• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Which Ideology is Most Receptive to Bullshit?

by Noah Carl
1 May 2025 3:04 PM

In his famous work On Bullshit, the philosopher Henry Frankfurt defined bullshit as speech intended to persuade or manipulate someone without regard for truth. He distinguished it from lying, which refers to speech intended to persuade someone of a falsehood. So while the liar attempts to steer his interlocuter away from truth, the bullshitter is largely unconcerned with truth—seeking instead to impress or bamboozle his interlocuter.

There’s a certain amount of bullshit floating around on all sides of the political spectrum—no ideology being completely immune. But we can still ask: which ideology is most receptive to bullshit?

Psychologists and political scientists have been looking into this question for the last decade. Initial studies were inconclusive, with some finding that right-wing individuals are more susceptible to bullshit and others finding that individuals on the extremes of politics (both right and left) are more susceptible.

In a 2019 study, Artur Nilsson and colleagues sought to reconcile these conflicting results. They studied susceptibility to bullshit in Sweden, a country with a multi-party system, and they examined the separate effects of social liberalism and economic leftism.

The authors used a clever method to measure receptivity, which was originally developed by Gordon Pennycook and colleagues. Specifically, they asked participants to rate the profundity of seven bullshit statements (e.g., “Your movement transforms universal observations”) as well as seven genuine aphorisms (e.g., “Your teacher can open the door, but you have to step in”). The bullshit statements were generated by stringing together random profound-sounding words into syntactically correct sentences.

Bullshit receptivity was measured by participants’ ratings of the seven bullshit statements. Another construct, bullshit sensitivity, was measured by adjusting participants’ ratings of the seven bullshit statements for their ratings of the seven genuine aphorisms. The rationale here is that some people might have a tendency to rate any statement as profound—and adjusting for ratings of the aphorisms controls for this.

As to political ideology, Nilsson and colleagues asked participants which party they would vote for, where they would place themselves on a 9-point economic left/right scale from “economic equality is much more important” to “economic freedom is much more important”, and where they would place themselves on a 7-point liberal/conservative scale from “much more in the liberal direction” to “much more in the conservative direction”.

So what did the authors find? Bullshit receptivity was positively associated with social conservatism but negatively associated with economic rightism (albeit weakly). It was also positively associated with religiosity. When the authors broke down the results by party, they were particularly interesting:

Source.

Supporters of the centrist Liberal party and the centre-right Center party were the least receptive to pseudo-profound bullshit and the most sensitive to it. At the other end of the spectrum were supporters of the left-wing Green Party, who were the most receptive to pseudo-profound bullshit. Consistent with the earlier results, supporters of the right-wing Sweden Democrats were also receptive to pseudo-profound bullshit. Other parties’ supporters fell somewhere in between.

Interestingly, supporters of the Green Party had average reasoning ability (unlike supporters of the Sweden Democrats), indicating that their receptivity to bullshit cannot be attributed to a general lack of critical thinking. The authors suggest it may stem from “prior exposure to pseudo-profound bullshit”, perhaps in the form of New Age spirituality.

Overall, the study suggests that the relationship between ideology and susceptibility to bullshit is complicated, with social conservatives being more receptive than social liberals and economic leftists being slightly more receptive than economic rightists. However, it is the Green movement that appears to be most receptive—at least in Sweden.

Tags: BullshitConspiracy TheoriesGreen AgendaPropaganda

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

COVID-19 Started in America, Not China, New Chinese Government Report Claims

Next Post

Migrant Channel Crossings Hit 10,000 in Record Time Under Labour Despite Starmer’s “Smash the Gangs” Pledge

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

11 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 36 of the Sceptic: Karl Williams on Starmer’s Phoney Immigration Crackdown, Dan Hitchens on the Assisted Suicide Bill and Tom Jones on Reform’s Local Council Challenge

by Richard Eldred
16 May 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

15 May 2025
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

16 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Ten Things George Soros is Funding in the UK

15 May 2025
by Charlotte Gill

Chris Packham is the New St Francis of Assisi

15 May 2025
by Sallust

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

Chris Packham is the New St Francis of Assisi

36

‘Trans Toddlers’ Allowed Gender Treatment on NHS

36

Chinese ‘Kill Switches’ Found in US Solar Farms

23

News Round-Up

14

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

10

Spy Agency Report on the Alleged “Extremism” of AfD Turns Out to Be So Stupid That it Destroys all Momentum for Banning the Party

16 May 2025
by Eugyppius

The Folly of Solar – a Dot on the Horizon Versus a Blight on the Land

16 May 2025
by Ben Pile

Renaud Camus on the Destruction of Western Education

15 May 2025
by Dr Nicholas Tate

‘Why Can’t We Talk About This?’

15 May 2025
by Richard Eldred

Daily Mail Misses the Real Story About Long-Term Stable Antarctica Ice in Dumb Quip About Climate ‘Deniers’

15 May 2025
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

May 2025
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Apr    

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment