complained to the US publisher of author Simon Elmer and his books have been cancelled because they warn about the Muslim takeover of Britain. Apparently this is racist. The US chief is facing deportation.

st27
st27
4 months ago

Good on David Rose for doing this. There’s also a lot of info I’ve been following from Paul Thacker and Sayer Ji on Substack.

CCDH aka Labour Together (the two are heavily intertwined) made the mistake of sticking their dirty little fingers into US politics: the resulting DoJ attention (and civil suits) have produced disclosure of their dirty little methods.

Why is no-one forcing this disclosure over here?

Be in no doubt: the OSA was a vehicle for censoring political opponents from the start, and so is the current hysteria about age restrictions. Nothing to do with the Cheeeeldren or Haaaaate at all.

pjar
pjar
4 months ago

According to The Times, the police have collared somebody for selling McSweeny’s mobile phone. Hopefully, they may be able to recover it as it’s hard to prove you’ve sold something, if it doesn’t exist? Which, in turn, suggests that they might be able to recover the messages… just in time to bury them under the local election results, perhaps?

Oh, look… a squirrel…

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.