Campaign group UsForThem is reporting that the just-released draft of the International Health Regulations amendments from the WHO Working Group shows a massive climbdown in almost all areas of concern. Here’s the summary (emphasis in original):
Massive climb down from the WHO Working Group on almost all substantive concerns that we and others have raised over the past 18 months.
- The WHO’s recommendations remain non-binding. Article 13A.1 which would have required Member States to follow directives of the WHO as the guiding and coordinating authority for international public health has been dropped entirely.
- An egregious proposal which would have erased reference to the primacy of “dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms” has been dropped. This proposal marked a particularly low water mark and should never have been suggested.
- Provisions that would have allowed the WHO to intervene on the basis of a mere “potential” health emergency have been dropped: a pandemic must now either be happening or likely to happen, but with the safeguard that to activate its IHR powers the WHO must demonstrate that coordinated international action is necessary.
- Proposals to construct a global censorship and ‘information control’ operation led by the WHO have been dropped.
- A material dampening of the expansionist ambitions of the WHO: provisions which had proposed to expand the scope of the IHRs to include “all risks with a potential to impact public health” (e.g. climate change, food supply) have been deleted. The scope now remains essentially unchanged, focused on the spread of disease.
- Explicit recognition that Member States not the WHO are responsible for implementing these regulations [has been added], and bold plans for the WHO to police compliance with all aspects of the IHRs have been materially watered down.
- Many other provisions have been diluted, including: surveillance mechanisms that would have given the WHO a mandate to find thousands of potential new pandemic signals; provisions which would have encouraged and favoured digital health passports; provisions requiring forced technology transfers and diversion of national resources.
The published document is only an interim draft, to be put before the IHR Working Group during this week’s final negotiations, so it could yet change.
That said, on the basis of this draft this is a profound victory for people power over unaccountable technocracy.
UsForThem says a full briefing is to follow.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
While this news is undoubtedly welcome I would not trust the WHO in any way. Anyone believing that their revised amendments to the IHR have now gone away is a damned fool. There might be a slight pause while the perps retreat for a re-think but they are set on a one world government and that is what they are intent on achieving and with all the misery therein.
Billy’s Disease X will still be released Winter 2025 and possibly with something else tagged on the better to convince the wayward Third World governments to fall in line. Is the deliberate collapse of the world economy now to be brought forward?
The likely result of this set back to the WHO machinations will be the unleashing of even greater mayhem.
Expect a lull before the storm.
You know it Hux me old Fruit ! Also just seen footage of St George’s Day March kettled by police to cause a skirmish which they posted straight away ! Mainstream all over it of course !
Two tier Policing, they are not even pretending!
Look at the waste of police resources though. And this is only a fraction of them! Good day to be a career criminal in London. What did they think was going to kick off? They weren’t getting sticks, fireworks or garbage bags lobbed at them like the terrorist nutters do on the regular. The sole intention is to shit-stir and cause the trouble in the first place, but I think everyone’s wise to them and their tactics now so they don’t give them the satisfaction.
https://twitter.com/IncMonocle/status/1782803312858780037
Contrast that with the police here, with their pals. I’m sure they gave them a stern talking to for trampling all over the war memorials and behaving like disrespectful tw*ts;
https://twitter.com/IncMonocle/status/1724911357261189298
Yes, thanks to Mogs I have seen the new style of Met policing. Obviously we are not having Stasi style policing this is just British two-tier policing. Isn’t it strange that anti-British muzzies get treated with kid gloves but British patriots are threatened, kettled and then attacked.
Well done Fishy you bleeding traitor.
Sanity= https://twitter.com/WorldByWolf/status/1713574590704681190
Vs
Psycho nutjobs= https://twitter.com/IncMonocle/status/1767217792309162430
But it’s the Jews and the patriots that are the problem, evidently.
Tedros is a Chunt the police are traitors & their boss is a bullsh1ting liar !
Perhaps that’s why they go so hard on patriots, all that pent up frustration that they dare not use on Pro-Hamas. JSO etc.
Yes, but just one point. I struggle to see the advantage to the activist billionaire class (who appear to work alongside the deep state) of collapsing the world economy. A bird in the hand……….
Well a Reset or war is always good for the Elites, they can plunder the resources of places in conflict. The Bankers and big industrialists love a war. That was true in WW1 WW2 and now in 2024. Read War is a Racket by General Smedley Butler, or the book I have about the same person; The Plot To Seize the White House. Look how Ukraine is for sale to Black Rock J.P Morgan etc. It was also Julian Assaunge who said about Afghanistan is a money laundering operation, hence why it went on so long.
Absolutely still don’t trust the buggers.
Yay! Now watch the twats like a hawk because they won’t give up.
“The WHO’s recommendations remain non-binding.”
Passports were also “voluntary and non-binding” after the First World War.
The sheep just follow along, unquestioningly, and BOOM – before you know where you are, it’s become convention. For our safety, y’ know.
To fly in the face of convention, you need to be an archos.
Fascists usually slice the salami. 2024 – a few slices made and the sheeple eat. 2025 – a few more…2026 an update and a few more…ad nauseum…the roadmap is clear – a world health-medical nazism using the Rona scamdemic as a pilot project and template.
James Roguski has strong views about the just released draft:
‘In a pathetic attempt to mask their complete and utter failure, the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body has failed so completely that they have no choice but to propose that nations sign an unfinished document and agree to delay the details into the far distant future.’
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/bullshit
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/bad-amendments
https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/evil-negotiating-tactics
Good news, but I expect this will just be a strategic retreat.
In a year or so, Disease X will be agreed, the concoction finalised and released …. and we’ll be back to full-on propaganda and scaremongering mode with the so-called “Sovereign” nations falling into co-ordinated line again …. on the “advice” of the “experts at the WHO.”
I am not convinced we are there yet.
The document has been watered down, but is full of ‘details will be negotiated further down the line’ and there is still no visibility of the financial ramifications.
So the parties are asked to sign a vague document, which still could have a huge impact in the wrong hands.
I simply don’t trust governments to stand up against a WHO pandemic treaty if we have another scare, no matter how watered down the document is.
It is a ‘no’ from me. We don’t need an authoritarian, non-democratic body ruling our lives. We have seen how much harm authoritarian rule caused at individual level.
The WHO and UN and our Governments can not be trusted, whatever amendments have been made or proposed or accepted. They have demonstrated over the last four years that they are controlled by Globalist interests and our good health is not their objective. Control over every aspect of our lives is.
I don’t trust the WHO either but here’s the thing: all those apologists for the proposals who said it didn’t mean what we said it did – well it clearly did. There was nothing to drop or water down if we weren’t right.