So, Rishi Sunak will shortly be installed as our new Prime Minister – the fifth since 2016. Indeed, Prince Charles is already on his second PM and he hasn’t even been crowned yet, suggesting he may break his mother’s record of appointing 15 during her reign. You wait 70 years for a coronation and then two come along at once!
My email box is filling up with people claiming this is a WEF-orchestrated coup. The evidence is overwhelming, they say. Here’s the Naked Emperor on the case for prosecution:
His father-in-law, Narayana Murthy, is an Indian billionaire and founder of Infosys. In 2005 Narayana was co-chair of the WEF’s annual event, along with Bill Gates. Infosys has partnered with the WEF to deliver digital services which to many look like social credit systems and biometric IDs.
Infosys runs India’s digital ID scheme called Aadhar and Rishi’s wife owns just under 1% of the company. That doesn’t sound a lot but it means she gets £11.5 million in dividends every year.
Rishi is also a keen Central Bank Digital Currencies advocate.
Mr Sunak’s former hedge fund was heavily invested in Moderna and he refused to say whether he would profit from the Covid vaccine.
Here’s a nice photo of Rishi with the National Farmers’ Union President wearing her nice shiny WEF Agenda 2030 badge.
Here’s Rishi explaining his new Agenda 30 Green taxes and Sovereign Green Bonds, sponsored by the WEF.
We also can conclude that Rishi is the globalists choice by looking at who supported him and what they say.
Tobias Ellwood MP was an early Rishi supporter announcing that “the free market experiment is over and the reset begins” before swiftly deleting his tweet.
Tobias is a member of the Global Thinkers Forum, Chair of the Defence Select Committee and reservist in the 77th Brigade, the secretive section of the British Army’s information warfare unit (Hi guys!). Here he is again calling for a reset.
Two other Rishi supporters are Tom Tugendhat, Chairman of the Foreign Affairs Committee, and Michael Gove, Chief Westminster King Maker, who both attended the Bilderberg meeting in Washington in June this year.
Individual statements or policies can be argued away as conspiracy nonsense or coincidence but put it all together and it is clear that inexperienced Rishi was placed into power a couple of years ago with the intention of pushing an agenda that benefits the few.
Worth reading in full.
You won’t be surprised to hear I don’t buy it. Not just because it assumes that a conclave of puppet masters are responsible for a series of unfortunate political events, ignoring the thousands of variables that are responsible for history unfolding in the way that it does – including the free will of the protagonists – but because there’s a simpler explanation.
Liz Truss lost power because she and Kwasi Kwarteng chose to introduce a mini-budget they’d made no effort to prepare the financial markets for and which probably would have spooked those markets even if they had. They put an energy support package in place that would cost the British Government up to £100 billion, depending on the global energy markets, and proposed to cut taxes by £45 billion without any corresponding cuts in public expenditure, in spite of the fact that inflation is the highest it’s been in 40 years, our national debt is £2.45 trillion (up from £1.8 trillion in March 2020) and we’re almost certainly heading into a recession. Forget the proposal to cut the top rate of tax and scrap the cap on bankers’ bonuses – those supposedly ‘libertarian’ measures were irrelevant. It was the fact that the British Government was going to have to borrow hundreds of billions of pounds without any serious plan to balance the books that sent the currency markets and the bond markets into a tailspin.
There was nothing inevitable about that – Liz and Kwasi could have waited until next Spring to unveil their pro-growth strategy and gone about implementing it in a measured, gradual way instead of springing it on everyone just days after a period of national mourning.
But the events that followed this catastrophic political misjudgement do have an air of inevitability about them: first the U-turn on cutting the top rate of tax, then the defenestration of Kwasi, followed by the appointment of Jeremy Hunt, then the U-turn on not raising corporation tax and the shrinking of the energy support package from two years to six months… how could any Prime Minister survive such a cascade of humiliations?
After she’d been dethroned in these circumstances, Rishi’s coronation also seems unavoidable. Had it been Boris who succeeded her – or, God forbid, Penny Mordaunt – the financial markets would have jack-knived again. Indeed, gilt yields started to rise the moment rumours began circulating that Boris would throw his hat into the ring and didn’t begin to drop until he announced he wouldn’t be standing. I daresay that was an important factor in his decision not to run – if the currency markets and the bond markets rejected him, just as they’d rejected Liz, he’d have no choice but to resign as well.
So what’s the moral of the story? Remainers will argue this proves that take back control was never more than a clever political slogan. The idea that Britain could regain its sovereignty by leaving the European Union was always for the birds, given all the other international forces restricting His Majesty’s Government’s room for manoeuvre, not least the financial markets. Indeed, Jonathan Freedland wrote a column in the Guardian about what he called “the sovereignty delusion” making precisely this point:
Truss and her now ex-chancellor were given the rudest of reminders that in our interdependent world there is no such thing as pure, untrammelled sovereignty. No government can do what the hell it likes, heedless of others. In this case, the restraint on sovereignty was not the EU: it was the money markets. But their verdict was as binding as any Brussels edict; in fact it was more so. They ordered the removal of a chancellor after just 38 days in office and the cancellation of the Government’s economic strategy. It is the financial markets that have taken back control.
There’s a deal of truth in this, but with one important caveat: the money markets probably wouldn’t have reacted in the way they did to the mini-budget if inflation wasn’t approaching double digits and if Britain’s national debt wasn’t 100% of GDP. Freedland blames Brexit for Britain’s straitened economic circumstances, but the actual cause was Boris Johnson and Rishi Sunak’s mishandling of the pandemic. If they hadn’t mothballed the economy for 18 months and borrowed ~£400 billion to pay people not to work our national finances wouldn’t be in such a parlous state and Liz and Kwasi probably would have got away with it. The financial markets didn’t take back control. Boris and Rishi handed it to them when they more or less bankrupted the British economy.
There’s an irony here. Boris and his closes allies reacted in the way they did to the pandemic because, as they saw it, it was the best way to ensure their political survival. I daresay the same calculation was made by most political leaders who rushed to impose lockdowns and then borrowed hundreds of billions to cushion the economic shock. But the result has been a global recession and a grim new financial reality in which political leaders can no longer spend their way out of trouble. So one after another the incumbents are going to fall – and, as in Boris’s cases, their successor’s too. From now on, anything other than brutal austerity won’t be economically feasible, even though it’s politically disastrous. Britain is the canary in the coal mine; soon, every Western country will be like Italy, changing Prime Ministers every five minutes.
Those who see the hand of the WEF or Bilderberg or Bill Gates in all this are not cynics, but romantics. They cannot bring themselves to believe that sheer human folly could have brought us to such a point. Mankind is not so inept, surely? There must be some controlling intelligence directing events, even if it’s malignant. I almost wish that were true, because the truth is even harder to bear — we are the authors of our own downfall. But bear it we must if we’re going to avoid making such a catastrophic mistake again.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
So it is clear that some of the heating is indeed caused by us. Cleaner air is allowing more sun to heat the earth’s surface. We need to start polluting the atmosphere to stop climate change then.
No, we don’t need to pollute. We just need to be aware that more CO2 and trivial increase in warmth, (likely now reducing) are beneficial to all life on Earth. Including penguins and polar bears.
Including penguins and polar bears and pensioners.
An interesting juxtaposition – all creatures living in freezing conditions.
But the ECHR has recently ruled that pensioners are killed by warm weather! Why would they need any heating? It’s dangerous for them!
Yep, and we should get all that oil out of the sea bed and burn it, quick, before some undersea earthquake releases it into Our Precious Oceans!
A pleasure to read such calm common sense. One of the most upsetting realisations of my life is the utter corruption of the scientific method by vested interests. From being the glory of western civilisation. I now find increasingly I belive nothing, Chri5 Morrison is a ray of light in the gloom.
Very few scientists are saying men cannot become women, so why should we believe anything the rest of them are saying these days.
Another great article from Chris and yet the net-zero, climate doom bandwagon is now like an enormous oil tanker set on a course to wreck society for reasons unrelated to climate, it will not be easy to stop the relentless path of this horror Juggernaut. Yes, for sure, we need facts like this to show what is happening but I am not sure how we stop the net-zero scam from progressing on its relentless, sinister path to misery?
A constant and unrelenting barrage of facts, graphs, and more facts to counter their ludicrous arguments is our only hope, I’m sorry to say.
But we must NEVER give up!
We need to record carefully the names of every single supporter of this CAN Bill.
One of the things that has been most lacking for the last twenty years has been accountability.
CAN Bill backers have painted a target on their own backs.
If and when there is a public mood for retribution for all the damage done by those who have maliciously promoted this abject “destroy the West” nonsense agenda, there will be a need for accurate records of those who have promoted and profited from it.
Come on mister down voter..explain your self
Thank you for being a coolly logical, and almost lone voice in recent years, Chris. A year ago at a private dinner I asked a Tory leadership contender “And who will be paying for the imminent decommissioning of wind turbines and solar panels…poor old taxpayer once again?” Immoderate fool that she is now revealed to be, Badenoch eviscerated me.
The trance of recent decades appears to be breaking, liars and charlatans outed, and facts starting to win the day.
Keep up the great work!
Denis Rancourt (https://denisrancourt.ca) wrote the following about the ‘pandemic’:
In the big picture, this was an unprecedented mass assault against our populations perpetrated by evil design at the highest levels, enabled by the indoctrinated and spineless professional classes (politicians, clinicians, scientists, judges, media, executives…).
Take out ‘clinicians’ and I think the sentence applies equally to Net Zero: it is an unprecedented mass assault against our populations enabled by the indoctrinated and spineless professional classes …
Consequently, one can assume the persons or groups behind these ‘assaults’ are one and the same.
As someone who regularly appreciates Chris’s articles and is in broad agreement with him I would have some caution about the line taken here. In a charged atmosphere of media frenzy one needs to be careful not to fall onto the same trap as them. The cooling described here is too short term to allow any trends to be discerned especially with El Nino involved.
We would like this global warming lunacy to be undone once and for all, but I think it is a little premature to rejoice on the basis of this data.
The UK Government funded Net Zero plans are shown below. UK Government = Civil Service.
Why is it possible for people like Trofim Lysenko and Pol Pot to succeed in their mad plans? Also, in spite of all the damage those two individuals inflicted on humanity both died in their beds. There are now more of them and with people cheering them on.
The Trump effect will sound the death-knell for the Climate Change fraud. With USA breaking ranks, the global (Western edition) united front will crumble. More real scientists will feel confident enough to break cover, and the MSM will have no option but to start reporting truth instead of hyperbole, fear-mongering and Tales of the Apocalypse.
Then there is the “Far Right” in UK & Europe inching its way to Government, coinciding with economic collapse as people shiver in the dark caused by Net Zero.
If something cannot go on for ever, it will stop. But a heck of a lot of damage will be done meanwhile… see CoVid fake pandemic and so-called vaccine.
I look forward to the £multi-million Climate Change enquiry and Mistakes Were Made, Lessons Must Be Learned™️ reports.
The only thing a calling a mathematically calculated change of 0.29⁰C a spike shows is that someone’s using a nonsense scale for temperature values, see attached image.
Interesting article in The Light this month about a company called Telraam based in Belgium with an international reach. Caerphilly Observer in S Wales was looking for volunteers to assist in gathering street data by having one of their devices in their car windows, gathering street & traffic flow data.
“Telraam want all of you to join their community of partners to improve urban mobility, promote smarter transportation and foster sustainable cities”…..Make of that what you will!
Reason alone will not stop this climate change cult. Until the billions of mostly public funding you pay for, dries up, this will continue. Charlotte Gill points out regularly how and by whom public funds are being used by fake charities and non profits to drive this scam.
Instead of investing in carbon capture the government should be investing in creating artificial oil and petrol . We have less than 50 years supply it has been estimated.