We’re publishing a guest post this morning by Steve Waterson, Commercial Editor of the Australian. He is concerned that a myth is quickly growing in Australia that the country managed the pandemic rather well. As he points out, that’s only true if you ignore the curfews, the house arrest, no visitors, toilet paper battles, five-kilometre limits, an hour a day of exercise, closed borders, internationally and internally, closed pubs, restaurants, shops, parks, gyms, beaches and golf courses.
At a Sydney restaurant last month I found myself sitting next to a woman I’d never met before, the wife of one of the other guests.
We’d already endured the unattractive, passive-aggressive, American-style formulation of “I need you to check in”, from one of the staff, who then “needed” us to wear a mask for the five metres and six seconds between the entrance and our table.
My old-man mutterings about a time when people began such requests with “Would you mind …” or “Could I trouble you to …” were interrupted by my cheery new dining companion. “You shouldn’t really be complaining,” she smiled. “Australia has done better than anywhere else in handling the pandemic.”
Heroically resisting the urge to up-end the table, I made a few polite observations in response, until my wife gave me her “nobody needs another rant from you” look and piloted the conversation into more tranquil waters.
It’s barely two years since the Covid lunacy first infected us, but already its history is being rewritten. In newspaper columns and on television, opinion-laden pundits are patting the enforcers and the obedient on the back, reassuring themselves with this dazzling myth that we managed our pandemic with admirable wisdom and efficiency.
Lacklustre politicians are understandably keen to embrace and promote this view, starting with the Prime Minister’s mantra that we “saved 30,000 lives”. Did we, though? Figures emerging from the few places that didn’t impose life-changing restrictions on their populations suggest they made next to no difference.
At best we tacked an extra couple of months on to the lives of some very old people in nursing homes, then immediately cancelled whatever benefit that afforded them by turning their last weeks into a lonely, bewildering, miserable slide towards the grave when they were forbidden to see family and friends and were attended by carers dressed like astronauts. They’re mostly dead by now, but I trust they slipped away with a message of gratitude on their lips.
Have we forgotten what we went through? Is there a societal equivalent of the mechanism by which we suppress the memory of acute pain?
Before the narrative is embedded too deeply to remove, thereby permitting the same ludicrous weapons to be deployed when the next crisis occurs, perhaps we should remind ourselves of some of the highlights of our exemplary Covid performance.
Oh yes indeed, we got through the pandemic better than anyone else, as long as you’re prepared to ignore the curfews. The house arrest. No visitors. Toilet paper battles. Five-kilometre limits. An hour a day of exercise. Closed borders, internationally and internally. Closed pubs, restaurants, shops, parks, gyms, beaches, golf courses.
What else? No hospital or home visits to dying parents or children. No funerals or weddings. No holidays, reunions, gap years. No school or university. No jobs. Small businesses destroyed. A mental-health crisis. Surgeries and medical screenings suspended.
Then the impositions: carrying ID papers outside your home. QR codes. Contact tracing. Masks. Vaccine passports and mandates. Quarantine. Isolation. Protests forbidden. Monstrous fines. The thin blue line of pepper spray and truncheons.
That’s probably enough to be getting on with. Except to note that the whole mad exercise by now will have cost us almost half a trillion dollars. If that’s success, you’d hate to see what failure looks like.
And it’s still not over. Britain and other European countries, much harder hit than we ever were, are lifting all their Covid-related rules; but here, time ran out this week for hundreds of lowly supermarket employees who didn’t want to be vaccinated, punted from their jobs even as unvaccinated customers were flooding, maskless, back into their aisles. Their vaccinated colleagues in the retail sector, meanwhile, are recommended by state governments to continue to wear masks “to protect vulnerable people who must access these premises and services”.
This novel notion that ordinary citizens are obliged to make whatever sacrifices pop into our health bureaucrats’ twisted brains to save their vulnerable neighbours is getting a little sinister. There’s a small number of people I’d feel obliged to protect if they were in danger – family, a few friends, some of their less obnoxious children – but I assume, and expect, that everyone else will similarly see to themselves and their own. We pay substantial taxes to ensure the state takes care of those in genuine need, and my responsibility to the rest of Australia is to behave myself and do as little harm as possible.
It’s a shame if there are people so fragile that contracting Covid is a death sentence, but that’s life in all its savage unfairness. Perhaps I’m an unfeeling monster, but I’m puzzled that their frailty entitles them to have all 25 million of us accommodate their needs, rather than take the appropriate precautions themselves. Is it genuine selflessness that motivates the shoppers who continue to wear masks, or fear? Or even, as I’m starting to suspect, ugly faces?
When America’s doomed experiment of Prohibition ended in 1933, there were counties in many of the Southern states that dreaded the return of alcohol to their towns, and they are still “dry” to this day. The same appears likely to ensue in parts of this country, with vestigial, nonsensical regulations set to remain in force in perpetuity.
How else can we explain the lingering idiocy of the mask rules? In NSW they are still required in “high-risk settings”, such as on public transport. How sitting next to someone for five minutes on a bus or ferry presents a higher risk than sitting next to a stranger for two hours in a cinema defeats me, but it was never about logic, was it? In Victoria, masks are no longer required in most indoor settings, but you still face a fine if they catch you outside the house without one in your pocket.
Pity the poor politicians: it’s so very, very hard to let go, particularly if you’re a certifiable cretin. There are no density limits in our parliaments.
One consolation is that we’re not in freedom-loving Canada, where the measured response to the truckers’ anti-vaccine mandate blockade of Ottawa was to cancel their driving licences, freeze their bank accounts and seize their pets. With luck the truckers will never bring their semi-trailers to the capital again. It would be amusing to see how long the government could go without their maple syrup and poutine, eh? Or in PM Justin Trudeau’s case, without tins of shoe polish for when he’s putting on his party face.
Elsewhere, world affairs reveal how flimsy are the rights and institutions we take for granted, and put this fading disease and our response to it into perspective. Let’s hope we can one day rule a line under these two years of stupidity and focus on more important matters.
Should that day ever arrive, and you find yourself feeling unmoored, nostalgic for the days when ridiculous politicians and their lickspittle minions blew their meddling noses all over your private business, remember the Western Australia fun park has just reopened (the state was shut down for one case last year, but opens now with thousands of cases every day; but again, it’s not about logic, is it?).
Ignore the sneering insults thrown your way in recent months by WA’s profoundly unimpressive Premier, jump on a plane and head west for a taste of the golden era of government overreach, where lockdown remains a thrilling possibility!
Getting in couldn’t be easier: if you’re double-vaccinated, have a valid G2G pass, take a rapid antigen test, carry proof of vaccination, wear a mask everywhere indoors, you’ll be welcomed and encouraged to savour the touristic wonders of the state. My mistake, sorry: that only applies to people from the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Venezuela or any other dump around the world. Interstate Australians will be denied entry unless they can show they’ve had a third vaccine shot.
WA’s obstacle course is moronic, sure, but don’t expect it to disappear in a hurry. Instead rejoice in the inventiveness of our highly placed buffoons, who can be relied upon to deliver a series of comic masterpieces to lift our spirits in troubled times.


Discussion
Comments
This week across the site:
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to the Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
I think that Australia will have to adopt a new national anthem as the current one with ‘we are young and free’ is obviously inappropriate.
I’d suggest ‘Australia Uber Alles’.
PM Trudeau and Ms Freeland and J. Singh are graduates of the WEF programme; she a board trustee. How does the WEF brainwash these so called global ‘leaders’, including J Ardern, NZ. Are they promised a place at the elite table once the rest of us are digital ID controlled, eating deep fried bugs whilst they dine on fine salmon and angus beef.
Western Australia is still reporting cases, cases, etc. using the PCR test. Would someone tell McGowan and Chief Health Officer Dr Andrew Robertson that the CDC no longer recognises the PCR test as valid; also, in Jan. 2021 the WHO questioned the validity of the PCR test. PCR test inventor K. Mullis (RIP) said it should not be used for this purpose. If it is invalid, then the confirmed covid 19 cases collected in Australia and worldwide are meaningless.
Lovely rant. Thank you!
Sorry, back to front – read from my last post up: I assume there are several out there who would literally die to be one of the first associated with Elon Musk’s pioneering.
Dr. Yuval Noah Harari, Transhumanist and World Economic Forum (WEF) loyalist, recently informed us that “the days of free will are over” but that humans are now “hackable animals.”
Recall, it was under the Rona Regime that we openly became lab rats. In June 2020, in the face of the (fake) COVID-19 Hegelian-Esque emergency, a symposium was held to weigh the pros and cons of bypassing animal trials.
This was warp speed, baby.
“Although this looks promising for fast-tracking vaccine development, there is division among the scientific community about bypassing animal models before Phase I clinical trials. In addition, agencies like PETA are against using animals for research purposes. The question remains: Can vaccine research do without an animal model?”
Me: We are all animals on this planet, however our species is defined as Human, but vaccinated are no longer human, but trans human, with no human rights at all, as above.
As Merkley states, Musk prompted this technology as a way to help people with paralysis… Read more »
Neuralink Experiments Kills 15th Monkey
Published on February 25, 2022
Written by activistpost.com
Elon Musk’s Neuralink brain chip has killed yet another monkey. Nonetheless, steps toward human testing forge forward. (Me: Trans Human?)
A total of 15 macaque monkeys out of 23 have died at U.C. Davis in a Neuralink-funded project titled “Development of a Large-Scale Brain-Machine Interface in Rhesus Macaques.” By now “the others may be dead too,” says Ryan Merkley, the director of research advocacy for the Physicians Committee For Responsible Medicine (PCRM).
In addition to monkeys, Musk’s company whose slogan is “breakthrough technology for the brain” has also implanted Bluetooth-enabled chips in pigs and sheep in order to connect and communicate with computers via a small receiver.
Veterinary records obtained by PCRM, a US non-profit that advocates alternatives to animal testing, describe monkeys picking at their cranial implants post-surgery only to be drugged. While the animals are ‘under,’ they are hooked up to “electrophysiology hardware” to make sure the electronics are working. Some monkeys used in this experiment underwent “multiple major survival surgical procedures,” in which as many as 10 craniotomies were performed on one animal.
The Nefariousness of Neuralink
Neuralink had a contractual agreement with the… Read more »
patent US8415325B2 is listed in the Moderna patent, here. Hydrogels are also mentioned in a second Moderna patent, here. Hydrogel is listed in the Johnson & Johnson patent, here. Hydrogels are made from Graphene Oxide. Nobody can deny the evidence that Graphene Oxide is in the shots.
GMO HUMANS
All the Covid-19 “vaccine” patents mention gene deletion. All the patents except one, mention “complimentary DNA” (cDNA). cDNA is a chimeric mRNA cocktail that’s being coded into Human cells using artificial genetic sequences in cross-species genomics.
According to the US Supreme Court ruling in 2013, altering Humans with cDNA makes them patent eligible. The court documents show that cDNA is made using modified bacterium and Supreme Court judges ruled it patent eligible. This means that a plant, animal or Human, could be patented and owned if first genetically modified with cDNA.
Mark Steele summarized it perfectly by stating:
In the US, the Supreme Court has ruled that vaccinated people worldwide are products, patented goods, according to US law, no longer human. Through a modified DNA or RNA vaccination, the mRNA vaccination, the person ceases to be human and becomes the OWNER of the holder of the modified GEN vaccination patent, because… Read more »
Official Biochemical and Statistical Evidence 100% confirms Moderna created Covid-19
By The Exposé on March 3, 2022
Evidence has emerged which proves beyond a reasonable doubt that the pharmaceutical giant Moderna, the company that has made billions through the sale of an experimental Covid-19 injection, actually created the Covid-19 virus.
Covid-19 means: 19 nucleotide sequence and not 2019 at all.
On February 23 the Daily Mail ran an article showing that Moderna has patented the 19 base letter (nucleotide) sequence which codes for the Furin Cleavage site in Covid-19.
By a concerned reader
They cited a Paper by Scientists in India, Switzerland, Italy and the US (cautiously entitled: MSH3 Homology and Potential Recombination Link to SARS-CoV-2 Furin Cleavage Site) in which they calculated that the chances of a 19 nucleotide sequence patented by Moderna randomly appearing in Covid-19 in circumstances where it does not appear anywhere else in nature are 1 in 3 trillion.
Furthermore they did not merely apply for a patent on 2016 February 4 with US9587003B2: as reported in the Daily Mail. They actually applied on 2013 December 16 for 4 patents with US9149506B2, US9216205B2, US9255129B2, US9301993B2:as well.
So Moderna had developed the 19 nucleotide gene sequence… Read more »
Dr. David E. Martin documented the patents in his dossier
https://f.hubspotusercontent10.net/hubfs/8079569/The%20FauciCOVID-19%20Dossier.pdf
He should be accoladed for daring to expose the history of this scam, which has Fauci’s fingers all over, it just has he did with HIV/AIDS – another immune system “issue”, how curious.
any publication that claims to say something about the covid19 virus should be completely ignored, for the virus covid19 does not exist.
if you cannot distinguish between a virus (sarscov2) and the disease it causes (covid19)you have no business writing about either of them.
Such a well written piece and as a Melbourne resident (aka BadDanistan) I agree with everything he said wholeheartedly. It makes me want to jump out of my skin with anger and frustration like the Incredible Hulk when I think about it all. And those smug idiots who can’t see past their own little lives and think Australia handled it well make me want to shove their faces into a bowl of smashed avocado.
I am so sick of this covid aka great reset nonsense. But I undertake as a duty to inform people about facts about cheaply, effectively and qucikly curing this so called virus symptoms. Search for c19ivermectin on your search engine. On that website you will find as of right now there are 142 studies. 93 of them are peer reviewed about curing covid19 with ivermectin. These are undeniable evidences. Get your ivermectin before it is too late https://ivmpharmacy.com
What a disgusting photograph!
A terrific and restrained, castigating article.
Tip o’ the hat Sir.
We need more writers like this man. That was outstanding. Hope there’s at least a few Australians who also aren’t amused by the madness of the last two years.
Australia “did well” because it is in the middle of nowhere. There is no other reason. We know for a fact that lockdowns do not work. In fact we knew this right at the beginning but decided to do it anyway. All the evidence since has proved that decades worth of pandemic planning, all of which recommended against lockdowns, was correct.
Still, Australia has shown its true colours over the past two years. It is not somewhere I ever wish to visit and I won’t look at the Australian people in quite the same way ever again. No doubt Australia will invent some ad-hoc mythology to justify its hysterical, damaging and reprehensible reaction to COVID because the only alternative would be too embarrassing and shameful to admit to.
The author is quite right about the passive-aggressive flavour of “I need you to…” when it is said for example by a counter clerk, and he’s interesting on the worsening of social norms in Australia. In Britain there is an additional layer of dishonesty in the favourite expression “for you” when it is said in similar circumstances. We’ve all heard “Is there anything else I can do for you?”, as if you are an absolute scrounger for expecting to receive a service you’ve paid for or an irritating neurotic for requesting some information about something you’re considering buying. The way it is said often communicates that the person views you as a complete pain in the neck who is simply taking advantage of circumstances in order to exploit them and make them do unnecessary work, rather than just signing on the dotted line, buying what you’ve been “allowed” to buy, and not complaining ever. Of course the words on the “page” don’t communicate that at all. That’s classic passive aggression. And this behaviour is by no means limited to clerks or bureaucrats. Even those who actually own the business you’re dealing with can sometimes be just as bad.
PS I’m… Read more »
I see one of the biggest job sites “indeed” now has a political message supporting ukraine against russia conflict on its front page. All well and good and all but is it acceptable for a site focused on jobs and employment to push political leanings on its users? If I went to a place of work and was pushed political stances that was not relevant to the job, then I would not particularly want this.
We have always been at war with East Asia
In 2019, we were planning to go to Australia, I’m not now going anywhere near that Totalitarian state. They should be utterly ashamed of their behaviour.
I read yesterday that many Australians are disappointed that some people have chosen not to visit / holiday in Australia and are therefore worried about the impact on tourist revenue.
Although I feel sorry for the Australian people and their economy, there’s as much chance of me visiting Australia, Canada, Italy and such like as there is of the likelihood of me touring Cambodia’s killing fields after the legacy of the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot.
Russian-Australian man kicked off live TV discussion for questioning the narrative.
A few days ago Shiteator, excuse me, Senator Lindsay Graham called for the assassination of a world leader on national television without any backlash, no mention of inciting hatred anywhere from the hypocrites in media.
Russia are the ‘new enemy’ so racism, hate and intolerance toward them is fine.
I watched the video of the man being kicked off, All the person did was highlight double standards and for that was shamed for that opinion, scary really, I saw somewhere twitter said it was not against its rules for lindsay Graham to advocate murdering someone from a sovereign state, double standards that.
Full jabbed aussie cricket legend Shane Warne just died of a heart attack at 52, when the truth about the jabs is realised, he’ll be spinning in his grave.
“he’ll be spinning in his grave.”
And he will be bloody good at it, too.
Good piece thank you.
But we all know the backtracking is in full swing and there’s zero we can do about it.
We know this yet keep complaining, and repeating the same responses we know will not change anything.
How about we focus our energy on something radical for a change. Which though not guaranteed, at least has a change of moving something in the right direction?
Anybody up for this?
If we proceed with the current approach we will be victim become perpetrator, repeating the same mistakes which we know never work. We will have been absorbed back into the system without realising it.
“At best we tacked an extra couple of months on to the lives of some very old people in nursing homes …”
In the UK during the first months of the plandemic they moved old people in very large numbers out of hospitals and into care and nursing homes. At this time every government and MSM mouth was shouting about the virulence and contagiousness of COVID-19, but yet none of these old people were tested for the virus before they were moved en masse into care and nursing homes.
Even in normal times hospitals are hotbeds of infections and the mass movement of patients from hospital wards to nursing homes would be unacceptable given the risk of spreading diseases and infections to the isolated nursing and care home residents.
Then in complete and utter contradiction to their couldn’t-give-a-toss about spreading diseases, infections and SARS‑CoV‑2 from hospitals to nursing and care homes, they refused to let people visit their relatives in nursing and care homes, because they’d spread diseases, infections and SARS‑CoV‑2.
It’s as if they purposefully set out to humiliate people in the most sneering way possible.
Take a look at Matt Hancock having a sneer about the “vaccines”.
Then… Read more »
That’s the 1st time I’ve seen the video of Madcock supposedly crying – the creep is literally laughing, and it was Morgan who suggested he was “emotional”.
I can’t comprehend how the general public can be so stupid and gullible to believe these fraudsters.
He’s a disgusting POS.
I know three doctors who were working at the time of the flu pandemic of 1969-70 and none of them can remember any details because in those days we simply had the infrastructure to cope with a new infectious disease, and we got on with it. People interpret conspicuous, high/heavy-handed management as being effective – if there was effective management society would have gone as normal.
Is there something about the medically extremely vulnerable that makes them uniquely susceptible to covid rather than flu or one of the other myriad of nasties that are constantly circulating ?
UK Government data confirms the Fully Vaccinated are now up to 3.2x more likely to die of Covid-19 than the Unvaccinated.
In other words, people that have been gene therapied are three times more likely to acquire immunodeficiency and be unable to fight-off what are otherwise easily defeated infections.
But in spite of the mountain of evidence that the plandemic and gene therapies were a gangster driven genocidal enterprise from the start, they’ll be lots of people saying and thinking like this lady quoted in the article:
“You shouldn’t really be complaining,” she smiled. “Australia has done better than anywhere else in handling the pandemic.”
All the unquestioning and accepting people like this lady will have been gene therapied up to their eyeballs. A lot of these cretins are going to get ill over the next few years from infections that they’d normally fight-off without even knowing they had had them.
They’ll then trot to their doctors and be diagnosed with HIV and be told they have developed AIDS. And then they’ll be put on concoctions of medications.
I’m not the schadenfreude type, but many of these cretins are so Messianically righteous about getting the “vaccines” that a little hubris… Read more »
DAILY SCEPTIC – PLEASE STOP referring to what has happened over the last two years as a “pandemic”.
Or, better, qualify it as a pandemic of lies, corruption, behavioural science, propaganda and abuse etc.
The Bruces and Sheilas have been in a dream land. Crikey even Neighbours has ended.
’until my wife gave me a her – nobody wants another rant from you- look’!! Sounds like the look I get from my partner when on one of my anti- covid rants too!
Superb.
His writing reminded me of Clive James. There are fewer journalists with such a way with words around these days.
There are fewer journalists – full stop. By and large, they have been replaced by liars, propagandists and toadies like Peston, Vine, Morgan and the rest of the crew. In all this time, I’ve never heard one ask a sensible or relevant question at the ridiculous Johnson/Whitty/Vallance/Van Tamm shows.
Of course, they do work for organisations which are subsidiaries owned by Government, albeit temporarily, and bought by the lashings of advertising (propaganda) money paid to them out of the public purse.
As you rightly observe, there aren’t any Clive Jameses around, but I can resort to my dog-eared collection of paperbacks of his Observer TV criticism, and his other books. When in advertising, I used to buy all the Sundays to see if my clients’ ads (oddly, a lot for Australian state governments, Ten Pound Poms etc.) were in the right places, but, as for the Observer, it was straight to Clive James and never mind the ads.
The problem is that the propagandized churnalism has now taken over – the Covid experiment was pushed further than they could ever have hoped – and now try getting a reasonably broad-based view on the Ukraine,
I love it that the man being assaulted by the police has has his mask firmly in place.
‘I may be a protester, but there are limits to how far I’ll transgress.’