New official data from the ONS released today add a further 730 non-Covid excess deaths in England and Wales to the total of the last five weeks, bringing the figure to 4,964. This means nearly 5,000 more people than usual have died in England and Wales in the last five weeks of causes other than COVID-19.
The total deaths in the most recent week were 10.1% above the five-year average, as depicted in the chart below. The chart shows in blue that Covid deaths account for less than half of the excess deaths this week, though note that the chart over-counts Covid deaths as it includes any death with Covid. The 4,964 figure for non-Covid excess deaths quoted above is calculated using deaths due to Covid, i.e., where Covid is recorded as the underlying cause on the death certificate.

Private homes, care homes and hospitals are all experiencing excess deaths at present: 23.4%, 6.5% and 5.3% respectively in the most recent week.
The ONS report does not comment on what might lie behind these worrying trends. The fact that it coincides with the spring vaccine booster campaign among older folk has raised worries for many, particularly in light of the ONS data showing hospitalisation rates for non-Covid reasons many times higher in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated, and the vaccine safety concerns raised by clinical practitioners who believe their vaccinated patients are at greater risk of disease and death.
As we keep saying at the Daily Sceptic, these matters need properly investigating.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Quite possibly VAIDS is kicking off.
For anyone new here (LOL, as if):
VAIDS: Vaccine-Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome.
The experimental jabs (Pfizer, Moderna) are not traditional vaccines*, but are instead mRNA drugs which very good at winding up your immune system to only recognise highly specific strains of coronaviruses – the strains which the big pharmaceutical companies have decided (with their crap computer models) that your immune system should be wound up for. It gets so fixated on that strain that when it meets a slight mutation (which happens with coronaviruses all the time) it is completely incapable of recognising it as such, so you come down heavy with it, before your immune system has had chance to figure it out.
Natural infection with the real thing leaves your immune system in a much better position to recognise mutations.
* Traditional vaccines introduce the real virus in a weakened or inert form into your body. When it encounters the live, wild, deadly form, it knows exactly what to do to beat it. This is useful for the viruses which do not mutate much, if at all, and which kill indiscriminately, i.e. regardless of whether you are young, old, fit, unfit, male, female…
Thanks Marcus and apologies to all for using an acronym without the full title.
Pleasure, obviously it’s a layman’s explanation, there’s a lot more to do with t-cells and whatnot which I have forgotten, but that is the gist.
Big Pharma thinks it knows how to prepare – in advance – your immune system for strains of coronaviruses which don’t yet exist or they think have only just appeared somewhere in the world. It’s a different and wholly untested approach to trying to get ahead of Nature: which sterilising vaccinations have been so good at for so many decades.
Indeed, one of the key figures behind the study and design of mRNA (Dr Robert Malone) has been saying repeatedly, since the beginning, that they are dangerous and not fit for purpose (and he has of course been repeatedly denounced by all the usual suspects).
There was one trial, involving some ferrets, which were given an mRNA “vaccine”. They were then all infected with the real virus – and they all died.
In other words, there is nothing we can do to stop flu viruses. Thankfully, though, they are just flu viruses – at worst, a minor inconvenience for 99.9987% of the population (which aren’t suffering from VAIDS).
Excellent commentaries, thank you very much. And I say that as a Biochemistry + Physiology graduate with many years experience of working within the infectious diseases world with a pharma company, back in the 60s when they were reasonably trustworthy.
Thanks, DBB! I don’t even have a degree to my name :/
“Uni” sucked so bad I left after less than six months.
A shame to hear of your Uni experience. I had the best three years of my life, up until then. Though this might have had something to do with getting away 500 miles from home and spending too much time in the snooker room at the Union. My bad 🤣
The utter hubris of mankind to think we can defeat nature.
Deaths at home is an area that’s been woefully under examined over the past 2 years.
There seem to be a lot more deaths occurring at home. These are those “sudden” and “unexpected” deaths I keep reading about every day.
The latest one that grabbed my attention was actually in a hotel not at home. A female law school dean, 57 (I think), died suddenly and unexpectedly while at a legal conference.
Will continues to crank out one important (and taboo) article after another. It’s like he is single-handedly taking on every mainstream journalist on the planet.
These sentences grabbed my attention with this particular dispatcH
“… particularly in light of the ONS data showing hospitalisation rates for non-Covid reasons many times higher in the vaccinated compared to the unvaccinated.”
Comment: In America, I think many practitioners are NOT asking for patients vaccine histories probably so they won’t have any “causal effect” evidence.
“The chart shows in blue that Covid deaths account for less than half of the excess deaths this week, though note that the chart over-counts Covid deaths as it includes any death with Covid.”
Comment: By now it is a given that “Covid deaths” are inflated by including any deaths of anyone who had a positive PCR test 25 days prior to their death. So we can be pretty confident that at least some of the excess deaths attributed to Covid were really not “from” Covid … and thus also may have also been related to the vaccines, at least in some of this cohort.
For a long time I thought the “excess” non-Covid data would be enough to generate some belated mainstream media attention into the likely/possible vaccination explanation. But this data has now been out there for many months and there’s still no mainstream press curiosity or interest. If there’s been no interest in this area of inquiry to date, there probably won’t be any interest in the future either. Past behavior does predict future behavior.
Note that in the UK ONS report it says, in the Glossary, that: “Coronavirus (COVID-19) deaths are those deaths registered in England and Wales in the stated week where COVID-19 was mentioned on the death certificate. A doctor can certify the involvement of COVID-19 based on symptoms and clinical findings – a positive test result is not required. Definitions of COVID-19 for deaths in Scotland and Northern Ireland are similar to England and Wales.”
In effect, there is NO test requirement at all. The late (and notorious murderer) Harold Shipman would have loved it, bit here we are. Be wary about interpreting the results in the report; they are based on one professional opinion, and that’s that.
Especially as the move post Shipman to have two medics sign a death certificate was removed by the lovely, not at all corrupt or midazolam murdering Hancock. Still not revoked.
I didn’t know that. Thanks BB
Having just reviewed this week’s report, I note that it does not have the whole UK figures: “Because of the bank holidays on 2 and 3 June, data processing has been delayed in Northern Ireland, so mortality figures for the UK in the week ending 27 May are not available.”
No doubt there will be some disruption on account of the two bank holidays last week, with a degree of transfer to this week as well.
23.4% in care homes?! Well if it is in fact an attempt by eugenicists to reduce the number of “useless eaters”, they’re certainly making a good job of it!
If we look at the all cause death occurrence data from yesterday’s weekly publication (that takes out the affect of bank holidays on when deaths are reported), and compare it with the 2015-2019 all cause average (which is the period ONS use for occurrence data) we can see there has been a spike in all cause deaths in England and Wales coinciding with the Spring booster campaign. This now appears to be subsiding.
Unfortunately doesn’t appear to be possible to post up images any longer on DS so can’t attach my chart to show this. I don’t particularly want to load up an image to an image website and link to it.
If Daily Sceptic have stopped images being posted up that’s a real nuisance and much as I think we should support DS it will stop me posting here as it makes informed comment on something like death numbers very difficult.
Just to update, I’ve received a message from Will to say he’s asked for the ability to add images to be restored
Thanks Will
I compare the weekly deaths with the 2010-2019 weeky deaths, corrected for population. This avoids any interference from the distortions of the hoax pandemic.
Averaged over the last 3 weeks, the weekly deaths are 8.7% above maximum and 15.5% above average.
I would put my chart or table here but that no longer seems possible on DS – plus, I have had to pay a donation again to contribute to the discussion. Anyway, I keep it all on Telegram here.
Another point upon the newly-emerging Sudden Adult Death Syndrome is the category of more-or-less the same name in the Yellow Card Reports. They are currently at ‘Death’ = 561 and ‘Sudden Death’ = 74.
So a total of 635 unknown, uninvestigated and uncared-for deaths. These have been initiated by the jabs and it is bleedin’ obvious what’s going on!