Premium

10 Stupid Studies Costing £23 Million That Rachel Reeves Could Have Easily Cut

The Government is wasting astronomical sums of money and has no excuse to tax the nation more, says Charlotte Gill. Behold, here are 10 examples of stupid university projects costing taxpayers £23 million.

6 min read

With Rachel Reeves's stern words from Downing Street on Tuesday, many are wondering if she’s about to hike income tax. It seems pretty clear she’s about to put some sort of tax up in the autumn Budget. Reeves’s justification for doing so is that “the world has thrown even more challenges our way”; it’s the usual guff, as though an act of God were the only reason the UK’s economy is in disarray. But the Government is also wasting astronomical sums of money and has no excuse to tax the nation more. Behold, here are 10 examples of what we’re currently being charged for, totalling £23 million (and there’s a lot more where that came from). These are university studies, either funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council or the UKRI Future Leaders Fellowship.

£4,092,635 – The Centre for People’s Justice, University of Liverpool (Apr 25-Apr 30)

The Centre is a “coalition of over 45 organisations from community, business, philanthropic, cultural, artistic, charitable, legal, government and university sectors”, led by the University of Liverpool Law School. It “pursues change-making research that responds to the public’s need and desire for fairer, safer and more inclusive societies”, and offers “Social Justice PhDs” – just what UK taxpayers are crying out for!

£3,304,309 – Ending Extreme Poverty through Social Protection? Experimental Evidence from 10-year Nationwide Randomised Cash Transfers in Rwanda and Malawi, University of Oxford (Nov 24-Nov 28)

The project, which began in

Keep reading –
Donate £5 monthly
or £50 annually

Subscribe today to get unlimited online access, as well as our Premium newsletters and podcasts.

  • Read paywalled articles
  • Comment below the line and connect with other users
  • Watch and listen to the longer Premium version of our weekly podcast
  • Listen to every article
  • Receive Premium version of our daily newsletter
DONATE NOW

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
RTSC
RTSC
10 months ago

This kind of nonsense is precisely why I gave up my “little” post-retirement job a few months ago and now have a life of leisure, which is simplified so that I pay as little tax as I possibly can.

As a child, my parents taught me that there are two main ways of having more money: earn more, or spend less. It’s obvious that Theeves never learnt that lesson since she’s destroying the means of earning more and refuses to spend less.

I’m now operating both: my income is reduced, but so is my spending on VAT-attracting goods and services. I refuse to fund this Marxist Government’s profligacy any more than I absolutely have to.

And that is how an economy dies.

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
10 months ago

I read the titles and it makes me want to cry. They could be in a foreign language and would make as much sense.

RW
RW
10 months ago

I think the prevalence of art in these pseudo-studies is because the (post-)modern definition of art no longer relates to any particular ability to do anything (like painting pictures) but is basically do whatever you want (and then call it art). That’s evident in a statement like

creating benefits and opportunities for researchers, engagement practitioners and a wide range of research, cultural and community organisations

I mean, isn’t this absolutely great? Taxpayer-funded research to create benefits for tax-payer funded researchers, what more could the public possibly want? Only misers would want taxpayer-funded reasearch to create benefits for the public!

sskinner
sskinner
10 months ago
Reply to  RW

“creating benefits and opportunities for researchers, engagement practitioners and a wide range of research, cultural and community organisations”
How would Da Vinci describe how he worked and the benefits of what he produced.

RW
RW
10 months ago
Reply to  sskinner

?

Presumably, that he worked as painter to produce paintings commissioned by people who wanted to have a painting of something because that was what he did.

Boomer Bloke
Boomer Bloke
10 months ago

Then there are all the anti white racist and delusional trans promoting programmes otherwise known as DEI throughout the police, judiciary, civil service and the rest of the public sector, worth a few million, Ukraine, Chagos, COP 30 and all the other net zero nonsense including subsidies for renewables, millions to France for doing nothing about illegal immigration from their shores, millions in overseas aid everywhere because reasons, millions to Ed Milliband’s travel budget. And so it goes on…

FerdIII
FerdIII
10 months ago
Reply to  Boomer Bloke

Follow that money. These waste of time, low IQ, White/Anglo phobic ‘projects’ are in the main money laundering exercises and propaganda. Endless government leads inevitably to this not so glittering scum of bird exrement floating on the polluted pond of secular culture.

Hester
Hester
10 months ago

my guess is that’s just the tip of the iceberg

Gezza England
Gezza England
10 months ago
Reply to  Hester

I was thinking it is just the edge of the black hole.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.