• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

UKHSA Ignores Its Own Published Evidence to Tell GB News That ‘Masks Work’

by Dr Carl Heneghan and Dr Tom Jefferson
17 April 2023 3:16 PM
Discarded face mask.jpg

Discarded face mask.jpg

After our live interview on GB News on our findings of the UKHSA review, one of the two anchors, Philip Davies MP, received the following communiquè from the UKHSA: 

Dr. Renu Bindra, Deputy Director of Public Health Clinical Response at UKHSA, said:

“The current evidence on face coverings suggests that all types of face coverings are, to varying extents, effective in reducing transmission of respiratory viruses in both healthcare and community settings. N95 respirators are likely to be the most effective, followed by surgical masks, and then non-medical masks, although optimised non-medical masks made of two or three layers might have similar filtration efficiency to surgical masks.

“The evidence specific to COVID-19 is still limited and does not allow for firm conclusions to be drawn for specific settings and types of face coverings. However, there is no evidence to suggest that face coverings and masks would be less effective at preventing the transmission of COVID-19 than any other similar respiratory infection.”

BACKGROUND

Throughout the pandemic, UKHSA published several rapid evidence reviews and a statement from an expert panel informed by review-level evidence (available here).  

In the most recent version, review (update 2), studies were assessed by experienced reviewers using a risk of bias tool, which can be applied to most study designs (observational and interventional). In all three evidence reviews of the effectiveness of face coverings, all biases the reviewers felt were present were detailed in the supplementary tables and limitations were reported throughout, as well as in the conclusions and main messages. 

In the overview of evidence conducted for the expert panel, reviews were assessed using AMSTAR 2, and key findings were given a confidence rating by combining the overview of evidence with expert knowledge and experience.

The most recent ‘Living with COVID-19’ guidance states that COVID-19 should be managed like other respiratory infections and only recommends face coverings for those with symptoms of a respiratory infection, who have a high temperature or feel unwell and are unable to avoid contact with others.

We appreciate John McCarthy’s comment: “Why do you waste your time on such nonsense?“

However, we take officialdom and responsibility seriously. So we read and reread Dr. Bindra’s message to make sense of it – but we were defeated, much like Mr. McCarthy foresaw.

Let’s start off in order of nonsense. The first statement says:

The current evidence on face coverings suggests that all types of face coverings are, to varying extents, effective in reducing transmission of respiratory viruses in both healthcare and community settings. N95 respirators are likely to be the most effective, followed by surgical masks, and then non-medical masks, although optimised non-medical masks made of 2 or 3 layers might have similar filtration efficiency to surgical masks. (emphasis added)

In contrast, our Cochrane review reports:

We are very uncertain on the effects of N95/P2 respirators compared with medical/surgical masks on the outcome of clinical respiratory illness  N95/P2 respirators compared with medical/surgical masks may be effective for ILI… ‘The use of a N95/P2 respirators compared to medical/surgical masks probably makes little or no difference for the objective and more precise outcome of laboratory‐confirmed influenza infection.’ (emphasis added)

As the source of Dr. Bindra’s statement is not cited, we are at a loss to explain the source of such certainty.

However, here comes the bizarre bit. On April 14th, the Daily Telegraph reported: “A rapid review report published by the UKHSA investigated if high-quality masks, such as the N95, KN95 and FFP2 coverings, protect clinically vulnerable people in the community from catching Covid.”

The UKHSA rapid Review reported: 

The purpose of this rapid review was to identify and assess the available evidence for the effectiveness of N95 and equivalent face masks as wearer protection against coronavirus (COVID-19) when used in the community by people at higher risk of becoming seriously ill from COVID-19 (search date: up to September 26th 2022).  The review did not identify any studies for inclusion, and so could provide no evidence to answer the research question. (emphasis added)

And then Dr. Aodhán Breathnach, a Consultant Global Health Microbiologist at UKHSA and a Consultant Medical Microbiologist at St George’s University Hospitals recently published a study which found masks in hospitals had little impact on Covid transmission in the Omicron wave. He told the Telegraph: “In my view, there is no good evidence that N95 masks work any better than surgical masks.”

So what were Dr. Bindra’s statements based on?

The second paragraph of the statement is even more peculiar: 

The evidence specific to COVID-19 is still limited and does not allow for firm conclusions to be drawn for specific settings and types of face coverings. However, there is no evidence to suggest that face coverings and masks would be less effective at preventing the transmission of COVID-19 than any other similar respiratory infection.

If the evidence relating to Covid is limited, it is because governments, public health bodies, foundations and so on refuse to carry out good quality studies to answer the question. 

There is also a subtler point: the statement assumes SARS-CoV-2 transmission is different from that of all the other respiratory agents. However, we do not know this because good quality investigations based on molecular epidemiology methods have not been carried out on the transmission of other agents such as rhinoviridae, influenza or human metapneumovirus. 

Dr. Bindra’s Background continues the series of puzzling contradictions:

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, UKHSA published a number of rapid evidence reviews and a statement from an expert panel informed by review-level evidence (available here).

The link takes us to a page where the evidence of “face coverings” is out of date. The first review in the list is September 2021, which contains no convincing evidence of anything, as we have pointed out, study by study.

In the most recent version of the rapid evidence review (update 2), we pointed out that no included observational study had a protocol, analyst blinding or gave a clear definition of COVID-19.

In the overview, evidence was given a confidence rating by combining the overview of evidence with expert knowledge and experience. This is expert-level spin, as expertise is at the bottom level of evidence as it is opinion. A perusal of the panel report shows that it met three times: “The panel met three times on March 1st 2021, April 21st 2021 and May 12th 2021.” The conclusions are out of date, although the UKHSA website reports it was updated to March 31st 2023.

Perhaps the most ludicrous statement is: “It should also be noted that the most recent ‘Living with COVID-19’ guidance specifically states that COVID-19 should be managed like other respiratory infections and only recommends face coverings for those with symptoms of a respiratory infection, who have a high temperature or feel unwell, and are unable to avoid contact with others.”

It is in direct contradiction to what is in paragraph one, in which the claim that all types of face coverings are, to a greater or lesser extent, responsible for lowering the risk of infection.

So what can we conclude? The UKHSA statement is an opinion; it is poorly thought through, and it certainly isn’t based on the evidence. It is based on evangelism which is eroding what is left of trust in science.

When it comes to informing public health, who should we then trust?

Dr. Carl Heneghan is the Oxford Professor of Evidence Based Medicine and Dr. Tom Jefferson is an epidemiologist based in Rome who works with Professor Heneghan on the Cochrane Collaboration. This article was first published on their Substack blog, Trust The Evidence, which you can subscribe to here.

Tags: Cochrane reviewCOVID-19Mask MandatesMasksPropagandaThe ScienceUKHSA

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Why Are Brits Still Pro-lockdown?

Next Post

And Finally…

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

44 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

Episode 39 of the Sceptic: Michael Reiners on Multiculturalism vs Free Speech, Charlotte Gill on Commie Academy and Tim Samuels on ‘White Men Can’t Work’

by Richard Eldred
6 June 2025
3

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

10 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

10 June 2025
by Ben Pile

Shock New Evidence Shows Unnatural 60-Second Heat Spikes Drive Many UK Met Office Temperature ‘Records’

9 June 2025
by Chris Morrison

Anti-Migrant Riots Erupt in Northern Ireland After “Romanian Teenagers” Charged With Sexual Assault

10 June 2025
by Will Jones

RFK Jr. Removes All 17 Members of CDC Vaccine Panel

10 June 2025
by Will Jones

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

29

Miliband’s £14 Billion Nuclear Boost to Avert Net Zero Blackouts

27

Sadiq Khan Knighted by King as Londoners Fume He’s Being “Rewarded for Failure”

26

Anti-Migrant Riots Erupt in Northern Ireland After “Romanian Teenagers” Charged With Sexual Assault

18

London-Based ‘Hamas Operative’ Behind Greta Thunberg’s Gaza Flotilla

38

Who Will Watch the Healthcare Watchdogs?

10 June 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Australia’s Scandal-Ridden Covid Prime Minister Scott Morrison Awarded Nation’s Top Honour

10 June 2025
by Rebekah Barnett

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

10 June 2025
by Ben Pile

Yet Another Study that Exaggerates COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness

9 June 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

Shock New Evidence Shows Unnatural 60-Second Heat Spikes Drive Many UK Met Office Temperature ‘Records’

9 June 2025
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

April 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

April 2023
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
« Mar   May »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

10 June 2025
by Richard Eldred

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

10 June 2025
by Ben Pile

Shock New Evidence Shows Unnatural 60-Second Heat Spikes Drive Many UK Met Office Temperature ‘Records’

9 June 2025
by Chris Morrison

Anti-Migrant Riots Erupt in Northern Ireland After “Romanian Teenagers” Charged With Sexual Assault

10 June 2025
by Will Jones

RFK Jr. Removes All 17 Members of CDC Vaccine Panel

10 June 2025
by Will Jones

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

29

Miliband’s £14 Billion Nuclear Boost to Avert Net Zero Blackouts

27

Sadiq Khan Knighted by King as Londoners Fume He’s Being “Rewarded for Failure”

26

Anti-Migrant Riots Erupt in Northern Ireland After “Romanian Teenagers” Charged With Sexual Assault

18

London-Based ‘Hamas Operative’ Behind Greta Thunberg’s Gaza Flotilla

38

Who Will Watch the Healthcare Watchdogs?

10 June 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Australia’s Scandal-Ridden Covid Prime Minister Scott Morrison Awarded Nation’s Top Honour

10 June 2025
by Rebekah Barnett

Miliband’s Bonkers Solar Blunder

10 June 2025
by Ben Pile

Yet Another Study that Exaggerates COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness

9 June 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

Shock New Evidence Shows Unnatural 60-Second Heat Spikes Drive Many UK Met Office Temperature ‘Records’

9 June 2025
by Chris Morrison

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment