You probably haven’t heard of Sean Corby, but he has just won a huge victory for free speech, writes Alka Sehgal Cuthbert in Spiked. Thanks to him, opposition to Critical Race Theory has been recognised by a U.K. court as a ‘protected belief’ under the Equality Act for the first time. Here’s an excerpt.
Earlier this year, Corby took his employer, workplace-conciliation service Acas, to an employment tribunal after bosses ordered him to remove his social-media posts criticising Black Lives Matter (BLM). Last week, the tribunal ruled in his favour, confirming that holding a view that opposes critical race theory (CRT) is a protected ‘philosophical belief’ under the Equality Act.
The verdict is undoubtedly good news. But the events that led to Corby having to defend his freedom of speech are still troubling.
His problems started in August 2021. He posted comments opposing the divisive ideology of BLM and CRT on Yammar, an internal workplace-communications platform. In particular, he argued that a better way to address racial problems was articulated by the late Martin Luther King, who famously called on us to judge people according to the content of their character rather than the colour of their skin.
Some of Corby’s colleagues took issue with his advocacy of a universalist, colourblind approach to race. Of course, people don’t have to agree with the views of those they work with. We can disagree with others while accepting their right to hold and express those views. But it seems Corby’s colleagues were incapable of such tolerance. They complained that his comments demonstrated “a deep-rooted hatred towards black and minority-ethnic people who challenge racism”. As a result, they said, they would not feel “safe” when having any personal contact with him.
At this point, you would have hoped that Acas would have told these people, politely, that what they were saying was ridiculous – that Corby’s criticisms of BLM constituted neither personal hatred nor a threat to their safety. But that’s not what the bosses did. While they dismissed the complaints, they also instructed Corby to take the posts down, because they had caused offence.
Corby could have complied and agreed to keep his head down from then on. This is what many people do in situations similar to his, and they do so for understandable reasons. But not Corby. He recognised that, in asking him to take down his posts, his employers were abandoning any pretence of impartiality. They were coming down on one side of the BLM debate. They were effectively instructing him to publicly recant his deeply held views, which he expressed in a cordial manner. He refused to comply and took his case to the tribunal with the support of the Free Speech Union.
While celebrating the ruling, Cuthbert notes “caveats” in that the ruling relies on the Equality Act’s concept of “philosophical belief”, for which courts have set a high bar. “If we’re serious about free speech we should defend people’s right to air views that do not meet this threshold,” she says.
Worth reading in full.
To my mind, a further problem with the ruling is the implication that Critical Race Theory is also a protected ‘philosophical belief’. But we wouldn’t protect the belief that all black people (or people from any other racial group) are inherently racist and ought to be permanently disfavoured in the workplace and society to overcome their ‘privilege’, so why should we protect the same racist beliefs about white people? It’s plainly invidious to have different rules about what blanket statements can be made about white people and non-white people, and the increasing acceptability of doing so breeds resentment. Opposition to Critical Race Theory isn’t really a ‘philosophical belief’ so much as a commonsense opposition to anti-white racism, and this ruling, though welcome on its own terms, ultimately reinforces the framework that gives the divisive, anti-white ideas being spewed out of American academia their legitimacy.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Well done to this chap and those who helped him.
I think this whole idea of “protected beliefs” has to go, doesn’t it?
Either everything is protected, or nothing is. How the hell can anyone decide which is which?
Indeed, well done Sean Corby. There is real bravery in taking on a big outfit such as ACAS and the personal cost both physically and mentally must have been tremendous.
How sad that the premier conciliation service has so signally failed to adhere to its own principles and even worse cannot even recognise such failings. A period of introspection would not go amiss. Some hope.
Congratulations to Sean Corby and many thanks to the Free Speech Union for securing this victory. Hopefully, this win will encourage more people to take up membership of the FSU.
The FSU is a fine organisation and sadly much needed.
I’m pleased to hear about this, however I wonder if his employer will treat him fairly in future. I hope the FSU are ready to back him up if necessary.
GB News has confirmed the sackings of Laurence Fox and Calvin Robinson.
hat tip TCW comments section.
We saw it coming but that’s really shit nevertheless. And the fate of Dan is hanging by a thread, yet to be revealed then? He was already going through it due to some psycho ex’s allegations wasn’t he? Christ, it’s like bloody Lockstep! It’s all the ones on our side, the freedom fighters, that are getting targeted. I’m thinking of Brand and Bellfield as well. Maybe I’ve forgotten somebody…
”GB News said in a statement: “Laurence Fox and Calvin Robinson were both suspended last week pending internal investigations that have now concluded. As of today, GB News has ended its employment relationship with Laurence Fox and Calvin Robinson. The internal investigation into Dan Wootton continues.”
Meanwhile, a GB News staffer told The Independent: “The removal of two shockjock conspiratorial presenters makes this a great day for GB News.
“Hopefully we can finally turn to producing more of the intellectually curious broadcasting that our viewers love to tune in to.”
https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/laurence-fox-gb-news-fired-calvin-robinson-b2420338.html
No question the screws are tightening Mogs.
Wootton led a witch hunt against Johnny Depp …. he deserves everything that he gets
Johnny Deep is taters deep with the WEF.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/breaking-laurence-fox-arrested/
From TCW just now.
Beat you.
… but they are only following orders
it is reminiscent of historic warnings of state control.
But a well done to the brave man resisting the state BLM theory with the amazing free speech union! A win against state ideology control.
I think they need to arrest Khan for manipulating the truth buying science with tax payers money to buy surveillance state cameras . Outrageous authoritarian mayor in my view.
Critical Race theory incites racial hatred
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/breaking-news-gb-news-fires-fox-sacked-while-he-sits-in-jail/
Is it a purge that’s gathering pace ? Neil Oliver will be next I bet ! Mark Steyn , Belfield , Brand ( not GBN ) Robinson , Fox ( by his own hand ) Tommy & Katie etc Anyone against the mainstream are being targeted !!
Katie has a weekday show on TNT Radio (readily available as a podcast)
This is a bloody joke. Nobody is going to take the knee in some pst-nuclear reality. Franly given the seriousness of our situation I couldn’t give a moneky’s abuot some stupid discussion. You might want to tune into reality. Seriously we are moving into different times. I am not knocking your cause I am just telling you where it might end up.
Another great result for the FSU. Sets a valuable precedent.