George Orwell’s estate has been accused of attempting to censor 1984 by adding a ‘trigger warning’ preface to a US edition of the dystopian novel. The Telegraph has more.
The new introductory essay describes the novel’s protagonist Winston Smith as “problematic” and warns modern readers may find his views on women “despicable”.
Critics claim the preface, written by Dolen Perkins-Valdez, an American novelist, and included in the 75th anniversary edition published in the US last year, risks undermining the work’s warning against control of thought by the state.
In 1984, citizens of the superstate Oceania are punished for subversive thoughts by the Thought Police.
Now, in a real-world twist, the estate that oversees Orwell’s literary legacy stands accused of ideological policing.
“We’re getting somebody to actually convict George Orwell himself of thought crime in the introduction to his book about thought crime,” said Walter Kirn, a novelist and critic, on America This Week, a podcast hosted by journalist Matt Taibbi.
“We’re not yet in a world where books and classic books are being excised or eliminated,” Kirn added, but warned that the Orwell estate-approved edition of 1984 had been “published with an apology for itself”.
Ms Perkins-Valdez’s preface is included in the anniversary edition of the 1949 classic, published by Berkley Books, an imprint of Penguin Random House.
In it, the award-winning novelist said that she aimed to approach 1984 as a new reader, and admitted that, given the protagonist’s views, she might once have abandoned the book entirely.
“I’m enjoying the novel on its own terms, not as a classic, but as a good story, that is, until Winston reveals himself to be a problematic character,” she wrote. “For example, we learn of him: ‘He disliked nearly all women, and especially the young and pretty ones’.”
The novel follows Winston Smith, a minor bureaucrat who secretly rebels against the regime with Julia, a fellow party member. Their doomed affair is cut short when they are arrested, tortured and brainwashed into betraying one another.
Although Ms Perkins-Valdez eventually concludes that Orwell was portraying misogyny as a feature of totalitarianism, her comments have provoked a backlash.
Her preface also takes issue with the novel’s handling of race. As a black woman, she says she finds little to connect with characters in Oceania.
Mr Kirn questioned the need for Ms Perkins-Valdez’s introduction, pointing out that the anniversary edition already included a foreword by Thomas Pynchon, one of the greatest living American novelists.
“If you have a foreword by Thomas Pynchon to a book, you don’t need another foreword, right? You got maybe the greatest living novelist of our time, who’s also a recluse, to come out and write something. That’s all you need.
“But no, these people felt they needed an introduction before the old white man’s introduction. So this version of 1984 has a trigger warning!”
He called it “the most 1984-ish thing I’ve ever f—— read”.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.