In 2013, the CNN presenter Deborah Feyerick asked if asteroids falling to earth were caused by climate change. Earlier this year, CBS anchor Nate Burleson commented on the Tonga earthquake by saying: “We talk about climate change… these stories are a harsh reality of what we are going through. We have to do our part because these are more frequent.” Last week, the academic networking blog The Conversation discussed the Fagradalsfjall volcano eruption in Iceland and asked: “Is climate change causing more eruptions?”, adding that it had the potential to increase volcanic eruptions and affect their size.
Dear God – they’ll be telling us that climate change causes lightning next. Wait, hang on – “Washington DC lightning strike that killed two serves as climate warning” – Reuters, August 5th.
In the climate change show, jumping the shark is now a daily occurrence, particularly in the mainstream media. Gaslighting on a global scale is evident as the media push the command-and-control Net Zero agenda. Bad weather incidents and natural disasters are catastrophised to promote this increasingly hard-left political agenda. But the distinguished atmospheric scientist Emeritus Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT recently voiced the views of an increasing number of people when he said the current climate narrative was “absurd”. Yet he acknowledged that it had universal acceptance, despite the fact that in a normal world the counter-arguments would be compelling. “Perhaps it is the trillions of dollars being diverted into every green project under the sun, and the relentless propaganda from grant-dependent academics and agenda-driven journalists, along with the political control offered to elite groups in society by Net Zero, that currently says it is not absurd,” he speculated.
The Daily Sceptic has written numerous articles presenting evidence that global warming started to run out of steam over 20 years ago, despite the frequent, back-dated and upward temperature adjustments made by state-funded weather services. No science paper exists that proves conclusively that humans cause noticeable changes in the climate by burning fossil fuel. Despite years of research, scientists are no nearer knowing how much temperatures will rise if carbon dioxide doubles in the atmosphere. No link has been shown directly connecting temperatures and CO2 rises (and falls) over the entire paleoclimatic record. Countless natural processes play a part in determining climate conditions. And attempts to link individual weather events to long-term changes in the climate are produced by climate modellers and green activists giving vent to wishful thinking.
In the absence of credible science, there has been a resort to the name-calling, shaming and appeals to authority, common in previous ages. The recent news that the Great Barrier Reef (GBR) had returned to blooming health, and was showing record growth, was a disaster for most mainstream media outlets. All parts had reported for years that the coral was on its last legs due to human-induced climate change. During this time, the GBR observer Professor Peter Ridd was vilified for stating that the reef was a vibrant and healthy ecosystem. He was fired from his post at James Cook University for pointing out the deficiencies in the output of reef science institutions.
In August 2019, the Guardian reported that the former Australian chief scientist Ian Chubb had accused Ridd of “misrepresenting robust science” about the plight of the GBR. Shamefully, it repeated without comment Chubb’s slur that Ridd was relying on the “strategy used by the tobacco industry to raise doubts about the impact of smoking”.
Professor Ridd emerges from the whole sorry affair with his reputation restored and an acknowledgement that true scientists report their findings without fear of the mob, or seeking the favour of the Establishment.
Just days before the news was confirmed that the GBR was continuing to grow back in record amounts, the Guardian ran a long article saying that scientists had demonstrated “beyond any doubt” that humanity is forcing the climate to disastrous new extremes, They hadn’t, of course, and “beyond any doubt” is a phrase borrowed from the criminal law, not science. Professor Terry Hughes from the National Coral Bleaching Taskforce estimated that close to 50% of the GBR coral is already dead. Attribution science is said to show that the hot March weather in 2016 that caused a “catastrophic die-off” in 2016 was made “at least 175 times more likely” by the human influence on the climate. A more realistic explanation, invariably ignored in mainstream media, is that the powerful El Nino experienced in that year warmed sea waters temporarily, and led to a natural burst of bleaching. Full reef health was quickly restored when the effect of the natural oscillation was removed.
The global media gaslighting over political climate change is easier to understand if you follow the money. Earlier this year, the Daily Sceptic reported that the Associated Press was adding two dozen journalists to cover “climate issues”. Five billionaire foundations, including the left-wing Rockefeller operation, supplied $8 million. AP now says over 50 jobs are funded from these sources. The BBC and the Guardian regularly receive multi-million dollar contributions from the trusts of wealthy donors. It is estimated that Bill Gates has given more than $300 million over the past decade to a wide variety of media outlets. Democrat power couple James and Kathryn Murdoch also help pay the staff’s wages at AP. On their Foundation web site, it is noted that there is an investment in Climate Central, where meteorologists are used as “trusted messengers” of the links between extreme weather and climate change.
Meanwhile, the foundation of the green technology-funding Spanish bank BBVA hands out annual €100,000 payments. Last year the cash went to Marlow Hood of Agence France-Presse, who describes himself as the “Herald of the Anthropocene”, the latter being a political renaming of the current Holocene era. In 2019 Matt McGrath of the BBC took home the annual prize, while in 2020 it ended up in the coffers of the Guardian.
The White Queen tried to believe in six impossible things before breakfast. It’s a shame climate change wasn’t around in Alice’s day.
Chris Morrison is the Daily Sceptic’s Environment Editor
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Yesterday in my back garden it was 100°F in the shade. I attribute that event to the Sun shining. I am now a fully fledged climate scientist. Cannot wait for the money to come flowing in.
It’s almost like they want to stoke a revolution.
‘It’s almost like they want to stoke a revolution’
You mean the Chinese Communist Party and Russian Federation, who are encouraging and exploiting the Climate Change scam (plus coronavirus lockdowns etc) to try and undermine Western economies and democratic traditions?
We need more, not less democracy / freedom / liberalism etc to get us out of the current mess.
Revolution simply means a violent power grab by a self-selected faction followed by single party tyranny.
Out of the frying pan and into the fire
(no fake Climate Change catastrophising analogies intended!)
Eppur si muove
I don’t get that Joe.
The problem with the world is that there are too many mad people about.
This has come about through the widespread ingestion of harmful chemicals.
Here is the latest example of this lunacy
‘Would there still have been climate change under socialism?’
https://www.newstatesman.com/ideas/2022/08/would-there-be-climate-change-under-socialism
As any fule kno, there would still have been climate change had Space Marshal Knuudlx Zabrok from Planet Epsilon Agbat descended to Earth on his moonriding gammascope, assassinated every single world leader and forced the global population to eat worms.
Nevertheless, the general thrust of this crashingly dull and stupid article is clear. ‘Climate emergency’ is the lever to once more apply the nostrums of socialism and, thanks to a mind numbingly incompetent succession of leaders since 1990 in this country, culminating in the egregious Bunter, taxation at its highest since 1945, we are already almost there.
All we have to do to return to some semblance of normality is to make the ingestion of harmful chemicals illegal. Oh! Hang on……
so Monro I read the article you linked by Leigh Philips. I think as calls for socialist planning go it’s pretty humanist and avoids the backward looking reaction of much green ideology. Maybe because not all sceptics are raving right wingers I found it interesting for another reason. As an economist who has studied radical economics as well as mainstream I think there is a place for planning but it should be democratic and accountable. Sadly the sort of planning we see today plans for a few. Today every policy is driven by sharp market makers, shrieking advocates and nefarious NGO’s. Then largely uninformed and impressionable civil servants and a barely curious set of ministers plan. The market failure and open rent- seeking of energy companies over climate policies is a case in point. Energy providers use the subsidy fuelled transition and geopolitical shocks to increase their supernormal profits and reduce consumer surplus to consumer risk because energy policy is crafted by them. Train privatisation delivers poor services while profits are repatriated to state owned companies in Europe. Let’s have a wider debate.
Train privatisation delivers poor services….and yet we would have no train service at all, were it not for the private companies that set the railways up in the first place.
The centrally planned NHS delivers poor services, knocked into a cocked hat by the social insurance funded healthcare systems of our near neighbours.
Pure capitalism is, pretty much, profit driven anarchy. Pure socialism is, of course, public spending until you run out of other people’s money and they get upset, as Bunter has just discovered.
Fortunately (perhaps), in this country, we have a first past the post system which allows the pendulum to swing between elements of socialism and capitalism and, hey, its deja vu all over again, we’re now back to the Seventies for the time being.
And yet what would have been the best time to be alive for a citizen of this country? You’re looking at it. This is probably as good a system of government as we are ever going to get.
Democracy: the least worst system of government.
A complete failure to understand what is going on.
And don’t forget our salvation will not arrive via the ballot box.
There will be no ‘salvation’.
This is as good as it gets.
Get used to it.
My earlier remarks concerning harmful chemicals refer:
‘Gates tries to show in this book that he gets it, while at the same time demonstrating on every page that he just doesn’t. As he draws up his elaborate plans for global governance, Gates writes that he does so knowing that he hasn’t been elected. He tells us he wouldn’t want to be anyway (after all, we can surmise, if he were elected, he might be accountable).
Gracefully, Gates understands that people are angry at the huge increases in wealth disparities during the pandemic, and pledges to return his profits to “make the world a fairer place”. He recognises that poor people across the world have suffered, and are far less able to deal with lockdowns, and even acknowledges that harsh measures might not be a good idea in some of them… And yet he recently went on record as saying that ‘if every country does what Australia did, then you wouldn’t be calling it a pandemic’. We can, in fact, judge him by his actions, and his words: he says one thing, and funds and promotes others.’
https://unherd.com/2022/05/bill-gates-wants-to-build-a-dystopia/
My earlier remarks about harmful chemicals refer:
The conspiracy that shadowy actors are secretly controlling the government has long flourished in the murkier corners of the internet. But the theory burst into the mainstream of Western politics when former US President Donald Trump began to espouse it at his rallies, claiming that “unelected deep state operatives who defy the voters to push their own secret agenda are truly a threat to democracy itself”.
‘Donald Trump’s staff “were now in some of the most powerful jobs in American politics, and they discovered that even despite that they still couldn’t make the American political system do exactly what they wanted.
The US system contains necessary checks and balances to limit how much power a president can exercise – but this “boring” truth was overlooked by Trump. Instead, says Elledge, the “deep state” became a useful scapegoat for the failings of the president’s administration: “it’s a useful political idea because it conjures up an enemy, but it keeps it vague. So you can keep changing who the deep state might be.’
The New Statesman 11 August 22
New Statesman gaslighting.
Yawn.
Many studies claim that yawning is your body’s effort to cool down your brain.
Dysbiosis and inflammation of the gut have been linked to causing several mental illnesses.
Try Gastro Ease
This is an interesting website, you can determine the elevation angle of the sun at different latitudes and longitudes during the day at different dates. I set the longitude to 0 and the time zone to 0. What it shows is that at this time of year the sun is higher in the sky for longer than the southern tropics. At the summer solstice the sun is as high in the sky as it is at the equator but for longer. It’s the jet stream that determines our weather pattern.
It’s the new religion.
The scientists are the clergy.
The media are the evangelists.
And the whole thing is captured and controlled by the oligarchy of our time who are the patrons and beneficiaries of the whole thing.
It’s the same deal as with previous religions. The oligarchs fund the religion and in exchange the priests and evangelists deliver the submission of the population.
Mid tier rich people (companies) play along or get crushed.
Like any half decent religion it exploits small kernels of truth and the intrinsic desire of humans to be part of something bigger and transcendental.
And following in a long tradition, this new religion borrows heavily from previous religions.
So for example, in Christianity, God is omnipotent and loves us all. When something good happens, well there’s your proof of God’s love and mercy. When something horrible happens, like the horrific death of young children, well in that case God acts in mysterious ways and it’s not for us to question his plan.
The climate guys tweaked it to create their own version. We terrible humans are warming the planet and need to keep the temperature down by behaving properly. When there is a heatwave, there is the proof of rising temperatures and of our sin. But, when there is an unusual cold spell, ah, well that’s climate change – our sinful behaviour doesn’t just cause warming it also causes temporary “extreme” cold weather.
It’s not a coincidence that climate change worship is flourishing in those places where traditional religions are most in decline. i.e. Europe.
Another great piece from CM! And I think this is one that will be very useful for passing on to family and friends as a way of sowing seeds of doubt about the scientific basis of anthropogenic climate change.
Oh the irony! I have just come back from town in the lovely sunshine. Smack in the town centre were parked two vehicles hired by Extinction Rebellion. One was giving away “free” vegan burgers, along with warnings of the demise of the planet from cow farts and carbon dioxide. Alongside it was a sizeable van with both sides converted into massive video screens relaying loop videos of our impending doom.
The first van heated its Planet-friendly burgers on a small propane cylinder, like the hot-dog stall nearby. The second ran its power-hungry display off a portable diesel generator quietly chugging away inside the van.
The operation appeared to be staffed mainly by attractive white middle-class students probably armed with more air-miles and sound-bites than IQ.
Coming to a town centre near you soon!
You must not call that lovely sunshine it’s extreme heat because of climate breakdown and we’re all going to die because it’ll never rain again until it’s going rain again and the experts don’t yet know when this might happen! In particular, we must not fall for rumours that it’ll rain again in autumn! That’s not proven yet!
[As per Guardian article of today, pro forma about 57% of the English regions now being declared to be in drought]
The one conclusion that can be drawn when any water company declares a drought in this country is that said water company has completely and utterly failed in their primary purpose – to provide an adequate and plentiful supply of clean water.
The respective boards should be dismissed and forcibly removed if necessary. No firkin about with failures.
Nigel Farage says ‘it’s absolutely MAD’ Irish government paying farmers more than £4k per cow culled
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CbTcK28usuk
GBNews
Yellow Boards By The Road BUILD BACK FREEDOM …
Wednesday 17th August 12pm to 1pm
Yellow Boards
Junction A332 Windsor Rd &
A330 Winkfield Road,
Ascot SL5 7UL
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Bracknell
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
The met office is gaslighting us about global warming. Plenty of chem trails over the Devon skies once again yesterday. What is being discharged? The met office says they are contrails. Really, that stick around for hours, spread widely and do not move like clouds? Causing our weathwr to be very queer for the past six months, at least.
Well I never. You don’t per chance think that they might also be gaslighting us on all corona things do you? He who pays the piper……
I’m in facebook prison for 48 hours for trying to share this. “Your message couldn’t be sent because it includes content that other people on Facebook have reported as abusive.”
We can see why so many refer to this as a money making scam. “Follow the money” has never been truer. Climate change only happens in rich Western countries for a reason. So many have been brainwashed by the constant trillion pound barrage of propaganda. It really has become a cult with the lemmings walking lockstep for the cool-aid. This is all funded through your tax revenues. This will not end until rich Western Countries stop allowing this abuse of their tax systems.
“Deborah Feyerick asked if asteroids falling to earth were caused by climate change”. That proves it, not a single ounce of brain power in any of them. No comprehension of reality.
Chris, I can’t really add anything to what you have published so well. The only thing is that Boris Johnson does nothing about removing the crazy climate levy which needs to be done now in fear of upsetting his wife. It will be a good thing when BJ finally goes, so we can actually be governed by who we vote for rather than their unelected partner.