I’ve written a piece for the Spectator’s Coffee House blog about the ‘Lockdown Files’ – the 100,000+ WhatsApp messages on Matt Hancock’s phone that Isabel Oakeshott has leaked to the Telegraph. They demonstrate, beyond reasonable doubt, that Hancock wasn’t following some diabolical plan cooked up in Davos, just lurching from pillar to post trying to save his political skin, trying to stick to the advice from the Government’s scientific advisors where possible, but seemingly ignoring it when it was politically inconvenient (although Hancock denies that charge).
To be fair to Hancock, the medical advice often changed from one moment to the next and wasn’t always consistent, as these messages reveal. The overall impression left by the ‘lockdown files’ is that the government wasn’t ‘following the science’, as Hancock and others claimed – not because the scientific advice was clear and they were ignoring it, but because there was no such thing as ‘the science’. We were in uncharted waters and no one really had a clue what to do, including the Government’s scientific advisors.
What’s unforgivable is that the Government imposed policies it knew would cause widespread suffering, such as banning people from visiting their dying relatives in hospitals and care homes, without really knowing whether they would save lives. As Hancock’s WhatsApp messages make clear, such measures were often imposed because the government wanted to be seen to be doing something – anything – rather than admit the truth, which is that it was completely out of its depth.
I then go on to summarise the most scandalous revelations in the ‘Lockdown Files’, before concluding by expressing gratitude to the Telegraph and Isabel Oakeshott for making the WhatsApp messages Public:
Not only are they clearly in the public interest, but the people who lost loved ones during the pandemic – particularly in care homes – should not be forced to wait until the official inquiry concludes before discovering what went on behind the scenes when the pandemic struck and, more importantly, whether mistakes were made. In addition, the revelations may help us prepare better for the next pandemic, which could strike before the inquiry makes its recommendations.
I’m also thankful for another reason, namely the ongoing debate I’ve been having with James Delingpole and others about whether the pandemic and the response to it, including the development and roll out of the mRNA vaccines, were all part of a sinister plot to enrich a cabal of billionaires and enable them and their political allies, such as Klaus Schwab, to railroad through their globalist agenda. I’ve always maintained that it wasn’t; that it was cock-up not conspiracy and these WhatsApp messages confirm that analysis. There was no ‘plandemic’. It was just the usual political clown show.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Isn’t it more accurate to say that the Gates-funded Telegraph’s highly selective extracts from the files, supporting the mainstream “we should have done more testing” narrative, give the impression that there was no “plandemic”? Or have they given us access to the full files somewhere?
If the mainstream media airbrush out the influence of the Gates-funded Tony Blair Foundation (influence that Tony Blair claims was extensive, with agents embedded in the governments of more than 21 countries during the initial outbreak) and of the Gates Foundation itself, does that mean there was no influence?
On the one hand Toby says there was no plandemic, on the other he takes for granted – and thus reinforces – the now prevalent idea that there will be a ‘next pandemic’, whatever ‘pandemic’ now means (the WHO having redefined the term). Are we all now habituated to the idea that pandemics every few years are to be expected, and is that really the lesson of the past thirty years?
Toby Young can double down all he wants on the idea that Hancock’s messages prove he was just cocking up, but they just don’t prove that at all.
On testing, for example, Matt Hancock might have been all over the place on when to test, who to test, how much to test. But I’ll tell you what he was never considering: not testing at all.
He might have been making it up on the hoof with regards to lockdowns, masks and jabs, but he wasn’t ever considering not doing any of those things.
So all his messages demonstrate is that the implementation of a global strategy was carried out in a somewhat chaotic fashion in each place, by each of the people charged with implementing lockdowns, masks, tests, jabs etc. As you might expect when something is done at that scale, across the world by different people.
In fact, when you stop and think about how all these things were rolled out almost perfectly synchronised across the globe I don’t know how you can possibly think it is anything but planned.
The fact that it’s all coming from the Gates’ funded Telegraph should be the least and last of the alarm bells.
Yep: intelligent evil people knew perfectly well that their plans would be implemented by corrupt intellectual mediocrities and that any incompetence in the execution would be very helpful in denying the plans.
Spot on.
Indeed, they are merely playing dumb and hoping no one notices.
Not forgetting ‘testing’ was inaccurate and meaningless.
Oh please. You actually think these muppets decide anything?
Everything was put into place via bureaucratic protocol and health regulations. Follow that up with controlled messaging on media and it all went perfectly to plan.
These dumb messages only prove these guys are even dumber than they appear.
If we accept that Matt was flapping about like a bed sheet on a washing line, that doesn’t mean that others weren’t better organised in the management of the charade, and I’m thinking of years of regulations and policies that suddenly we all found we were living our lives by. It also fails to take account of the alignment of interests that appears to have gone on, where many people were not making independent choices, but making the choices that they were expected to by their peers.
NO! I am not having this for one moment!
What about taking advice from scientists that had obvious conflicts of interest?
What about ignoring the redefinitions of pandemic and vaccine?
What about media manipulation and control?
What about cost benefit analysis?
What about the deliberate suppression of safe remedies through re-purposed drugs such as ivermectin?
What about the breaking of the Nuremberg Code?
What about the deliberate overlooking of jab adverse reactions?
The list is endless
I started, at the beginning of this hoax, thinking there had been a mistake. A few weeks in, I thought they knew there was a mistake and were covering their backsides. Then, the unmistakable conclusion had to be that there was a global plan behind it. Why else would the world act in lockstep against established science?
There may be some idiots and sheep following orders, but make no mistake – there is extreme culpability here!
Exactly, but apparently all those arguments are negated because of a few messages from an incompetent minister
The minister’s utter incompetence was a useful factor for the bad guys to rely on. In essence, nudge Matt a little and watch him panic and do the thing we want him to do!!
Could not agree more. I have seen footage where Hancock refers to the authors of the Great Barrington declaration as ‘outliers’. Not to mention the constant moving of the goalposts re age limits for the ‘vaccine’. Hancock’s strings may well have been pulled but this is definitely NOT a cock up. As much as I alike Toby and what he is doing, I find it hard to believe that he thinks these experts and all their advisers just happen to get these things wrong (time and time again)
And all around the world… at the same time.
In other words Toby is the archetypal Coincidence Theorist.
Well said Mike….these messages don’t address the worst of the scam…not in the slightest…..good grief even the egregious Devi Sridhar has used them in the Guardian today to make the case for the fact there should have been more testing…God help us!
I can’t help thinking it’s another ‘look over here’, and throw Hancock on the bonfire moment, to stop us seeing the mess the country is in, the excess deaths, and as they topple us into WW3….something is coming they want to hide….
Don’t rule out that they might be preparing the ground for the next “pandemic”, getting everyone ready for manic testing for the next deadly virus.
Isn’t that the whole premise of the WHO’S new pandemic treaty? A SWAT team of virus hunters scouring the globe for the next killer pathogen and triggering mass testing when they identify a candidate?
Maybe Stewart…they are already talking about testing kits being rolled out for Avian Flu!….
Bit it’s not planned….it’s just bumbling incompetence don’t you know?
I hope Toby reads your comment. It might just persuade him to change his mind by next week’s London Calling. James is going to roast him if he doesn’t.
“not because the scientific advice was clear and they were ignoring it, but because there was no such thing as ‘the science’.” Sorry Toby, I beg to differ. There was an existing well established pandemic plan, which was ditched for no good reason. And all the subsequent actions were in lockstep with multiple other governments. The lockstep continues with the uncannily unanimous orchestrated support for Ukraine which is dragging us closer to a nuclear war (following the Bush Blair fanboy WMD model) and which is hollowing out further our already inadequate military, our shrinking credibility as a nation and the taxpayers’ pockets.
I see the phantom spineless downvoter is back. Cat got your tongue?
It’s Toby.
It’s his site and he can do what he wants…
Really there two pandemic response plans; the traditional, normal one and the Bill Gates one simulated in Event 201.
When the opportunity arose, the Gates machinery kicked in and carried out its assault on public and private institutions around the world, much like when a criminal gang move into a neighbourhood, terrorise everyone and take over.
Blimey, Toby doesn’t want to give up does he?
Just go back to Lockstep 2010 or Agenda 2030.
Actually, it doesn’t matter whether what has happened to us was planned, it was, or not. The net result is the rolling out of Klaus and Billy’s great reset or as they like to call it the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The net result could well result in millions of deaths and misery for the survivors.
Let’s stop arguing the toss about cock-up or not.
Let’s assume our government is acting unilaterally but with our best interests at heart. Could anybody seriously defend any single government action since March 2020?
No, I thought not. So can we deal with now and the coming few weeks in this ongoing game of charades?
For crying out loud!
Oh please. The files are a minor part of the whole plandemic. Why was everything in lockstep, including changes to the MCCD across every G20 country in March 2020? Why was the propaganda and lies the same across the G20 including fake actors and shoots of diapered idiots with Minister Moron in front of armless dummies? Why the lockstep in the Jabbinations? Why the massive data fraud still ongoing, first to inflate Rona dead, now to hide Stab dead – in every G20 country? Why is every country’s real Rona death toll ~8% of the total stated? Why the 4 (yes 4) planning sessions for a scamdemic in 2019? Just by chance was it? Why the endless confabs between G20 and various WEF, Gates et al during the plandemic? What were they discussing? What about the BBC and TNN initiative across the G20? What about Musk’s Dec 2022 Twitter dump that the US Gov and others bought and managed tech platforms? What about the billions paid by gov’ts across the G20 to the fake news and faker science? The list is endless.
Hancocks files are pimples on the elephant ass and say nothing except the obvious fact that he was pushing through the scamdemic against even mild objection. Your conclusions are exactly the opposite of what this small pimple dump reveals.
There might well be truth in the hypothesis that there were some ‘in control’ (presumably US, China, WHO, WEF) and that people like Hancock were ‘useful idiots’.
More than might. Literally all the evidence points in that direction.
Unless Hancock was somehow responsible for “cock ups” in Germany, France, China, Italy, Spain, the US, Belgium,… (every country in the world except Sweden and Belarus)
Nailed it.
The crime here is that they didn’t respond with the science as it emerged but instead stuck with their original policies.
As politicians they are always going to take the route of ‘blame anyone else’ rather than stand up and say mistakes were made.
Sadly, if they’d said mistakes were made as soon as it was understood that they were mistakes, along with evidence showing that they had tried their best, there would have been some understanding. As it is, they’re now ‘in too deep’ and to admit those mistakes also means admitting to suppression of ‘the new science’ with all of the problems that came (or remained) as a consequence.
They had every opportunity to call a halt to the nonsense in June 2020. ‘Covid-19’ – whatever it was – had gone. This is witnessed by all-cause mortality – normal from June 2020 to October 2020. They did not need jabs nor implement masks in July.
I’m not sure I can agree with that.
Even if “the science” suggested that lockdowns, forced masking and forced vaccination were effective germ control measures, I still wouldn’t agree with them and would consider their implementation a crime.
Just because some, or even all, of the idiots in charge of delivering it in the U.K. didn’t know what they were doing doesn’t mean it wasn’t planned. It was just planned at a higher level than them, by the people who actually run the show globally.
This is from Lawyers of Light explaining their concerns re distracting from & covering up the Midazolam death protocols prescribed in hospitals & care homes to folk with respiratory distress, the latter without the patient being seen & DNR notes put in place without consultation with or consent from the patient & their families. Very real concerns of the predictable & centrally proscribed protocols usually prescribed to terminally ill patients only.
“Alert!
Be very very careful and have a critical mind about this, given the likelihood of Midazolam questions being raised in Parliament soon.
These messages may well show Hancock’s brazen lies about many many things, but make no mistake, people in care homes DID NOT die as a result of lack of useless PCR testing before they went into them.
They died as a result of the protocols adopted from NG163.
This may well be COVER for that.
We will not be commenting further on The Telegraph’s Hancock whats app messages issue, as we believe it’s clear cover for our midazolam questions that are finally to be put to Parliament, even though we originally sent them to Javid in 2021.
Lack of testing did not kill those in care. NG163 protocols, unlawful DNR’s, do not admit to hospital orders, lack of antibiotic treatment, lack of GP visits, & being locked away from family did increase deaths.
How would a useless PCR test have helped in light of the above?
Don’t be fooled.
The issues being covered in The Telegraph constitute many things, but what they do not constitute is the truth about what led to excess care home deaths in April 2020, and the sheer gravity of those issues.”
“Given todays WhatsApp dramas I personally feel the below are the questions a critical mind would ask about care home deaths.
– What good would inaccurate PCR testing have done?
– If some care residents were that sick, why were they not in hospitals, which were empty as we know? You do not need to test someone to know if they are severely unwell. You can see by observation that they are.
– Linked to the above, what effect did do not admit to hospital orders have?
– Were frailty scores used based on age when deciding who to treat/admit to hospital from care?
– What effect did policy driven iatrogenic interventions have?
– What effect did unlawful DNRs have?
– What effect did withdrawal of support services, such as in house GP visits, SALT teams, physio etc have?
– What effect did isolation have? On this issue the what’s app messages do reveal a brazen disregard by Hancock, of care residents’ emotional states and how this is linked to health. The lack of visiting also led to lack of oversight by family members who often feed their loved ones, (see Rosemary Rehman case)
These are the important questions I have so far.”
The Lockdown Files demonstrate no such thing. The Plandemic wasn’t planned in the UK: it was an American Operation.
The UK simply followed Fauci’s lead.
The fact that Handcock is an arrogant, incompetent fool is irrelevant.
Discussions at minster level should not under any circumstances to conducted via any system where there isn’t a full record held for the long term. These types of secret messaging systems are clearly attractive to politicians, but they should be barred from using them (I’d say a jail term should be mandatory if there’s evidence of secret messaging — pour encourager les autres).
I will second that wholeheartedly.
Oh dear, this is starting to erode my confidence in this site. One fumbling minister in the context of similar actions around the globe proves the whole covid mess was all just incompetence!? Are you serious?
I suspect the last paragraph reveals a more relevant reason for wanting to arrive at this conclusion: the ongoing rivalry with the crowd-pulling maestro himself and this articles author. I suspect JD will tear this idea of a cuck-up to shreds on the next London Calling. Not that he needs to. The idea there was no coordinated activity between WEF lickspittles to control every aspect of the covid fiasco from abandoning our existing pandemic preparedness plans to silencing experts and others with different opinions is absurd. Of course “the science” kept changing because there never was anything scientific about any of it. What is scientific about vaccinating people against an infection they have already had or which is harmless to them? Nobody seemed to learn either. Governments just kept repeating the same useless activities and mandates because those useless activities were there to control not help
I wonder if the DS is being got at the same way GB News, Project Veritas, etc… were?
I know the WHO suddenly revised its pandemic guidelines early in the outbreak to be much more draconian, simply reversing previous guidance on the value of lockdowns etc. Were they not also instrumental in the program to develop vaccines, therefore suppressing any alternative treatments to avoid liability claims via the EUA? Were the WHO and it’s sponsors not the puppetmaster behind governments, and the Hancocks of this world just struggled to execute the WHO plan? There was also a lot of expediency – I clearly remember the shortage of masks; only when they became available were mask mandates introduced! Now of course the WHO wants to be the de jure authority for anything it decides to call a pandemic. This is the real plandemic, not individual country responses.
I bet Toby still believes in Father Christmas.
Hancock almost certainly didn’t have a plan, but that doesn’t mean that there wasn’t one among the many other people involved in trying to subvert people’s minds to do as we are told.
Pilar? Is that the name of another of his popsies?
Nothing to add really – just as incredulous as everyone else that anyone could conclude “there was no plandemic” just because we’ve been allowed to see some text messages from some UK minister who could well just be a useful idiot or the whole thing is spin.
No Toby, I’m afraid the only thing this proves is your bizarre naivety. That some of it may not have been planned is not proof that none of it was planned.
I am beginning to worry whether TY supports the values of DS anymore. Is he hoping for a safe Labour or LibDem seat or a Tory Peerage.
100% sure he supports the values of DS. He’s just a bit in denial I think. Or just sees it differently to us.
He doesn’t want his wife to divorce him.
Which is why he normally sticks to free speech issues.
Feels a bit odd speculating about the site owner on his own site but why would his wife divorce him?
I’m not sure how setting up a site called Lockdown Sceptics at a time when questioning Covid madness was heresy could be seen as sticking to free speech issues.
Because claiming that free speech is being restricted isn’t called a “conspiracy theory”: it’s accepted that it is happening but argued to be a “good thing”. So he’s operating on non-batshit territory, from the point of view of the people he has to get along with.
If you look at articles on here that he’s authored over the last year he’s concenrated on free speech issues and left the rest to others.
Maybe
I think he’s sincere
I think there’s a good variety of Covid sceptical articles here
I think outside of the sceptic community he’s seen as a spreader of Covid misinformation so if he’s trying to get away with something it hasn’t worked
I haven’t argued that he’s insincere.
I haven’t argued that there aren’t covid-sceptical articles on here. I’ve pointed out that he isn’t the author.
I’m arguing that, as a proponent of free speech, which he clearly is, he can remain at least politically tolerable to people he needs to get along with for perfectly valid personal reasons whilst at the same time hosting “heresy”.
I’ve sadly wondered the same thing. He’s definitely becoming more mainstream by the week – as if there’s other forces/incentives at play. Nick Dixon seems to also have started treading the same path. Something just feels… off.
He is sincere but at the same time unable to call a spade a spade because it looks bad…
I have considered this post and I think the last sentence was un called for and I withdraw it. I do not doubt Toby’s motives but I remain concerend about his willingness to give the benefit of the doubt to the political class.
The fact that the conspirators cocked-up their conspiracy doesn’t mean there was no conspiracy.
Hancock hugged his “mistress” as if he’d never before encountered an adult female.
Looking at the majority of contributions to this thread the sheer irony of individuals signing up to an avowedly free speech platform then using it to try and bludgeon the creator of the site into silence / acquiescence is genuinely breath-taking.
Toby Young has done far more than any other major public figure in the UK to try to maintain / restore the democratic freedoms that have been so undermined in the last few decades (especially relating to COVID tyranny and Net Zero). He is a tireless worker for this cause who somehow manages to retain positivity and good humour throughout.
Those trying to shut him down because they disagree with his personal assessment of the Hancock files are simply demonstrating that ‘cancellation culture’ operates in all areas of discourse.
They are not going to succeed.
I’ve spent a lot of time defending TY here and elsewhere, but I don’t see why I can’t say he’s way wrong when I think so. He’s a big boy and capable of defending himself and facing criticism. I’m sure he would not have it any other way. Not sure how we’re trying to “cancel” or “bludgeon” him. There are those who question his sincerity which I think is unfair and inaccurate, but most here are just disagreeing with him.
Yes rereading the thread I can see that the majority of comments (including your own) are of this perfectly reasonable ideologically challenging type. I had skim read it and fixated on a few personally pejorative ones – so apologies for that misrepresentation.
I do stand by my points praising Toby’s fantastic general work in the field of democratic rights and freedoms.
Yes totally agree
No apology required
All part of the back and forth which is generally of a high quality here
Cheers, and completely agree about the unusually high standard of discourse on this forum.
Despite containing no “Profanity and abuse” my comments have disappeared ???
The fact that Hancock is a bungling idiot does not prove it wasn’t all planned. Lockdowns, masks and experimental injections happening in lockstep globally wasn’t by accident. That response to the ‘bad cold’ wasn’t a ‘cock up’. It was premeditated on a global level and it was never about our health, but rather about enriching interest groups and transferring power (basic rights) away from ordinary people. This didn’t all happen spontaneously, even if talentless mid level bunglers like Hancock had to continuously optimise their self interested response to the globalist project, which they are all themselves signed up to. Look who benefitted and look who lost out…
Toby thinks that the msm pushing a single line while every institutional (bureaucratic, political, legal, scientific, academic, etc.) decision was just an unhappy ‘cock up’… yet, those institutions are made up of individuals and the decisions they made cost lives. Many lives! But we are supposed to write it all off as well intentioned people just cocking up! F off Toby! Even if you don’t believe it was a plan: these individuals operate in their self interest and they have too much power. To call it a cock up (even if it wasn’t a plandemic — which it was) is simply wrong: the chaos and destruction they sow is neither here nor there as long as they get what THEY want…
I’m not a so called expert(thank God) but reasonably intelligent but I told my boss in February 2020, that this was a type of flu and they were wrecking the economy for it. 3 years of our lives we’ll never get back. Refused the untrialled vaccine and always will. The government has proven itself to be inept.
“We were in uncharted waters and no one really had a clue what to do, including the Government’s scientific advisors.”
Er… I thought we had a perfectly good “pandemic preparedness plan” to fall back on before the CCP got involved and we all (well the government and 90% of the great British public) started running around like headless chickens vis a vis corporal Jones?
Incidentally how do you know we’re soon going to have another pandemic? Thought I’d read somewhere that pandemics come round every 30-40 years? The next one shouldn’t be around until 2050 at the earliest. Oh forgot the WHO have changed the definition – funny that? And who “owns” the WHO…. well blow me down if it ain’t the CCP and old Billy Gates. Amazing.
Just saying.
Oh and one last thing, hasn’t Gates got a vested interest in The Telegraph like about 3,500,000 vested interests?
It’s got to the point where Toby’s ignorance, blindness, stupidity is making me consider my ‘donation’ – Nowt as blind as someone that chooses not to see but reading the same old crap in light of all developments is getting very tedious!
This is not Daily Scepticism, utter lunacy!
Nah, we need DS. We’re free to disagree with TY, and are doing so. I think he’s way wrong on this one, but we get a good variety of articles here representing different viewpoints.
‘Build back better’. Not an obvious phrase to use in the depths of a public health crisis, yet they were uttered almost simultaneously by Boris, Biden, Trudeau, Ardern, the Australian guy and Macron. No collusion, my arse…
Oh come on Toby, really??
It’s beyond denial that Bill Gates played a massive role in driving policy in this and many other countries which is why practically the entire world overthrew their existing public health policies and implemented never before seen policies practically in lockstep – and now the WHO is attempting to become the world’s pandemic policy and health information superpower and police force to ensure that Gates’ promised Pandemic 2 will go off without troublesome dissent. That the world continues in lockstep with net zero policies that *will* enslave humanity is also beyond denial. For heaven’s sake man, get real.
I disagree that this suggests there was no ‘plandemic’. In my opinion, the jury is out as to whether or not this virus was ‘released’ but there was certainly a planned response with much of the ‘science’ originating from the WHO and the prior pandemic table top exercises funded by Gates et al and attended by the usual suspects including the tech giants.
The ‘science’ which was followed including the ‘not recommending’ of ‘go to’ treatments like Ivermectin, silencing of dissenters, lockdown and masking requirements all lead back to these groups via the WHO who strangely are currently seeking GREATER control over how different Govts respond to alleged (and potential) health threats and are currently discussing and voting on this without any media attention or dissent. Indeed, they are probably quite happy with this distraction and Hancock being made a sacrificial lamb in the process
Spot on.
Toby Young is here accepting that the ‘Lockdown files’ – the WhatsApp messages, etc – are REAL, and not just fabricated (by the 77th Brigade and/or MI5, perhaps) to give the impression of incompetence and/or minor corruption (oh, those daft politicians!) when what we know to be going on, quite clearly, is a long-planned global genocide. Stanley Johnson and his son Boris are eugenicists who have both written about the urgent ‘need’ to reduce global population. Bill Gates is known to share this view, as do many others in the WEF who have expressed these opinions openly. These people HATE humanity. Birth rates are down, excess deaths are up, everywhere where the ‘vaccines’ were used in sufficient numbers. Fake bird flu is next, with children being the target of the next round of forced and coerced injections. Fear via the mass media will make it happen. Unless there’s enough good left in the world to resist. Is there?
National politics is a side-show to world events and side-show actors are not privy to global planning.
Read Kennedy’s Book “The Real Anthony Fauci” which clearly gives the collusion with Bill Gates on the capture of Public Health by the Gates and his Billions. This extremism & control that Gates exhibits goes back 25 years. The whole pandemic playbook has been honed over 20 years by Gates and his sycophantic followers. The death and destruction he has foisted on Africa is unbelievable. Faucy is just a pawn in Gates program. Gates has access to all the big political leaders, he had a well published private meeting in early 2020 with BJ. I was skeptical when I first read this book but I am rereading it now and it makes total sense. This Gates program has been going on for over 20 years.
Mr Young… can’t see the wood for the trees?
Don’t confuse strategy (the plan) with tactics (the means to execute the plan).
The strategy is to enslave us under the ownership of a self-selected few.
Health emergencies, environmental emergencies, provoking wars are all tactics in support of the strategy.
I don’t believe the escape of the virus from the lab was planned, but certainly the response was planned (they had had gamed it a few weeks before) and it certainly was coordinated.
It was not a pandemic in the usual accepted meaning, but the plan was to make it appear a pandemic. So yes it was planned… a ‘plandemic’.
It is true that there is, as yet, no global Mustafa Mond, but that last paragraph is an unfair parody of the red pilled outlook.
In fact there is not one inner party but many, and their watchword is Crisis Opportunity. The workings of one of them were exposed in the Climategate emails. At least two others have been at work during the Covid crisis – the lockdown party and the vaccine party, both on the lookout for a problem to which they have a long-prepared solution. Their backers are not motivated by money but philanthropy of a sort, for the very reason that you can’t spend ten billion on yourself. As for Davos, consider the student unions these days. They now have Equality Officers, Diversity Officers, Sustainability Officers etc etc and some have Intersectionality Officers. The purpose of these last is to coordinate the story and ensure that no blob challenges the policy of any other blob. Klaus Schwab is an Intersectionality Officer and the purpose of his conference is coordination.
As for team James and team Toby? You can both see that behind the curtain there is nothing but a second rate Wizard of Oz. What wacky James can see and sober Toby can’t or won’t is that the Wonderful Wizard has it in for us.
Toby – I suggest you need to consider matters more widely and beyond the Hancock level. And certainly beyond the Johnson level. Bear in mind how eveything changed in UK following Johnson’s meetings with Gates.