The 23,000 Unexplained Deaths in England and Wales That Raise Serious Questions of Vaccine Safety

Take out the noise from the mortality data for England and Wales and what you find are 23,000 additional deaths since the vaccine rollout began that urgently need to be explained.

5 min read

Can we find signals of vaccine injury deaths in U.K. mortality data? Will Jones isn’t sure, but I think we can.

A recent study by the Health Foundation at first glance suggests there is very little to cause concern. Indeed, the headline number of 34,000 fewer non-Covid deaths during the pandemic, together with the fact that non-Covid deaths have been lower than average during 80% of the period, should be a cause for some celebratory relief. However, this is not the end of the story, and there are some important caveats to this rather rosy outlook. A major one is the possibility that Covid deaths have been overcounted by Covid being ascribed to deaths from other causes, and non-Covid deaths correspondingly undercounted.

There has been some discussion of this in the media recently, and it is indeed a distinct possibility as the UKHSA definition of a Covid death is one that has occurred within 28 days of a positive Covid diagnosis, whether or not that person died for another reason. In the analysis below I am using ONS data, where the definition is that COVID-19 appears somewhere on the death certificate. This means it includes deaths where COVID-19 was not the underlying cause. There is also evidence that COVID-19 was put as underlying cause more often than it should have been. Insofar as Covid deaths have indeed been overcounted and non-Covid deaths undercounted the trends presented here will be underestimates and the true trends will be larger.

This is what a chart of the non-Covid mortality in England and Wales looks like for the period in question using the raw mortality data from the ONS, without any adjustments being applied. It might best be characterised as inconclusive.

However, the Health Foundation report does provide two major clues as to whether there may be large distortions in the raw data that need to be corrected in order to tease out a signal of a systemic effect that needs further attention.

The first of these is mortality displacement. At the end of week 12 in 2021 there had built up about 120,000 excess deaths since the start of the pandemic in the U.K., when compared to the pre-pandemic five-year average.

The median age of these deaths was just under 85 years of age, and it is statistically likely, as mentioned in the Health Foundation report, that around 9% of these deaths would subsequently displace recorded deaths in the following year. This is probably a lower estimate, as it assumes that Covid deaths are in people of average health for their age, which is not generally the case for Covid deaths.

That represents around 10,900 deaths. I therefore amortised this over the period and added it to the non-Covid mortality data.

The second major distortion is due to “deaths due to respiratory diseases as an underlying cause”. According to the ONS, these are about 14% of total deaths.

Much attention has been drawn to the fact that influenza deaths have been largely absent during the past two winters. This is also the case with other respiratory disease. Whether or not this is a consequence of the Covid virus outcompeting other viruses, or rather some issue like social distancing measures reducing spread, is moot. The important point is they are absent and this needs to be taken into account as they currently form part of the ‘non-Covid’ deaths in the five-year average and so reduce the estimate of non-Covid excess mortality during the period.

Most of the reductions in excess deaths shown in the Health Foundation report are in line with what you might expect from a 9% mortality displacement. For example, ‘dementia and Alzheimer’s disease’ is down by 11%, stroke 12% and heart disease 4%, all big killers of the segment of the population susceptible to serious Covid. However, ‘influenza and pneumonia’ at minus-48% and chronic lung conditions at minus-25% are way out of sync with that estimate.

The really striking change, however, is the 22% increase in mortality from ‘ill-defined conditions’. Of note also is that there are thousands more deaths recorded by the ONS during the study period with a cardiovascular contribution, whilst deaths with cardiovascular disease as a primary cause are lower (by 4%). Clearly something is badly amiss.

In order to get a true picture of the comparative change from the pre-pandemic five-year average mortality for every cause of death bar Covid and other respiratory disease, I removed all the mortality data for ‘influenza and pneumonia’ and chronic lung conditions from both the five-year weekly average and the pandemic mortality data.

When both of these actions have been taken, the chart of the non-Covid excess mortality data (below) shows more than 23,000 excess deaths occurring during the study period, which is broadly in line with the number of vaccine injury deaths estimated by Will.

This is a much clearer signal that has hitherto been hidden in the noise of overall mortality data. It represents causes of death other than Covid or respiratory disease, and indicates that there is a systemic, population-wide effect operating during the study period.

The most likely candidate is the vaccine rollout. The curve shows a steady incline, which is in accordance with the VAERS data for vaccine injury deaths that Will highlighted in his article. The risk versus benefit of these Covid vaccines for large sections of the population will clearly be substantially called into question if the hypothesis is correct.

The rapid and sustained rise in mortality begins around early July. Any prior vaccine deaths may have been masked by the large number of deaths that occurred during the Covid Alpha wave (some of which may have been misattributed to Covid). The sustained increase coincides with the Delta wave and finishes around the time of the Omicron wave becoming prevalent. This may be a coincidence, but alternatively it may warn of a failure of immunity in the population that leaves it vulnerable to major stressors in the environment. The drop in non-Covid deaths during the winter may once again be due to Covid deaths being overcounted and non-Covid deaths undercounted while Omicron was highly prevalent. We see that non-Covid excess deaths have begun rising again in recent weeks.

Is it not time now to halt the vaccination rollout for all those except the most vulnerable in society until this phenomenon is thoroughly investigated? If the hypothesis is correct, each new booster risks further degrading the future health of all who receive them.

Comments

This week across the site:

Email me alerts for this discussion
Notify of

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

108 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Johnny Dollar
Johnny Dollar
4 years ago

Shhhh…. whist the continue to INJECT our innocent children….. CRIMINALS

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago

How fortunate that none of these ‘serious questions of vaccine safety’ were put to our Prime Minister , Boris Johnson, when he was allowed to coast through a chummy, easy time in his GBNews interview this morning.

So easy that he did not rule out more lockdowns and promised us more virus and jabs on the way!

Where are Jeremy Paxman and Robin Day – even Marr and Snow might have had a few useful points to score?

Mrs Merton would have made a better job of it:

“Tell me Boris , what first attracted you to the easy life, Champagne parties chauffeured cars, attractive young ladies and “Emergency”autocratic powers that now go with the Job of being Prime Minister?”

marebobowl
marebobowl
4 years ago

Everyone in the medical research world, data analyst world and scientists, medics and nurses are acutely aware that these experimental biologicals are causing serious adverse events and deaths. Unfortunately the Uk health authorities and the unintelligent gov’t officials
are in denial despite ALL the data available for everyone to see. Even Pfizer has had to publish their first to data dumps. Warning******these vaccines cause seriou adverse events and deaths.

Epi
Epi
4 years ago

“If the hypothesis is correct, each new booster risks further degrading the future health of all who receive them.”

Well done DS finally caught up. Just need the other 90% of the population to do the same. But of course nobody wants to admit they’ve been conned.

PGP
PGP
4 years ago

A simple way to test this would be to stratify by age. Nothing fancy – just under 65s and 65+ should do it. You need to choose a cut-off where there will be a reasonable number of deaths in the younger cohort. If the peak shifts in the two age groups, earlier for older and later for younger, then it would be strongly suggestive of vaccination as an underlying cause.

Adrian25
Adrian25
4 years ago

A friend of mine in England has seen 8 of his 60-70-ish friends die from stroke/heart attack over the last 12 months. All were jabbed. All were unexpected, sudden deaths and were previously healthy.
The most recent happened on April 1st, a guy who, as he put it, “Told me I was an idiot for being unjabbed.”

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago

23,000 …interesting figure .

That is just about ten times the Official ‘Yellow Card’ statistic of deaths by vax. ( 2075)..widely accepted by the authorities as representing around 10% of actual fatalities – so 20,750.

Pure coincidence of course.

JeremyP99
JeremyP99
4 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

Not really – the MHRA have publicly stated that they believe only 10% of fatalities are reported.

Ergo, c20k killed by the Johnson Jab.

Dale
Dale
4 years ago

And when you consider that there is no virus … doesn’t this point to even higher vaccine deaths ?

Chris_uk
Chris_uk
4 years ago

The vaccine lies far exceed any of the other Big Lies that I am aware of. We’ll never know how many people died as a result, possibly millions. And as with all the Big Lies, they will have to tell more lies and play more dirty tricks to stop the truth ever coming out. Will they ultimately get away with it? Unfortunately, they probably will, because somewhere around 80% of people don’t seem to be capable of basic reasoning. 

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
4 years ago
Reply to  Chris_uk

But the good news is, 20% is enough. The great changes, the breakthroughs, the dawning lights have always come from a minority.

Judy Watson
Judy Watson
4 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

I bloody hope so.

Rwatson1955
Rwatson1955
4 years ago

I would re-tweet this, but I’ll only get suspended by Twitter again

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago

‘the fact that non-Covid deaths have been lower than average during 80% of the period, should be a cause for some celebratory relief.’

Given that iastrogenic death (medics killing people with the intended treatment being given to the intended person not because of incompetence) is the third biggest cause of death this shouldn’t surprise us.

The glorious NHS had far fewer opportunities to kill off the many thousands if not millions that steered clear of them, even as they did all they could to kill of the supposed covid patients with ventilators and midazolam they just couldn’t make up the numbers.

MTF
MTF
4 years ago

“if you torture the data long enough, it will confess to anything”

A passerby
A passerby
4 years ago

The was a message left in 2002, (supposedly by aliens) in binary code in a crop circle at Crabwood Farm House, Wiltshire, England. Of course it may be an elaborate hoax. Message read:- Beware the bearers of FALSE gifts & their BROKEN PROMISES. Much PAIN but still time. BELIEVE. There is GOOD out there. We OPpose DECEPTION. Conduit CLOSING.

loopDloop
loopDloop
4 years ago
Reply to  A passerby

Yes it was a hoax. It was made by Disney to promote their movie Signs. All fully revealed now. By the way all crop circles are made by humans. Yes, some are very nice. Yes, I know, you want them to be made by ‘aliens’. But what you want to be true and what is true are two different things. In any case, the Crabwood Farm circle was not just made by humans, but was actual advertising for an actual Hollywood movie.

ImpObs
ImpObs
4 years ago

I expected DS to be all over this…

PANDEMIC TREATY

Never before in the history of mankind has an organization openly plotted a coup against the sovereignty and health freedom of every human on earth.

https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/pandemic-treaty

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  ImpObs

and yet, not a mention ATL, and yet those BTL mention it regularly.

Send it to them via the link at the bottom of the News Roundup section suggesting it is important that they cover it.

A Y M
A Y M
4 years ago

Considering the felling of the vulnerable as well as the young by this junk shot, I wouldn’t recommend it to them either.
And this thing is going to have a long tail of unusual and sudden deaths, not to mention a rise in cancer rates which will be blamed on our near destroyed health systems….

Doom Slayer
Doom Slayer
4 years ago

This doesnt include the vaccine deaths from jab one at the end of 2020/2021, miscatergorised as non covid deaths in the unvaccinated group.

MrTea
MrTea
4 years ago
Reply to  Doom Slayer

That part of the jab fraud is particularly cunning.

Lockdown Sceptic
Lockdown Sceptic
4 years ago

Universal Basic Income: Canada /Ireland / Palm Springs
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mM7Tiwm0L40
Katie Hopkins OFFICIAL

Stand for freedom with our Yellow Boards By The Road next events 

Saturday 9th April 2pm to 3pm
Yellow Boards 
Loddon Bridge, A329 Reading Rd, 
Winnersh (Outside Showcase)
Wokingham RG41 5HG
  
Tuesday 12th April 5.30pm to 6.30pm
Yellow Boards By the Road 
Junction Broad Lane/  
A3095 Bagshot Lane
Bracknell RG12 9NW 

Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane 

Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens 
(Cockpit Path car park free on Sunday) 
Sturges Rd RG40 2HD   

Bracknell  
South Hill Park, Rear Lawn, RG12 7PA

Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell

Milo
Milo
4 years ago

And again, VERY different countries, all doing basically the same thing, and calling it by the same name, UBI, and UBI of course features in the WEF Great Reset handbook, and people don’t see what is going on??

Wake up! Wake up before it is too bleeping late!!!

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  Milo

What grates about the KH presentation, which was otherwise good and informative, is the end where she says we will have to work together to oppose the propaganda. BUT SHE DOESN’T SAY HOW.

How Katie? How do we work together?

Choir needs some instructions. Better and more effective to all act in concert as opposed to all try our own thing and get nowhere.

GlassHalfFull
GlassHalfFull
4 years ago

Excellent summary.

However, if we showed this to anyone the first question they would ask is who is Nick Bowler and what are his qualifications?

milesahead
milesahead
4 years ago

As the authorities keep insisting:

comment image

Gregoryno6
Gregoryno6
4 years ago

It’s getting closer!

Not Vaccinated.png
J4mes
J4mes
4 years ago

Is it not time now to halt the vaccination rollout for all those except the most vulnerable

Why should it be acceptable to inject vulnerable people?

Covid is a scam – there was never a need to inject the population with gene therapy but they continue to do so and people of all levels of fitness are dropping down dead without inquiry.

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

The most vulnerable should be subject to the focussed protection of the Great Barrington Declaration and everyone else should be allowed to get on with their life (or not as the case may be) according to their own personal choice.

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
4 years ago
Reply to  Milo

I would re-phrase that slightly: “The most vulnerable should be offered the focussed protection”.

If I were classed as vulnerable, I would still want my right to choice.

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago
Reply to  Alter Ego

But…. I thought we had established that the vax does not protect people from anything but definitely causes very serious and even life threatening side effects in many more people than any other mass vaccination programme in our history including children?

Am I missing something?

Alter Ego
Alter Ego
4 years ago
Reply to  David Beaton

The GBD was talking about people staying at home and being helped to do so, if they were “vulnerable” – rather than imposing lockdowns on the entire community.

The vax certainly doesn’t protect people from anything!

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago
Reply to  Milo

“Getting on with their lives” is exactly what they do not intend to allow people to do!

RTSC
RTSC
4 years ago

A friend, triple jabbed, recently got Covid for the second time and casually remarked that it was much worse this time than the last, which was pre-jab. And STILL neither she nor the others around the table worked it out.

Catee
Catee
4 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

I’ve left my local bowling club because so many of them have this conversation endlessly and I just couldn’t stand listening to their stupidity any longer.

J4mes
J4mes
4 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

My fanatical sister is angry at the government because she claims they’re in denial that covid is coming back. Meanwhile her nine year old son is openly scared that he will catch covid because he’s only been jabbed once and wants his second.

Back in the office, every colleague around me has the app. Apparently someone tested positive the other day and they were scrambling to find out who it was.

The covid scammers have successfully trained a sizeable section of the population to uphold the scam, while they sit back, aloof and appearing like they want to ‘live with covid’.

Criminals, the lot of them.

TheBluePill
TheBluePill
4 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

People are still using the flawed contract tracing app? Surely not, I thought that thoroughly died off last summer. What part of the country are you from, just so that I can avoid it?

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  J4mes

Fanatical friend of mine and their offspring were so keen for the jabbing to take place that they would likely have had a party to celebrate the event of the second jab “he’s fully protected now” – this was the FB post.

I am convinced there is something in these jabs which damages people’s brains, if not takes them over in some form of mind control.

How otherwise can a formerly rational and scientifically trained person become like this? We have all been subject to the same brainwashing and I, unjabbed, not only haven’t succumbed to it but have actively resisted it and seen through the scam for what it was. The only difference is the jab.

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

I have relative in similar position – triple jabbed (after recovering from covid) and then succumbing to it again – now suffering from seemingly long covid with excessive sweating and problems with memory and concentration.

Said relative was very pro jab.

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago
Reply to  RTSC

So what did you say to them?

cyclingnut69
cyclingnut69
4 years ago

Just take a moment to reflect on how many people in your extended network and beyond who were fully jabbed and suddenly and unexpectedly have passed away. I try to pretend it’s incompetence as opposed to premeditated depopulation.

TheBluePill
TheBluePill
4 years ago
Reply to  cyclingnut69

I tried to calculate a percentage to express my anecdotal evidence of deaths shortly after vaccination to deaths from Covid-19, but my calculator says something about “error dividing by zero”???

Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
4 years ago

The only way to get these serial liars to admit that they were wrong would be to face them with unequivocal evidence of mortality due to vaccines.

The most obvious way to do this should be to mandate continual booster injections for children of the the youngest ages, who appear quite susceptible to heart damage.

If we kill off about 25% of the next generation, that should be sufficient to overcome the biased fact checkers and demand an investigation. I suspect that anything less will not work…

A passerby
A passerby
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

Personally I would prefer to replace the government or at least 25%, start at the top and begin tomorrow.

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

By wrong, do you really mean “lying”?

Overfilledwaistcoat
Overfilledwaistcoat
4 years ago

Missing table for my previous comment weeks 25-41 comparison of all cause mortality in 2020, 2021 and the 10 years before.

ons 2021 v 2020 22 week period.png
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
4 years ago

It will never be halted. They are in too deep and, assuming the wealth of evidence that supports the observation is correct, the shots have damaged the immune systems of the vaxxed, so they’ll have to keep getting shot every few months – or go cold turkey and hope for the best (I’d plumb for the latter). There are too many complicit, in too many places of high office, for these crimes to ever be publicly exposed. A disgusting state of affairs.

Overfilledwaistcoat
Overfilledwaistcoat
4 years ago

I’ve been recording and analysing the ONS all cause mortality figures since April 2020. The ONS gives weekly mortality figures broken down by age and separately by region week by week since 2010. I take five week window around each week/age range and week/region combination for the period 2010-9. I then take the mean and S.D. of this. Nothing fancy here, just what Excel provides me with. I then compare this with the equivalent weeks in 2020, 2021 and 2022, I use these comparisons to establish anomolies in the all cause mortality.

Looking at anomalies in 2020, there are four distinct periods. 1) Normality before the first wave. 2) The carnnage that was the 1st wave. 3) Low mortality before the 2nd wave 4) The 2nd wave up to the end of 2020.

As a model of whether vaccines are safe and effective I then have looked at periods 3 and 4.

Period 3, weeks 25 to 41 was a time when Covid was circulating in 2020 but there was no surge in deaths. So my reasoing is that if the vaccines are safe the mortality in the equivalent period should be a bit less than 2020 and hopefully,… Read more »

ons 2021 v 2020 weeks 42-52 period.png
jingleballix
jingleballix
4 years ago

Yes, I have done similar………I have tabulated monthly ‘all-cause’ mortality since 2012.

They began jabbing on 8-DEC-20.

The four-month period DEC-20 to MAR-21 saw 234,016 deaths…….

…….this more than 229,249 deaths in the four-month period of the ‘killer first wave’ in MAR-20 to JUN-20.

Note too that JUL-21 after the second jabs kicked-in, saw all-cause mortality of 48,136, much higher than the 10yr average for July of 38,900.

OCT-21 saw 54,789 which was 27.5% higher than the 10yr av.

Someone needs to study in detail the mortality rates within a few weeks of jabbing.

TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
4 years ago

 The maximum effect that the vaccines could have had, if there were no other factors and all excess mortality was produced by Covid was to reduce the excess death toll from 18,000 to 15,000. It’s not exactly a glowing endorsement of the vaccines effectiveness.

Or 370 billion of taxpayer’s money,

David Beaton
David Beaton
4 years ago

“Their information “- it might as well be on the moon for all they are concerned.

itoldyouiwasill
itoldyouiwasill
4 years ago

Young lad I know, told him I had not been vaccinated. He jokingly calls me anti vax and I play along. He was in hospital last week, Bels Palsy (sp). Only 27 ffs, all for a vaccine he no way in a million years needed. How many more like this? Answer is we will never know because the highly paid consultants and public servants running the NHS are all guardian reading, self serving, lying, hyporcitical, amoral pieces of shit.

Judy Watson
Judy Watson
4 years ago

In hospital for Bells Palsy!!!!!
What the flip??

A short course of steroids at home should sort it

Maurice
Maurice
4 years ago

I’d love to understand how the Swedish study in the BMJ a couple of days ago affects informed views on vaccine safety. I’m too ignorant myself to grasp it well.

itoldyouiwasill
itoldyouiwasill
4 years ago
Reply to  Maurice

Do you have a link for this please?

HaylingDave
HaylingDave
4 years ago

Yes, a bit more context please.

Is this the study?

https://www.bmj.com/content/377/bmj-2021-069590

“Risks of deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and bleeding after covid-19: nationwide self-controlled cases series and matched cohort study”

Maurice
Maurice
4 years ago
Reply to  HaylingDave

Yes, that is the one!

Karolina Stolarska
Karolina Stolarska
4 years ago
Reply to  HaylingDave

The study doesn’t appear to consider vaccination status as a factor for the heart problems as no mention of it at all! Would be easy to conclude that all heart-related issues are due to Covid and not the jabs especially as people tend to test positive after injection for a time.

Doom Slayer
Doom Slayer
4 years ago

Was just about to say the same. Always look at the limitations of a study. Covid 19 is considered by some to be a vascular disease and can cause clotting. Just the spike protien from the vaccine has been shown to cause clotting, hence some of the problems it can cause. But the point is you need a severe case of covid for those kind of problems, which will only develop in those particularly vulnerable. Whereas the vaccine can cause problems regardless of prior health status and covid risk factor.

Maurice
Maurice
4 years ago
Reply to  Doom Slayer

Thank you both

Milo
Milo
4 years ago
Reply to  Doom Slayer

And yet, where same symptom can be caused by both jab and covid, MSM always present covid as being the greater risk and the jab as the saviour (stopping you getting covid, and therefore a worse and more serious case of whatever the symptom in question is – for example, the myocarditis).

Cecil B
Cecil B
4 years ago

Whats 23,000 when you have drugs to push

Thank you for reading. Please help us keep the Daily Sceptic going by becoming a donor.