A biologically male trans woman who kept her gender secret before sex acts with a man has been found guilty of sexual assault. The Mail has the story.
Ciara Watkin, 21, of Stockton-on-Tees, was found guilty of multiple charges relating to sex acts [he] performed on the 21 year-old man over a number of days in June 2022.
The sexual assault charges were brought at Teesside Crown Court today after Watkin failed to disclose [his] transgender status to the man, which meant he could not have given informed consent.
After drinking and getting to know each other, the pair went to a bedroom, where Watkin told the defendant [he] was on [his] period, preventing him from touching [him] below the waist as [he] performed sex acts on him.
A few days later, Watkin attended the victim’s home where further sexual activity took place. The victim’s mother and friends had met Watkin and suspected [he] was trans, the court heard.
Watkin then blocked all contact with the man but eventually got back in touch with him, before telling him via text that [he] was trans and had male genitalia.
The victim, who was described as a “naive young man”, said the revelation left him feeling sick and told the police that he “didn’t swing that way”. …
A jury at Teesside Crown Court convicted Watkin of two counts of sexual assault and one of assault by penetration.
Watkin was granted bail but the judge said “jail was the overwhelming likelihood”.
The judge urged the prison authorities to consider the “very real management issues” that jailing the defendant will pose.
Is he 21 now or was he 21 when the crime was committed in June 2022? He could have been 18.
ellie-em
1 year ago
Hehe, the poor victim was expecting the person on the left…and horror…the fella on the right turned up.
Doesn’t explain why the victim went back for seconds 🤮
CazT
1 year ago
The complainant must have been desperate to go with this object – you’d have to be blind not to notice his ‘gender’ if he was wearing those leggings! I presume the reporter failed to notice use the word ‘her’ in the first sentence before going on to use the masculine denominator elsewhere.
RTSC
1 year ago
Seriously …. how could any “normal” young man possibly fancy that, if IF he thought it was female?
I guess he was not a ‘normal’ young man and could not believe his ‘luck’. If the man was in a vulnerable group then the sentence could be high to reflect this.
Jonathan M
1 year ago
Every time someone claims that “transwomen are women” he or she should be shown these photos.
Jackthegripper
1 year ago
Even with beer goggles on I’d be able to see that was a fat pig ugly geezer.
Crispin
1 year ago
Wow, what a stunner! Over several days, it’s given me the shivers.
Corky Ringspot
1 year ago
My God! Another biblical-style flood is necessary. Difficult also to feel sympathy for the ‘victim’ of this creature’s perversion.
I wonder, also, why Richard Eldred uses the feminine possessive adjective and the term “gender”, when what he’s talking about is ‘SEX’! (‘Gender’ for language studies, ‘sex’ for everything else – how many times??!!)
Cargocultist
1 year ago
Pwoar! Lucky guy! I can’t understand why he complained…
BillT
1 year ago
Plus it looks like it’s got a dangler, possibly hidden behind the handbag.
BillT
1 year ago
Drinking? I couldn’t swallow enough beer to get the goggles operating!
Mogwai
1 year ago
I don’t understand. What difference does it make if this person is trans or not when the guy ( was he registered blind or something?🙈 ) consented to the “sex acts”? How does this then get spun to be classed as a sexual assault? This is a new one on me, unless the definition’s changed when I wasn’t looking.😳
“…further sexual activity took place.” Sounds all totally consensual to me. The guy even went back for more!🤦♀️
…and AFTER his mother and friends had told him she was probably a he! Sorry, I really shouldn’t laugh, but I can’t help it. If the lad was a kid, I’d be angry, but this is just hilarious!
I tend to believe in “caveat emptor” where adults are involved but he’s described as “naive” which I wonder might be code for some kind of learning difficulty.
For consent to be lawful, both parties have to know what they are consenting to, being fully aware of the circumstances. It’s why blokes have to.be *very careful* if a drunk person asks them to sleep with them. A person can be classed as being too drunk to have given consent.
The jury here concluded that had the victim been fully aware of the circumstances, he wouldn’t have consented to the sex acts. The perp’s words about “… being on ‘her’ period…” reinforce that he got the victim into bed through deception. The victim, therefore, didn’t give lawful consent to the sex acts.
That the victim needs to sue his optician is another issue.
transmissionofflame
1 year ago
Alternative headline – Man who performed sex act on another man while lying about his sex found guilty of sexual assault.
huxleypiggles
1 year ago
Watkin? What a firkin growler. Not even a ten-pinter.
Tone Loc was ahead of his time
1989
I went up to this girl, she said, “Hi, my name is Sheena”
I thought she’d be good to go with a little Funky Cold Medina
She said, “I’d like a drink, ” I said, “Ehm, okay, I’ll go get it”
Then a couple sips she cold licked her lips
And I knew that she was with it
So I took her to my crib, and everything went well as planned
But when she got undressed, it was a big old mess, Sheena was a man
So I threw him out, I don’t mess around with no Oscar Meyer wiener
You must be sure that your girl is pure for the Funky Cold Medina
I Appreciate the the kinks as much as you, they once played at the grey topper in Jacksdale, Nottinghamshire, what a night I would have been missed if I hadn’t lied about my age! 🫠
Yer, just act tough and gruff!😊
But don’t wear denim or they wouldn’t let you in!
The kinks where passing by to a gig in Manchester i believe so it wasn’t advertised,I was just lucky, they stayed in Nottingham and decided to do a surprise gig in the topper, can’t blame them, look at the acts who played the Topper!
The Grey Topper, Jacksdale, England Concert Setlists | setlist.fm https://share.google/94PdemoriahZ4JoVR
Impressive list. Just shows the value of seizing the day.
We got away with murder getting into pubs back then, seems a lot harder now though kids who want to drink still seem to be able to, at other peoples’ houses, booze bought by parents or older brothers and sisters I presume.
Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
The expression “lipstick on a …” springs immediately to mind.
I think the 21 year old man should have gone to SpecSavers.
Is he 21 now or was he 21 when the crime was committed in June 2022? He could have been 18.
Hehe, the poor victim was expecting the person on the left…and horror…the fella on the right turned up.
Doesn’t explain why the victim went back for seconds 🤮
The complainant must have been desperate to go with this object – you’d have to be blind not to notice his ‘gender’ if he was wearing those leggings! I presume the reporter failed to notice use the word ‘her’ in the first sentence before going on to use the masculine denominator elsewhere.
Seriously …. how could any “normal” young man possibly fancy that, if IF he thought it was female?
I guess he was not a ‘normal’ young man and could not believe his ‘luck’. If the man was in a vulnerable group then the sentence could be high to reflect this.
Every time someone claims that “transwomen are women” he or she should be shown these photos.
Even with beer goggles on I’d be able to see that was a fat pig ugly geezer.
Wow, what a stunner! Over several days, it’s given me the shivers.
My God! Another biblical-style flood is necessary. Difficult also to feel sympathy for the ‘victim’ of this creature’s perversion.
I wonder, also, why Richard Eldred uses the feminine possessive adjective and the term “gender”, when what he’s talking about is ‘SEX’! (‘Gender’ for language studies, ‘sex’ for everything else – how many times??!!)
Pwoar! Lucky guy! I can’t understand why he complained…
Plus it looks like it’s got a dangler, possibly hidden behind the handbag.
Drinking? I couldn’t swallow enough beer to get the goggles operating!
I don’t understand. What difference does it make if this person is trans or not when the guy ( was he registered blind or something?🙈 ) consented to the “sex acts”? How does this then get spun to be classed as a sexual assault? This is a new one on me, unless the definition’s changed when I wasn’t looking.😳
“…further sexual activity took place.” Sounds all totally consensual to me. The guy even went back for more!🤦♀️
…and AFTER his mother and friends had told him she was probably a he! Sorry, I really shouldn’t laugh, but I can’t help it. If the lad was a kid, I’d be angry, but this is just hilarious!
I tend to believe in “caveat emptor” where adults are involved but he’s described as “naive” which I wonder might be code for some kind of learning difficulty.
I can field that one…
For consent to be lawful, both parties have to know what they are consenting to, being fully aware of the circumstances. It’s why blokes have to.be *very careful* if a drunk person asks them to sleep with them. A person can be classed as being too drunk to have given consent.
The jury here concluded that had the victim been fully aware of the circumstances, he wouldn’t have consented to the sex acts. The perp’s words about “… being on ‘her’ period…” reinforce that he got the victim into bed through deception. The victim, therefore, didn’t give lawful consent to the sex acts.
That the victim needs to sue his optician is another issue.
Alternative headline – Man who performed sex act on another man while lying about his sex found guilty of sexual assault.
Watkin? What a firkin growler. Not even a ten-pinter.
With the amount I’d have had to have drunk to even consider tackling that f-ing monster I’d have passed out long before!
😀😀😀
WTF is that?
Tone Loc was ahead of his time
1989
I went up to this girl, she said, “Hi, my name is Sheena”
I thought she’d be good to go with a little Funky Cold Medina
She said, “I’d like a drink, ” I said, “Ehm, okay, I’ll go get it”
Then a couple sips she cold licked her lips
And I knew that she was with it
So I took her to my crib, and everything went well as planned
But when she got undressed, it was a big old mess, Sheena was a man
So I threw him out, I don’t mess around with no Oscar Meyer wiener
You must be sure that your girl is pure for the Funky Cold Medina
Or this classic! Imagine that thing in the picture tempting you into sex ! Ray Davies and the kinks had it nailed (pardon the pun) in 1970
Lola https://share.google/f1pNXnKe9TOMelCDd
Great song! Love The Kinks. Used to see Ray sometimes when we lived down North London way, outside his studio in Crouch End.
I Appreciate the the kinks as much as you, they once played at the grey topper in Jacksdale, Nottinghamshire, what a night I would have been missed if I hadn’t lied about my age! 🫠
Back in the days when we could lie about our age and get away with it.
Yer, just act tough and gruff!😊
But don’t wear denim or they wouldn’t let you in!
The kinks where passing by to a gig in Manchester i believe so it wasn’t advertised,I was just lucky, they stayed in Nottingham and decided to do a surprise gig in the topper, can’t blame them, look at the acts who played the Topper!
The Grey Topper, Jacksdale, England Concert Setlists | setlist.fm https://share.google/94PdemoriahZ4JoVR
Cannot believe i missed Sweet!
Impressive list. Just shows the value of seizing the day.
We got away with murder getting into pubs back then, seems a lot harder now though kids who want to drink still seem to be able to, at other peoples’ houses, booze bought by parents or older brothers and sisters I presume.
I just had another listen to ‘Lola’ and whilst searching for it, came across this little snippet on the search page.
Who’d a thunk it – the BBC having principles?
It’s why the lyric was changed to Cherry Cola.
🤢 🤕 🤮 🤢 🤕 🤮
Holy Toledo. I’m sorry…I shouldn’t find this funny… What was that young lad smoking?!
How could the John not know?
Especially as it mentions “assault by penetration”. Actually perhaps best not to ponder on that….
Jesus! I’ll have a pint of whatever that 21-year-old man was drinking.
Which one?
🙂
In the words of Arnie, you are one ugly MF!
But it might be a very nice person! 😇 🙏
I never in my life want to drink a pint of whatever he was drinking. Could you imagine waking up next to that. Don’t try, it will ruin your weekend.