New evidence has emerged that the mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are routinely injuring the heart of all vaccine recipients, raising further questions about their safety and their role in the recent elevated levels of heart-related deaths.
The latest evidence comes in a study from Switzerland, which found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people, with 2.8% showing levels associated with subclinical myocarditis.
The official line on elevated heart injuries and deaths, where they are acknowledged, is that they are most likely caused by the virus as a post-Covid condition rather than the vaccines.
However, expert group HART (Health Advisory and Recovery Team) has pointed to Australia as a “control group” on this question. HART notes that even though Australia had not had significant Covid (only 30,000 reported infections and 910 deaths) prior to mid-2021, it still saw a trend in excess non-Covid deaths beginning in June 2021 (see below). HART notes that Australia “did not have prior Covid as a reason for seeing this rise in mortality and hospital pressure from spring 2021”. Instead, “the results from this control group indicate that the cause of this rise in deaths, particularly in young people, must be something in common with Australia, Europe and the USA”.
In New Zealand, economist John Gibson found a temporal association between boosters and excess deaths, estimating “16 excess deaths per 100,000 booster doses” (see below). He noted that the age distribution of the deaths corroborated the hypothesis: “The age groups most likely to use boosters show large rises in excess mortality after boosters are rolled out.”
In Japan, Guy Gin reports that Professor Seiji Kojima of Nagoya University found the same correlation during the booster rollout in January to March 2022 (see below) – a time when most excess deaths were not with Covid.
In Israel, a study in Nature observed a similar trend for 16-39 year-olds, with cardiac arrest emergency calls rising and falling with the first and second doses and then rising and falling again after doses for recovered individuals.
Dr. Eyal Shahar looked at the Israeli deaths data for all ages and estimated “a plausible range of the booster fatality rate in Israel in August 2021” of eight to 17 deaths per 100,000 vaccinees. In the Netherlands, vaccinologist Dr. Theo Schetters estimated a booster fatality rate in the over-60s as high as 125 per 100,000 vaccinees.
As to cause, Dr. Michael Palmer and Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi at Doctors for Covid Ethics have set out what they deem “irrefutable proof of causality” that mRNA vaccines are causing vascular and organ damage. From studies and autopsy evidence the medical experts show:
- mRNA vaccines don’t stay at the injection site but instead travel throughout the body and accumulate in various organs;
- mRNA-based Covid vaccines induce long-lasting expression of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein in many organs;
- Vaccine-induced expression of the spike protein induces autoimmune-like inflammation;
- Vaccine-induced inflammation can cause grave organ damage, especially in vessels, sometimes with deadly outcome.
They explain that autopsy evidence shows that “the strong expression of spike protein in heart muscle after vaccination correlates with significant inflammation and tissue destruction”. They add that “vaccine-induced vascular damage will promote blood clotting, and clotting-related diseases such as heart attack, stroke, lung embolism are very common in the adverse events databases”.
A recent case report in Vaccines of an autopsy conducted on a 76-year-old man who died three weeks after receiving his third COVID-19 vaccination confirms the role of the vaccine. It found the presence of spike protein but not the nucleocapsid protein in the deceased man’s brain and heart, proving that the vaccine (which unlike the virus only produces the spike protein) was the cause of the deadly inflammation.
In the heart, signs of chronic cardiomyopathy as well as mild acute lympho-histiocytic myocarditis and vasculitis were present. Although there was no history of COVID-19 for this patient, immunohistochemistry for SARS-CoV-2 antigens (spike and nucleocapsid proteins) was performed. Surprisingly, only spike protein but no nucleocapsid protein could be detected within the foci of inflammation in both the brain and the heart, particularly in the endothelial cells of small blood vessels. Since no nucleocapsid protein could be detected, the presence of spike protein must be ascribed to vaccination rather than to viral infection. The findings corroborate previous reports of encephalitis and myocarditis caused by gene-based COVID-19 vaccines.
A case report of the autopsy of a 55-year-old patient who died four months after receiving a Pfizer jab as a second dose (his first dose was AstraZeneca) made similar findings.
SARS-CoV-2 Spike protein, but not nucleocapsid protein was sporadically detected in vessel walls by immunohistochemical assay. The cause of death was determined to be acute myocardial infarction and lymphocytic myocarditis. These findings indicate that myocarditis, as well as thrombo-embolic events following injection of spike-inducing gene-based vaccines, are causally associated with a injurious immunological response to the encoded agent.
A recent meta-analysis claimed to find that the risk of myocarditis is “more than seven fold higher in persons who were infected with the SARS-CoV-2 than in those who received the vaccine”. It claims this supports “the continued use of mRNA COVID-19 vaccines among all eligible persons per CDC and WHO recommendations”.
However, critics have pointed out the numerous flaws in this meta-analysis and highlighted that it is at odds with a major Nordic study of 23 million people that found the risk of hospitalisation post-vaccination in 16-24 year old males was up to 28 times higher than the risk post-Covid. At the Daily Sceptic we have written about this Nordic study as well as a number of other studies with similar findings, including ones from France, England and the U.S. (alongside critiques of studies that purport to show otherwise). A study from Israel confirms the elevated risk from vaccination and states: “We did not observe an increased incidence of neither pericarditis nor myocarditis in adult patients recovering from COVID-19 infection.” A study from Italy found a similar absence of elevated myocarditis during the pre-vaccination pandemic period.
We should also note that vaccination does not prevent Covid infection so the risks are additive and the comparison between vaccination risk and infection risk is false. Cardiovascular injury also is not the only serious adverse event associated with these vaccines. A recent study by researchers from Harvard, Oxford and Johns Hopkins University (among others) found that the mRNA vaccines are up to nearly 100 times more likely to cause a person of student age serious injury than prevent him or her from being hospitalised with COVID-19.
Most of these studies only look at clinical adverse events, i.e., events serious enough to warrant medical assistance. Studies are now emerging which show these clinical events to be just the tip of the iceberg of a far larger number of subclinical injuries. A study in Thailand found cardiovascular adverse effects in around a third of teenagers (29.2%) following Pfizer vaccination and subclinical heart inflammation in one in 43 (2.3%).
The Swiss study mentioned above was recently highlighted by Dr. Vinay Prasad and comes from the European Society of Cardiology. It confirms the Thai result, finding at least 2.8% with subclinical myocarditis (possibly more as the researchers excluded half the cases as possibly from another cause). Dr. Prasad observes that this means subclinical myocarditis is hundreds of times (“two orders of magnitude”) more common than clinical myocarditis. The rates were highest in women at 3.7%, which is one in 27 vaccinated. (Dr. Prasad notes this is different to the Thai study, which found the usual higher rates in males; he suggests this may be related to how the researchers excluded cases.)
Crucially, the study found elevated troponin levels – indicating heart injury – across all vaccinated people (see chart above, where the dark lines being shifted to the right of the fainter control group lines implies elevated levels throughout the vaccinated population). This indicates the vaccine is routinely injuring the heart (an organ which does not heal well) and that the known injuries are just the more severe instances of a far larger number occurring right across the board.
These injuries are not necessarily short and over with quickly. Studies have shown that spike protein is still being found in the blood of many vaccinated people at least four months after vaccination, suggesting it is still being produced in some way. The mechanism of this long-term production of spike protein by the body has not been identified (is the genetic code being incorporated into the cell’s DNA?). But if cells in the cardiovascular system and elsewhere are still producing this pathogenic and inflammatory protein for months on end, the risk of auto-immune injury as identified in the autopsies above greatly increases. Such an auto-immune injury may be triggered by re-challenge by the virus ramping up the immune response to the spike protein, which may explain why excess non-Covid deaths often accompany Covid waves.
There is now considerable evidence that mRNA vaccines are routinely injuring the heart, with raised troponin levels across the board and subclinical myocarditis in up to one in 27 cases or more. These are not rare events, as is often claimed by medical authorities and in the media. They are alarmingly common.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I am not sure what point there was in this story. We know BBC employees are highly paid so she would have the cash to do this. We also know they favour unlimited immigration. We know they think British tax payers should pay for anyone, from anywhere to come here to lengthen the queues for services.
what is the news value?
if you had reported the BBC journo had offered to take in a couple of them or was to pay for their lifetime costs, now that would be News.
Has she been promoted yet. Has Sunak recommended for an award.
“In another, it was reported that Ms. Harper warned that a 29-year-old Somali man who sexually assaulted a deaf girl aged 17 would be at “severely heightened risk” if he was sent back to Somalia because he had committed a sex crime.”
You’d kind of hope that people tempted to sexually assault or contemplating any serious crime would feel at “severely heightened risk”. Isn’t that the point? Better still, not just feel at “severely heightened risk” but actually BE at “severely heightened risk”.
“but actually BE at “severely heightened risk”.
This is what should be happening. And it is no different in this country. Paedophiles are at severe risk in prison in this country and deservedly so. They remain at risk even in anonomised community settings and as far as I am concerned rightly so.
A BBC employee has no business indulging her rank stupidity in such matters unless in her own time and at her expense.
Furthermore, once the deportation order is issued it should be immediate ie next plane out and no messing about.
“Furthermore, once the deportation order is issued it should be immediate ie next plane out and no messing about.”
That seems like harsh treatment for the BBC “journalist”, even by your standards
There wouldn’t be room on the plane for all the ones I’d like to see aboard!
The government could always book a fleet of aircraft – they love chucking taxpayers money about.
Well actually tof my comment was aimed at the Third World perps but I would have no problem in seeing this fake journo treated similarly.
Actually, can you remember several years back, there was a plane with a convicted sex offender on it who was in the process of being deported. But when the passengers got wind of the fact he was facing possible death ( allegedly. Not sure if that was true but the deets are a bit blurry now, tbh ) when he got back to his home country they all did a ‘mutiny’ and the pervert was allowed to get off and stay. I think it was the UK but it’s a bit vague now, and I don’t remember what happened to him.
Well this woman is exactly like those idiotic, reckless passengers. Why in the name of all that is rational, would citizens want dangerous trash like that roaming the streets, like a ticking time bomb, just waiting to strike again? How on earth can sharing a society with vermin like this be in anyone’s best interests? I’m just mystified as to the inner workings of many people’s minds these days, I really am at a loss.
Damned right Mogs.
We don’t want to be facing a…
‘Lessons will be learned’ event once again.
Do we?
As society becomes more and more fragmented it becomes weaker, ( the scamdemic years were a good example of this ) less able to form a resistance to threats and so it becomes less safe. This is especially true of larger cities. We could do a lot worse than listening to the many ex-Muslims, many of whom are active on Twitter. Honestly, if it’s not the globalists it’s the bloody Islamists. Does that make anyone who resists ”far-right”, by default?
“What has Islam brought to Europe?
Intimidation, censorship, terrorism, rape gangs, no-go zones, hate preachers, violent homophobia, oppression of women, jihadist marches, shari’ah courts, madrassahs (indoctrination of children), halal slaughter, occupation of roads for prayers, blaring the adhan over loudspeakers, massive welfare fraud, Islamist political parties, rabid antisemitism, attacks on churches and Hindu temples, extreme intolerance for Ahmadis and apostates, and much more.”
~ Alliance of Former Muslims
https://twitter.com/ImtiazMadmood/status/1754823623766896772
As summaries go that takes some beating Mogs.
While agreeing with all of that….Maajid Nawas is a great guy. The fact that he says how Muslims are not interpretating the Koran correctly may well be true, but many don’t see it that way and they are the ones we have a problem with.
It seems this is the psychological side of the demise of society ready for Build Back Better.
Yes it was in the UK and he turned out to be a total wrong’un.
Personally I’d have got off the plane because I wouldn’t have wanted to be on it with him (don’t see why decent passengers should be transported with the scum), and just let the damn thing take off.
I remember on the old Wooton show Amy Michel saying that migrants were not committing sex crimes because they were migrants. ——-Sorry Amy you are totally wrong. In Sweeden migrants commit 10 times more sex crimes and rapes than Indigenous Swedes. So they are committing sex crime entirely because of who they are and what their culture is. STOP making excuses for these scum.
This person has literally argued people who committed violent crimes in the UK must granted asylum because having committed these crimes in the UK would negatively effect their social standing in the countries they supposedly fled from. Ie, first, they immigrate illegally, then, they commit violent crimes and then, they must be allowed to stay forever because they committed violent crimes.
People whose minds are twisted like this will endanger any society they’re allowed to be part of.
BBC is a criminal organisation. This story just confirms the obvious. Help an illegal criminal – get deported with the illegal criminal.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/polly-billington-face-of-the-emerging-master-class/
Here is another thoroughly nasty piece of work about to burst from her cocoon – Polly Billington. And she has form; until recently head honcho at the deeply malicious UK 100. A real US and Them advocate.
“Her UK100 scheme, aided and abetted by politicians, is designed to impoverish us, removing our rights and liberties that we took for granted as participants in a civic democracy. It’s a near future of no travel, no petrol, no pets and no petty cash. East Thanet is sleepwalking into electing an extremist, whose decarbonisation plans will apply to hoi polloi but not her and her pals in high places.”
She is standing for Labour in the Thanet by-election and when elected will doubtless muscle her way on to Labour’s front bench.
I saw a news clip with Greta protesting somewhere, one of the placards said…’End Private Jets’….If she keeps on like that she will be kept outside in the snow at the next Davos meeting. She would have to mingle with all the hoi polloi like Rebel News.
Oh, we can’t be having that Ron. Has she been placed on half pay or something?
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/dolans-digest-its-the-immigrants-stupid/
Simon Dolan, whom I do have some time for, but here with a lamentable apologia for Fishy and his mob of treasonous barstewards. The guy is way behind the curve.
Remember he launched two legal challenges against Lockdown with no success. Does anyone remember what their reason (excuse) to reject the challenge was?
This woman is a bloody disgrace to humanity and should not be allowed to live freely amongst decent people in civilized society. Not only is she a complete traitor to British people but a traitor to women. She has played an active role in jeopardizing both national security ( to be fair, the politicians can take full credit for that one ) and the safety of British citizens. How much more migrant crime does a country actually need? Have we not reached peak ‘cultural enrichment’ from the paedo-worshippers and criminals yet?? Is Europe to continue being the garbage disposal unit for the third world rejects? Because this is what’s happening now, which I’m sure people like her will be all in favour of. Nothing says ”you have been conquered” like a Western country having ‘no-go zones’ and self-appointed Sharia psychos roaming around. But I suppose as long as women wear a hijab they’ll know who to molest and who to leave alone, so there is that..I mean, evidently “lessons” were not ”learnt” after the scandal of the extensive and long-running Pakistani rape gangs preying on vulnerable young girls. Unforgiveable, FFS!
”In the United Kingdom, there are now “no-go zones” that are Sharia compliant. Islamists seek to replace British law with Islamic law and left-wing immigration policies are helping the Islamists to achieve their goals.” ( 1min clip )
https://twitter.com/sapphirewrites_/status/1741067386772734031
Have you read “While Europe Slept” and “Surrender” by Bruce Bawer yet? Not that you need any educating on this subject, but I recommend those books. I notice there is some new Islamic Political Party supposedly for the “Muslim Community”——-I wasn’t aware that we needed political party’s to cater for different religious bunches of people. Do all Catholics think the same and require a political party? How about all protestants? Jews? ——–Only Muslims.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/king-charles-iii-diagnosed-with-cancer-buckingham-palace-says/
Official statement from the Palace for those who can be bothered.
This is a really good argument for setting a retirement age for royals such that their successors do actually succeed them before they enter the still-kept-alive-by-medical-maintenance stage of their lives. Charles III has now become king. That’s all he was ever going to become and he should really considering retiring now so that the present heir apparent can actually become king while he has still something like a life in front of him.
Willy is by all accounts thicker than his Dad. Maybe we will find out sooner rather than later.
Well, the idea that them Royals shag around like all students do and when they finally, likely out of exhaustion, settle down with some random tart, that random tart can just be ennobled and everything’s fine is obviously a reductio ad absurdum of the very concept of nobility and monarchy, but this would be a different conversation. Nevertheless, kings are supposed to be young or at least not already, for all practical purposes, very expensive OAPs by the time they finally get to ascend the throne.
And yet the BBC is somehow impartial… Sure.
Indeed. I think it’s close to impossible for any organisation working in the news and current affairs area to be “impartial”, so the solution is to get the state out of the business and then it’s “caveat emptor”.
Truly impartial? Probably not. But the BBC can be way more impartial, as we all know. And setting new guidelines is useless. There already are guidelines, but the people who are supposed to enforce them are just as impartial as the people they’re overseeing.
I’m not sure how that could possibly work. A political/social attitudes questionnaire to sort people into groups, quotas for people in each group, divide up tasks between them, get people of opposing views to write the same article and publish both.
Two basic steps to get most of the way there:
But like I said, who’s going to hold them to this?
Well, depending on your political views you will decide which facts to include and which not to, and which “sides” are worth getting statements from. As you say, who will enforce this? You’d need left and right wing “enforcers” – I think it has to be adversarial.
Yeah, and you get left and right wing overseers, except the right wing overseers will be exactly like all the commissions created to investigate the government: bought and paid for. So it’s a never ending cycle of “who’s watching the watchmen?” The only way out of this is for the people to hold the media and Ofcom accountable, but people couldn’t care less, which is why we’re in this mess to begin with. This is why TV, Hollywood, and social media are so important for the globalists. Keep the people satisfied and you can do whatever you want.
When I was young we had a set of national newspapers that were reasonably well divided between left and right – the spectrum still exists but the whole range has shifted to the left. Perhaps that was just luck.
It wasn’t luck. Some people worked very hard for that society. They’re all gone now, or too old to care.
Certainly good people worked hard and many are gone, but I think what evolved was luck or maybe the market doing its work. Press Barons, as they were know, were possibly more right wing, as I think the rich in general used to be, but I am not sure why for example the Daily Mirror supported Labour from 1945 onwards.
I think it’s socialism. I think those Press Barons, as self interested as they may have been, still cared about providing a good service. They had no interest in lying on a grand scale. But once socialism came along, that gave people an overarching cause. The People’s Cause. Combine this with the postmodernism that was so common amongst the socialist intelligentsia, and you have a perfect storm. There’s no facts, there’s no objective reality. All there is is power, and we must have the power at any cost so that we may further The People’s Cause. Like Diana West likes to say: “The issue is not The Issue. The Issue is always The Revolution.” Now you had people outright lying and supporting false narratives because they believed it was for a good cause. And there’s nothing that makes ordinary people more receptive to evil than believing it’s in the name of good.
So things changed. Back before all this, the worst people in society were out for themselves, trying to make some more money. Now the worst people in society aren’t even working for themselves. They lying, cheating, stealing, destroying without even realising the damage they’re causing, because they’re convinced it’s all in the name of the common good.
The Daily Mirror started supporting Labour for The Cause.
I still don’t know whether that kind of rich powerful person supports left wing causes because they really believe in them or for other reasons. Larry Fink of Blackrock has made a point of pushing Net Zero and “DEI”. Why?
With socialism there has always been three groups, as far as I can tell. The Party, the enforcers and the useful idiots, and the compliant population. The enforcers and the useful idiots either do what they do to survive, or they genuinely believe in the cause. Very few people in the Party believe in the cause. Most know that the goal of socialism is to create a subservient worker class, and that they’re the ones who truly own the means of production, supposedly in the name of the proletariat.
So I don’t think for one second that people like Larry Fink, or George Soros, or Klaus Schwab believe anything they say. I have absolutely no doubt that they don’t have a genuine bone in their bodies. But A LOT of the people working for them truly believe. Ordinary people just don’t force others through such ordeals, even if it’s in their self interest. But get them to believe that it’s all worth it, that utopia awaits, that it’s all for the greater good, and they’ll do it. And in any case, if they didn’t believe that would mean that millions of people are in on a conspiracy where they know none of this will ever work, but they’re keeping it a secret. It would make no sense.
And you see this everywhere. In the summer of 2022, when there was that so-called drought, I went to a park and noticed that even though the adjacent river was up to its usual level, the park’s duck pond was drained. Why? To conserve water, I’m sure the council would say. The end result? “Oh wow, this drought is so bad even the lake dried up!” Was the local council like “Yeah, let’s drain the lake and make these fools believe that there’s a drought when there isn’t so they live in fear of climate change!” No chance. What happened is that someone at the top did have that goal in mind and just told councils to shut down water features and drain ponds and whatnot, in order to conserve water. And the local authorities just did it. They didn’t ask themselves how exactly that will save water. They didn’t reply saying “but we have enough water”. That’s above their pay grade, not their responsibility. Useful idiots, advancing The Cause without even knowing. There’s no need for a conspiracy theory when people just mindlessly do what they’re told.
“So I don’t think for one second that people like Larry Fink, or George Soros, or Klaus Schwab believe anything they say.”
That would be my guess too.
My arse is more impartial than the BBC. It may not be symmetrical but it’s definitely more impartial.
https://off-guardian.org/2024/02/06/family-of-9-11-victim-vows-to-keep-fighting-for-new-inquest-after-uk-attorney-general-denies-them-a-second-time/
It is impossible not to conclude that, as usual the British government is colluding with the US government in covering up the real facts behind what really happened on 9 / 11. I am inclined to believe this was another Deep State job.
Agreed…And also Dr David Kelly.
Dr David Kelly certainly. Bliar had him ‘removed.’
One really has to appreciates this argument:
In another, it was reported that Ms. Harper warned that a 29-year-old Somali man who sexually assaulted a deaf girl aged 17 would be at “severely heightened risk” if he was sent back to Somalia because he had committed a sex crime.
In other words, he must be granted asylum because he committed crimes here(!).
Obvious implication: Harper and her ilk want people to commit violent crimes in the UK.
Quote
The BBC has since announced that Ms. Harper was leaving the organisation. It is understood that she will depart later this month and that her most recent role at the corporation was as a journalist reporter. It remains unclear whether she quit or was sacked.
Intelligence asset – busted. The sickening ways of the treasonous establishment.
This should be another nail in the BBC coffin. Not that is that much more room for more nails. I despise the BBC and this slapper.
Is she unmarried? Often find these bleeding heart women are just falling romantically for the ‘bad boys’ they are supporting
Female biology is destroying our civilisation. I am with Nick Dixon on removing the vote from women and men who have not worked in a job that has to earn a profit. And men who have been in the military would get two votes. And all public sector workers automatically get no vote because they can influence the decisions of ministers through their work, and they are paid from enforced taxes.