Confidential medical data belonging to half a million UK citizens has been breached from UK Biobank and put up for sale on a Chinese website, with the Government unable to guarantee individuals cannot be identified. The Mail has more.
The UK Biobank holds de-identified biological samples and health data of 500,000 volunteers – used to advance cancer, dementia and Parkinson’s care.
But Technology Minister Ian Murray announced today there has been a large-scale data breach which resulted in highly confidential information being leaked.
The data have been found for sale on three separate listings on the Chinese e-commerce site Alibaba on Monday April 20th.
“At least one of these three datasets appeared to contain data from all 500,000 UK Biobank volunteers,” Murray told the House of Commons.
“Additional listings offer support for applying for legitimate access to UK Biobank or analytical support for researchers who already have access to the data.
“I want to reassure the House up front however, that Biobank has advised that these data did not contain participants, names, addresses, contact details or telephone numbers.”
He added that the Government has today spoken to the vendor and does not believe there were any purchases from the three listings before they were taken down.
But according to reporting by the Times, Government sources have slammed the Biobank’s security arrangements, labelling them “extremely lax”.
Responding to the news, Dame Chi Onwurah, Science, Innovation and Technology Committee Chair, said: “It’s deeply concerning to learn that the highly sensitive data held by the biobank has not been subject to proper controls.
“My committee has carried out extensive scrutiny of public sector information security and data hygiene, and in February Ian Murray and Government officials assured us that standards would improve, and public data would be better protected.
“Today’s statement, however, demonstrates just how little progress has been made.
“It raises serious questions about whether lessons have been learned from repeated data breaches and leaks, and whether robust data management practices are being enforced at publicly funded bodies.
“Public trust in the handling of sensitive data is handled [sic] is key to the Government’s digital transformation ambitions. This is another blow to public confidence.”
But Professor Sir Rory Collins, Chief Executive and Principal Investigator at Biobank, maintains it takes data protection “extremely seriously”.
“Last week, we found that de-identified participant data made available to researchers at three academic institutions were listed for sale on a consumer website in China, owned by Alibaba,” he said.
“This is a clear breach of the contract signed by these academic institutions and they, along with the individuals involved, have had their access suspended.”
Datasets including gender, age, month, birth year, socio-economic status, lifestyle habits and measures from biological samples were included in the breach.
As a result, Murray said he could not guarantee that no one can be identified from the data.
Worth reading in full.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
What a surprise (not).
Your personal data is not safe and not protected by the State. Don’t ever give them your data voluntarily.
Well where do you think all the data AI is supposedly gathering come from. Anybody know? If AI is supposed to be the be all in intelligence well guess what, unless they hold every piece of data known to man, including the details of those in studies, they are not holding all intelligence. They have to get heir grubby little hands on all data. But if you insist on blaming this on China, the boogeyman, go ahead.
Digital ID anyone?
ID cards anybody?
You already have one, it is a drivers licencse or passport
I thought all right thinking people believed that genetics was discredited racist pseudoscience. Surely if you can identify as the opposite sex you can identify as healthy?
Genetics can make predictions about susceptibility to illness but apparently not about intelligence, tendency towards antisocial behaviour. Ok.
UK universities are corrupt and incompetent. The UK medical authorities are corrupt and incompetent.
We have had plenty of evidence of this already.
People should draw the appropriate conclusions.
It was not China💖