They say 13 is unlucky for some – well, it looks like that’s true for anyone wanting to investigate the impact of the Covid vaccines on infections, hospitalisations and deaths as, true to its word, this week, week 13, sees the last Vaccine Surveillance Report issued by the UKHSA to include these data.
From April 1st 2022, the U.K. Government will no longer provide free universal COVID-19 testing for the general public in England, as set out in the plan for living with COVID-19. Such changes in testing policies affect the ability to robustly monitor COVID-19 cases by vaccination status, therefore, from the week 14 report onwards this section of the report will no longer be published. Updates to vaccine effectiveness data will continue to be published elsewhere in this report.
The point about testing is somewhat valid, of course – the problem is that this change won’t affect hospitalisations and deaths data, and they could replace at least some of the infections data with the results that come from the (continued) testing of healthcare workers. This comes at a time with record-breaking infection levels in the U.K., as identified by sources including the ONS and the Zoe Symptom Tracker. These record case levels have been reported in the media, such as in the Guardian and the BBC; I find it odd that these reports blame the virus and our relaxation of restrictions for the record case levels – they don’t even mention the possibility that it is the vaccines that are causing this problem. Twelve months ago there were plenty of experts suggesting that mass vaccination could result in what had been seen in prior candidate vaccines for coronaviruses – an initial few months of protection followed by an increase in susceptibility to disease – but the existence of these warnings continues to be ignored. On the other hand, the promises that these vaccines were ‘safe and effective’ continue to be believed, despite vast amounts of evidence suggesting the opposite (they’ve certainly not worked to get us to ‘Zero Covid’).
To be fair to the UKHSA, there is likely to be a huge impact from the removal of free testing (which has cost the U.K. extraordinary sums of money for little apparent benefit) on infection statistics, and Covid appears to have mutated into a much more benign virus. As things stand, there is hardly more benefit to the population in informing them of Covid case numbers as there would be in informing them of the number of colds going around at the moment. Nevertheless, the data had been useful in terms of identifying the actual value of vaccination (also costing extraordinary sums of money for what now appears to be little apparent benefit). I can only imagine that the decision to stop publishing infections, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccination status has been made, as in Scotland, to reduce the risk of inconvenient facts being released (note that UKHSA promises that it’ll continue to release convenient facts).
Enough moaning about what was inevitable – on with the analysis of this week’s data.
Cases
While the UKHSA data haven’t quite matched the data from the ONS and Zoe Symptom Tracker since the start of the year, they are currently making up for lost time in showing a substantial increase in cases compared with last week’s report. Once again, the report shows most new cases to be in the triple vaccinated, with the unvaccinated showing the lowest numbers of new infections.
The progression of the current Covid wave by vaccination status is fascinating – the new infections appear to be occurring disproportionately in the triple vaccinated with only relatively small increases in those that have received fewer doses and the unvaccinated.
This said, the huge discrepancies in rate of increase seen in earlier weeks are no longer seen, with this week’s data showing an increase in case rates in those aged 18 to 80 of around 22% for the unvaccinated, the single dosed and the double dosed, and a 28% increase in the triple vaccinated – though the large discrepancies in overall case rates remain, of course.
These new data are naturally reflected in our estimates of the vaccines’ effectiveness at preventing infection, with data for one and two doses of vaccine remaining broadly static (albeit negative) and new lows in our estimates of VE for the triple jabbed, with those in their 60s hitting almost minus-400%, meaning the triple jabbed are around five times as likely to test positive as the unvaccinated. Note also that our estimate of VE for the triple jabbed aged under 18 has now firmly cemented its position below zero.
Hospitalisations
The UKHSA data on hospitalisations show a similar trend to last week’s data – three doses of vaccine show some protective effect, whereas the protective effect for those having been given only one or two doses remains close to zero. Again, the data show a slight uptrend in the estimated VE for younger individuals. As mentioned in last week’s post, this is somewhat expected based on trends seen in previous waves; it is unfortunate that we’ll have no further data to explore this effect.
Of specific note this week is the move towards zero of the estimated VE for protection against hospitalisation in those aged over 80 – this is the very age group for which the vaccines supposedly offer real benefit (as they’re at most risk from Covid); the data suggest that the vaccines have failed in this role.
Deaths
The estimates of vaccine effectiveness at protecting against death continue to show the same trend – an apparent protective effect of the third dose, but that one or two doses end up increasing risk.
Caution is required for these data as there is evidence that the apparent protection against death for Omicron variant is much more complicated than it appears – I have hypothesised previously that this has occurred because those closest to death have not been offered the latest vaccine dose. This effect is apparent when the mortality data is analysed by the unvaccinated versus those that have been vaccinated with any dose as one group.
This week shows a reversion to the trend in the 40-50 age group, and a similar result in seen for all those aged under 50 – the vaccines appear to offer no protection against death for the individuals that have lower vulnerabilty to Covid anyway.
And so the days of the UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report’s section on infections, hospitalisations and deaths by vaccine status draw to a close. As I mentioned earlier, the ending of the publication of these data was inevitable – indeed, I’m only surprised that it lasted this long. Perhaps we need to thank those people in the UKHSA that continued to publish these data even when they started to diverge from the official narrative. As to the future? I suppose we’ll have to content ourselves with the data crumbs that do get published.
I’ll close with some thoughts on where things might go from here and what signs to look out for.
Infections: It is highly likely that we’re currently reaching the peak of the current Covid wave in the U.K. The big question is where it goes from here – what is most likely is that it will drop to a new intermediate level and remain elevated for some four to six weeks and perhaps longer. The higher this intermediate level is, the worse the long term outlook because of what it tells us about the role of the vaccines in suppressing immunity and driving infections; I’d imagine that a levelling off at over 50,000 cases per day would be a negative sign. Once we get to the end of spring it is most likely that we’ll see a substantial drop in cases due to seasonality – but if cases don’t drop to near zero by June then it doesn’t bode well for the future.
Hospitalisations: With the Omicron variant we have probably got close to the point where there is no meaningful protection against hospitalisation offered by the vaccines (both because the virus has evolved to become less pathogenic, and because vaccine effectiveness is very much reduced). What happens next is unclear. The infections data suggest that the Omicron variant has evolved to meet the immune characteristics of the majority of the world’s population (i.e., vaccinated people that have antibodies against one very specific spike protein) and the immune characteristics of the unvaccinated are no longer relevant to its existence, whether they’ve had a prior infection or not. At the same time, our immune systems are complex and we don’t fully understand the impact of different subtypes of antibodies declining (waning) at different speeds. With this in mind, I’d suggest that we look out for people falling ill very rapidly without the classical period of symptomatic Covid, and possibly with some time (weeks) between infection and the onset of Covid disease complications, as this may reflect the vaccines inducing tolerance towards the virus.
Deaths: Omicron appears to be much less lethal than prior Covid variants, although note that it appears to have brought with it a longer period between initial infection and death (in both vaccinated and unvaccinated). I expect to see official figures continue to show low death rates from (or with) Covid over the coming weeks and months, but with the complication that the real death rate will likely be somewhere between two and three times greater than official figures show (deaths within 28 days of infection). Now that we’re entering spring the death rate will almost certainly plunge and the real test will probably come next winter – but that’s a long time off and we’re probably best advised to enjoy our summer instead of worrying about it.
Amanuensis is an ex-academic and senior Government scientist. He blogs at Bartram’s Folly.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Thought – I assume information on hospitalisations and deaths by vaccine status should still be made available through FOI requests?
Information is only available if it’s recorded, so they can simply stop recording it. Many things that would have been useful to know in order to help understand the impact of covid have not been recorded, and I believe this is quite deliberate.
Hmmm. Seems highly unlikely that they won’t ask and record vaccination status when being admitted to hospital for a virus with a ‘vaccine’ available. In fact that would surely still be an important question, one they’d have to go out of their way not to ask and record. Whether that information is formally held is another question entirely I guess.
I am sure they will ask and record it somewhere, but there are most likely another few steps involved in collating and correcting/preparing the data that they can simply stop doing should they wish, meaning that the information requested cannot be made available easily.
Currently the info is recorded at trust level and then sent down to UKHSA to be collated — there are plenty of ways to muck up data at local level (eg, report different trusts’ data for slightly different periods, etc).
Well I have unfortunately had quite a few admissions to hospital since March 2021. I have been asked just once if I have had the “jabs” and that was more conversational than official.
Is there something on my NHS file?
Probably on everyone’s NHS /GP record.
Like it or not, if you’ve ever had a “positive” PCR, this is recorded, in fact it is required.
This is, as I understand it, a prerequisite as “Covid” is/was a notifiable disease.
It’s because it’s all about Health Security you see. Lol.
Oh, and in addition, just try and find out what they do with it.
Police DNA database anyone?
You are right of course! My local florist tells me that has never been been so busy with funeral flowers!
Excessive mortality is impossible to hide. It is everywhere.
It will take months for the FOI request to be ‘processed’, and when they release it they’ll have the data in a different format that’ll make comparative analysis difficult.
Next sage of the cover up program
‘Next sage‘
…I see what you did there.
With the ending of the not fit for purpose free testing, it is a dead cert that “cases” actual reporting and hospitalisations will drop like a stone.
Could someone, preferably everyone here who can, bombard the Guardian and the BBC with this article/link please – especially in their appropriate comments sections.
I am unable to do so simply because all my communications (save the postal system) have been blocked/”moderated” by said purveyors of truth.
Interesting article, thanks.
In terms of the next consequential health problem, it’s maybe worth putting a crisp tenner (while one can still get them) on mass obesity issues. In the light of many cases of apparently healthy young (and not so young) vaxxed folks keeling over during or after exercise, I (empirically and anecdotally, no solid evidence) have noted a definite decline in the numbers of people I see jogging or hill walking. Even neighbours have been cutting back on their pre jab exercise regimes, usually citing time considerations. There’s still loads out there walking slowly and sitting down, benches are packed on sunny days, but rare to see quite as much breathless, sweaty pavement pounding – especially in the over 30s.
On the other hand, with rampant inflation set in for the foreseeable, rampant obesity might have met its ultimate financial adversary in high food and energy prices; and the post-vaxx world is simply transitioning to a more expensive, more sedantry but equally healthy lifestyle to offset those (sshhh…) inconvenient side effects?
Possibly. It certainly is an interesting second-order effect (possibly related to post-infection mild dyspnea in the vaccinated.
I’m rather concerned about other (first order) side effects. These appear to be:
Good points all! There was already mounting evidence of even short term side effects (mhra, VAERS) on several fronts by Feb 2021 that should have at least paused the roll out program there and then. The trickle of released Pfizer documents from 2020 have only underlined that enough was known to have justifiably called a halt to the madness.
It wasn’t madness – all part of the plan. Reset.
The reason there are far fewer is because they were all previously on the longest paid holiday they will, hopefully, ever have! I didn’t get even one flaming day
You might have a point there, but weekends too?
A number of people I know who are jabbed are suddenly quite breathless and so don’t sound to be breathing properly. Ironic really when you think of the reason why they took the vaccine. This may also partly explain why more bums on seats. Also seeing a lot more walking with sticks as an aid where I live.
My wife ran her fourth London marathon in the autumn and I was shocked by how much more ruined the participants were, at the finish, compared to the pre vaccination years. I understand that there were many more health emergencies during the race as well but, obviously, that has been covered up.
Still negative vaccine effectiveness against testing positive in every age group when comparing unvaccinated vs vaccinated (any dose). See attached chart.
Effectiveness against testing +ve worsening in the oldest age groups (coloured red)
Now minus 370% effectiveness in the 60-69 age group, that is 4.7 times the rate of positives in the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated.
And nearly 4 times the rate of positives in the 70-79 age group in the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated.
And in the over 80s, 2.6 x the rate of positives in the vaccinated vs the unvaccinated.
Interesting stuff, as ever.
Down to just 20% of emergency care hospital admissions within 28 days of +ve test in the unvaccinated and 80% in the vaccinated.
And just 10% of deaths within 28 days of a +ve SARS-C0V-2 test in the unvaccinated and 90% in the vaccinated (any dose)
IIRC those are roughly the proportions of vaccinated v unvaccinated in the entire population.
30.5% unvaccinated and 69.5% vaccinated (any dose) of the total English population (all ages) according to UKHSA figures at week 12.
Of course when comparing things like deaths you need to take into account confounders such as age also.
And this is my chart of the percentage experimentally vaccinated in each age group according to the UKHSA figures up to week 12.
(bit fiddly to produce that chart so possibility for errors in the chart, but it’s probably right).
I don’t usually like to show effectiveness against +ve test emergency care admissions or +ve tests deaths (because the metric we should use should be effectiveness against emergency care admission with or without a positive test, or effectiveness against all cause deaths.
But to illustrate the point in the article about effectiveness against emergency care hospital admission (within 28 days of a +ve SARS-C0V-2 test) in the over 80s the chart looks as follows when comparing vaccinated (any dose) with unvaccinated. Hard to see how it wouldn’t have started to go to negative effectiveness next week.
Quite — they appear to have stopped reporting data at exactly the point where they’d be showing the vaccines to have produced net harm.
It’ll probably get worse from here.
Yes.
And this is based on net harm in relation to the single condition which the vaccines are supposed to be protecting against, covid (although covid and a +ve test for SARS-C0V-2 are different things of course)
When you factor in all the non covid harm from the experimental vaccines as well …..
Thanks for that — things are looking dire.
Two weeks ago I went out to dinner with a social group – 9 people in total. Two days later one of them (triple jabbed) said he had tested positive and a couple of days later 4 others did as well. All were triple-jabbed. The two of us who have “confessed” to being un-jabbed were fine. Just saying ….
How do you know you were ‘fine’? Did you test yourselves?
And what of the other 2 persons? 5 + 2 = 7, and it was a party of 9.
Dead?
‘How do you know you were ‘fine’?
Isn’t this a prime example of covidian thinking?
Just because you are prefectly well doesn’t mean you are perfectly well. no no, what you need is a government approved test to let you know.
Thanks for the reply here. The internet seems to divide the world into a series of echo chambers, so it is important to allow a sceptical voice. Of course, in the ‘big world’ this doesn’t happen, as scepticism has been banned by social media etc — but there’s no need to drag ourselves down to their levels.
The really big problem we have here is that there’s rather a lot of entrenched positions where people subconsciously change their assumptions as the situation changes, rather than think objectively about the problem.
For example — back in early 2021 everyone I knew was getting vaccinated to ‘protect granny’ — they weren’t worried about Covid, particularly, but were worried about getting infected and passing it on. Then, suddenly, it was all about stopping hospitalisation/death, and protection of others was forgotten; it is very important to try to see this type of behaviour in the self.
So, what I’d suggest is that you (and everyone else) thinks hard about your own understanding of the situation at this exact point in time — the start of April. Think about what would need to happen to make you change your mind, make you consider that the vaccines have made things worse (in your case), or make you think that they’ve been a massive success (in my case).
I’ll start you off with my thoughts: The biggie is case rates (as Covid isn’t a dangerous disease for the non-vulnerable). I currently consider that the vaccines currently increase the risk of infection significantly. If I get objective evidence (prospective matched cohort trials) that the vaccines consistently reduce infections by more than 50% over a 12 month period then I’ll consider them to be useful. I’d then need to understand side effect rates (we need prospective matched cohort longitudinal studies), but I’d accept that there’s a benefit to enter into the ‘net benefit/harm calculation’.
Over to you.
It’s all very well asking people to “think hard” but you can’t base anything on “infections” because none of the tests are fit for purpose. The only data that is worth looking at is ‘vaccination’ – hospitalisation- recovery or death. In depth analyses can’t be based on “infections’….pie crust.
By fine one assumes they mean they have no symptoms and don’t feel unwell. If you have no symptoms then (in most cases) you are are not ill and don’t have any infection to pass on. Plenty of very experienced Scientists have confirmed that asymptomatic transmission is a lie.
When ware we going to get an admission that the jab “brings on” the virus?
I wonder this too. But as much as we assume it’s so bleeding obvious everyone should know, whenever I mention it people look at me like I’ve just said “well everyone knows the moon is made of cheese”.
“It is highly likely that we’re currently reaching the peak of the current Covid wave in the U.K.” – have heard that before!
“Covid deaths within 60 days” – meaningless.
“but if cases don’t drop to near zero by June then it doesn’t bode well for the future.”
I thought the ‘wheels of the bus were coming off’ and ‘the house of cards was collapsing’ – looks more like “more of the same” to me.
“Omicron appears to be much less lethal than prior Covid variants” – how can you get ‘less lethal’ than zero?
“the real test will probably come next winter” – looks like it’s all been planned well in advance! Back to face masks, lockdowns, social distancing, pubs and restaurants to be closed, more vaccines, and tougher restrictions for international travel.
Can discarded face masks be used as winter fuel for heating your home next winter? Discuss!
PPE is being burnt to the tune of 500 lorries full a month to save the millions on storage costs, one would hope power generation is being considered.
Burning Plastic carcinogenic air polluting smoke factor? Of no importance to the Red ‘Pseudo Greens’ in charge of course.
Or statues to Valance, Whitty and the other so-called ‘heroes’ made up of unused masks, discarded masks, and Downing Street empty bottles…
Only if your mask burner is installed by a government approved installer. There could be government subsidies available to incentivise sales of mask burners. Then in a couple of years there’ll be a compensation scheme for people who were mis-sold a mask burner.
Exactly what’s coming with heat pumps!
The hypocrisy would be breath-taking if it wasn’t the first time we had been exposed to similar – it is almost fit to be called “recycled” – a shame they hadn’t employed the same tactic with the PPE they are prepared to burn – should also be added to the fraud tally on the other thread.
I don’t think there will ever be another ‘lockdown’, but the goverment is quite capable of introducing other draconian and unecessary measures which will essentially be a lockdown – they just won’t dare call it that.
To cover each point in turn:
Thankfully we still have Amanuenis and others to disseminate what evidence there is to show that the experimental jabs are useless.
The vast majority of the population are still in thrall to jabbing and doing what ever they are told.
Other than immediate family members who were coerced into being jabbed I no longer care what happens to the great unwashed who were warned if they had bothered to do the research.
I haven’t had any form of jab for over 40 years and I don’t intend to start now even if a scary mutation rears it’s ugly head next winter.
Don’t dismiss vaccines out of hand — but definitely follow the science.
The interesting one is the ‘flu jab — the evidence for its effectiveness is very lacking. I’m surprised that there’s such a fuss about making everyone have it, given the evidence we do have.
There is perhaps evidence that it is useful for healthcare workers (particularly those aged 40-60) because it helps stop the spread of influenza in hospitals — but even then I’m very hesitant about encouraging vaccination (medical treatment where the only benefit is to others is an ethical nightmare).
Look up Alex Berenson’s analysis of the flu jab in the US. Zero effect. Pointless. Money making con.
I think most healthcare policy makers are easily gamed with fraudulent and or flawed studies. In the case of flu, they didn’t take into account the healthy vaccinee effect, and for some reason – although this has now been clearly pointed out and any evidence for a benefit destroyed – there is a seeming inability to reappraise the situation.
Most vaccine studies are flawed it would seem, and there is a long history of obscuring data in order to window dress them. I don’t understand the motivation, but it seems to be a combination of money and psychopathy on the part of the vaccine developers, backhanders to regulators, and that public health is either getting backhanders too, or are just thick as pig shit (possibly both there).
Vaccine – a substance used to stimulate the production of antibodies and provide immunity against one or several diseases, prepared from the causative agent of a disease, its products, or a synthetic substitute, treated to act as an antigen without inducing the disease.
This is the old definition of a vaccine, I think, not yet erased from the public record.
Vaccine: A preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases. This is the new one.
You notice there is no mention of immunity.
I find your posts very informative, and you are obviously coming from a position of knowledge. but as a GP, I find it difficult to tell my triple or quadruple vaxxed patients that they have covid. The point of a vaccine used to be to PROTECT the patient from getting the disease.
These people have grown up believing that being vaccinated greatly reduces their chances of getting the disease vaccinated against. They drag their reluctant crying children in for their needles, believing that this will protect their children in the future, i.e. provide IMMUNITY. They accept that they are not 100% effective.
It is very obvious to anyone with a brain cell that these gene therapies do not provide any immunity whatsoever. If vaccine effectiveness is zero, there is no protection. I am not an anti-vaxxer, although I now believe more and more that we are vaccinating against things that do not need to be vaccinated against. However if we are inoculating people, and here in Australia, we have just approved covid injections for 0-4 year olds, with something that may well harm them, we are destroying any trust we have built up over the years. If the harms that seem to be caused continue to happen, I will have a very hard job explaining it to my patients.
What I find frightening is the cognitive dissonance in the vast majority of the population, who don’t seem to be able to see that getting the injections doesn’t stop them catching covid, and if they do, don’t seem to be dismayed by it. The anger just isn’t there, as it should be.
Meanwhile, the latest MHRA Yellow Card reports from last Thursday show they are 100x more effective than any previous jab at knocking people off and injuring them.
More analysis on Telegram here: https://t.me/mikes_stuff
I hate the Yellow Card system — in these days of ‘big data’ we should be collecting all these data automatically via hospitalisations and GP visits (something would still be needed for non-medical aspects, I suppose).
As it stands the Yellow Card system is a gift to the pharma companies.
I suspect that thousands of injuries and deaths as a direct result of the vaccines are not being recorded – so the Yellow Card is now doing more harm than good in effectively concealing the truth.
pfizer et al were very happy to use the vaers system.
I’d prefer it if the government had no data whatsoever on me or anybody else.
Only 2075 deaths ? This cannot possibly be right – the figures were near enough 2,000 months ago.
I have read and heard about half a dozen deaths just in the last three days!
Clearly the reporting system has now ‘broken down'(?) altogether and vaccine deaths are being wrongly categorised – just as the original Covid death levels were hyped up!
People don’t report deaths ‘that might be because of the vaccines’ that occur more than about a week after vaccination.
This is one of the deep flaws in the Yellow Card system.
Thank you Amanuensis for your weekly analysis of the UKHSA data – much appreciated.
Something I’m sure everyone here has experienced is hearing about a fully vaxxed relative or friend who’s subsequently caught Covid and come out with a comment along the lines of: ‘So relieved I had all the shots – it could/would have been soooooo much worse if I hadn’t’. I wonder how you respond to that, as I struggle to know what to say. The best I can offer is something like: ‘There’s no evidence to support that view and, in fact, data published by the UKHSA shows the vaccines make little difference to how sick you are if you subsequently contract the virus’. Can anyone improve on this somewhat feeble response please? Ta!
You could say to them that the Pfizer trial showed more people dying of all causes in the vaccine group than in placebo so they have made it more likely they will die than if they had left the vaccine in the bottle.
In all seriousness there is no point, they lack the ability to think.
This table shows the relative change in the ‘cases’, hospital admissions & deaths of the over 70’s triple vaccinated & never vaxxed. Hardly any change for the triple vaxxed, massive change for the never vaxxed. Clearly, vaccines don’t deliver anything like they were promoted as doing.
The reality is that the outcome has always depended on your health not on your vaccine status.
Yes – happened to two friends of mine, both triple jabbed and then got the lugy.
As a rabid anti-jabber I could not help but comment ‘ the jabs worked well then’.
Needless to say they will be going for their fourth jab.
Tell them the elephant trumpet joke.
Ie (quick version — apologies in advance for not being a better comic)
A man starts a new job in a new building somewhere in central London, and is just settling down for his morning’s work when a guy in a brightly coloured outfit suddenly strides into the open plan office, blowing a trumpet badly but loudly. The trumpeteer makes his way through the office, startling everyone along the way, and even after he’s left the office his trumpeting can still be heard in the distance as he makes his way through all the other offices.
Surprised by all the commotion, the man turns to the woman seated next to him, and asks ‘what’s all that about?‘
‘Ah, we have to do that to scare off the elephants‘ comes the reply.
The man though confused for a second, not understanding what was said, and then replies ‘but there are no elephants!’.
‘Exactly‘.
There’s an episode of the Simpsons where Lisa gives Homer a cheap necklace to ward off bears from Springfield. “I can’t see any bears”
“Exactly”.
I had that exact conversation this morning; someone’s fully-vaxxed daughter had very severe COVID symptoms ” thank goodness she’d had the vaccines, or it would have been SO much worse – she could have ended up in hospital”.
I replied that there was a school of thought that the jabs made you more vulnerable to the virus – even made it worse (I didn’t feel equal to describing ADE). The blank incomprehension on her face is something I see often, nowadays.
I’d love a neater explanation but until it’s delivered by Dr Hilary or Mosely (cue smell of sulphur) no one will believe it.
Good try Jane G.
I too hear a lot of that and am stumped for what to say because if I was to tell them that the jabs had likely damaged their immune system they’d call me a conspiracy theorist.
Michael Mosely who boasted in his Fail on Saturday column how he was dis-inviting the unjabbed from his christmas party and telling them why. Stupid, stupid man.
“That’s OK Michael. I don’t want to go to a party filled with thick as pig shit bigots anyway.”
“Have you heard of antibody dependent enhancement? No? Well it was something that everyone was worried about as they started development of the vaccines, because it had happened in every previous attempt to develop a coronavirus vaccines. Turns out they always make infection worse. I can find you clips of people like Fauci warning about it.
We are still at the stage of crossing our fingers and hoping it doesn’t happen with these ones. It will take time to tell. But I am still worried it could happen. It took 18 months before the Filipino government pulled the dengue vaccine a couple of years ago – and a few hundred children had died first – there were early signals of a problem there too, but the governments ignored them.
I think the government might try and cover it up if there are issues, because everyone will be really pissed when they find out what a giant risk this was and that it was never explained to them properly.”
try that? it’s what I tried on my unscientific mother. She’s coming round.
Looking at the first graphic, infection rate per 100,000 by vaccination status, I was struck by how the ‘under 18’ and ‘over 80’ groups at the extremes, differ in pattern from the rest.
Can one assume that the over 80s become particularly susceptible to infection irrespective of the number of shots they have been given solely on account of of their age?
I wonder whether there is data available that shows the total number of unvaccinated people in each age group? If there were, could one use that figure as an index with the other three groups being shown as a proportion/multiple of the unvaxxed?
It is rather interesting, isn’t it.
We speak of ‘the immune system’ as though it is a uniform ‘attribute of human’, but in fact humans (mammals) have broadly four very different stages of immunity (with transition periods between them):
You shouldn’t expect a given ‘immune system thing’ (eg, vaccination) to have the same effect in each of those four groups.
What about the other measure of ‘Vaccine Effectiveness’ – have we got the latest Yellow Card stats – they seem to be very elusive or have they just stopped compiling them?
Just seen the post below which gives us the latest figures – at last! Not pleasant reading.
One of my colleagues was sending other colleagues pictures of a positive LFT as an April’s Fools prank on Friday morning, implying that their birthday this weekend would be ruined by ‘testing positive’. The sheep concerned has been stockpiling LFT’s all week, so I wouldn’t be surprised if they did self-isolate all weekend anyway, it wouldn’t be the first time for this person.
Also, another colleague came in and asked me if I had had any of the ‘injections’ yet. No I replied, “I have a God given immune system that has served me rather well for several decades, I would rather take my chances with the rona than the ‘injections’ thank you very much”. This colleague also noted I was the only one who hadn’t had the rona, despite not having the ‘injections’. FFS!
I’m not sure anyone genuinely believes the not-a-vaccines work any more. I think it is more that people do not want to entertain the only alternative if they were jabbed. We did warn them. They chose not to listen. Tough titty matey as far as I’m concerned. I ran out of patience with them when I was accused of making things up to suit myself.
And yet one of my SITP friends said this morning that people were queueing up at her local GP surgery yesterday for their booster jabs! So plenty still believe in them. But of course the sort of excellent data we get here is never shown on MSM so why would they doubt?
How many people were aware that Pfizer were the co sponsors of the Oscars this year? How many people were aware that Pfizer also happen to be pushing their new alopecia drug?
Following the stunt played out at the Oscars, with Will Smith slapping Chris Rock, I should expect any government who genuinely cares to protect the public would have banned Pfizer from operating within the country.
Of course the “fact checkers” have robustly slapped down the crazy conspiracy theorists. These days I take that as a clear indication the theories are correct.
Fifteen fully vaxxed tennis players dropped out of the Miami Open last week.
FIFTEEN.
Buried Bombshell: Tennis World Rocked as FIFTEEN “Fully Vaccinated” Players Unable to Finish Miami Open
https://thelibertydaily.com/buried-bombshell-tennis-world-rocked-as-fifteen-fully-vaccinated-players-unable-to-finish-miami-open/
Nadal was supposed to have a stress fracture of the rib as the reason for his breathing problems in his loss at Indian Wells. Is that a pseudonym for jab adverse effect do we think?
At this rate of going, by the time we get to Wimbledon Djokovic might win it by default for being the last man standing able to compete in it.
2,000 extra all cause deaths linked to New Zealand’s vaccine roll-out.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/dASUoQ92PTbD/
Dr. Peter McCullough, “it’s unequivocal, the vaccines are causing large numbers of deaths.”
https://rumble.com/vzc8pe-dr.-peter-mccullough-its-unequivocal-the-vaccines-are-causing-large-numbers.html
Pfizer documents published 1st April 2022 (originally Nov 2021, now unredacted) confirms that Pfizer and the FDA knew Vaccine-Associated Enhanced Disease was a possible consequence of mRNA covid-19 injections.
That was in the FDA briefing docs too. They defo always knew.
Like with dengue, which they also knew about, before they killed hundreds of kids. They just don’t give a shit. I’m reading “The Real Antony Fauci” and none of this is new – the only difference is the scale
Johnson is still cheer leading the jabbing – including our kids!
When will it stop?
https://www.financialsense.com/podcast/20225/edward-dowd-greatest-scandal-our-times-about-break
Listen to mp3 from 36:48 mins on.
(I don’t think this is “April Fool’s Day” joshing).
I do however think Dowd is wrong in his forecast of a titanic struggle of vaxx makers -vs- insurers. Based on experience to date, the former will just continue brazenly to stonewall it, and the latter will seek to avoid liability on the grounds that jabbee was submitting self to an experimental medical procedure and/or invoke one of the other numerous policy exclusions which serves to remove liability…
Perhaps some readers will consider reading the surveillance report itself.
Don’t be idiots and believe what the author of this article says.
Before you point your thumbs down, go and read the actual report.
We’ve read it, you tit. Every week.
like with all the covicrap, you can’t read the “conclusions” and caveats as they’re there just to make the data palatable to TBTB. You have to look at the data & draw your own conclusions. And none of it looks good for the “vaccines” or those gullible enough to have taken them.
tree = troll
How many jabs have you had, and what were they?
So you have read the report? Would you care to give us your views on it?
No I thought not.
Yes all useful but why do we want the elderly to live longer that is all that has happened lockdown has failed it does not work as a public health policy, and cannot stop the spread of a virus which too very slim young healthy people, and what did we do cause misery and destress
by instead of unlocking once we vaccinated the vulnerable groups the over 70’s over 65’s we decided to give a vaccine to those 18 , and then people in their twenties and thirties over knowing no idea that this could stop a young single person have children, when there is already knowledge of the vaccine can cause the spike protein around the placenta , yet a lot of young people
from my common knowledge out and about on the street seem all too well to give up their fertility till early 40’s by that time it is too late to have a family size of three , or more
the affect on fertility among woman under 43 in relationships or single have already two children want a third , will be a huge detrimental effect on the population
but to the globalist agenda of tearing down our moral family values Christianity , and the transhuman thing depopulation is the way to go , if there are fewer people on the earth only the really rich and the millionaire billionaire class to rule the world to go on holiday three times a year while the poor go on holiday once a year . I
it is clear of you had the virus, and had a dry cough headache, and lots of arm and leg pain , and possibly some bad headaches you still if recovered with ivermectin in two weeks, you will have T cell immunity which will mean you might not get the flu bad next autumn winter and you might then get it but your body would recognise it , and it will protect you from getting it , it will give you some herd immunity, and you will not get it again,
yet the vaccine is seen as the only sign of protection against a virus which affects 000.05 percent of the population, more than a food diet fresh fish , vegetables fruit .
‘100 Percent’ Vaccinated Cruise Ship Hit With COVID-19 Outbreak
https://www.theepochtimes.com/100-percent-vaccinated-cruise-ship-hit-with-covid-19-outbreak_4369373.html
By Jack Phillips
Stand for freedom with our Yellow Boards
Tuesday 5th April 2022 4pm to 5pm
Yellow Boards By the Road
A3095 Maidenhead Road/B3034 Forest Road
Three Legged Cross, Forest Rd, Warfield,
Bracknell RG42 6AE
Stand in the Park Sundays from 10am – make friends & keep sane
Wokingham Howard Palmer Gardens
(Cockpit Path car park free on Sunday)
Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
“Omicron appears to be much less lethal than prior Covid variants…I expect to see official figures continue to show low death rates….but with the complication that the real death rate will likely be somewhere between two and three times greater than official figures show”
Extraordinary prognosis here, considering how increasingly acknowledged the proliferation of bogus Covid-19 death stats has been, and the predominant SARS2 variant is weakest to date but has the highest R0 to date, creating the highest number of incidental positive tests and bogus Covid-19 death stats.
“we’re probably best advised to enjoy…instead of worrying about it.”
Welcome to any rational thinkers April 2020.
My daughter has two thirty-ish friends who got jabbed during the first few weeks of their pregnancies.
Both had ultrasound scans.
One baby had a hole in the heart and other heart defects and the mother terminated her pregnancy.
The other baby has serious issues which I don’t know in detail, but that pregnancy will be terminated.
My daughter’s mother refuses the booster as she was seriously ill right after her second Pfizer shot.
My recently-retired friend has over the last 12 months told me of 8 of his friends who died of strokes or heart attacks.
All were jabbed.
The most recent death was last Friday, of a 62-year-old man who, he said, ‘Told me I was an idiot for not being jabbed’.
I forgot to add that of those 8 who died, all were in previously good health, in their sixties, and their families were shocked.
Just a lowly retired family nurse practitioner, but I can tell you, our neighbours and bridge and bowls clubs members are dropping like flies.
All triple jabbed, all have covid. Omicron. Yes it resembles a cold and no one has been hospitalised. But it is very clear, their is no vaccine effectiveness. NONE.
Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche has pleaded to STOP vaxxing during a pandemic because it drives the virus to mutate and possibly become more lethal. Fortunately for now, omicron is a pesky cold. So how about taking the advice of a real expert rather than the clowns who have been running the show to this point, spent our hard earned money and taken us to this point of a record breaking number of covid cases, a fortune spent on completely ineffective vaccines that are also causing massive amounts of adverse events. UK Yellow card system. A disaster.
This bioweapon, I mean virus, has certainly created chaos. I have to ask, was that the intent. Now we have more chaos with the proxy ukraine/Russia crisis. Fascinating that zelensky had a few minutes in his busy schedule to make a recording for the Grammy award attendees last night. Fascinating, he has time to chat with the drug fueled musicians and attendees of the Grammy’s in Las Vegas, but can’t be bothered to sit around a table with Putin for a few minutes. The word puppet comes to mind.
Now we see chaos in travel, our economy, costs of all fuels and foods. Has anyone seen just one government cabinet member or the prime minister recently. It is like this. We got you into this mess people of the UK, good luck dealing with it, figure it out. Anyone else feel abandoned? I do.
I will be saving the link to this report and the discussion btl.
USA ‘cases’ & deaths don’t look so different to the pre-vaccine period. 90% effectiveness? I don’t think so.
Europe ‘cases’ & deaths not so different to the pre-vaccine period.
I wonder whether the vaccinated have merely postponed their risk for a few months but haven’t actually increased it overall. So at the moment most of the unvaccinated have already caught COVID and have better immunity than the triple vaccinated who have previously been temporarily protected but are no longer and so are particularly at risk of catching it. If that were the case then after this wave has passed perhaps everyone will be about the same risk – except the few people who have somehow never been exposed at all. Is there any way to process the data to find out whether the vaccines actually have no effect long-term on infection/hospitalization/death?
This is what SWPR.org says – that the vaccines don’t have negative efficacy but the vaccinated are “catching up” with the unvaxxed.
Intuitively, to me, that feels wrong. With there being both 4-5x a great number of vaxxed (roughly) than unvaxxed, that they are having 4-5x the rate of infections of the unvaxxed just feels wrong. The unvaxxed (unless they’re all living together in one community away from all the vaxxed) couldn’t have all been spreading it and building massive immunity through 2021 while the vaxxed were protected….it just couldn’t spread like that, with up to 80% of adults vaccinated, if the vaccines actually did anything.
I think you can only get that high level of infection rate in the vaccinated if you are being reinfected more regularly than the unvaxxed. I readily admit though, I havent done the maths and it would be quite hard to do it.
My gut feel is that the unvaxxed will have strengthening immunity through the regular encounter of the the virus in its many forms with the innate immune system.
While the vaccinated have damaged innate immunity and are unable to mount a comprehensive adaptive response, thanks to OAS, courtesy of the vaccines. So they will catch it more easily and catch it repeatedly.
Please could you explain to me how the graphs on these posts are extracted from the info on the vaccine surveillance reports? I’m sure the explanation is somewhere here, but I’ve been looking for ages! Thank you.