Further cutting edge scare mongering was on display in last Sunday’s second episode of Sir David Attenborough’s Frozen Planet II. More and more bowhead whales were said to be falling prey to killer whales, as the warming climate causes the barriers of sea ice to melt earlier in the year. Bowheads can utilise sea ice to evade harm, although the Frozen Planet attack was filmed in summer shallow water as 50 socialising whales gathered to rub their skins on rocks. Killer whale attacks on bowheads are not new, although there have been recent efforts to use the threat to promote climate change alarm. However, the U.S.-based National Ocean and Atmospheric Administration notes that “transient“ killer whales are known to prey on bowheads “and rates have increased every decade”. Better reporting and larger numbers of killer whales, also known as orcas, are among a number of possible reasons cited.
Orcas are one of the top ocean predators and will kill a variety of prey including minke whales in Antarctica. A small number of juvenile bowheads are undoubtedly taken. Other losses also occur with hunting allowed for communities in the Arctic Circle. Meanwhile, a group of ecologists recently reported that bowhead population sizes have increased over the last 30 years over large areas of the Arctic due to improvements in the production of food. As with all life in the Arctic, slightly warmer summers have led to improved food supplies from the bottom to the top of the chain. Another animal to have benefited from this higher abundance is the polar bear, whose numbers are thought to be at a record level around 32,000. Seal numbers in the North Atlantic were recently reported to be increasing.
Recent warming in the Arctic, which has reduced summer sea ice, has also proved helpful to bowheads since they can expand their territory. Bowheads are highly adapted to their environment, and have a pronounced bump on their heads which they use to break ice up to half a metre thick. Thinner summer ice further north means larger areas to feed.
Of course another great contribution to the rise in bowhead numbers is the decision to stop killing them, apart from a number of special Inuit permits. Bowheads were much prized by whalers, and their numbers were thought to have dropped to around 3,000 a century ago. Counting whales is naturally difficult but a recent abundance estimate put numbers in the western Arctic at 12,505 – with a 95% confidence that the total was between 7,994 to 19,560. Bowheads are also found in many other areas of the Arctic.
Last Sunday’s Attenborough programme followed the recent emotional line laid down by Mark Brownlow, his Executive Producer. “We get the audience invested in our characters, which we then use to communicate the message,” explained Brownlow. Cue scary music and strings as a young bowhead is shown isolated by a pack of orcas and for one hour repeatedly battered. Intoned Attenborough: “Then they pushed the youngster down until it finally drowns”. Cue end of music, cue climate change message and cue young children going to bed with tears in their eyes.
Still in the Arctic for episode 2, Attenborough, needless to say, repeated his improbable guess that all the summer sea ice in the Arctic could be gone by 2035. This claim is starting to attract a lot of critical interest on social media and elsewhere following the disclosure last week in the Daily Sceptic that it is the product of a climate model. It appears to have been taken from a paper written in 2020 by a group of academics working at the Met Office’s Hadley Centre. It was said that the model was able to replicate the climate in the last interglacial – not the most difficult task since they presumably knew the answer in the first place – and thus confidently predict that all the summer ice in the Arctic, right the way up to the North Pole, could disappear in about 12 years.
As we have also reported, the guess is looking more improbable by the year since Arctic summer sea ice has started to make a small recovery. The National Snow and Ice Data Center noted that last month, “sea ice extent is likely to remain higher than in recent years”. According to this source, the average sea ice extent ranked 13th lowest in the recent satellite record. Meanwhile, according to the EU weather service Copernicus, the overall annual coverage of sea ice was very close to the 1991-2020 average.
For years, alarmists have been making ludicrous claims of climate tipping points and breakdown. Even single examples of natural predation are rustled up to push the emotional buttons. The messaging of course is designed to help impose a command-and-control Net Zero political objective. Science has been corralled and politicised in order to strengthen the message. The ridiculous notion that the science is ‘settled’ has been allowed to stand. With the stakes rising daily as the disaster of Net Zero looms, how long can they get away with it?
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Funded by B&M Gates & best friends with Chelsea Clinton.
Sridhar is the living embodiment of an establishment puppet.
I asked you this already, but regardless – have you played the Dane yet?
As a youth I used to weep in butcher’s shops.
The COVID science was always an interdisciplinary effort: Whoever had some well-sounding academic or at least medical title and was willing to have the right oponions in public could – no matter what his field of expertise, if any, actually was – become part of The Very Wise Sages®
‘Science’? No $cientism. Follow the money.
Real science has been dead since maths and models usurped physical reality (mid 19th century).
Einstein is a famous example (there are few things as stupid as relativity).
This non-Scot whatever she/zhe is has no idea about the immune system.
No one can prove to me that flying viruses exist.
Bacteria can’t exist outside a host.
“Devi Sridhar’s Knowledge of the Epidemiology of Respiratory Viruses Could be Written on the Back of a Postage Stamp”Wasn’t it blindingly obvious?
I always remember the great Ian Brown’s Twitter post in response to comments on his Twitter feed, which contained some “vaccine sceptical” views from smart-alecs along the lines of “Stick to singing mate, you don’t know anything about medicine”. His answer “OK, but you’re taking medical advice from a computer salesman” (Billy, in case you were wondering).
It must be harder for the authors to stomach than for the rest of us – their profession has disgraced itself despite their best efforts to do the right thing. A lifetime of work betrayed by the wicked, the stupird, the selfish and the lazy.
“A lifetime of work” is the issue here – all that study, all those exams, the belief that they were doing the right thing because the process drove them in that direction. To suggest or to ask them now to double check they did the right thing, they thought they knew the right thing, “the science” and were they in the wrong after all? It doesn’t bear thinking about. What a loss of face and of status. Better to double down and see no evil, hear no evil…
”If other countries can do it, there is no reason why we can’t, too.”
As Sir Desmond Swayne put it in a question in the Commons: “Herd stupidity”.
Quite, I still want to check out his voting record on all matters relating to CV NPIs etc ….
I think he voted against most/all of it – when they had votes. Lots of stuff was passed without a vote early on.
Credit where it is due. Clearly the estimed Doctors Heneghan and Jeffries have had enough of pussy-footing politeness and have opened an “who dares wins assault” and frankly I don’t blame them.
The time has come to get rid of the whole lot of them and this waste of space oxygen thief Sridhar deserves to be amongst the first.
A horrible blot on humanity.
When four days ago, I pointed out that Sridhar’s expertise lay in the field of anthropology and that perhaps an epidemiology/medicine/virology qualification might be better suited to her post as chair of Global Public Health (aka ‘the pandemic professor), three folk gave down votes. Prof’ Heneghan would seem to agree with my comment. Thank heaven I took his and Mike Yeadon’s advice and remain unstabbed.
As for the Olympically dim Richard Burgon, it doesn’t surprise me that he pinned his colours to Sridhar’s mast and is likely to be a front bencher in Starmer’s upcoming clown show. Sheesh!
All lockdowns do is kick the can down the road. Simply explainable with two packs of cards. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z4kWbYlopN4
I’m a subscriber to TTE. Neil (perhaps the Neil who comments here – hope he doesn’t mind me quoting him) said this:
“First time I saw Devi on TV and heard she is a professor in the dept of public health at Edinburgh I had to find her background and was comforted to read she’s an anthropologist who wrote a book with the young Clinton. I thought that explained why her knowledge of virology and medicine differed from my 50 year old knowledge.
She was reported to be one of crankies favourites.
This last week has been a great relief to realise my understanding is ok!”