160800
The Weekly Sceptic Live The Weekly Sceptic Live The Weekly Sceptic Live
  • Log in
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

No, the Lockdown Files Don’t Prove the Government’s Pandemic Response Was All a Giant Cock-Up

by Dr James Alexander
6 March 2023 9:00 AM

Eugyppius argues that the many thousands of Matt Hancock’s finger-flicking conversational exchanges leaked to the Telegraph do not provide evidence of a conspiracy.

His argument has much that is sound in it and I admire its tone. But in the great argumentative battle between cock-up and conspiracy as explanations of pandemic protocols, he comes down on the side of cock-up. The protocols were “driven by autonomous political and institutional forces rather than nebulous globalist conspirators”. In short, he claims:

  • Advisers and bureaucrats originally pushed for lockdown.
  • Once lockdown protocols were initiated, the Government and the media terrorised citizens to ensure they would comply.
  • Politicians used public panic as an opportunity for politicking.
  • Everything was really about politics, not science.
  • There was a feedback loop, whereby restrictions were introduced, strictly enforced, generating a fear in citizens which justified further restrictions and enforcement.
  • The politicians knew that there was no medical justification for the protocols, but allowed political imperatives to keep them in place.

After these arguments he concludes that the people responsible are not only “callous and evil” but also “really dumb”. Then he sets aside the first claim (“callous and evil”) to emphasise the second (“really dumb”). He says, and I paraphrase, that nothing meant anything, that no one had any idea of what they were doing, that all the policies were illogical, and that the politicians themselves were shallow abusive narcissists.

This is a fine, robust, amusing and invigorating argument. But it has two related flaws running through it.

The first flaw is that by emphasising “really dumb” over “callous and evil” he loses the necessary clarity of insisting that the policies were foolish and evil.

Folly and evil are different. Folly is a consequence of ignorance, and is forgivable, or exculpable. Evil is harder to forgive. (Jesus made it evident that forgiveness was only owed to those who were penitent and admitted their sin. The unrepentant should not be forgiven.) I think saying ‘it was only folly’ is to let the politicians off the hook. It is as if we are saying to ourselves that Hancock was a sort of 1960s seaside postcard character, of ‘How’s Your Father’ vintage, who was a bit of a lad, nice but dim, got everything wrong, but had a good heart. He sought more than his 15 minutes of fame, and quite remarkably ended up with more than half an hour.

We can summarise Hancock’s career thus:

  1. Boring preliminary. Before 2020: ‘Knows where the bodies are buried.’
  2. Terrifying development. In 2020, poses as a saviour of bodies.
  3. Comic interlude. In 2021 and 2022, after groping a particular body, is found out as a foolish figure, but tries to make something of this, burnishing a reputation by being on television and causing a book to be compiled out of some of his words.
  4. Justice is done. In 2023, suffers deeper damage to his reputation when many more of his words, this time unburnished, and substantially political instead of laughably trivial, appear without his permission.

I think the policies were evil, and that if we attempt to point to casual correspondence and cynical utterances of the sort we see in the Lockdown Files in order to justify the idea that it was all just human comedy then we miss the significance of everything that happened.

The other flaw is related to this. It concerns the word ‘conspiracy’. Unlike Eugyppius, I think there was a conspiracy, or, to speak more exactly, there were chains of conspiracies which we may as well attempt to see as contributing to a singular event in such a way that they can be called a ‘conspiracy’.

Right at the beginning of the pandemic I checked the etymology of ‘conspiracy’ and found that it literally meant ‘breathing together’. This was ironic. For the politicians, bureaucrats, advisers, etc. were conspiring – though it seems more by text messaging than in actual corridors of power – to prevent us, the people, from conspiring. We wanted to breathe together: we were not allowed to. Ironic, but also deadly.

In Book I of The Wealth of Nations Adam Smith famously said that people of the same trade “seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the publick”. He was referring to what he called ‘merchants’ but we may apply the same insight to politicians, bureaucrats, advisers, journalists, academics. Now, what is interesting is that Eugyppius agrees with this. He more than once points out that all these figures conspired against the public. But he nonetheless does not want to call the whole thing a conspiracy. Well, Eugyppius, we could instead call it ‘a congeries of conspiracies’: but, for short, and for simplicity’s sake, why not call it conspiracy?

In addition, Eugyppius says as part of his case that the original pressure for lockdown came from public health officials, advisers and bureaucrats, not from politicians. He does not ask the obvious question, ‘Why?’ And surely the answer has to involve chains of conspiracies, of lines of possibility opened up by those who sought to influence opinion: in short, ‘conspiracy’. Why was everyone insisting on a strong response – a strong unprecedented, disproportionate response – as soon as they possibly could?

If I caricature Eugyppius’s argument then it is this:

  • There was a grotesque series of accidents.
  • This generated an immediate reaction.
  • The accidents and reaction were immediately locked into a feedback loop, and suddenly everything was out of control.
  • The cause is stupidity.

My answer to this is ‘Nay’. It is not only stupidity. It is also, as Eugyppius says, evil. And since it is ‘evil’, then there was always an obvious ‘good’, which was to avoid reacting to a grotesque series of accidents, and certainly, even if there was such a reaction, to do everything possible to prevent the emergence of a feedback loop. But no. The Government, the corporations, the advisers, the reporters all encouraged the loop. They took their opportunity. They conspired. They contributed to the grand conspiracy.

To be sure, excuses can be found if we look for them. The zeitgeist is relevant. We live in a world of health and safety, an irreligious world, a world of entitled higher educated people programmed to favour state intervention, a world dominated by state taxation, state expenditure and state employment, and a world in which the state is penetrated by private corporate interests. But I favour the word ‘conspiracy’ for a very clear moral reason. It alleges responsibility.

We do not have to envision Klaus Schwab as a Bond villain. But we do have to hold Schwab, Gates, Ferguson, Fauci, all of them, responsible: and the only way to do this is to credit them with enough Machiavellian intelligence to have had some idea of what the consequences of their actions must have been: and to have known that, to have acted as they did, they were contributing to the most successful conspiracy against lived life ever carried out by peacetime politicians.

I am not saying that the entire thing was planned from beginning to end. That is impossible. But some can see much. And others can pay for much. And many think the public is not capable of dealing with something like a pandemic. And once one begins to trace connections, one sees that certain figures proposed foolish and evil possibilities only because they were encouraged to propose them. The success of the conspiracy may have been unexpected, even to the conspirators. Conspiracy may not have been the singular cause of what happened (though it may yet be shown to have been), but it was a consequence and continual accompaniment of what happened. The conspiracy against the public was relentless, and almost watertight. There was folly in it, but the substance of it was not folly. It was evil. No participant in that evil should be able to evade responsibility for it by pleading ignorance or folly.

To be sure, conspiracy was helped along by corruption, collusion, compliance – all of which floats on Hobbes’s two most important words, ‘fear’ and ‘pride’ – and there were a thousand aspects to the entire sorry tale, many misunderstandings, accidents, interruptions. Many consequences were unintended. But many, if not all, were intended. And the closure of the narrative, the tying up of the narrative by government and media, meant that these figures were conspiring, consciously and coercively, against the public; they were conspiring against anyone who attempted to reveal any aspect of the conspiracy; they used the word ‘conspiracy theory’ as a clever way of distracting from their own conspiring; and they should not be let off the hook just because we do not want to risk being called ‘conspiracy theorists’.

Conspiracy theorising is just as important as cock-up theorising. Each is almost worthless without the other. Both are required.

Dr. James Alexander is a Professor in the Department of Political Science at Bilkent University in Turkey.

Stop Press: Matt Hancock joked about Bill Gates, telling aides the Billionaire “owes me one” considering “how many people I’m getting his chips injected into”. Not evidence that it was all a conspiracy theory, but typically stupid, given that he handed over the messages to a sceptical journalist. MailOnline has more.

Tags: Cock-UpConspiracyEugyppiusLockdown Filesmatt hancock

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Mainstream Media’s Response to the Lockdown Files Proves They Will Never Change

Next Post

Putting Europe’s Energy Crisis into Perspective

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

58 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

 

DONATE

PODCAST

Nick Dixon and Toby Young Talk About the Attack on Kellie-Jay Keen by Trans Rights Activists, the BBC’s Perverse Insistence on Calling a Rapist “Her” and the Brutal Cancellation of Alfie Brown

by Will Jones
28 March 2023
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editors Picks

Britain’s Backlash Against LTNs: Fed-Up Residents Torch Road Blocks Hours After They Were Installed

28 March 2023
by Will Jones

News Round-Up

28 March 2023
by Will Jones

In Defence of Andrew Bridgen’s Speech to Parliament on the Risks vs Benefits of Covid Vaccination

28 March 2023
by Norman Fenton, Clare Craig, Martin Neil, Jonathan Engler and Mr Law

The Great Food Reset Has Begun

28 March 2023
by Will Jones

The Dumb Chain of Events that Brought Face Mask Tyranny to the West

28 March 2023
by Eugyppius

In Defence of Andrew Bridgen’s Speech to Parliament on the Risks vs Benefits of Covid Vaccination

30

The Dumb Chain of Events that Brought Face Mask Tyranny to the West

25

The Bad Science Behind Sadiq Khan’s ULEZ Anti-Car Crusade

25

News Round-Up

35

Britain’s Backlash Against LTNs: Fed-Up Residents Torch Road Blocks Hours After They Were Installed

13

In Defence of Andrew Bridgen’s Speech to Parliament on the Risks vs Benefits of Covid Vaccination

28 March 2023
by Norman Fenton, Clare Craig, Martin Neil, Jonathan Engler and Mr Law

The Dumb Chain of Events that Brought Face Mask Tyranny to the West

28 March 2023
by Eugyppius

The Bad Science Behind Sadiq Khan’s ULEZ Anti-Car Crusade

28 March 2023
by Ben Pile

Mainstream Media’s New Obsession: Labelling Criticism of 15-Minute Cities ‘Conspiracy Theories’

27 March 2023
by Rebekah Barnett

Almost Everything Is “Institutionally Racist”

27 March 2023
by Noah Carl

POSTS BY DATE

March 2023
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  
« Feb    

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

Twitter

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Forum
  • Donate
  • Newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Create New Account!

Please note: To be able to comment on our articles you'll need to be a registered donor

Already have an account?
Please click here to login Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment