Premium

The Habermas Machine

Have you heard of the "Habermas Machine"? It's a Google AI tool that reaches compromise between contending arguments. But what's the point if it doesn't actually make people agree, asks Prof James Alexander.

7 min read

Have you heard of the Habermas Machine?

In fact, have you heard of Jürgen Habermas? Still with us, and like Charles Taylor and Alasdair MacIntyre, he is one of the mighty antique philosophers of our time. MacIntyre is 96, Habermas is 95 and Taylor is 93. I was just in a Comprehensive Exam for a Ph.D. student and one of the examiners mentioned all three names. Well! It’s the zeitgeist. No one half that age is at all well known. But we are all familiar with our ancients. Alain Badiou is 88. Georgio Agamben, that hero of COVID-19, is a mere stripling at 82.

Anyhow, Habermas.

Boring.

Private Eye’s page 94 + 1.

He is basically the house philosopher of post-war Germany and the European Union. He was a sort of Marxist, and a sort of Frankfurt Schooler, and a sort of radical, but also a sort of liberal. He was acceptable enough to cross swords with John Rawls, that high saint of boring American political thought. Scruton did him down in Thinkers of the New Left, in which, I paraphrase, Scruton said that Habermas had clotted prose and the mind of a bank manager who happened to be on the Left: bureaucratic. I have always thought that Habermas was, in fact, the sort of figure who was invented to do the Weberian job of educating the unpolitical Germans: but, oddly, since we like our Germans, was brought across the Atlantic to tell Americans things they might like

Keep reading –
Donate £5 monthly
or £50 annually

Subscribe today to get unlimited online access, as well as our Premium newsletters and podcasts.

  • Read paywalled articles
  • Comment below the line and connect with other users
  • Watch and listen to the longer Premium version of our weekly podcast
  • Listen to every article
  • Receive Premium version of our daily newsletter
DONATE NOW

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

9 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
RW
RW
1 year ago

I propose another: A Nietzsche machine — will tell everybody who criticizes its outputs that he’s simply too daft to understand them and will tell everybody who approves of them that this shows that he’s simply too daft to be worthy of having seen them.

This machine will further human understanding by becoming the universal enemy everybody loathes.

kev
kev
1 year ago

Who needs objective truth when AI generated consensus gives us all the answers we may ever need?

Sandy Pylos
Sandy Pylos
1 year ago
Reply to  kev

Are we in the process of making God?

transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
1 year ago

Pomerantsev:

Regulation can only do so much when it comes to speech. We need to support the creation of other platforms that are designed not to amplify lies and hate, or to just suck our personal data and sell us things, but to promote a better conversation

By “better” he means that everyone ought to agree with him and people that don’t are Literally Hitler.

HicManemus
HicManemus
1 year ago

My favourite is “The Machine Stops” by E M Forster…a chilling tale that is coming closer to truth for comfort.

Tonka Rigger
Tonka Rigger
1 year ago

I think the Hobbes Machine is already up and running, and ticking away like a well-maintained engine.

For a fist full of roubles
For a fist full of roubles
1 year ago

My favourite one is the Useless Machine.https://youtu.be/mqvh3R8nKSA

lymeswold
lymeswold
1 year ago

Might be useful in a marriage.

Atticus
Atticus
1 year ago
Reply to  lymeswold

Eh? What? And take all the fun out of life. Yes dear…

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.