This new book by Norman Fenton and Martin Neil, sub-titled ‘Exposing the flawed science and statistics behind the COVID-19 event’, needs to be read. Of all the books on the COVID-19 years, this one really has the COVID-19 narrative on the ropes.
It strikes me that there will be four ways the material in Fighting Goliath is approached.
The first approach will be to ignore it completely and assume that this is all nonsense and written by a couple of conspiracy theorists who don’t understand the real science behind COVID-19. That would be a mistake.
The next would be the approach of those who could be described as smugly certain about the COVID-19 narrative. These are the people who will not dirty their hands with figures and statistics and think this is unnecessary as they are sure they know the truth about COVID-19 (and many other things) without the need for evidence. It is insufficient to claim that you are in the know about the supposed COVID-19 conspiracies and it is inadequate to expect other people to believe you. It is essential to provide evidence. Evidence is the only thing that will change the minds of the health promoters, policy makers and politicians and specifically those who imposed such dreadful measures as lockdowns, face masks, social distancing and compulsory vaccination on huge numbers of the population with such detrimental outcomes.
Then we have the virus deniers, who prefer to be called virus sceptics. These are people who don’t believe that viruses exist and are, in and of themselves, part of a great scientific conspiracy. There is a spectrum of virus sceptics from those who propose some serious and reasonable arguments as to why the viral hypothesis is not correct up to and including the seriously deranged, amongst whom are many grifters using the no virus hypothesis to promote their own quackery and alternative medicine. At the most extreme end of the spectrum there are those who do not even believe in bacterial infections or the use of antibiotics. These are seriously dangerous people, and they believe exclusively in the terrain theory of health. They begin from a mistaken perspective.
However, there is a fourth group: the informed sceptics and the authors of Fighting Goliath are exceedingly well-informed sceptics both being respectable academics and statisticians who have risked their reputation and careers to speak out against the prevailing COVID-19 narrative. Anyone sceptical of the COVID-19 narrative will find the hard evidence he or she needs in this book.
Fighting Goliath is a barely expurgated version of the collected writings of the authors, along with many acknowledged co-authors. Most of the writing has been published in blogs and alternative news outlets such as the Daily Sceptic and TCW Defending Freedom because these are the only outlets that would tolerate a sceptical view of the ‘pandemic’ and, especially latterly, the dangers inherent in the COVID-19 vaccines over and above the fact they were largely or perhaps completely ineffective. Nevertheless, the fact that these alternative outlets have been used does not detract from the rigour with which the authors approach the subject.
The main arguments in the book are around the exaggerated lethality of COVID-19 and, concomitantly, the exaggerated data about spread of the virus and data around vaccine efficacy and COVID-19 vaccine deaths. The only data that were downplayed in the official narrative were those on vaccine hesitancy, presumably to make the refuseniks and the reluctant feel like an outlying minority. The authors demonstrate how the unvaccinated were far from alone.
A convincing case is made in Fighting Goliath for the claim that influenza did not miraculously disappear at the height of the COVID-19 years but was either deliberately not being sought or data were simply being ignored with the purpose of maintaining the focus on COVID-19. However, readers should note that there are competing theories from within the sceptical movement to explain biologically how influenza could have been outcompeted by COVID-19 through the phenomenon of viral interference and evidence from laboratory data that influenza had in fact disappeared, at least in the U.K.
Regarding COVID-19 deaths, the issues of how they were classified, leading to anyone with a diagnosis of COVID-19 or testing positive for COVID-19 (not necessarily the same thing) being classified as a COVID-19 death, regardless of the actual cause of death, is covered. In the same vein, the overuse of artificial ventilation, undoubtedly a plausible independent cause of ‘COVID-19’ deaths, is also considered.
The authors also investigate the case of the disappearing antibiotics, despite stockpiling — presumably for use — during viral pandemics being recommended public health practice. Could the disappearing antibiotics and the copious distribution of the tranquiliser midazolam have had anything to do with the excess deaths observed during the COVID-19 years, especially of older people warehoused and imprisoned with all visiting privileges withdrawn in nursing homes? Probably.
There is an inescapable message in Fighting Goliath that people who were aligned with the COVID-19 narrative could promote any old nonsense with impunity. But sceptics providing hard evidence and arguments were pilloried, cancelled, struck off and ostracised.
It is abundantly clear from the book that the lethality of COVID-19 was wildly exaggerated by several orders of magnitude. There is also the little-known fact — certainly new to me — that the COVID-19 virus was declared to be of low lethality and risk to the general population prior to the day that the first lockdown was imposed. Lockdown, therefore, was imposed with the full knowledge that this was not a dangerous situation. Of course, the figures now speak for themselves. Take China, the presumed source of COVID-19, where remarkably few people died of the virus and where the emergency centres (equivalent to our ridiculous and never used Nightingale wards) were dismantled within about a month of their erection. Ours were still up over a year later.
As someone who has followed the authors’ Where are the Numbers Substack, I well recall how the scales fell from my eyes over COVID-19 vaccine efficacy (or lack thereof) when they exposed what is described in Fighting Goliath as the “cheap trick”. The trick, which purports to demonstrate vaccine efficacy by comparing deaths or infections between vaccinated and (allegedly) unvaccinated individuals, involves the (mis)classification of some vaccinated people as being unvaccinated if they had only received the vaccine at some arbitrary point prior to when the outcomes were compared. Thus, two vaccinated people could be classified in a case control study or prospective trial into different arms if, say, one of them had been vaccinated within two weeks of the endpoint of the study.
In another chapter the authors demonstrate the importance and the influence of timing in collecting and reporting outcomes, especially deaths, when comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated people. If there is no protective effect of a vaccine and deaths are measured simultaneously, then the true outcome will be observed. However, given that in any large group some people will die, then if the deaths in the unvaccinated group are measured a week later than those in the vaccinated group it will appear that the vaccine has some protective effect. This is beautifully demonstrated using two tables.
The material in Fighting Goliath is presented chronologically. It is remarkable, in that light, that some of the material presented was written very early in the sequence of COVID-19 events. Having initially accepted the official narrative the authors began to take some ‘deep dives’ into the data which showed that, at the least, the official narrative was flawed or, at worst, being manipulated to heighten fear and subjugate the population, possibly merely to see if it could be done. Therefore, Fenton and Neil (along with others) were exposing the flaws very early but were completely ignored. The authors explain how they were denied access to mainstream scientific journals, had papers retracted and were even prevented from publishing and retracted from pre-printing sites. The control of the official COVID-19 narrative was as far-reaching as it was strong.
Due to the running order and the nature of the text, Fighting Goliath has some internal duplication of material and repetition of arguments. That, clearly, is what the authors intended and anyone who wants to use their evidence to test or support their own arguments will find it all here, and in the copious links to supporting material. Perhaps Fenton and Neil have had enough of fighting Goliath and wish to reclaim their lives. But I would love to see a complementary volume which is presented as a condensed, heavily edited and proof-read version under subject headed chapters, each with a firm conclusion.
Many within the COVID-19 sceptical movement will disagree with some of Fenton’s and Neil’s claims and everyone outside of the COVID-19 sceptical community will disagree with most or all of them. However, now we have Fighting Goliath, we should be very grateful for it, for the authors and for their many eminent collaborators.
Fighting Goliath (Sovereign Rights Publishing) is available on Amazon.
Dr. Roger Watson is Academic Dean of Nursing at Southwest Medical University, China. He has a PhD in biochemistry. He writes in a personal capacity.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I see #TwoTierKeir is trending, shortened to 2TK.
Prediction: Within 6 months, 2TKQ+ or 2TKTQ+ will be in use as a moniker.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/pact-future-planetary-technocracy-global-crises-global-corporatocracy/5864483
Note for all – I was timed out before I could finish editing this piece so I had to start again.
To the downticker – go and take your medication.
The bit just below the DT headline…
“amid speculation of a far-right rally”. These f*ckn people have to give an excuse for Muslim attacks on whites, but no mention ever of the three little girls slaughtered by an immigrant animal to defend the actions of white rioters. I could not hate MSM and the government more.
Quite clearly, Rudakubana is not an immigrant, whatever else he may be.
I don’t give a flying f*ck what the state-approved official definition of an immigrant is. If a child of immigrants refuses to integrate into a society, and then slaughters 3 children, they’re an immigrant. They’re certainly not part of the indigenous population. Call them whatever you want, your silly little semantics completely miss the point, so you need to update your database. I can’t believe I’ve been successfully goaded, and actually reacted to, AI.
Nobody gives a ‘flying f*ck’ what some random punter on the interweb, most particularly not you, thinks of much at all.
The fact remains that someone born in this country and educated in this country is most certainly not an immigrant.
So, out of morbid curiosity – and to test the bounds of your Google-gathered robotic intelligence – what definition does your algorithm give to describe the child of immigrants that rejects their adopted culture and slaughters three little girls as they pretend to be Taylor Swift? This one will test your machine learning capabilities because it throws emotion into the mix.
Drop the silliness. You are making yourself look ridiculous.
Rudakubana is a first generation British citizen and child murderer.
He will receive his just deserts.
“He will receive his just deserts” …..oh no he will not..
Kept warm and fed for the rest of his miserable life
He should have been shot dead at the scene
What he will receive will, no doubt, be a great deal worse than that.
👍 👍 👍
Ok I wouldn’t normally interact but if pedantry is at play here technically he is classed as a first generation immigrant, as they like to class themselves.
I know I’m opening myself to rants here but
“Nobody gives a ‘flying f*ck’ what some random punter on the interweb, most particularly not you, thinks of much at all.”
I certainly do as that’s why I support DS so that I can give a FF to what others say, even you.
Well done 👏
If you wish to ‘interact’ it would be more useful, someone might actually give a FF, if you stuck to the facts:
You are a British citizen if you were both:
Here we go. Yes indeed to be accurate they are classed as British by us. I did clarify though that, as many I have spoken to, they also class themselves as ‘first gen immigrant’ as I stated in my response.
Gosh you’re angry today!
All concerned please note: the case will turn up in a Crown Court in due course, and we should find out more about it then. However, the last time I came across a case of stabbing to death of someone locally was when the culprit turned out to be a local English guy who happened to be a paranoid schizophrenic, who owned his own house. Charged with murder, but ended up being guilty of manslaughter on the grounds of diminished responsibility, and detained indefinitely in Broadmoor.
There was a fair bit of media reaction etc, and an element of “something must be done” – like ideas of closing footpaths etc (where the attack occurred), but all that noticeably happened was that the local council installed loads more cameras to spy on the general public, or at least to improve security.
What we can observe is that whatever the underlying cause of the Southport crime was, it has been hijacked to justify all sorts of other problems.
”What we can observe is that whatever the underlying cause of the Southport crime was, it has been hijacked to justify all sorts of other problems.“
Exactly, well put.
Given the magnitude of this, and there have been no leaks to quell the disturbance, I see two possible explanations. 1) there is an anti-english element to the attack 2) the elites are using it to deliberately sow division. The lack of any kind of leaked information will give us the answer in due course.
There is a great deal to be angry about, particularly those who try and label British perpetrators as ‘immigrants’; not useful and likely to exacerbate rather unsavoury sentiments.
Whatever caused this murderer to commit his unspeakably barbaric slaughter had nothing to do with his parents country of origin.
Perhaps some British citizens may label themselves as ‘first generation immigrants’. I have never heard that, myself. But this is, in any case, not relevant. As far as the British Crown is concerned, they are British citizens. The vast majority of them are proud to call themselves British citizens and not a few are descended from family members who fought for this country. The British Armed Forces still have many outstanding members whose parents, families, were born overseas.
I don’t very often agree with your perspective but in this case I cannot fault your logic.
Many well known and accepted British people are “first generation immigrants”. For example, immediately after the war there was an influx of Jews formerly from Germany who have settled here and produced children who have become a respected part of the British establishment.
During the 1970s there was an influx of East African Asians, the children of whom have become well known establishment figures, Priti Patel is perhaps the highest profile one.
Are people trying to claim that these are not really British because they are only first generation immigrants?
Probably some people claim they’re not British, the same as some people look at the race or colour of the skin to claim someone is not British. Utterly ridiculous. Those you have stated above are useful contributing members of society, who whilst holding on to their religious beliefs to which I have no problem, usually integrate into our society. No one seeking refuge here from legitimate danger should be turned away if we are their last recourse. Unfortunately there are many who wish to turn this country into a replica of the place they purportedly ‘flee’ from whilst contributing nothing but live of the government’s freely given generosity with our tax money. It is a crime to enter a country illegally, something successive governments choose to overlook. Sure the government has been lax with legal immigration but not to clamp down on illegal immigration is a catastrophic failure.
You, with your unreasonable common sense!
There we go. Thanks state-approved Google search algorithm. Rolls off the tongue. Now define ‘settled’ – you know, just for some robotic fun. Like I’ve said before, I’m either communicating directly with a bot, or with a teenager using AI. Last post – pointless talking to silicon.
Look it up.
Just because some idiot let the rats into the chicken coop, and they start breeding as rats are wont to do, that doesn’t mean that their offspring are chickens. They’re still rats, and they’re still likely to steal the grain and attack your flock.
Have you ever worked with Africans?
Not a Chakrabarti fan, but at least she has got this in the Grauniad: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/article/2024/aug/07/big-tech-disorder-riots-surveillance-live-facial-recognition
The argument frequently offered by the left concerns the issue of some POC faces and false positives. It seems to me that a more fundamental problem with its blanket usage for the left is that it is incompatible with the wearing of niqabs etc.
Christopher Hitchens vs Keir Starmer already gone.
I can still see it?
Good ! I heard a while back that Khant will soon be PM 😳
Has it gone ! I saw it & my eyes & ears are still bleeding 🤯
https://www.globalresearch.ca/pact-future-planetary-technocracy-global-crises-global-corporatocracy/5864483
“There are barely two months left until the big UN meeting Summit of the Future (September 22-23) where the “Pact for the Future” is to be signed by world leaders (heads of government and state). The pact, which essentially constitutes a blueprint for a global technocracy to manage global risks on behalf of the global corporatocracy, is now being finalised for completion by early August.”
A long and uncomfortable read which outlines where the world is heading. Topics covered include the likelihood of another Scamdemic before Christmas, the theft of the commons, a potential financial crash, World War and the push for One World Government.
With all the above as background it is easy to see why Kneel is acting as he is. As nothing more than a lowly District Manager in the One World Government hierarchy it is essential that he provides at least a run-through of how control can be asserted and maintained. The civil disobedience playing out in our towns and cities is manna from heaven for him and no doubt his agents will be behind much of it. Lockdowns in some form look inevitable. This will be a re-run of Canada, Australia and New Zealand. No wonder he was keen to empty prisons while insisting on two tier policing.
It looks grim.
‘Global research’ is run by a ‘nutty Canadian Professor’.
It is potentially a bit more sinister than that (follow the money).
Research from Stanford University’s Internet Observatory, a program examining abuse in information technologies, found links tying Global Research to Russian military intelligence agency operations. The 2019 study, commissioned by a U.S. Senate intelligence committee, analyzed online content that Facebook attributed to the spy agency commonly known as the GRU.
Some of Globalresearch’s greatest hits:
Footnotes
[1] Globalresearch – RationalWiki
[2] http:// http://www.globalresearch.ca/breaking-us-used-nukes-on-iraq-afghanistan-atomic-bomb-dropped-on-tora-bora-expert/27972
[3] http://www.globalresearch.ca/genocide-denial-in-rwanda-questioning-the-official-view-of-history/5410169
[4] http://www.globalresearch.ca/was-srebrenica-a-hoax-eye-witness-account-of-a-former-united-nations-military-observer-in-bosnia/731
[5] http://www.globalresearch.ca/north-korea-a-land-of-human-achievement-love-and-joy/5344960
[6] http://www.globalresearch.ca/depopulation-vaccine-in-kenya-and-beyond/5413445
[7] http://www.globalresearch.ca/fluoride-killing-us-softly/5360397
[8] http://www.globalresearch.ca/poison-is-treatment-the-campaign-to-fluoridate-america/31568
Oh yes….and ‘chemtrails’ are being used for ‘geoengineering…….
😉
Referencing ‘Global Research’ is just plain dotty, very much like the retired Canadian Academic who runs it..
‘Research from Stanford University’s Internet Observatory, a program examining abuse in information technologies, found links tying Global Research to Russian military intelligence agency operations. The 2019 study, commissioned by a U.S. Senate intelligence committee, analyzed online content that Facebook attributed to the spy agency commonly known as the GRU.
Based on the research, the State Department said Global Research published or reposted articles by at least seven authors using aliases — or “sock puppet personas,” according to the Stanford report — to hide their ties to the GRU. The content remains accessible on the website.’
https://off-guardian.org/2024/08/06/the-peoples-court-of-new-normal-germany-part-two/
C J Hopkins outlining his up coming trial in Germany on charges of thought crime.
“If you’re an American (or a Brit, or Australian, or whatever), and you’re thinking this is just a story about Germany, or the EU … well, I’m sorry, but it isn’t. My case is just one of countless examples of the criminalization of dissent that is happening throughout the West. A lot of Americans don’t realize it, but freedom of speech is protected in the German constitution.”
The “criminalisation of dissent.”
What exactly is Kneel up to? Ah yes, “the “criminalisation of dissent.” The parallels are obvious.
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c75nn9dr0rvo
And presumably the CPS have lots of evidence of social media influencers instigating “far right” riots from abroad.
Is that not code for Tommy Robinson? He’s a social media influencer, he’s abroad, he’s an active member of the defunct EDL, and if he says “Don’t riot” it’s a secret signal to riot. That’s worth an international arrest warrant before his holiday finishes and he flies home, in any prosecutor’s book.
I assume sceptics will recognise the irony in my comment – this is how everyone from Starmer to Farage is reacting… but not Elon Musk or Glenn Beck.
Your two downticks may show otherwise
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13714153/Standing-army-6-000-police-officers-ready-deployed-trouble-hotspots-far-right-thugs-warned-face-10-years-jail-riots-ministers-plan-courts-sitting-night-500-extra-prison-pla
Is this “standing army” of police made up of Calais Yatch Club members by any chance?
Where is this “standing army” located given that it must be able to react at a moments notice?
Full on Nazi then.
It’s a good point. It’s either a bluff or something deeply more sinister. I was pondering yesterday about how the Muslim hordes coordinated and amassed so quickly; there’s obviously the fact they gather in quite tightly knit, self-isolated, communities, but then another, all too obvious, thought came to me – mosques. We’ve got a thousand+ buildings which can act as terrorist/radical Islam offices sat in plain sight throughout the UK. An acceptable home for a different culture to plot against the inhabitants of their adopted country/culture. Now you import a few million more Muslims, shoehorn a few agent provocateurs at senior levels within the mosques and… voila! You have an Army. An Army that is so motivated by religious beliefs that they think a murderous death is entry to heaven, and whose radicalisation and organisation makes them twice the size they actually are. Just a thought.
More than a thought ! however if they are being used as a weapon how will they be quelled if they get the upper hand , 🤔
Is TTK / 2TK also advocating a ‘standing army’ to protect our beaches / lands from the usurpers who daily invade our shores? Thought not.
Where are they amassed – easy, in the
barracksnumerous hotels and HMO’s, paid for by the ever-suffering taxpayers.Wasn’t TTK planning on releasing 20,000 inmates from prison soon? That’ll create space – and more beside – for the wrongly labelled terrorists AKA ‘Enough is Enough’ anguished people to be accommodated.
Yes
It’s very possible
“The physics of Net Zero”
This article assumes we are trying to make the UK both Net-Zero and self sufficient but as far as I can see that is not what is happening. We seem intent on making the UK net-zero and totally dependent on Chinese and Asian technology.
With electric cars (EVs) the policy seems destined to destroy the UK and European motor industry and open the door to cheap Chinese EVs only suitable for local utility travel.
With windmills and solar panels, where are they made? and do the people making them having any great aim of going net-zero?
At which point one has to ask if the UK’s Net-Zero policy is not simply a nihilistic, dismal, destructive policy of despair, decline and immiseration? And if the answer to that question is yes, then who is behind this policy? why are they doing it? and why are so few people trying to stop it?
I largely agree with your comment.
The answer to your last para is to be found in the Global Research article which I have posted.
The Chinese have insufficient Oil/Gas, so EVs, powered by coal-fired power stations, is a sensible solution, for them.
But if they could persuade the West to adopt the same technology, even though we have the fuel, it would be a security bonus, for them, of course. And JSO activity would be another.
Not sure about the Chinese EVs but I heard recently of a farmer who phoned John Deere to complain about his new tractor packing up and demand a technician turn out immediately to sort it out… only to discover that his last direct debit had failed, for some reason, so they’d simply turned it off from the factory until he paid up.
Years ago I saw maps showing us as a district of Europe !
We are also dependant on other countries for fertilisers and only 40% sufficient in food.
We soon won’t produce our own cement ,steel or oil.
All the media and politicians and police are “stoking” the riots. Whilst no one is forgetting the lunatic who went on a mass stabbing that culminated in three little girls dying horrifically, the media and politicians and police constantly covering up for wrongdoers, regardless of their religion, race, actual sex, is adding fuel to the flames. By qualifying each time there is a crime that it’s ’mental illness’ ‘the assailant is unknown’ (unless they’re white or English) ‘a woman raped the girl’ or in this case, ‘in response to far right’ it lets the perpetrators off the hook for their crimes and allows retaliation by supporters of the wrongdoing, of which there are many. There are many good and decent people that live in this country who feel they are ignored, derided and scorned, if we’re going to calm everyone honest discussions need to be had, sadly I don’t see that happening in the near future.
On this, it seems to me that established power in this country likes to present itself as moderate and centrist but in reality it has now become the main promoter of extreme ideology, namely radical liberalism.
They now shove extreme LGBT ideology down our throats, mass immigration which brings in people who ironically are the least tolerant of liberalism, extreme climate policies.
There is literally nothing moderate about what the establishment promotes these days. They think that speaking calmly and with a solemn admonishing tone makes them sensible. But their words and policies are very extreme.
The result is what we have now. A few angry people ready to take to the streets and the vast majority sitting quietly at home feeling confused and hectored.
War has been declared on the UK,s indigenous peoples , they want us whimpering in the corner sucking our thumbs !
https://www.militarystrategymagazine.com/article/civil-war-comes-to-the-west/
An excellent and learned article which sets the case that Civil War is now inevitable.
This is a very interesting reference. Thank you.
This seems to make a great deal of sense right now:
‘Over the last thirty years the West has preoccupied itself thanklessly in an expeditionary capacity in the invertebrate civil wars of others—generally counterproductively but sometimes just fruitlessly. During that time, it has developed not just in the military but also in the quasi-NGO sector a certain capacity for thinking about ‘root causes’ of conflict as well some fluency with operations in seriously divided societies that have been deranged by endemic internal war. It is past time to turn the mirror on ourselves.’
The Future of War is Civil War, David Betz
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/12/12/646
Performing my usual daily 20 sec scan of the above headlines shows most (with a couple of honorable exceptions) of our media journos are hopelessly out of their depth in reading the signs of the times, cause and effect.
Out of date, out of touch.
Be very picky choosing your morning media dashboard.
I am in complete agreement.
Has anyone seen any figures for the numbers of “rioters” in each incident?
Usually with public disorders we are regaled by estimates of the numbers, however I don’t recall figures for rioters, except when it comes to total arrests from all separate incidents.
I suspect these are comparatively small occurrences, not on the scale of other recent “non far right” ones, but are being conflated to make a political point and to make them look more menacing than they really are.
In terms of active participants, most reports I have seen involve groups of young men hanging round apparently aimlessly, with one or two activists at the front goading the police rather than encouraging others to make massed advances.
In the case of the attack on the migrant hotel, it seemed that the police were standing against a wall, dressed in full riot gear, watching the break-in rather than attempting to stop it.
In today’s DT, behind a paywall, we have the news, expected ever since 2007, that the Laws of Physics cannot be repealed:
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2024/08/07/power-chiefs-fear-net-zero-blackouts-in-london
I’m relieved, as people in my village thought I was upsetting the status quo, when we had a professor stating the opposite!
“Pubgoer attacked by masked men ‘left with lacerated liver’”
“A man attacked by a masked mob outside a pub in Birmingham has revealed that he has suffered a torn liver and is ‘not interested’ in any apologies.
Sean McDonagh, 51, was punched and kicked in front of The Clumsy Swan pub after hundreds of men – many waving Palestinian flags – had gathered on Monday night to keep the Muslim community safe from a rumoured far-Right rally.
When the anticipated protest in Bordesley Green failed to materialise, a large group – some armed and many with their faces covered – started attacking the pub in nearby Yardley, believing that EDL members were drinking in there.”
NONE OF THE ARMED MUSLIM GANG WERE ARRESTED.
“When the elites loved rioting” – From the London riots to BLM, liberals and leftists have spent far too long celebrating street violence as virtuous, writes Tim Black in Spiked.
Well done to Tim Black for telling the truth.
Almighty God has finally awakened the Righteous Wrath of the British People.
A good news underground cable report: https://eandt.theiet.org/2024/08/05/national-grid-turns-south-londons-ps1bn-electricity-superhighway
“Christopher Hitchens 2009 vs Keir Starmer 2004”
Thanks to Richard Eldred for including this powerful video.
“Armchair thug is first to be convicted for riot Facebook posts”
Leeds working man faces prison term for Facebook posts.
In contrast, here is a photo of the grinning Jordanian let off scot-free after harassing female joggers and assaulting a female police officer:
Jordanian asylum seeker, 27, who assaulted a police officer after drunkenly pestering female joggers is spared community service due to ‘health and safety issues’ | Daily Mail Online