• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Customers Hit With Shock Bills of Tens of Thousands of Pounds as Four Million Smart Meters Stop Working Properly

by Will Jones
27 March 2024 9:00 AM

Households are being hit with shock energy bills of as much as tens of thousands of pounds as four million smart meters are not working properly. The Telegraph has more.

The number of ‘dumb’ smart meters is up from a previous estimate of 2.7 million, following revisions to official statistics released by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) published last week.

Bill payers have complained of feeling “terrified” by the devices after receiving shock meter readings putting them thousands of pounds in debt.

Lord Callanan, the Minister for Energy Efficiency and Green Finance, said he was “deeply concerned” about the figures in a letter to the energy watchdog on Thursday. 

He called on Ofgem to enforce legal requirements for suppliers to ensure that smart meters are working properly.

He said: “The scale of some suppliers’ underperformance in optimising their operation metering estate over a period of time shows these steps may not have been taken universally,” adding “I am deeply concerned about this”.

Broken smart meters do not provide consumers with an accurate reflection of how much energy they have used and can lead to incorrect charges appearing on plug-in displays.

Problems with smart meters have affected high-profile consumers. In December, artist Grayson Perry complained of a £39,000 bill he received on a smart meter. In the same month, broadcaster Jon Sopel revealed his device handed him a £19,274 bill.

Estimates by the National Audit Office (NAO) put the number of faulty smart meters in Britain at just under three million last June. DESNZ has now said that the actual figure in June was 4.31 million – far higher than reported at the time.

Worth reading in full.

Tags: Energy BillEnergy CostsNet ZeroSmart appliancesSmart meters

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Free Speech Tsar to Begin Crackdown on University Censorship

Next Post

Gender Self-ID in Spain Has Been a Disaster for Women

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

43 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
2 years ago

Once again the green blob is shown up as utterly incompetent, it’s either that or their loathing for humanity is causing the pursuit of planetary depopulation.

116
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

“the pursuit of planetary depopulation.”

Welcome aboard.

63
0
MichaelM
MichaelM
2 years ago
Reply to  Tyrbiter

Could I (naively, probably) ask how the pursuit of net-zero assists with depopulation? What is the mechanism? Is it through people freezing to death as a result of fuel poverty? Or is it simply based on reducing life expectancies by increasing poverty?

18
-6
JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  MichaelM

Do you not know any history?

12
-3
MichaelM
MichaelM
2 years ago
Reply to  JXB

Why do you ask? Remind me, please. Are you one of these guys who answers a question with a question?

9
-8
barrososBuboes
barrososBuboes
2 years ago
Reply to  MichaelM

closing 3000 farms in the Netherlands. If you want to eat it will have to be insects and it won’t be unconditional. Use your imagination.

25
0
VAX FREE IanC
VAX FREE IanC
2 years ago
Reply to  barrososBuboes

And using over 40 years of my car windscreen as a guage, insect numbers are considerably depleted as well. No meat, no insects, no crops because we’ve acheived net zero carbon dioxide (an important plant food I understand). I reckon that leaves all us plebs pretty much screwed.

9
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago
Reply to  VAX FREE IanC

“Net zero CO2” does not mean that there is no CO2 in the atmosphere, it means that CO2 is not increasing. The amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has increased over the last century.

0
0
VAX FREE IanC
VAX FREE IanC
2 years ago
Reply to  Anthony_Blighe

I know this.I take it you’re not an an admirer of Chris Morrisons numerous features discussing this topic on this platform. I find them quite informative personally.

0
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago
Reply to  VAX FREE IanC

Sorry if I misinterpreted your post Ian (I too am vax-free, but that’s another story).

No, I’m not fan of Chris Morrison, I think he is tarnishing the Daily Sceptics’ brand. As I’ve said elsewhere here, this is a classic straw man argument – nobody is saying that batteries could or should replace gas power stations, yet CM has written a lengthy article as if they have.

The DS coverage of COVID and free speech has been fair, intelligent and well researched. This and other articles by CM do not meet their standards and he should be given the boot.

0
-1
Tyrbiter
Tyrbiter
2 years ago
Reply to  MichaelM

Cold, hungry people often die earlier than the warm and well fed. Death from cold causes up to 100x the deaths from high temperatures. Giving many people a toxic mRNA concoction also makes death more likely. There are quite a few very rich people who are behind these sorts of organisations including the green blob which has worked its way into governments and NGOs worldwide.

They do not have our welfare at heart.

43
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  MichaelM

I can give you one way it helps, and infact it is already occurring. Couples in the UK are increasingly deciding NOT to have children because of the energy and cost of living crisis.

13
0
JayBee
JayBee
2 years ago

The problem is that the Net Zero cabal lives in its own ‘maths is racist’ bubble, and that it now has the power and nothing to fear from the brainwashed plebs until the bills actually become due and unpayable.
Though I also think that many of them do know this. These people are not trying to stop it, but are instead working towards bringing about the total collapse of economies and currencies by other means, like plandemics, to fill up their and their sponsors own pockets a bit more along that way.

72
-1
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
2 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

Don’t forget the depopulation element JayBee.

32
-1
barrososBuboes
barrososBuboes
2 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

The people need to beg for the communist take over. To get to that stage things will have to be very bad, before they get even worse.

4
0
Lancer
Lancer
2 years ago

I can only presume since we’ve reached peak oil and realised we need fundamental change in how we go about energy generation, those who are in control of the levers are undoubtedly setting up a system to covet the remaining resources for themselves (is that stating the obvious?).

I suppose all is fair in love and war but what they’re fundamentally forgetting from their ivory towers is an ignorance for where the tech, breakthroughs and comforts they now enjoy and want to use in their dystopian future came from – bustling economies across the world reliant on fossil fuels. With their declaration of a [supposed] transition – a plan without a plan, they seem to think they’ve all the innovation they need to go further and beyond – a naive perspective if ever I realised one, because a few (even billions) of windmills and solar panels just ain’t gonna cut it.

If we were serious about net zero nuclear power would be top of a very short list – but it isn’t so I can only assume they’re manufacturing a collapse with the hope of some miraculous innovation coming along. But where will that breakthrough come from without the bustling economies and the next bright spark to create the innovation?

54
-3
EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
2 years ago
Reply to  Lancer

Journos looking for a crisis and the left who want to neuter the west have claimed we are running out of oil and gas for decades. Available oil is a function of price and technology as well as, ultimately, geology.

there are huge unexploited known reserves at todays prices. At the price of renewables today there is a vast additional reserve.

if only politicians would reverse their policy of closing down hydrocarbons and as a consequence, the economy.

48
0
Lancer
Lancer
2 years ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Fair insight on the peak oil, or if we’re anywhere near that peak, but still even if we’re close I understand why the debate should shift.

Still, even if we are, who’s to say the current system isn’t our best bet to surpass any roadblocks. The purveying suggestion and the direction within the narrative looks to want to restrict everything, put a halt to life (slow it down). It’s a bite your nose to spite your face approach. What’s the system that’s got us to where we are, why would we want to hold that back, even when there are limited resources. We still need to innovate our way through it and for that you need the free exchange of ideas (not doing too well on that) and affordable power to function. Seems quite simple and those are the things in short supply (some of it manufactured).

10
0
James.M
James.M
2 years ago
Reply to  Lancer

Alternative theories on the origin of fossil fuels suggests that the earth replenishes its oil reserves through an abiotic process rather than the established theory that oil is the result of biodegraded plants and plankton. If this is true it pokes a hole in the sustainability argument.

19
0
Lancer
Lancer
2 years ago
Reply to  James.M

and that abiotic approach replenishes quicker than the decomposition?

0
-2
Lancer
Lancer
2 years ago
Reply to  Lancer

abiotic process* I meant

0
0
richardw53
richardw53
2 years ago
Reply to  James.M

I believe this theory originated from Russia. The Western oil companies did not want any research that showed that oil was plentiful therefore cheap, and there is nobody with the financial incentive to carry it out. Which on its own is a good indicator that there is something in the abiotic theory.

16
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago
Reply to  James.M

So the Earth creates fossil fuels as fast as we use them. This is great news! Can you post a link so that I can explore this is more detail? Thanks.

0
0
JXB
JXB
2 years ago
Reply to  Lancer

‘I can only presume since we’ve reached peak oil…’

Have we? Again.

That would be the sixth time we’ve reached it in my lifetime so far.

So why is it necessary for Biden to ban further exploration and extraction in the USA, why moves to stop investment in future exploration and extraction elsewhere, why is fracking banned in UK and Europe?

Explain how it can be, if we have reached peak oil, that there is now far more oil available than ever before with estimates of enough known reserves for two to three centuries at projected increased use?

26
0
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
2 years ago
Reply to  Lancer

We are absoutely nowhere near peak oil.
I have no doubt that we all have a minimum of 100 years of “fossil” fuels that can be used affordably and efficiently. Plenty of time to construct enough nuclear at a much lower cost and infinitely less environmental damage than ruinables.

12
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago
Reply to  Lancer

Peak Oil? Where do get that idea? There are 20 times more deposits of fossil fuels in the ground than we have actually used up until now.——- Remember that “deposits” are not the same thing as “reserves”

6
0
Lancer
Lancer
2 years ago
Reply to  varmint

Looks like I need to do more research on the peak oil, or if we’re anywhere near it. Appreciate the responses.

0
0
Sinor
Sinor
2 years ago

Nettards all. They know that the true costs are beyond feasibility but want to keep this hidden from us.I am really thinking that the only action we can take collectively to stop this madness is a revolt . When this happens I think a few heads on spikes will be in order .I have a list of suitable candidates to hand ..lol

40
0
emel
emel
2 years ago

Who’d have thought it?

9
-1
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago

The idea that windmills and solar panels will ever create enough energy in the first place to warrant all this battery storage capacity is in itself laughable.

45
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago
Reply to  Marcus Aurelius knew

“In 2020 renewables accounted for more than 43.1% of the UK’s total of 312 terawatt hours (TWh) of electricity generated. This outstripped fossil fuels over the course of a year”

– https://www.nationalgrid.com/stories/energy-explained/how-much-uks-energy-renewable

43.1% is laughable?

0
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
2 years ago
Reply to  Anthony_Blighe

Check the latest definition of “renewables”.

0
0
JXB
JXB
2 years ago

The reason the batteries are needed is because wind and solar are not continuous and not dispatchable… thus unreliable.

Therefore there is no reliable way charge up these batteries so that they can supply electricity when wind/solar power fails, so power from them will be just as unreliable as the primary sources.

Storage falls foul of the very problem they are supposed to solve.

You have to be mentally subnormal not to see and understand this or if you do, just malicious.

28
0
True Spirit of America Party
True Spirit of America Party
2 years ago

Have no fear, sand batteries are here!

https://www.iflscience.com/gigantic-sand-battery-could-provide-a-cheap-solution-for-storing-renewable-energy-66243

3
-1
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
2 years ago
Reply to  True Spirit of America Party

Bunk

1
0
7941MHKB
7941MHKB
2 years ago
Reply to  7941MHKB

There is no shortage of magical thinking that yet another fancy scheme using sand or unicorn farts or whatever will save the day.
Let’s turn the clock back. Where was the properly conducted small scale trial WITH THOROUGH COST BENEFIT STUDY for closing coal mines, blowing up power stations and erecting giant whirligigs?
Answer – there never has been!

15
0
RW
RW
2 years ago

The parts of COVID which weren’t about imitating China were mostly huge government subsidies for hitherto unprofitable gene engineering technology. Likewise, the brains behind Nut Zero don’t want to save a planet or ever reach Net Zero. What they want is huge government subsidies for otherwise unviable alt tech like electric cars, solar installations on roof tops and giant wind mills on otherwise useless (ie, unprofitable) land.

18
0
barrososBuboes
barrososBuboes
2 years ago

How ridiculous. How many serfs would have access to private transport ?

6
0
bfbf334
bfbf334
2 years ago

Net Zero Promoters “Have No Idea What They Are Doing”……………….
Only they know EXACTLY what they are doing.

Last edited 2 years ago by bfbf334
14
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago
Reply to  bfbf334

Do you know what they are doing? If so, what is it?

0
0
varmint
varmint
2 years ago

No wonder NET ZERO was simply waved through parliament with not a single question asked as to the cost/benefit of this absurdity. ———Blaming Tories for this is daft as all of the political class are in on this total scam. —–Who do these people really work for? It is isn’t you and it isn’t me . So who?——————-Or perhaps the idea is to head in the direction of NET ZERO knowing full well it can never happen, but achieve a lot of the wealth redistribution and lowering of living standards in the process but pull back ultimately from going all the way. Because going all the way is IMPOSSIBLE. The heating aspect of Net Zero alone is impossible as there are 22 million gas boilers in the UK and apart from building some wind turbines and looking a little into hydrogen, the government isn’t doing much to change that situation despite only having 29 years left. Successive governments have committed themselves to something that they have no idea how to achieve? ———Who in their right mind does this? Politics works best when politicians disagree and debate and discuss things, we should be very wary that something about this stinks since all politicians of all major parties all AGREE on Net Zero despite the cost and impossibility. ———-A cautionary tale

17
0
The Enforcer
The Enforcer
2 years ago

I have been getting and reading Francis Menton’s blog, the Manhattan Contrarion, for 2 years. It comes about 3 times a week and is always excellent in its content. I would recommend that all Daily Sceptic supporters read it.
He is one of the very few who has majored on the single biggest problem of the Net Zero policy, the storage of renewables. It has never been even looked at. I have been ‘educating’ my young Tory MP for the last 2 years – complete waste of time – thick as mince!

9
0
gedhurst
gedhurst
2 years ago

“Evidence grows by the day that the Net Zero fantasy is a societal and economic disaster waiting to happen.”
Chris, *nobody* could be that stupid and they’re not. They WANT you to die.

9
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago
Reply to  gedhurst

Who are “they” and why do they want us to die?

How are net zero policies going to make us die?

Is it possible they could have come up with a more efficient way to make us die?

0
0
MrVeryAngry
MrVeryAngry
2 years ago

Mineral oil (not ‘fossil fuels’) is the ‘greenest’ energy source. The whole net zero is all about control. It has zero to do with greeinie-ism

0
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago
Reply to  MrVeryAngry

So you don’t believe that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere has any effect on the amount of the Sun’s energy that is retained by the Earth. Interesting.

0
0
Anthony_Blighe
Anthony_Blighe
2 years ago

‘Germany, fully replacing natural gas back-up with battery storage “is a multi-trillion dollar project, likely costing a multiple of the country’s GDP, and thus completely infeasible”’

Chris Morrison has fabricated a classic straw man argument. No-one who has authority in these matters is suggesting that batteries be used to replace gas power stations. The idea is ludicrous.

Batteries are used for very short term storage to avoid the use of expensive “peaker plants”. Their advantage over peaker plants is that they can respond to changes in supply/demand in milliseconds, thus making the grid more robust.

Before anyone’s blood pressure gets too high, the 200MWh battery being installed near Hull by Harmony Energy is not subsidised and is a purely commercial undertaking [https://www.harmonyenergy.co.uk/general/harmony-energy-income-trust-brings-europes-largest-battery-energy-storage-system-online/].

Perhaps we can all agree that the price of gas is currently very high, most of it is imported, and supply may become restricted even at any price.

Is it not therefore logical to replace as much gas as possible with home grown wind and solar, the price of which is low, constant, predictable and not subject to conflicts abroad?

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Cancelled Climate Dissenter Professor Norman Fenton Speaks Out

by Richard Eldred
15 August 2025
14

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Britain’s First Trans Judge Appeals to ECHR Over Supreme Court Gender Ruling

18 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

18 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Biddy Baxter and the Decline and Fall of Blue Peter

18 August 2025
by James Alexander

The European Press Are Having a Big Stroppy Sad Following the Trump-Putin Summit in Alaska

18 August 2025
by Eugyppius

Furious Council Discovers Hundreds of Hidden Asylum Seekers Have Been Shipped Into City Despite Telling Home Office it had no More Room for Them

17 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

The European Press Are Having a Big Stroppy Sad Following the Trump-Putin Summit in Alaska

25

Britain’s First Trans Judge Appeals to ECHR Over Supreme Court Gender Ruling

20

Workers Tear Down St George’s Cross on Orders of Council That Prided Itself on Palestinian Banners as Flag Wars Spread Across Britain

17

Biddy Baxter and the Decline and Fall of Blue Peter

15

News Round-Up

20

Biddy Baxter and the Decline and Fall of Blue Peter

18 August 2025
by James Alexander

A Response to Fraser Nelson and His Critics

17 August 2025
by Noah Carl

Activists Run to Federal Court to Try to Ban Official US Government Report that Blows Holes in ‘Settled’ Climate Science Claims

17 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

How Taxpayers’ Money is Being Spent on ‘Sanctuary Cities’

17 August 2025
by Charlotte Gill

We Don’t Need More Windbags. We Need Water Plants and Batteries

16 August 2025
by Clive Pinder

POSTS BY DATE

March 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Feb   Apr »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

March 2024
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
« Feb   Apr »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Britain’s First Trans Judge Appeals to ECHR Over Supreme Court Gender Ruling

18 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

18 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

Biddy Baxter and the Decline and Fall of Blue Peter

18 August 2025
by James Alexander

The European Press Are Having a Big Stroppy Sad Following the Trump-Putin Summit in Alaska

18 August 2025
by Eugyppius

Furious Council Discovers Hundreds of Hidden Asylum Seekers Have Been Shipped Into City Despite Telling Home Office it had no More Room for Them

17 August 2025
by Richard Eldred

The European Press Are Having a Big Stroppy Sad Following the Trump-Putin Summit in Alaska

25

Britain’s First Trans Judge Appeals to ECHR Over Supreme Court Gender Ruling

20

Workers Tear Down St George’s Cross on Orders of Council That Prided Itself on Palestinian Banners as Flag Wars Spread Across Britain

17

Biddy Baxter and the Decline and Fall of Blue Peter

15

News Round-Up

20

Biddy Baxter and the Decline and Fall of Blue Peter

18 August 2025
by James Alexander

A Response to Fraser Nelson and His Critics

17 August 2025
by Noah Carl

Activists Run to Federal Court to Try to Ban Official US Government Report that Blows Holes in ‘Settled’ Climate Science Claims

17 August 2025
by Chris Morrison

How Taxpayers’ Money is Being Spent on ‘Sanctuary Cities’

17 August 2025
by Charlotte Gill

We Don’t Need More Windbags. We Need Water Plants and Batteries

16 August 2025
by Clive Pinder

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences