• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Is it Time to Accept That Omicron is not COVID-19?

by Dr Randall Bock
25 September 2022 9:00 AM

A few weeks ago, the Washington Post announced “President Biden, doubly boosted, is in a much more favorable position to fight COVID-19 than President Donald Trump was before the rollout of vaccines.” NPR elaborated, “Even if you’re the president, it’s hard to avoid a breakthrough Covid infection.”

We all know many individuals who have been vaccinated and boosted, yet still get infected. How does that happen? One reason is that original COVID-19’s SARS CoV-2 virus – to which human populations have built immunologic resistance through exposure, vaccine or both – no longer circulates. References to current illness as COVID-19 represents a category mistake (when a person talks about something as though it’s a different type of thing from the thing it is).

It was still pertinent to speak of ‘COVID-19’ after the late 2020 exit of the ‘ancestral’ version, since certain SARS CoV-2 descendants, via mutation, found gaps in our immunologic defenses to become next-generation (but milder) ‘variants of concern’ (VOC). They ran sequentially through the Greek alphabet, springing up around the globe: Alpha (England), Beta (South Africa), Gamma (Brazil), and Delta (India).

All of these second-wave variant-strains ultimately disappeared, superseded in the category of coronavirus infection by the significantly milder virus found circulating late 2021 in South Africa. This virus was given a Greek letter name as per the previous VOC format – but this was inappropriate, given that Omicron strain is not a lineal SARS-CoV-2 descendant. 

Its sufferers are not therefore having ‘breakthrough’ COVID-19 cases. Omicron is a coronavirus, so there is some crossover; however, there is no substantial immunologic protection from previous natural-illness COVID-19 recovery – and essentially zero from doubly-dosed COVID-19 vaccines. 

Before the SARS and COVID-19 pandemics, the textbook definition of a coronavirus episode was “acute, mild upper respiratory infection (common cold)”. Omicron symptoms are indistinguishable from the cold’s to the point that, in April, England updated its ‘COVID-19’-symptom list effectively to coincide with the common cold’s: “It’s not possible to tell if you have COVID-19, flu or another respiratory infection based on symptoms alone,” officials say. 

Yet, experts have not acceded to a return to (pre-Covid) normalcy (of not fussing over the coronaviruses whose symptoms overlap with myriad other common-cold viruses). 

A friend mentioned his exasperation and wonder of coming down with “COVID-19, again!” – but what were his actual symptoms?

“Not much, a bit of a cough, some achiness for two days; my wife had a fever of 99°, basically a summer cold.”

“The President Gets A Summer Cold” isn’t news. Those Biden articles weren’t ‘fake news’ per se, but they did beg the question in declaring his illness to be “COVID-19”. The press is not fully to blame insofar as public health authorities purposefully keep outworn, outdated ‘COVID-19’ in the lexicon. 

I propose that the vastly milder illnesses emanating from today’s predominant strain 22B-Omicron-BA.5 (and its successors) deserve rebranding outside the COVID-19 franchise. From a scientific standpoint:

  • The “22B” prefix reflects discovery as the second Omicron of 2022 (fully three years after COVID-19’s eponymous origin). 
  • “There’s no transparent path of transmission linking Omicron to its [COVID-19] predecessors.”
  • Genomically, Omicron’s gap from second wave VOCs exceeds theirs from the ancestral strain.

In other words, (per Emma Hodcroft of Nextstrain and the University of Bern): Omicron is almost like an orphan, without close relatives on the COVID-19 tree. Micaheleen Doucleff explains: “Its genes just looked so different from the other [COVID-19] genome sequences.”  

Dr. Hodcroft places Omicron on a genomic map far afield from all previous SARS CoV-2 strains, positing but never proving connection to the COVID-19 ‘family tree’.

Clinically, Omicron is less lethal than influenza, verging on common cold, according to the Financial Times.

Omicron infection does show as a positive on ‘COVID-19’ tests; however these have never been shown to be specific to SARS CoV-2 (versus other coronaviruses).

As Omicron’s not a direct SARS-CoV-2 descendant, it may just be an (uncommon) ‘common cold”. 

“Omicron may have picked up some genetic material from a cousin, a common cold-causing coronavirus,” notes Dr. David Aronoff.

This shouldn’t be shocking: coronaviruses represent the cold’s second most common cause by type.

Historically, there has been no nomenclature enforcement regarding the ‘common cold’, itself a bucket-term based on symptoms rather than viral subtypes. So whether Omicron is a classic ‘common cold’ coronavirus or a novel coronavirus that looks and acts exactly like any common cold is a distinction without a difference.

No doubt if, for some reason, we put this same level of attention and testing to the other disparate viral causes of common cold, we’d find unusual variant strains of RSV, adenovirus, influenza B, etc. The thing is, we don’t – because there’s no cause to do so. 

Omicron brings any further deep focus on coronaviruses to a point of diminishing personal and societal returns. Common colds are not tracked, discussed, tested, pre-vaccinated – let alone used as cudgels bureaucratically and legally.

Omicron, nonetheless, is still considered ‘COVID-19’ – yet warrants reassignment as ‘common cold’ – or perhaps baptism as ‘Corona-22’ – relegating erstwhile dangerous but now disappeared ‘Covid-19’ SARS-CoV-2 to the history books. So much confusion would be eliminated by Omicron’s simple rename to ‘Corona-22’. 

  1. Current infections would no longer incorrectly be deemed COVID-19 vaccine ‘breakthroughs’.
  2. Antiquated COVID-19 vaccines would be seen immediately as having no rational reason to be called ‘boosters’. 
  3. It would be medical malpractice to inject a 2019 flu shot today, even if relabelled as ‘booster’.
  4. COVID-19 vaccines could be memorialised for prior contributions, while removed from Corona-22’s pharmacopeia.
  5. mRNA for COVID-19’s SARS CoV-2 would be removed from the (inappropriately) ‘bivalent’ new anti-Omicron vaccine.
  6. As a medical side note, retirement has occurred routinely with Monoclonal Antibody Therapy (MAT). Each is phased out as its VOC disappears.  
  7. Vaccines and MAT produce the same result: spike-protein antibodies; yet, while MATs’ shelf-life coincides precisely with its matched VOC, the ancestral 2020 COVID-19-vaccine has persisted with its own VOC long gone.
  8. The ambient ‘fear factor’ would downwardly recalibrate to Corona-22’s (Omicron’s) around tenfold diminishment in lethality. 
  9. We’d have closure for the COVID-19 pandemic. (That day will eventually come, why not now?)
  10. COVID-19 societal roadblocks would contextually achieve obsolescence. The masks come off (and absurdities such as requiring this year’s pre-school children in Philadelphia again to be masked would more easily be counter-litigated).
  11. We’d begin to appreciate how common-cold coronaviruses got there in the first place – by the same ‘in like a lion, out like a lamb’ pathway.

Interestingly, the last point might help elucidate some of the others. Instead of lions and lambs, let’s look at wolves and poodles: both emanated from some now-extinct wolf. Current-day wolves can be as dangerous as they choose, having no investment in human health or happiness; from their own sanctuary they take human life with no remorse. The poodles’ ‘sanctuary’ is humanity. It’s foolhardy to bite the hand that feeds. 

By analogy, Ebola, influenza, and the original 2003 SARS have animal reservoirs in which to retreat and regroup – and thus, can be vicious. The common cold is more like the poodle. Its viral success requires keeping human hosts upright, semi-functional and sneezing. Hospitalisation and death interrupt the chain. 

A strong perimeter makes sense against wolves, but not poodles. There are influenza, but no common-cold vaccines. Pfizer is prepping one for Omicron, but as a tweak of its COVID-19 shot, keeping it under the Emergency Use Authorisation (EUA) umbrella. So long as the operative disease or virus term remains ‘ COVID-19’, the EUA’s liability-reduction, pharmaceutical company enrichment and political leverage remain. H.L. Mencken, cynic, said: “The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by an endless series of hobgoblins, most of them imaginary.” 

Whether governments had valid reason to bring fear in 2020 is arguable. None exists in 2022. The EUA, as the gift that keeps on giving, prevents any turning of the page from COVID-19 to Corona-22 or some other rational resolution. There is no reasonable or legitimate public safety purpose to behave as if ‘COVID-19’ is still the major threat in 2022, nor that the COVID-19 vaccine is still necessary. Moreover, the incipient ‘bivalent’ Omicron vaccine fulfills no genuine patient need. Historically, the common cold has never been pre-vaccinated; vaccinating after-the-fact has minimal positive and potential negative effects; and the COVID-19 portion has no medicinal, only legal purpose for existing as the second ingredient.

Dr. Randall Bock is a primary care physician near Boston, Massachusetts, and the author of Overturning Zika. Read his blog and follow him on Twitter.

Tags: COVID-19Omicron VariantPropagandaVaccine

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Dozens of MPs, Including Former Tory Leader, Call on Business Secretary to Do Something About Out-of-Control PayPal

Next Post

No, Bolsonaro’s Handling of the Pandemic Was Not “Disastrous”

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
EppingBlogger
EppingBlogger
3 months ago

Contempt of court.

seems if they won’t exert left in any party can’t get through their evil policies or find it inconvenient to do do using Parliament they can use the judiciary to deliver.

Now it is clear they over ride even their left wing judges when the answer is inconvenient.

6
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago
Reply to  EppingBlogger

Any decent, honest, law-abiding, patriotic Prime Minister would have forced the resignations of all those engaged in this juvenile plotting.

That sums up the state of this country today.

17
0
info@success-stories.co.uk
info@success-stories.co.uk
3 months ago
Reply to  huxleypiggles

I am ashamed to think of this man as our Prime Minister.

11
0
Heretic
Heretic
3 months ago

Why is this Trans Craziness so important to the Uniparty?
Is it just part of the general Satanic Destruction of God’s Creation?
Or is it a convenient Distraction from the Invading Muslim Army still swarming in every day?

Small boat arrivals: last 7 days – GOV.UK

11
0
transmissionofflame
transmissionofflame
3 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

Good question. The most obvious explanation for me is that it’s part of a divide and conquer strategy. I doubt that Starmer cares much about trannies or any of the other “oppressed minorities” he pretends to champion, beyond they are useful to him.

6
0
Mrs Bunty
Mrs Bunty
3 months ago
Reply to  transmissionofflame

He doesn’t care much about anything. He’s so self obsessed and enamoured with globalism he sees being PM as a stepping stone to an EU/WEF job so he’ll let the country go to ruin, that’s what globalisation wants, the end of nation states.

2
0
Andante
Andante
3 months ago
Reply to  Heretic

It is a vital item in the ‘Progressive’ policy agenda being pushed as hard as possible around the world in recent years. I call it the ‘smash society’ agenda. See Canada under Turdew, see USA under Biden and of course see the EU, supporting it to the hilt. Anything to help to ‘smash society’.

Starmer told us serfs, back in July last year, in his speech in the ‘Rose Garden’, after the summer riots, where he said … ‘The Labour Government will continue to introduce progressive policies in order to combat populism and right-wing extremism.’ That’s why he will not do anything to stop the boats.

1
0
Tonka Rigger
Tonka Rigger
3 months ago

When the Government circumvent the Courts the whole thing is close to collapse.

I hope.

7
0
Pete Sutton
Pete Sutton
3 months ago

What rights do trannies want that they don’t already have?

5
0
RW
RW
3 months ago
Reply to  Pete Sutton

The right to decree that humans must not have a sex would be my guess.

2
0
Curio
Curio
3 months ago

Yet again, another article that avoids to.mention Starmer’s vested interest in the issue.

1
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago

I recognize that ‘hate crime’ of a skirt! Someone ring the police. 😮
Look at them, hanging round the bogs like a bad smell.
If only more men agreed, James. Imagine stating that women wanting to keep their toilets as female only is somehow a ”privilege”…

”I’ll tell you something for nothing…

If I was with my mother, or my sister, or my aunt, or my nieces, or any of my female friends, & I witnessed them being intimidated, harassed & hectored by this rabble, as they attempted to use THEIR OWN SPACES…

I’d be having words.”

https://x.com/DreyfusJames/status/1914321320235483442

5
0
Mogwai
Mogwai
3 months ago
Reply to  Mogwai

Look at these mingers. Adam’s another decent man unafraid to stand up for women’s rights and protect his female loved ones from this insane ideology. Much respect for the real men out there;

”It is my f*****g business, because my loved ones will be in women’s single sex spaces with you lot & stats suggest that 96% of you still have full male genitalia.

This is a cult.”

https://x.com/EssexPR/status/1914286426453160200

4
0
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 months ago

The State Loves Useful Idiots

3
0
Jack the dog
Jack the dog
3 months ago

If he’s no careful this issue will bring him down.

It us SO ludicrous and he is so egregiously on the idiotic side of it…

3
0
Pete Sutton
Pete Sutton
3 months ago

You can understand them not wanting to offend the muslim vote, but the trans lobby? Purely from cynical self-interest, it makes no sense – can they be motivated by sincerely held principle!

Last edited 3 months ago by Pete Sutton
0
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 months ago
Reply to  Pete Sutton

“Principle?”

Not one of Kneel’s mob could define principle.

3
0
brightlightsweetown
brightlightsweetown
3 months ago

The Supreme Court was one of Blair’s wondrous pieces of legislation…now it doesn’t suit the new Labour PM.
Arise Sir Kneel stop grovelling to the twisted cult, you absolute hypocrite.

3
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 months ago

Two-Tier regards “The Law” as the equivalent of Holy Writ. So he can’t condemn this judgement. But he can change “The Law.”

However, McSweeny knows that the vast majority of the electorate agrees with the Supreme Court, so any attempt Two-Tier makes to change “The Law” will get a severe electoral backlash.

So I expect they will “reach out” to the ECHR who will declare what “The Higher Law” is … and Two-Tier will claim that he is obliged to follow “The Higher Law.”

We’ll see ….

1
0
SomersetHoops
SomersetHoops
3 months ago

I am not left wing biased myself, but I know people who are, and many of them are not in favour of trans ideology. I don’t understand what branch of the left the Labour Party is part of that is against the correct ruling by our judges that Trans “women” are not women. I’m pretty sure many genuine socialists would not want to be part of it.

0
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 45: Jack Hadfield on the Anti-Asylum Protests, Alan Miller on the Tyranny of Digital ID and James Graham on the Net Zero Pension Threat

by Richard Eldred
25 July 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

25 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

News Round-Up

25 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

Half of Public Think Islam is Incompatible with British Values

25 July 2025
by Will Jones

Covid Vaccines Saved Far Fewer Lives Than Claimed by WHO, Major New Study Finds

25 July 2025
by Will Jones

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

50

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

21

News Round-Up

20

Half of Public Think Islam is Incompatible with British Values

17

Starmer’s Palestine Action Ban Could Be Breaking International Law, Says UN

14

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

25 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

24 July 2025
by Charlie Cole

Twice as Many People Work in Environment ‘Charities’ Than in Wind Power Generation: ONS Report Reveals Shocking Truth About UK’s ‘Green Jobs’

24 July 2025
by Chris Morrison

POSTS BY DATE

September 2022
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Aug   Oct »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

September 2022
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Aug   Oct »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

25 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

News Round-Up

25 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

Half of Public Think Islam is Incompatible with British Values

25 July 2025
by Will Jones

Covid Vaccines Saved Far Fewer Lives Than Claimed by WHO, Major New Study Finds

25 July 2025
by Will Jones

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

50

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

21

News Round-Up

20

Half of Public Think Islam is Incompatible with British Values

17

Starmer’s Palestine Action Ban Could Be Breaking International Law, Says UN

14

Gradually, Then Suddenly: The Death Throes of a Regime

25 July 2025
by Dr David McGrogan

Wind Power Price Soars 11% as Government’s Promise to Cut Bills by £300 Fails to Materialise

25 July 2025
by Ben Pile

Report on Black Maternity Experiences Blames “Racism” Without Evidence

24 July 2025
by Dr Roger Watson

White Britons Are Right to Resist Becoming a Minority

24 July 2025
by Charlie Cole

Twice as Many People Work in Environment ‘Charities’ Than in Wind Power Generation: ONS Report Reveals Shocking Truth About UK’s ‘Green Jobs’

24 July 2025
by Chris Morrison

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences