A new peer reviewed article in the journal Vaccine has been published comparing surveys data on attitudes to vaccination from before the pandemic with attitudes now.
The authors report that “paradoxically, despite the success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, vaccine confidence has significantly declined since the onset of the pandemic”.
I am not quite sure why the authors appear so surprised at their result but a clue can be found in their use of the word “despite”. In many countries the “success” of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign relied in large part in pressuring, bullying and sometimes coercing people to get vaccinated.
Now if governments tell you that getting vaccinated is in your best interests, but that nonetheless those who choose not to get vaccinated will be pilloried in the press and on social media, barred from participated in normal everyday activities and, in some cases, sacked from their employment, perhaps we should not be surprised that people start to doubt whether those governments really do have their best interests at heart.
And those doubts have substance behind them. From a very early stage, it was clear that for many people, the known risks from vaccination probably outweighed any likely benefit. This was most obvious for those who had already had Covid (and for whom the marginal impact of vaccination in preventing a further infection was small), for groups who faced very low risks of serious illness if they contracted Covid and especially for young males for whom vaccination seems to be bring additional risks of heart problems.
But instead of acknowledging that Covid-19 vaccines may make sense for some people not everyone, too many public health officials, scientists and politicians have systematically downplayed immunity from previous infection, brushed aside concerns over side effects and dismissed concerns that the roll out to the whole population was rushed given uncertainty over long term effects.
The latter was a particularly serious error. Right from the start of the roll out the public was assured that the vaccines had been thoroughly tested. Yet in May 2021, the Government decided to stop providing the AstraZeneca vaccine to under 40s due to the relatively high rate of blood clots. That decision would have been little consolation to the families of the 73 people whose deaths the MHRA report as being linked to that vaccine.
Rather than taking that as a lesson, authorities around the world doubled down and rolled out vaccine mandates, passports and travel restrictions as a way of twisting more arms into receiving the jab. Ironically, these measures were aimed primarily at young people for whom the benefits of vaccination were lowest and (particularly for males) the risks seem highest.
The official rationale for these policies was that vaccination would help protect others from being infected. We now know that there was never any evidence to back this up. And when official data started to suggest that the vaccinated may be getting infected at similar if not greater rates than the unvaccinated, the response of some journalists was not to probe further and investigate but to encourage the authorities to suppress the data. Truly, you could not make it up.
Researchers such as Alex de Figueiredo from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine warned at the time that coercion was likely to lead to a loss of trust in vaccination more generally. With the latest research paper, we have firm evidence that this is indeed the case.
It is not unreasonable to conclude that the most dangerous ‘anti-vaxxers’ over the past two years have not been fringe conspiracy theorists but governments and the public health establishment itself.
It’s a sorry state of affairs, but where do we go from here? Well public health leaders could start by switching tack. Rather than setting out to persuade everyone to get vaccinated, they could concentrate on providing good information about benefits and risks to help people decide whether vaccination is right for them. If, at the same time, they start to engage honestly with those who have suffered side effects and acknowledge the high level of uncertainty that still exists in the evidence, perhaps they can begin to regain some of the trust they have so negligently lost.
David Paton is Professor of Industrial Economics at Nottingham University Business School. He tweets as @CricketWyvern.
Stop Press: Eugyppius has written about this survey as well: “Long after it had become clear to everyone that the vaccines would do nothing to stop transmission, the vaccinators persisted with their intemperate, coercive campaign, polarising all of society and calling into being a new kind of tribalism based on vaccination status which had never existed before.”
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
It is too late. The damage is done. The trust gone. Governments and media have lost their authority. The people must take back control.
Yes that’s why the people put Lizard Brain in charge, er… then swapped her out for Sushi – you mean it wasn’t the people? Oh well they’ll rectify that and when ‘democracy’ has its day they will vote in Sir Kier.
Thanks for the short history lesson. No, I don’t mean those people. No, I don’t mean the ballot box.
Given the way it was done, it might be interesting to see what happens to the Party membership figures. Will it collapse? Maybe it doesn’t matter for the likes of Sushi, but it’s a fact that the Labour membership did slump recently – look at their published annual reports. In their case, it was around 100,000, so around £5M membership fees lost.
Totally agree, FL, I will never ever trust anyone in authority or the media ever again. If it’s dictatorship they want they better prepare for a very strong resistance. I’m not so bothered about myself, I’ve had a good life, but I do worry about the kids and I will do anything in my power to push back against tyranny.
Very soon in 2020 it became very apparent that the only “solution” they would accept to the so called covid problem was mass vaccinations.
That made me deeply suspicious.
So i investigated the child vaccination schedule and discovered to my horror how many new vaccines had been added in the last 10 to 15 years when to my knowledge there was no substantial new threat of disease.
I also looked more closely at the history of vaccines and discovered the vaccine indemnity laws which exempt manufacturers of liability if the vaccine is on the official child immunisation programme.
Finally, I read Dissolving Illusions which gives a very different account of why diseases like polio, measles, small pox etc were defeated. Basically hygene.
That’s how I went from believing like most people that vaccines were a miracle of modern medicine to believing that they are mostly a scam for drug companies to sell treatments to healthy people.
My faith in vaccines is gone. My trust in the medical profession almost entirely vanished.
26 Jags and Stabs by the age of 2….ask your Dr Idiot, Dr Baffled, Dr I get money from Pfizer for all tests which prove their efficacy – especially the ‘papers’ looking at unstabbed vs stabbed children over the long term….there are none. An entire criminal industry stabbing babies and no one has the brains to study ‘effects’ or if the crap does anything except immune damage. Don’t mention autism, cancers etc. Verboten.
There has been one that I know of in the US, based on 10 years of data collected by Dr Paul Thomas with all the usual – published, trashed, retracted, defamed, suspended, prevented from publishing again, etc etc. James Lyons-Wieler & Russell Blalock (who are currently working on phase 3). The data is pretty much unequivocal. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/study-unvaccinated-healthier-vaccinated-kids/ https://live.childrenshealthdefense.org/shows/tea-time/KQVQXubFzs
Your second link does not work…
Totally this!!! ^^^^^^^^^^
Yes. I work in the NHS and have been on the same journey. I had my suspicions long ago before Covid when I was seeing the horrendous over medicalisation of the (mainly) elderly causing far more illness than these drugs were designed to cure.
Then seeing the medical profession hyping hysteria over an imaginary virus and killing lots of people in the ICU’s and care homes and then being patted on the back by the general public was the last straw.
The medical profession are totally corrupted, ‘a patient cured is a customer lost’ has replaced the hippocratic oath in what most doctors (sorry, pharmaceutical reps I should say) believe these days.
Social responsibility has been added to the Hippocratic oath sworn by most doctors these days. Problem is, it can mean whatever the authorities want it to mean.
I’ve been on exactly the same trajectory Stewart. I started off as pro-vax but once I saw what was going on with these jabs I became suspicious and did the same research as you. I am now reading Turtles All the Way Down and it is clear that the present skulduggery is just a continuation of business as usual for the vaccine industry. If you don’t look for vaccine injuries or investigate any possible mechanisms for injury, you don’t find them. Problem solved!
Same journey. The amount of childhood vaccinations should be the clue anyone needs. I’m not sure I’d bother vaccinating my kids even with mmr now. No trust on this industry.
Especially with mmr. Dr Wakefield was treated abysmally. All he said was that further investigation was needed to find if there was a link between mmr and autism, and he was struck off because he couldn’t afford to defend himself ( unlike his colleague who could and managed to reverse the judgement)
Spot on!
@stewart. I just noticed that you haven’t got the mandatory down vote from the troll. I am afraid you have no credibility on this forum until you get such an accolade.
Just reading Turtles All The Way Down, something I would never have contemplated two years ago. I, like you was a great believer, not any longer you just never stop learning – do you.
Same here Stewart. When I read about the overdosing of HCQ killing the Oxford trial patients, I was stunned. Then discovered that Big Pharma want child vaccine approval to get across the board indemnity. The medical fraternity is utterly bereft of any integrity. I want to see the bastards swing.
With reference to the reviewed paper: the “…notion that COVID-19 vaccines (especially RNA-based formulations) have been approved too quickly for them to have been adequately safety-checked, the latter often presenting itself in individuals that are not hesitant towards more established vaccinations…” appears to be a wise opinion, doesn’t it? Compare and contrast what would happen to other industries if equivalent numbers of injuries and death emerged after the introduction to market of a new product.
And it seems like only yesterday that saying any of that would get you banned from all social media, attacked in the MSM – charge led by luminaries such as Piers Morgan – and threatened with censure and expulsion from your job/profession
What a difference a day makes. People can now speak the plain truth without being burnt at the stake.
Indeed; even on YT, if you search for John Campbell’s channel.
Sadly, though, there are still quite a few people who want their vaccines right now and are suspicious of those who don’t have them. They also accept vaccine side effects as being one of these things.
‘Hesitancy’. Ha ha. Yeah okay. Drugs from a criminal industry, pushed by criminal politicians and criminal civil servants and a communist NHS….Well David, how about this.
1) 40% only took the quacksines because they were forced to.for work
2) 20% did their own homework and analysis and viewed them for what they are – poison cocktails with unknown manifests and poor testing.
3) 20% were on the fence but wanted to travel to Spain to bang a gong with some chica in Benidorm, so they also complied but were not that enthusiastic.
4) 20% are full on fascist retards who love ingesting unknown chemicals for a 0.03% IFR virus. These are the halfwit puffins still wearing the shit catchers and screeching for jab #17 (the game changer).
Once the b.s. was known and the death rate was obviously quite low, average age of death around 8000 with 80% being fat, most people clued in (around jab 2 it was obvious what was going on).
Not hard to figure out reallly David. Hence the ‘hesitancy’.
Rona was a hoax, the actual dead from Rona is 8% of gov’t propaganda (from, not with fake tests and hand waving).
Most of the NHS, Doris Mammaries Johnson, Fishy Rishi, *unt, Starmtard, 630 MPs (assume 20 are honest and opposed the fascism), the civil service, Fake News directors, most Doctors/nurses, need to be imprisoned.
It was all bullshit David, hence ‘hesitancy’.
Medical-Pharmaceutical-Industrial Complex. ££££££££££££££££
You mentioned age of death. Here is a chart of average age of death, ‘covid deaths’ compared with all-cause deaths. It is up to date from ONS data released today.
The age of death attributed to covid currently averages at 82.4 – nearly 4 years later than all-cause deaths at 78.3! Indeed, since the beginning of 2022, the average age of covid death has been higher than all-cause death. This was also the case for 2020 from mid-April onwards. While it would be absurd to say that covid prolongs life, from this perspective covid is of little concern for most people.
In 2021, from mid-March, the average age of covid death was less than all-cause death. During this period, covid would appear to be of concern. But that overlooks the fact that progressively younger people were being jabbed and had already survived a year of a stronger covid variant.
From whatever perspective we choose to view the data, the conclusions are much the same.
Trust is hard to earn but easily lost. I no longer trust that my GP is acting solely in my best interests.
What can they do to earn it back? Honestly, I have no idea.
I agree. But unless public health and governments are brutally honest I think the damage is done.
One further reason for loss of trust is the fact they are pushing Boosters. If you need 5 injections within 2 years it is not a very effective medical intervention is it?
The pressure to inject healthy young people and children with this experimental jab was what did it for me. As for pregnant women. My trust in public health authorities will never return after this.
I suppose I’m lucky, I didn’t have trust (based on personal experience over the preceding 25 years) to lose.
When the Inquiry occurs, they will probably be advised by their barristers not to give evidence unless they are granted immunity from future prosecution in Court. They will be looking after themselves, not us, in those circumstances. So, “brutally honest” they will not be.
Governments… honest…? In the same sentence? Are you kidding?
Well it’s not a vaccine then is it? Imagine having 4 polio shots within 18 months then still getting polio? You couldn’t exactly consider yourself immunized could you? I think the fraud and reality is dawning on more and more people now compared to the start of the roll-out, that omicron isn’t dangerous, the jab isn’t stopping people from getting Covid and that people are getting nasty side-effects. I feel like at this stage everybody knows somebody. I’ve got a friend in her 30s who was perfectly healthy, trying for a baby, but hasn’t had a period in 11 months since her last jab. She’s too young for the menopause and has wised up by reading more, realising these things are anything but what they’re purported to be. I think personal experience is a very effective teacher that comes with a handy red-pilling side effect. My husband’s been looking around at all his sports buddies and workmates being ill, despite being “fully vaccinated,” so he’s stopped at just two as well. I just hope people haven’t done irreparable damage to themselves but the scientific evidence doesn’t bode well does it?
The last para could apply to almost all modern healthcare interventions, especially regarding the (prevention and) treatment of metabolic problems. Our medical professionals have been captured by the processed food and pharma industries. They are both ignorant and willfully blind. A new approach is needed where medical research is independent of big business. Ordinary citizens are perfectly capable of understanding the risks and benefits of different lifestyles for their health but since the establishment of the NHS in particular we’ve been infantalised and discouraged from questioning the dogma and pharmaceutical driven approach to dealing with health issues.
Haven’t we just…
“The authors report that “paradoxically, despite the success of COVID-19 vaccination campaigns, vaccine confidence has significantly declined since the onset of the pandemic”.”
ROFL.
Unless they mean success in brainwashing or bullying people, shovelling hundreds of billions to Big Pharma for products that don’t work and probably cause more harm than good.
In their world, the “success of a campaign” means they have gained influence and made a profit – perhaps winning an election, if that’s possible, and manipulating the market as an investment. Not necessarily the same as delivering real benefits to the public, unfortunately.
I’m sure some involved in the process believe they have delivered real benefit – those lower in the food chain. I doubt any of the bosses, top “scientists”, “public health” officials and politicans give a toss about the public, beyond the perception.
Someone recently pointed out that we should view doctors as technicians not as latterday priests with some special gift/vocation and superior knowledge.
400 years ago doctors dressed in black and took blood out of their patients using leeches, etc., if the patient died it was because they had not been bled enough.
The Dissolving Illusions book Dissolving Illusions | Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History – Dissolving Illusions details facts and figures from long-overlooked medical journals, books, newspapers, and other sources. Using myth-shattering graphs, this book shows that vaccines, antibiotics, and other medical interventions are not responsible for the increase in lifespan and the decline in mortality from infectious diseases. is a very enlightening read.
They’re still doing blood-letting, just nowadays, they sent it off to laboratories (or claim to do so, anyway) just to make sure everything is right with it.
I do wonder if we are being too quick to condemn the old practice of blood letting. Recently I read that long-term blood donors appear to have a longer life expectancy and so I wonder if the body’s need to produce new replacement blood was seen as a sort of kick-start to the system. They may also have seen it as a quick way to help rid the body of toxins and pathogens. Perhaps the doctors of old weren’t as daft as we presume. The real quackerey may have started with early chemists (the pharma of their day) extolling the virtues of consuming mercury. That’s still in the environment and has been passed down through the generations.
It might be because people who are not allowed to donate blood are likely to have a shorter life expectancy :-
‘Who can’t donate bloodYou can’t donate blood if you:
There are other medical conditions that may mean you can’t donate.’
A nightmare scenario would be if people injected with the gene therapies are added to the above list.
I am a fit and relatively healthy 68 year old(osteoarthritis being the only minor problem). I live in Thailand and would happily donate blood but due to living in the UK in the 80’s and 90’s I cannot due to the possibility of having mad cow disease(nvCJD)
I have often wondered if someone who is unjabbed had to have a transfusion and it came from a ‘jabbed’ person. Would the spike protein be transmitted?
My professional journey towards pharmaceutical enlightenment through a 40-odd year medical career started with statins, then antidepressants, then antihypertensives, the influenza vaccines, and now Covid jabs.
It has become apparent that Big Pharma will invent a drug, then invent the disease.
Where the drug doesn’t work, just invent a new disease, or simply obfuscate or lie.
In the end, money wins every time, and the medical profession are the useless idiots in the process.
Wasn’t this strategy the basis for inventing “depression” as a disease just after the large pharmaceutical companies latched on to the idea (1950s?) of developing and legally marketing various misery-relieving psychoactive substances, while lobbying governments to outlaw traditional herbal and mycological cottage industries? Similar observations might be made about “anxiety”. In combination “anxiety and depression” are now widely considered to be a combination disease in need of treatment rather than a routine temporary condition of life and traditionally treated by social happy-clappy cults or individual experimentation.
Exactly.
In hyperlipidemia, hypertension and diabetes, the threshold for diagnosis similarly becomes lower over time, leading to huge increases in the numbers of those diagnosed.
And one skill our GP’s still have is to order a test.
Absolutely. ”A pill for every ill”. This applies particularly to mental health and the huge industry which is antidepressants and other psychotropics. They get so many people hooked due to medicalizing legit emotions which could be worked through with more support and talking therapies, that they become customers for life for Big Pharma. And so many horrible side effects too, especially when you try to wean off and withdraw from the damn things. The DSM seems to get larger with every edition!
“[…] the response of some journalists was not to probe further and investigate but to encourage the authorities to suppress the data”.
The response of Prof Sir David Spiegelhalter in that link is intriguing. In his interview[1] (on Desert Island Disks) he speculates about the mechanism by which The Lockdown was supposedly a “net life saver” because “young people were essentially locked up, they couldn’t go out driving fast, they couldn’t go out and get drunk, and they couldn’t get into fights and whatever, and so all these lives were saved.” So the “drop” in figures for young deaths was not caused by reduced physical contact and transmission?
The problem that Speigelhalter and other pro-interventionists have, IMHO, is tunnel vision and confirmation bias, over both lockdowns and vaccination. If they start off from the axiom that interventions can do no harm and indeed are beneficial then they automatically and unconsciously reject going down any line of reasoning that might disprove the axiom. Good intentions and optimism do not trump poor outcomes, no matter how much statisticians may torture the data to confirm their bias.
https://www.eppingforestguardian.co.uk/news/19902983.prof-sir-david-spiegelhalter-admits-overly-optimistic-pandemic/
With back to front logic David Spiegalhalter and Anthony Masters think the absence of a dip in mortality rates during 2021 points to people who have died with Covid having lost about 10 years of life despite the average age of death being in the 80s. With excess deaths continuing during 2022, do they really think this points to the average loss of life being even higher (20years, 30years etc) or will they twig that something else is happening? David Speigalhalter really needs to open his eyes and engage his brain before his professional reputation is completely destroyed. Assuming he isn’t corrupt of course.
‘6 People who have died with Covid have on average lost about 10 years of life
Some vulnerable people who died in the first wave would otherwise only have survived a short period longer. This “mortality displacement” often shows when a cluster of deaths due to extreme heat or cold is followed by a dip in mortality rates. At the start of the first wave, one of us (DS) was quoted as saying, “many people who die of Covid would have died anyway within a short period”, while others estimated that this proportion could be more than half. We were proved wrong by the limited deficit in deaths over the following year. It’s been estimated, on average, that about 10 years of life are lost from Covid-19 deaths in the UK, and 16 years globally.’
‘Covid by numbers: 10 key lessons separating fact from fiction’ published in The Observer 10th October 2021
“Those who died from/with covid in their early 80’s would have had another ten years of life left” – is an argument used, especially by Guardianistas when it is said the average life expectancy is 82ish anyway. They say this because those lucky enough to reach 80 have roughly a decade left, actuarially speaking.
But what they fail to account for is that the vast majority of those dying from covid would NOT have another decade because they were suffering from comorbidities in any event..
FWIW I was banned from their comments section for pointing this out about two years ago. .
His ‘accident preventions’ are also an excellent justification for a totalitarian state.
If you as a company were indemnified against any liability for what your product does, why bother with formal testing above the minimum?
And why would ANYONE in their right mind take such a substance? Anyone?
In theory the system should work. As a society, we want to encourage drug discovery and development. The barrier, absent liability protection, is that a drug’s profitability can be wiped out by one or two cases where a user suffers death or severe injury, since awards in such cases could be multi-million dollars, say. So, the solution is that we offer liability protection but put in place a regulatory approval process which allows us to assess whether the drug is safe.
Needless to say, this system breaks down if the regulators become “enablers” or are “captured” by the drug producers. Once we lose trust in the regulatory process, you are right – why would ANYONE in their right mind take such a substance?
Given the degrees of propoganda and downright coercion attached to the injections the only conclusion is malign intent. Until this is addressed trust in “vaccines”, the medical world and people working in the health care industry will continue to fall.
Nurses want a pay rise, BUT they are still pushing these kill shots. Quite frankly many of them no longer deserve what they are being paid. Sympathy – none.
Unfortunately, the tone of the article tends to the “mishandling” theory, or provides the umbrella cover of cock-up. It was no such thing. The propoganda was deliberate. Nothing about government actions these last three years has been about looking after peoples’ health, in fact just the opposite as I am sure we will find out in the next few years.
Opportunity missed.
I would say people now having seen how ineffective and dangerous the mRNA ‘vaccines’ are despite being told/lied to, to the contrary, may be wondering whether other vaccines are ‘safe and effective’ or is that more lies?
Some will recall the MMR ruckus with eminent doctors being discredited, but maybe on reflection, given the CoVid vaccine lies, they were onto something.
‘The official rationale for these policies was that vaccination would help protect others from being infected.’
In Germany where uptake of the umpteenth booster is extremely low, the Health Gestapo has dropped the ‘protect granny’ mantra and it is now ‘Protect myself’. That of course is only what vaccination can do, protect the vaccinated, except in the case of the mRNA Snake-oil it doesn’t even do that and may kill you.
Most vaccinations do (in theory) reduce your chances of getting infected and also of transmitting if you are infected – therefore, taking a vaccine to protect granny does in theory have some legitimacy. But that benefit should be an add-on to protecting yourself – if you wouldn’t take it to protect yourself and there are risks attached to taking it, then IMO it is a step too far to pressure someone to take it “to protect granny”.
Here in the NL we are often told how successful the jabathon has been in the MSM but go to alternative platforms for the truth. Example 1) this recent headline telling us how many have been saved from going to hospital;
https://nltimes.nl/2022/11/07/covid-vaccines-prevented-88000-hospitalizations-netherlands-13-months
Example 2) Due to a FOIA it was revealed that our former worm of a Health Minister got our RIVM ( Nat Institute for Public Health ) to fudge the stats as a means to get more people vaxxed and increase vax passes;
https://indepen.nl/wob-de-jonge-kon-op-bestelling-cijfers-bij-rivm-manipuleren/
Example 3) This chap on Twitter is doing the maths right and proving that the RIVM figures are junk. Only 6% of people 12 – 60yrs have taken the bivalent booster for instance. Only 3 million out of a 17.8 million population have had it. Read MSM and you hear an entirely different story;
https://twitter.com/djdejeu/status/1587549814702612483
( Sorry if this hasn’t translated to English. You’ll just have to take my work for it,
)
I noticed a clip of Christine Anderson MEP further down the thread: –
https://rumble.com/v1rcck8-christine-anderson-mep-at-prof.-perrones-covid19-conference-european-parlia.html
Yes I saw that. She’s great isn’t she? Proper kick-ass!
Yes, and Cristian Terhes.
The only good thing from all this criminal insanity is that it it is opening eyes to the dangers of the Miracle Of Modern Medicine – particularly vaccines generally and mRNA jabs in particular :-
http://vaccinepapers.org/ – for information re vaccines, and
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S027869152200206X – for the mRNA gene manipulations.
And you ain’t seen nothin’ yet, if GvDB is – finally- proven right…
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/how-vaccination-is-actually-driving-covid-to-be-more-infectious/
He has proved right about the rapid evolution of increasingly infectious variants, but wrong in his ‘doomsday’ prediction of a variant that would not only be highly infectious, but cause severe disease.
“…‘That will only happen if the virus manages to overcome the pressures exerted by the non-neutralising antibodies, because they prevent severe disease,’ he says. ‘My fear is that this will be the end station, where these mass vaccination campaigns will bring us.
‘I have been wrong about the timeline. I thought it would evolve much faster. I was predicting this outcome for this summer. What I have learned is that the immune system is extremely resilient. It can compensate and compensate, delaying the evolution of the virus. But the mutations are becoming larger, and accelerating.’
If a more damaging strain does emerge, the vaccinated would be at particular risk because of lacking the innate immunity developed when we become infected naturally…”
It does read like the script for a doomsday scenario, but maybe the producers have lost the plot now. We don’t have to be experts to observe that viruses and bacteria that tend to cause relatively minor infections in creatures are more likely to survive, after all. If that is all that the trade is accelerating, who cares?
It does read like the script for a doomsday scenario
It reads like the proof that the author could never have written the proof he wrote because his earliest ancestors already died out hundredthousands of years ago.
“…‘That will only happen if the virus manages to overcome the pressures exerted by the non-neutralising antibodies, because they prevent severe disease,’ he says.
Ok. Crankdenbossche is finally out, as demonstrated by this blatant abuse of terminology even laypeople like me can spot: Antibodies are said to be non-neutralizing if they’re attaching to the wrong part of a virus, ie, if the virus with the antibody attached can still infect cells (hasn’t been neutralized). Because of this, they don’t (and cannot) prevent anything.
RW – could you clarify please? – are you saying Geert Vanden Bossche is a fraud?
Interview with Stefano Scoglio, probably the most extreme credentialed critic yet:
The mRNA technology does not work at all in peoples bodies.
The stuff they are injected with is not even remotely a vaccine, just a purely toxic substance.
https://off-guardian.org/2022/11/07/that-mrna-vaccines-cause-cells-to-produce-spike-proteins-is-a-fairy-tale/
Probably repeating what other people have already posted: The so-called Corona pandemic has revealed that the government and anything more-or-less related to it (civil service, NHS, quangos, utility companies, banks and international organizations) are chock-full of egotist parasites devoid of any morals or values who all bow to the utilitarian dogma that it’s ok to sacrifice a few for whatever they consider to benefit what they believe to be the many and who all believe that any end they want to accomplish justifies any means they like to take.
The system has literally burnt itself on a great, happy bonfire. I wouldn’t again trust these people with telling me whether it’s presently day or night, let alone anything less obvious than that. Should they happen to tell the truth about anything, that will either be coincidence or ignorance on their part. Just think of Blowhard Johnson at COP27 wailing about the eternal climate guilt of England. Not that long ago, he posed as a patriot.
I think we’ll probably now see shysters like Bill Gates abandoning the cash cow that was the so-called vaccine industry, now that it has been utterly and forever discredited.
The Covid injections look now like an overplayed hand. And the word ‘vaccine’ will forever be associated with mandates, coercion, blackmail, corruption, bribery, lies and oh yes, state violence. Not things we traditionally associated with healthcare!
People Losing Confidence in Covid jab
Yellow Freedom Boards – next event
Thursday 10th November 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards
Junction B3408 London Rd &
John Nike Way, Binfield
Bracknell RG42 4FZ
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Good to see you are calling it a ‘jab’.
Trust is like virginity; once it’s gone, it’s gone.
“Rather than setting out to persuade everyone to get vaccinated, they could concentrate on providing good information about benefits and risks to help people decide whether vaccination is right for them.”
I have a better idea, take away their immunity to prosecution? Now that would concentrate theirs minds a tad more.
Meanwhile those in the driving seat currently should be made to pay for their irresponsible, selfish, greedy and frankly egregious actions.