Premium

This Pride Month, Who Will Protect Us From ‘Protect the Dolls’?

This Pride month, the viral meme 'Protect the Dolls' has been all the rage. Doesn't the term 'dolls' just sum up everything wrong with how the trans movement views women, says Steven Tucker.

10 min read

As annual Perpetual Pride Month progresses, we’ll all no doubt be seeing a lot more of new T-shirt campaign which is all the rage at the moment amongst that strange class of individuals who honestly believe small items of clothing can change both the world and actual biological reality alike – i.e., smug, Leftist shibboleth-spouting celebrities like Tilda Swinton, Pedro Pascal and a whole host of other luvvies you’ve probably never even heard of. Created by US-born fashion designer Conner Ives, who used his immense expertise to innovatively place the three simple words ‘Protect the Dolls’ in the middle of a white T-shirt and call it ‘art’, this latest sartorial sensation made its debut at London Fashion Week back in February, when Ives wore one on the catwalk himself.

In the months since, Ives’s T-shirt has become a runaway success, selling over 5,000 units from his website at £75 a pop. All proceeds go to an alleged good cause – ‘vulnerable’ transgenderists, suffering deeply in an age of Donald Trump and negative UK Supreme Court rulings. As of late April, Ives’s shirts had raised £380,000 for the American organisation Trans Lifeline, which campaigns to save the supposedly easily-smashable ‘dolls’ of the slogan (that is, men in dresses like Dylan Mulvaney, whose new memoir Paper Doll is available for you not to buy now) from being forcibly dismembered limb-by-limb by the Trumpians, the TERFs and the gender-Nazis.

Barbie’s latest biography

Charlie

Keep reading –
Donate £5 monthly
or £50 annually

Subscribe today to get unlimited online access, as well as our Premium newsletters and podcasts.

  • Read paywalled articles
  • Comment below the line and connect with other users
  • Watch and listen to the longer Premium version of our weekly podcast
  • Listen to every article
  • Receive Premium version of our daily newsletter
DONATE NOW

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

8 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Grim Ace
Grim Ace
1 year ago

Trans is about homosexual, weird men. It’s a sexual gratification thing.

Dinger64
Dinger64
1 year ago

Insanity!

jeepybee
jeepybee
1 year ago

Christ, wouldn’t let him near kids, would you? Look at that face!

Hardliner
1 year ago

After the recent vote in Parliament perhaps we should be celebrating ‘Died Month’?

Rainbows, anyone?

It’s all about attention seeking isn’t it. As the ‘me me’ generation crashes onto the studio floor of social media, is anyone still watching?

ACW
ACW
1 year ago
Reply to  Hardliner

You mean there will be another meaningless,
valueless
moronic flag to detest?

Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago

What Wesley said;

”Transgenderism must revert to being a form of private eccentricity. Recognition as one’s preferred gender can be privately negotiated but with no coercion by any entity private or public. We all have an absolute right to affirm or not affirm, believe or not believe, that gender identity exists, that no one can infringe.

Sex segregated spaces and activities remain segregated by sex, not “gender identity.”

Adults are free to inflict bodily self-harm on themselves in pursuit of an appearance they like but outside of any pretense of a medical protocol — these are cosmetic procedures that come with no promises to relieve dysphoria or unlock an authentic self and the cost is borne solely by the person seeking them. Any such promises constitute consumer fraud. Children are of course unable to consent to such procedures.

The state has no role in affirming any aspect of cross-gender ideation, avoids proselytizing to children in schools or to anyone else in any interface it has with the public. The person who has inflicted bodily self-harm on his sex traits is no more a distinct class of person to whom special privileges or protections can be conferred than… Read more »

Mogwai
Mogwai
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I honestly thought this was a comedy sketch, but it’s actually not. It’s just warp factor cringe. Look at this travesty of a fire brigade;

”Time has come to completely scrap ‘Pride’ Month which now is a source of embarrassment and boredom.”

https://x.com/prwhittle/status/1935662865119051813

thechap
thechap
1 year ago
Reply to  Mogwai

I’ve often wondered if not festooning your vehicles, your offices and yourselves with rainbows means that you hate homosexuals or support discrimination against them.

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.