Last week, the Arch-Hand-Wringer of Canterbury, Justin Welby, thought he had been April Fool’s pranked about a fortnight too early. Seeing a job advert for a £36,000-a-year “Deconstructing Whiteness Officer” for the Diocese of Birmingham, he called diocese up and asked it why the ad had not been “written in English”. The local Bishop could just have replied: “Because it’s intended to be read by the people of Birmingham,” but instead the person provided an answer to the effect that the job was really about “mak[ing] sure that those from ethnic minority backgrounds [but not necessarily those from ethnic majority backgrounds…] who apply for jobs in the Church of England have a level playing field”.
Archbishop Welby was not wholly convinced. “What on Earth does that mean?” he asked, before going on Times Radio to complain that the whole thing sounded “a bit like” a joke from the satirical BBC sit-com W1A (one of the Beeb’s few remaining recent funny ones, it should be noted). Indeed, in the spirit of W1A, according to Dr. Reverend Ian Paul, a rare non-woke member of the CofE, the anti-racist job advert had subsequently had to be withdrawn… for being racist.
The difference between genuine and fake news stories relating to ‘anti-racist’ – or, more realistically, anti-white – ideas and events these days is slim indeed, making it hard to tell the difference between the real ones and the spoofs, as the Archbishop of Canterbury himself so recently found. In 2020, for example, following the death of George Floyd due to the existence of white people and their evil forces of law enforcement, someone called Hannah Stubbs posted a petition on online platform change.org, requesting signatures to get the White Cliffs of Dover renamed by HM Government as the Black Lives Matter Cliffs of Dover so as not to offend any of the very many non-white individuals then heading rapidly towards them illegally in small boats.
According to Hannah’s rationale:
Is it really appropriate and sensitive in this day and age to persist in calling a national symbol ‘white’? The fact that these cliffs are called ‘white’ stands as a racially-insensitive reminder of white privilege and white dominance in a country where many people are Black or Minority Ethnic. Why should marginalised people have to utter the name of the race that oppresses them in order to refer to a geological feature?
After the petition caused outrage, Hannah’s effort was deemed likely to be intended as a satirical spoof by the site’s administrators and taken down (although it is archived here) – but how can we be absolutely certain she didn’t mean this demand to be taken seriously? These days, there really is no surefire way of telling.
With all this in mind, here is a fun/deeply depressing (you decide!) Easter Week quiz from the Daily Sceptic, asking readers if they can tell which of the following four perfectly harmless white things have genuinely been condemned as being racist, and which have not. Answers at the end: looking them up before you have played is yet another unacceptable example of self-entitled white privilege in action, so don’t.
1. Why are White Statues So White?
Whenever you go to a museum to stare at those lovely white marble sculptures from the days of Classical-era Greece and Rome, do you ever stop to ask yourself: why are these statues all so white? To be fair, this would actually be a somewhat legitimate question. Many such items were genuinely once painted in bright colours but, as tends to happen as the millennia pass by, such pigments faded and flaked down the years. If only the equally white-skinned Lord Elgin had been around in 1,000 BC to take them all back home to the British Museum for safe-keeping several thousand years earlier than he had been, perhaps this travesty would not have come to pass.
To certain obsessive-minded academics, the fact such figures are displayed inside contemporary Western museums without their paint back on is actually a deliberate cover-up of the truth that not every dweller on ancient Mediterranean shores was necessarily as white as the marble their sculptures are made from: a form of “retroactive whitewashing”, as it has been termed. This does rather ignore the fact that, as the Greeks actually tended to make their own statues from brown-coloured bronze, as opposed to Aryan-coloured marble, collective displays of those tend to look more like contemporary snapshots of the Diocese of Birmingham, c.2024, as opposed to that of the fictional Aryan ice-continent of Ultima Thule, c.5,000 BC, but never mind: these things must be condemned nonetheless.
After all, during the 20th century, no lesser figures than Hitler and Mussolini expressed their great liking for classical, white-coloured marble statuary. Apparently, Nazi race-ideologues even took measurements from Classical-era sculptures in order to create their race-index databases of the ideal measurements, ratios and proportions of the ideal Aryan human frame: so, the British Museum and the Apollo of Belvedere really caused WWII and the Holocaust.
The problem could be fixed by going all Al Jolson on such items and throwing buckets of black paint or smearing boot-polish all over their heads and faces, but this could be considered vandalism (unless performed by members of Just Stop Oil, of course. As a result, some academics now make the suggestion that coloured lights be installed in galleries to artificially project brown and black skin-tones onto the exhibits, just to make immigrants feel more at home when wandering amongst them, compulsively complaining about how racist everything is. When Nigeria agrees to paint some Tipp-Ex over the Benin Bronzes in return, I might feel a little more amenable towards the whole idea.
2. Why are Whiteboards So White?
In 2022, an academic paper was published in the snappily-titled U.S. journal of scientific pedagogy, Physical Review Physics Education Research, entitled ‘Observing Whiteness in Introductory Physics: A Case Study’. Here, insightful academics stood around staring at three students trying to solve a physics problem using a whiteboard, concluding that the whole shocking event proved once and for all that “Whiteboards can be racist like how housing, employment and the judicial systems were found to contain racist practices”, or at least they were found to do so once hard Leftists went deliberately looking for them in such areas, whether such things were actually present there or not.
According to the paper: “Whiteboards display written information for public consumption; they draw attention to themselves and in this case support the centring of an abstract representation and the person standing next to it, presenting. They collaborate with white organisational culture, where ideas and experiences gain value (become more central) when written down.”
If writing really does equate to whiteness, though, then how come we are constantly being told the entire skill was actually invented thousands of years ago by clever people like the ancient Sumerians, a brown-skinned race from the Middle East? Perhaps, as they wrote everything down on clay tablets in cuneiform, rather than on whiteboards, this just doesn’t count. Meanwhile, if white people went back to using old-fashioned blackboards once more, they would probably just end up being endlessly criticised for using white chalk to scribble on them again – probably sourced direct from the racist White Cliffs of Dover.
3. Why Are Government White Papers So White?
Last year, it surprisingly emerged that the traditional U.K. Government practice of naming a certain class of condensed official report as White Papers, after the specific colour of their covers, was yet another hideous manifestation of white supremacy. The practice had also since been adopted by the Canadian Government, you see, which was a form of disgraceful colour-based Civil Service Admin Department colonialism in action.
According to researchers at Canada’s National Sciences Engineering and Research Council (NSERC), as White Papers are generally considered to be the most authoritative ones, such “hierarchies inherent in the creation of White Papers are seen as artefacts of colonisation” and “are seen as exclusionary by some groups” of non-white total race-nutters, as “equating white with authority also implies superiority of peoples or individuals based on race”. It would seem that “Using [the word] ‘White’ as synonymous with authority is the antithesis of inclusion” and must be discontinued immediately, with the phrase ‘White Paper’ being replaced instead with something like ‘Position Statement’, in order “to heal from the past and support the process of reconciliation” with colonised indigenous Indians across Canada.
But what are the other, lesser types of paper the U.K. and Canadian Governments so wickedly tyrannise with their appalling paper-based racial hierarchies? Green and blue. So, which oppressed races in particular are White Papers racist against, then? Smurfs and Martians?
4. Why is White Paint So White?
In 2023, a whistleblower on public sector waste revealed to the world the astonishing fact that the Norwegian Government had been blowing around a million pounds of taxpayers’ kroner funding a multi-year academic project, ‘How Norway Made the World Whiter’ (‘NorWhite’ for short), devoted to demonstrating how, despite having no non-white colonies to speak of, Norway too had nonetheless helped colonise and enslave the entire non-white world. But how? By inventing a special kind of industrial-strength white paint, that’s how.
Desperate to daub themselves in white guilt, the self-hating academics responsible bemoaned how, “Aathough Norway is not a conventional colonial power”, as it had no colonies, it was still guilty of the crime of ethnically cleansing the world’s walls of all helpless brown, yellow and black shades and forcibly turning them hideously stale and pale nonetheless. The chemical compound titanium dioxide (TiO2) had first been synthesised by Norwegian chemists during the early 20th century, and then mass exported out to the world mixed in with a new, racially superior brand of white paint by the Norwegian manufacturing giants Titania AS and Kronos Titan – companies who, in order to help atone for their historic acts of literal racial whitewashing, had also helped contribute towards the contemporary Norwegian Government’s modern-day academic study of their crimes.
As putting non-toxic TiO2 in your paint made it longer-lasting and harder-wearing, as well as enabling it to resist discolouration and weathering, thus performing highly useful services like protecting metal from rust, the racist paint in question became highly popular. But, said the state- and industry-funded academics, there was a problem: although “not – at the time – considered chemically toxic, it created conditions for the emergence of attitudes toward colour that could be said to be socially toxic. These attitudes allowed hierarchies and dichotomies such as clean/filthy, modern/non-modern and civilised/primitive to materialise in everyday surfaces” like painted walls, furniture, ships, bridges and goalposts.
I’m pretty sure simple and common binary concepts such as “clean/dirty” existed prior to the invention of Norwegian white paint, you know – clearly the academics had never read Mary Douglas’s classic anthropological text Purity and Taboo, which traces the history of such ideas right the way back to ancient times in non-white lands like Africa and the Middle East. But then, Mary Douglas was a white person, so why bother reading any of that tedious old rubbish?
In the presiding academics’ bizarre and deluded view, Norway’s clean and pure TiO2 paint “played a globally leading role in establishing white as a superior colour”, and thus its appearance upon so many consumer products and furniture enabled whiteness to establish its “systemic spread” across our entire paint-colonised planet. Just like invisible demons in the mindset of an early Renaissance witch-hunter, or imaginary unseen germs in the mind of a paranoid Howard Hughes-type, “the inorganic compound hides in the food we eat, the paper we print on, the paint on the wall, as well as in concrete coatings, in synthetic textiles, tattoos, make-up, sunscreens and in endless amounts of white plastic products”.
Surely there is a problem here, though. I can’t pretend to have much in-depth, expert knowledge of the history of industrial chemistry myself, but I would strongly imagine the black-coloured, hard-wearing, rust-resistant, black paint equivalent of TiO2 white paint, whatever that may be, was also invented by white Western chemists, as the Industrial Revolution quite clearly happened in the white West, not in black Nairobi or brown Islamabad. As equally as many consumer items are likewise artificially coloured black via such means, doesn’t this balance things out rather?
ANSWERS:
- TRUE
- TRUE
- TRUE
- TRUE
Yes, that’s right, they’re all true, because this is 2024, four years after the death of George Floyd at the hands of whiteness (and some non-white, Hispanic and Asian-heritage policemen, although that particular awkward fact is very rarely publicised), and this is the mentally disturbed world we now live in.
If the CofE ever want to do some genuine good for their parishioners this Easter, maybe they could put an ad in a newspaper looking to hire a Reconstructing Whiteness Officer? They’d need to offer him a good salary, though, as, judging by the above cavalcade of total crap, he’d have quite a large job on his hands at present.
Steven Tucker is a journalist and the author of over 10 books, the latest being Hitler’s & Stalin’s Misuse of Science: When Science Fiction Was Turned Into Science Fact by the Nazis and the Soviets (Pen & Sword/Frontline), which is out now.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Same Home Office twerps that put any number of hoops and hurdles in the way of temporary visas for young sports men and women of the wrong ethnicity wishing to enter this country temporarily to play sport, while coughing up billions of taxpayers’ money to put up jobless illegal immigrants of the right ethnicity in hotels.
https://www.ecb.co.uk/about/policies/regulations/overseas
Sort of state-sponsored Far Left duplicity and truth-twisting you come to expect from the Twerps Office.
Twerps is a bit mild is it not?
Personally I prefer the Deringer to the Beretta or the Smith and Wesson.
We need to bring back public flogging… as a first step.
For civil service incompetence
“Twerp and twerps” such wonderful words!
I just think it’s funny. Bring it on.
It’s all grist to the mill of persuading normies how completely dysfunctional the government and the civil service are.
Totally unfit for service.
Where is the English Milei?
It is not Farage nor Tice.
Where is the English Wilders or Le Pen?
It is not Farage nor Tice.
Where is the English Trump?
It is not Farage nor Tice.
Hell, where is the English Meloni?
Nowhere.
We are on our own.
The closest to Milei might be Thatcher, the closest to Wilders or Le Pen possibly Enoch Powell. Hard to have a Trump as we don’t have a Presidential system, though there are some vague similarities with Farage but Trump is much more disagreeable than Farage and his voter base is fine with that – in fact that’s often why they favour him. I suppose Badenoch is a polite version of Meloni. In general they are all too afraid of being called “far right”.
Rupert Lowe gets my vote, figuratively speaking. He’s much more forthright than Farage and bangs on about “mass deportations” and what should be done with illegals and foreign criminals all the time. You’d be hard pushed to ever hear Farage utter that term.
Thanks for that. I know nothing about him other than the name. I will keep a lookout for him.
He’s a Reform MP who asks very pertinent questions in parliament.
Hear, hear.
Rupert Lowe is a fine speaker, very focused on the issues and solutions that need to be implemented. Ben Habib likewise. Zia is also sharp. Lee Anderson gives a refreshing dose of humour and down to earth.
future is looking bright.
A successful businessman I understand. Hopefully gives him an understanding of how the world works.
In what ways is Trump much more disagreeable than Farage?
I meant disagreeable in the sense that he is not afraid of upsetting people when required – more straight talking. For me, it’s a positive quality for a political leader.
They can say stupid things at times on an equal measure. Trump with Operation Warp Speed being a great thing, and Farage with….Make the Blair a vaccine Tsar.
I think you’re probably right.
However the English 2 party system does work, just not like other systems.
The way it’s supposed work is that the tory party will be forced to the fight by the success of reform and general disgust with 2tk and his lot.
They will ditch kemi and choose somebody more energetically right wing, who that might be God only knows.
A bit like we’re seeing in Germany where despite the cordon sanitaire stitch up, afd is dictanfluencing the direction of travel on some key issues.
You would think that, but since Cameron flooded the Nonconservative party with Liberal Democrats in 2009/10, the existing members of the left wing factions – the one nationers, the TRG etc have been fortified, removing any residual power from the Monday Club, the Euro sceptics and so on. Look at some of the thoughts of Badenoch now finding their way out. She is not of the right.
Yes you are right, however, they still have to avoid being outflanked on the right and with a surging reform party and an overton window well and truly shifted rightwards, the electoral arithmetic will be compelling.
The one thing they care about is being elected.
Unfortunately they value this over keeping election promises.
We can but hope.
Sunak seemed intent on losing, but I suppose he had ticked the “British PM” box which left him set up for life.
True…I have seen the video of her pushing “diversity”….enough said!
The guy Kemi run against was making all the right noises regarding immigration and Western culture being superior, but they chose Kemi. Maybe they need to think again. That said, both parties are captured by the Globalists like in that hollowed out ski resort.
Where is Meloni? Bought and paid for by the EU.
Some things never change, and certain corrupt organizations never will, as Connor Tomlinson wrote about RICU last November. I wouldn’t deign to give this absurdity a second thought;
”The body responsible is called RICU — the Home Office’s Research, Information, and Communications Unit. Some learned about it during the COVID pandemic, thanks to Laura Dodsworth’s A State Of Fear. Others may have heard of it in a report by GB News this month, which revealed that civil servants produced a report calling the grooming gang scandal, in which thousands of girls across England were sexually exploited by predominantly-Pakistani Muslim perpetrators, a “grievance narrative” fabricated by “right-wing extremists”. The report warned “right-wing extremist narratives (particularly around immigration and policing) are in some cases ‘leaking’ into mainstream debates”. It classified “Cultural Nationalism” as “extreme right-wing”: with the “main belief” being “’Western culture is under threat from mass migration’”. Another example: “Claims of ‘two-tier’ policing, where two groups are allegedly treated differently after similar behaviour”. As I mentioned in a previous essay, there are ample double-standards to point to in Britain’s justice system, regarding those imprisoned for civil unrest following the Southport murders this summer. The Labour government have denounced and distanced themselves from the paper.
RICU has also received notoriety in recent years as the parent body of counter-extremism programme, Prevent. Like many ostensibly neutral institutions, Prevent has been subject to ideological capture since its inception. A recent video circulating on X, urging those undergoing Prevent training to report teenagers for posting stickers opposed to mass immigration, has alerted some to this. But the insidious absurdities stretch back over a decade.
A review of Prevent found that, in 2019, RICU had compiled a dossier of materials circulated by social media users described as “actively patriotic and proud”. The canonical texts of these far right radicals include: books by Peter Hitchens, Melanie Phillips, and Douglas Murray; Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan; John Locke’s Two Treatises of Government; Edmund Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France; The Lord of the Rings; Beowulf; C.S. Lewis; Micahel Portillo’s Great British Railway Journeys; and, without a hint of irony, George Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-Four. Curiously, the Qur’an and Hadiths were not mentioned — despite Islamic groups being the predominant perpetrators of lethal terror attacks both in the UK and the world.”
https://courage.media/2024/11/25/how-islamists-influence-the-uk-government/
” … Micahel Portillo’s Great British Railway Journeys …”
Well, he was once Minister of Defence for Thatcher.
Thanks for this link to Ayaan Hirsi Ali’s platform. She does an incredibly good investigation into the whole murky web of alliances. I watched that Hope Not Hate documentary when the guy got a fake passport and also wondered thought how the hell he got away with that. It’s worth watching as it tries to discredit the writers of Aporia magazine as white supremacists,
How long?
Until we get a Reform Government I would think. Hopefully 2029.
Too many people still supporting the Fake conservatives.
Only if Reform start having policies now and start getting organised now. I can’t see it happening.
” hopeless Home Office”
Hardly “hopeless”. They are doing exactly what they think they are meant to be doing, which is continuing the establishment’s decades long project (really more than half a century now) to impose millions of people of alien cultures on the UK and for questioning this to be taboo.
The Home Office are staffed by personnel of foreign descent and white Leftard traitors, so it was ever thus.
Mass immigration into the UK started immediately post war. Home Office employees would have all been white British then. But the politicians wanted it and people went along with it- maybe they thought we needed the workforce to help reconstruction or we owed them for fighting for the Empire. White guilt was probably a thing even then. Powell was thrown under a bus.
“The Alleged Problem of Grooming Gangs” ????——-Always we are told not to cause “offence” and if we do it is a “hate crime”. Well you do not get much more offensive that telling thousands of young girls and their families that they were “allegedly” gang raped. —-This is disgusting wokery. How can this absurd Politically Correct Virus be eradicated?
Who wrote it? who commissioned it? all individuals should be removed from post, they are anti democratic and a danger to society, plus they clearly have zero empathy for the children who were raped and tortured by gangs of Pakistani men, as they prize the lie of diversity being our strength over the violence visited on young girls. We pay their wages for this?
all individuals should be removed from post
Absolutely right.
I think they must have an AI report writer with various defaults, press the button and ‘Far right’ appears as the answer to every question. From what I can tell, our civil service is idle and appalling.
‘ Should be removed’. Trump is doing a lot of removing across the pond but this is pie in the sky .. there isn’t a hope in hell of that kind of positive action in Ol’Blighty. Let’s face it our elites are too busy promoting ‘ being kind’ and pussy footing about the negative influence of Islam on the West. Wish I had faith in Reform but the rot is way bigger than someone like Farage can comprehend.
Two words spring to mind: “smoke” and “fire”.
Did Axel Rudakubana have any NCHIs recorded against him?
Brilliant question. I have submitted an FOI request. Doubtless it’s confidential as he was a “minor” at the time.
There are not enough candidates to replace large numbers of civil servants so we need a few effective non-politicised leaders (or politicised against woke, etc) together with new management boards.
Their appointment must be accompanied by changes to employment terms for the staff, annual reviews and other normal private sector supervision. Often the failures to follow policy will have to lead to dismissal.
not “enforced redundancy”, not transfer but dismissal with prejudice.
We don’t need to replace large numbers of civil servants.
We need to cut numbers by 50%.
Yes but if the other 50% are also disobedient lefties you’d need to get rid of them all. (I’m sure there are a good number who would follow orders, just need to work out which ones).
My considerable experience in the Civil Service confirmed that all those with right of centre views were workers. Those left of centre got lazier the more Marxist their opinions.
Whoops, posted before I read this.
My thinking exactly…..Why do we need more than, say, the 1990s. Where is this big state juggernaut taking us!
Current civil service numbers could be reduced by at least 50% and so long as the recruits had at least ten years private sector experience and a decent CV there would be no disruption to output, in fact it would noticeably improve. Anybody with left wing views would be barred.
Would Pixie Balls or some other government official care to start naming some of the apparently many “right-wing” extremists who are currently stomping the streets of Great Britain causing mayhem? I would love to meet a few for a chat, swap ideas and all that.
Je suis Right Wing.
The problem is that these political civil service appointments are already happening and have been happening (in all likeliness) since the days of the Blair governments. AFAIK, the so-called civil service is a Labour (and left Labour at that) dominated shadow government of the UK under direct influence of the extreme wing of the US democrats and only people happy with this direction of travel will be hired by all the other people who got already hired because of this.
The solution is thus not to politicize civil service recruitment but to depoliticize it again and to reassert government control over the civil service. Civil service unions financing lawfare suits to torpedo government policies should just be treated as people hired for a certain job (implement government policies) refusing to actually do it. All involved people to be dismissed immediately with prejudice. End of.
Yes we can’t have banana skins thrown in an aggressive way!
?
About the ousting of Dominic Raab:https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-65333983
There’s little detail about this available and hence, I don’t really have an opinion of this.
What I was trying to get at was that civil servants (or people acting on their behalf) using judicial review to shoot down government policies (the Rwanda plan) is de facto an abuse of process. Nobody was planning to deport civil servants to Rwanda (might be a good idea though) and hence, they had no standing in this, regardless of the contortions which were used to justify it. That was transparently just a pretext for refusing to implement a certain government policy for political reasons. If some civil servant was honestly convinced that the government was exposing itself to legal problems by acting in a certain way, he could and should have told this to the responsible government people but the decisions is ultimately theirs and civil servants are just executing agents. If a minister believes a and a civil servant believes b, a is what it’s going to be for the civil service.
I can see the system being swamped with self reported “crimes”, such as … my mother has called KS two-tier, come and arrest her, she won’t resist, as she is 92 and has dementia.
I am Spartacus.
This is how it went in Scotland, before the Law was amended.
The Human Rights Act is riddled with laws which undermine NCIHs. Freedom of belief, thoughts and expression; compensation, unlawful detainment, freedom from discrimination (yes, that can be applied to whites too, amazingly); no punishment without law; freedom from degrading treatment; liberty rights.
Now they can do their serpent thing with semantics as much as they want but the laws are stacked against them and they know it – hence their egg-shell approach when robustly challenged. If they want to continue to bring themselves down so be it. And as an aside, what company from overseas would choose to invest here when laws can be attempted to be so arbitrarily applied?
Well, would they like to inform the traumatised victims of brutal rape and abuse at the hands of the grooming gangs that it was all in their imagination? That their experience was just an “alleged problem” exploited by the “Far Right”… that old chestnut of a distraction from the spectacular failings of successive governments to address the most heinous criminal activity happening regularly on a disturbing scale?
Perhaps they would also like to look the victims of torture and abuse in the eyes and call them racist for making allegations of torture and abuse.
How long till the U.K. moves to political Civil Service appointments
We already have since Tony the Liar and his Liar-in-Chief Campbell forced out all the impartial civil servants whose duty to the state was not considered right for New Labour.
This is precisely what I was thinking
This is typical of institutions, universities, large corporates, MSM in Britain. It has become a self fulfilling prophecy. Namely, the mindset of the people who obtain the senior positions is that of the people who wrote this report. Over the last about thirty years, to even be hired into any reasonably senior roles the candidate had to spout the standard line on identity politics, liberalism, DEI or they had no chance. Even remaining silent is often insufficient. Hence the group think that produces such nonsensical reports. It is self reinforcing and the individuals have both gained employment and senior positions via this mindset. Essentially they have been rewarded for it. This is precisely why changing democratic governments actually changes little as much societal power resides in the leaders and employees in these institutions. It has always been like this but identity politics has been weaponised to make it worse. Nor is it simply a left wing problem, as the ‘top’ public/private schools and universities also push this nonsense, as they are preparing their pupils/students for roles in these very institutions. To fix it we need to reform the institutions and change the people leading them. Otherwise, nothing is going to change in Britain.
I just wish we knew the names of those Home Office civil servants who say things like: “The “alleged” problem of grooming gangs and claims of ‘two-tier policing’ are part of a “Right-wing extremist narrative” and police should record more non-crime hate incidents.”
These people do not represent the views of the majority.
If the UK ever gets a Trump-like breath of fresh air then these people need to be pinpointed now in readiness for the purge.
Re “a leaked Home Office report”…
Another meddling ‘report’…prepared by faceless bureaucrats.
Who ARE these people?!
This is what we need to know, the identify of these unelected people who impose their ideology on the community.
And make the ‘elected’ representatives accountable for their diktats, e.g. the Labour Party, which got into power in the UK on the votes of just 20% of the electorate, that is, 80% of people didn’t consent to being ruled by that shower.
“Stop Press: The Times says the lion’s share of these Home Office recommendations have been “rejected”
Not all? This means that some recommendations will be accepted.
It looks like the home office is full of left wing communists and totalitarianists. How could such a report so much against the British people come from anywhere in our government.
It seems like Starmer has been in there stamping his feet in a child-like way, insisting on his Trotskyist policies being imposed on all of us. That man is a traitor to British values.