• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Why the FDA Should Not Have Approved the Pfizer Covid Vaccine for Infants

by Dr Clare Craig
17 June 2022 11:13 AM

Severe Covid higher in the vaccine arm than in the placebo, two-thirds of the children dropped out, 97% of the Covid infections were ignored – Dr. Clare Craig, a diagnostic pathologist and Co-Chair of the HART group, explains in a short video why the Pfizer trial for Covid vaccination of infants aged six months to four years-old should be deemed null and void. The FDA voted unanimously on Wednesday to approve the drug for this age group. There follows a transcript of the video.

🧵 1/ Dr Clare Craig explains why the FDA should NOT have granted approval for roll-out in the 6 month to 4 yr old children cohort

This trial should have been deemed null and void. The regulators are failing to do their job.

Share widely & follow @hartgroup_org for updates pic.twitter.com/jnfojQ8gCH

— HART (@hartgroup_org) June 16, 2022

I’m Dr. Clare Craig, I’m a diagnostic pathologist and I’m Co-Chair of the HART group. And I want to take you through the evidence that Pfizer just presented to the FDA on the six month to four year-old children.

There’s an awful lot about this trial that has shocked me and I think will shock you too.

The trial recruited 4,526 children aged from six months to four years-old. 3,000 of these children did not make it to the end of the trial. That is a huge number. Two thirds of them. Why was there this drop off? That needs to be answered. And without an answer to that, on that basis alone this trial should be deemed null and void.

So, what did the trial show? Well, they defined severe Covid as children who had a slightly raised heart rate or a few more breaths per minute.

There were six children aged two to four who had severe Covid in the vaccine group but only one in the placebo group. So, on that basis the likelihood that this vaccine is actually causing severe Covid is higher than the likelihood that it isn’t.

There was actually one child who was hospitalised in this trial. He had a fever and a seizure. He had been vaccinated.

So now let’s turn to what they defined as any Covid. And what they did was to utterly twist the data.

They vaccinated the children and they waited three weeks after the first dose before the second dose. In that three-week period, 34 of the vaccinated children got Covid and only 13 in the placebo group, which worked out as a 30% increased chance of catching Covid in that three-week period if you were vaccinated. So they ignored that data.

And then there was an eight-week gap between the second dose and the third dose, where again plenty of children were getting Covid in the vaccine arm. So they ignored that data.

There were then seven days after the third dose, which they also ignored.

Which meant that in the end they had ignored 97% of the Covid that occurred during the trial and they just looked at tiny numbers – so tiny. In the end they were comparing three children in the vaccine arm who had Covid with seven in the placebo arm, and they said that this showed the vaccine was effective.

Stop Press: Read HART’s full analysis of the trial here.

Tags: FDAVaccinating ChildrenVaccine efficacyVaccines

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

Does Putin’s ‘Peter the Great’ Comparison Mean NATO Never Mattered?

Next Post

Re-evaluation of Pfizer Trial Data Shows Zero Efficacy, Say Experts

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

20 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
stewart
stewart
3 years ago

The problem with this is that it is so utterly outrageous that anyone who isn’t already very sceptical of the system just won’t believe it and will assume it’s not quite as bad as described.

If one accepts that this is true one cannot help but assume that the entire medical system is corrupted. Because something that obvious and outrageous can’t be an accident, or the actions of a few bad apples but a systematic failure.

Not too many people are ready to accept that and that is why in their minds they will dismiss this (if they even get to hear it) as “it can’t be quite right”.

98
0
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

Absolutely spot on. I know here in NL there is still a ridiculously high trust in the government and the public authorities. There would be next to no point in telling people about the producer’s own data on this trial, which even a buffoon can see shows that this stuff does not work in children (or anyone else for that matter). The fraud is so outrageous and in your face people simply would not be able to grasp it. They could not understand that if they can see very easily and clearly that the poison doesn’t work, than surely the authorities must too, and if they saw this they would never allow it – so therefore they must be misunderstanding what they are reading with their own eyes in black and white, what they can see all around them with vaxxed people getting the deadly bug time after time, with new lockdowns already being announced for the autumn – because this deadly bug might get deadly, just like Omic might have got deadly last winter, but didn’t.

“How many shots to prove that that this drug is safe and effective, Winston?” “As many as it takes to kill off the world’s population, then we will finally all be safe.”

45
-1
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  stewart

It’s more than just the “entire medical system” that is corrupted. It’s the entire government system, corporate system, education system, military system, mainstream media system, court system, etc.

There’s no “system” that is NOT corrupted.

If the mainstream media was NOT corrupted, they would have run this lady’s article and followed up on her claims …. but none did … because they are just as corrupt as the FDA, NIH, CDC, etc.

50
0
stewart
stewart
3 years ago
Reply to  BillRiceJr

I’m afraid I have to agree with you.

I see it as a systematic failure in the checks and balances which have really formed the basis of what we loosely call western democracy.

For a period, power within our society seemed to be somewhat distributed and with sufficiently divergent interests so that it didn’t seem possible for any institution or group of people to get away with too much without running into problems.

Now it feels as if pretty much every institutional power is aligned and operating in coordination. Governments, the bureaucracy, media, large corporations, NGOs, the banking and finance industry all seem to have their interests largely aligned and working together.

I’m not sure if the WEF is responsible for that or simply illustrative of all these different people coming together to align their interests in a common agenda to elevate themselves above and control the masses.

For anyone who doesn’t want to be or simply can’t be a part of that cadre the options presented seem to be play along or be crushed.

29
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago

Oscar Semmelweiss and Frances Kathleen Oldham Kelsey are TURNING IN THEIR GRAVES.

What the hell happened that so many people aren’t even interested to know this, even for the sake of their own kids?

I have been telling my friends, good people, the most I get is a shrug…

May Fauci and his kind rot in Hell.

71
0
JaneDoeNL
JaneDoeNL
3 years ago

How many people read the headline and thought is should have read “The FDA should not have approved the pfizer covid vaccine.“

26
0
crisisgarden
crisisgarden
3 years ago
Reply to  JaneDoeNL

Yes, I did.

14
0
TheGreenAcres
TheGreenAcres
3 years ago

I really don’t know how else to deacribe it but abject fraud. And the cover-up by the regulators is astonishing.

26
0
huxleypiggles
huxleypiggles
3 years ago

As the commentators below make clear putting this in front of the public will probably be met with indifference at best. There are I believe still members of the Skeptic family who do not accept that this whole Scamdemic is about depopulation. If injecting killer poisons into our babies doesn’t wake them up I don’t know what will.

21
0
BurlingtonBertie
BurlingtonBertie
3 years ago

I’ve just watched this. Maybe wake the flock up with shock tactics?

https://theinfowar.tv/watch?id=62a7a9a671d5801bf19beb91

4
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago

Unbelievable. It’s just brazen … and they get 11 people to vote unanimously. The world has gotten really dark.

15
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago

Something significant happened on Fox News last night. 

Tucker Carlson has the No. 1-rated news talk show in North America. This means more TV viewers interested in politics and current events watch his show than any other cable news program. Tucker Carlson is not a fringe talking head with a podcast or Substack site in the alternative media.

This extremely influential media figure opened his show last night with a scathing monologue, dripping with his famous sarcasm, that eviscerated Dr. Anthony Fauci himself. Furthermore, Carlson took on almost all of the false Covid storylines the mainstream press has fed us non-stop for 27 months.

I’ve watched the segment twice now. Tucker slays every part of the BS Fauci narrative – masks, vaccines that are neither “safe nor effective,” how the virus started, the unnecessary, harmful and cruel lockdowns (in his tirade, Tucker points out how many people spent their last days or moments on earth alone by themselves in a hospital room because Fauci’s guidance wouldn’t let loved ones be there and hold their hands at this moment)

Some of these points have been made by other TV personalities or suggested (at least on Fox News), but there’s never been a constant 20-minute barrage of biting and angry sarcasm directed at Fauci and his brain-dead acolytes and sycophants. 

Carlson proved that the sky didn’t fall when someone finally took on Anthony Fauci and showed what a hypocrite and non-scientist he really is. (Sen Rand Paul, featured in the video clips, has proven this as well).

Tucker’s monologue proved that a TV commentator CAN challenge the faux Covid narratives. True enough, the government might cancel its pro-vaccine ads and commercials on Fox; Big Pharma, in solidarity with Pfizer and Moderna, might pull all the commercials they are running on Fox.

But even this likely pay-back tells us something important. Presumably executives at Fox News knew what Tucker was going to say and that his remarks would not please the Powers that Be who run the world through the Pharma and Medial Cartels … these network executives knew that there could be major economic “blowback” – but they let Tucker say what he wanted to say anyway. 

True, it took 27 months for Tucker to go off on something Daily Skeptic readers have been going off on for … 27 months, but better late than never. Someone has to push the mainstream media envelope and show a little courage. 

Now the big question becomes will other Fox hosts start doing the same thing? Is it possible that someone from, say, CBS, might make some of these same points nows? (I doubt this. They will double down on getting Tucker cancelled and run out of the country).

Still, Tucker stepped out on his own and touched the Third Rail of Woke, Captured Media … and so far he has lived to talk about it. Maybe he will start a trend? Maybe his words will go viral? Maybe “Teflon Tony” isn’t impervious to journalism criticism after all.

I wish this video included the 6-minute interview Tucker did with a guest after his monologue. This guest, a fierce critic of Fauci, was even more agitated than Tucker … And Tucker, to his great credit, let this man go off.

https://video.foxnews.com/v/6308038251112

Last edited 3 years ago by BillRiceJr
33
0
Arborvitae23
Arborvitae23
3 years ago

Just wondering if the great and good will have their babies and toddlers vaccinated?

8
0
Nearhorburian
Nearhorburian
3 years ago
Reply to  Arborvitae23

Blair’s kids didn’t get the MMR vaccine.

Last edited 3 years ago by Nearhorburian
12
0
DevonBlueBoy
DevonBlueBoy
3 years ago
Reply to  Nearhorburian

I wouldn’t put it past Bliar and his gobby wife to say their brood didn’t get the MMR (proper) vaccine to garner votes from the Islington crowd but gave it to them on the quiet

1
-1
Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
3 years ago

John Mason MSP mocks people for asking questions about vaccine injuries 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DH0Up7w1qQI
Mark Steyn GBNews

Stand for freedom & make friends with our Yellow Boards By The Road

Tuesday 21st June 11am to 12pm
Yellow Boards 
A329 Peel Centre 
Skimped Hill Lane, 
Bracknell RG12 1EN 

Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30am to 11.30am – make friends & keep sane 

Wokingham 
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD   

Bracknell  
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA

Henley 
Mills Meadows (bandstand) RG9 1DS

Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

4
0
9markshaw1
9markshaw1
3 years ago
Reply to  Lockdown Sceptic

Mark Steyn at his best and John Mason deserved everything that was blasted at him, and more. Does anyone sometimes dream that people like Mark Steyn, Neal Oliver and various Daily Sceptic contributers such as Claire Craig were on the newsdesks of all the mainstream TV channels?

3
0
RTSC
RTSC
3 years ago

They could have save a whole lot of trouble if they’d just thought of a number between one and ten.

1
0
thefoostybadger
thefoostybadger
3 years ago

https://twitter.com/drgregkelly/status/1537001779447361536

Apologies if posted previously.

Whole thread is completely insane….

Although there are some clues to this “doctor’s” sanity within his profile, (rainbow flag and pronouns!)

1
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  thefoostybadger

Saw this in boriquagato’s substack email circular.

That’s one seriously clueless doc, right there. Clueless in every respect.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 53: Starmer’s Bizarre Bid to Brand Reform Racist, the Real Danger Posed by Labour’s Digital ID and the True Cost of Net Zero

by Richard Eldred
3 October 2025
2

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

7 October 2025
by Richard Eldred

Does Trump Not Realise How Globally Toxic Tony Blair Is?

6 October 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Backlash as Nando’s Limits Customers to One Coke per Visit Under New ‘Nanny State’ Rules

6 October 2025
by Will Jones

Stupidologiology

6 October 2025
by James Alexander

Britain Needs a New Backbone

7 October 2025
by Clive Pinder

Britain Needs a New Backbone

35

News Round-Up

29

Stupidologiology

29

The Tories Need to Renounce Their Climate Authoritarian Past

24

Conservative Party Members Want Pact With Reform, Poll Finds

20

Scientists Are at Last Uncovering the Links Between ME, Long Covid and Long Vaccine

7 October 2025
by Patrick Ussher

Britain Needs a New Backbone

7 October 2025
by Clive Pinder

The Tories Need to Renounce Their Climate Authoritarian Past

7 October 2025
by Ben Pile

Does Trump Not Realise How Globally Toxic Tony Blair Is?

6 October 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Stupidologiology

6 October 2025
by James Alexander

POSTS BY DATE

June 2022
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May   Jul »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

June 2022
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930  
« May   Jul »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

News Round-Up

7 October 2025
by Richard Eldred

Does Trump Not Realise How Globally Toxic Tony Blair Is?

6 October 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Backlash as Nando’s Limits Customers to One Coke per Visit Under New ‘Nanny State’ Rules

6 October 2025
by Will Jones

Stupidologiology

6 October 2025
by James Alexander

Britain Needs a New Backbone

7 October 2025
by Clive Pinder

Britain Needs a New Backbone

35

News Round-Up

29

Stupidologiology

29

The Tories Need to Renounce Their Climate Authoritarian Past

24

Conservative Party Members Want Pact With Reform, Poll Finds

20

Scientists Are at Last Uncovering the Links Between ME, Long Covid and Long Vaccine

7 October 2025
by Patrick Ussher

Britain Needs a New Backbone

7 October 2025
by Clive Pinder

The Tories Need to Renounce Their Climate Authoritarian Past

7 October 2025
by Ben Pile

Does Trump Not Realise How Globally Toxic Tony Blair Is?

6 October 2025
by Ramesh Thakur

Stupidologiology

6 October 2025
by James Alexander

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences