This is the 26th of the round-ups of Covid vaccine safety reports and news compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous in the current climate (find the 25th one here). By no means is this part of an effort to generate alarm about the vaccines or dissuade anyone from getting inoculated. It should be read in conjunction with the Daily Sceptic‘s other posts on vaccines, which include both encouraging and not so encouraging developments. At the Daily Sceptic we report all the news about the vaccines whether positive or negative and give no one advice about whether they should or should not take them. Unlike with lockdowns, we are neither pro-vaccine nor anti-vaccine; we see our job as reporting the facts, not advocating for or against a particular policy. The vaccine technology is novel and the vaccines have not yet fully completed their trials, which is why they’re in use under temporary and not full market authorisation. This was done on account of the emergency situation and the trial data was largely encouraging on both efficacy and safety. For a summary of that data, see this preamble to the Government’s page on the Yellow Card reporting system. (Dr. Tess Lawrie in June wrote an open letter to Dr. June Raine, head of the MHRA, arguing that: “The MHRA now has more than enough evidence on the Yellow Card system to declare the COVID-19 vaccines unsafe for use in humans,” a claim that has been ‘fact checked’ here.) Boris Johnson said in October that being double vaccinated “doesn’t protect you against catching the disease, and it doesn’t protect you against passing it on”. We publish information and opinion to inform public debate and help readers reach their own conclusions about what is best for them, based on the available data.
- A plan to expand Covid vaccinations to all children aged 5-11 in England is delayed amid an impasse between the Government and its vaccinations advisory committee (JCVI), though the announcement has been made in Wales and Scotland.
- The Children’s Covid Vaccine Advisory Group (CCVAG) has written to the JCVI and the U.K.’s Chief Medical Officers to request an urgent meeting and an immediate pause to the rollout of Covid vaccines to children, pending the results of a public inquiry.
- New case reports of adverse events following Covid vaccination:
- A study has shown the risk of myocarditis from the vaccine is greater than from Covid for males under the age of 40.
- Official data from Public Health Scotland show the vaccinated population have accounted for four in every five COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations and deaths over the past two months.
- A new study has shown that antibodies in unjabbed Covid survivors are ‘stronger’ over time than in people who’ve had two shots but no infection.
- CDC data shows nearly 35,000 Covid vaccine injuries have been reported among 5-17 year olds.
- Leaked U.S. Department of Defence data shows link between disease and COVID-19 vaccination amongst military personnel – the data have been discussed widely, including at the U.S. Senate, by Dr Ryan Cole, attorney Tom Renz and Senator Johnson.
- Passive surveillance reporting in the U.S. shows the risk of myocarditis after receiving mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines was increased across multiple age and sex strata and was highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males and young men.
- Confidential Pfizer trial report obtained by Strong and Free Canada shows the death of more than 1,000 trial participants in the first three months – a 3% death rate among resolved adverse events.
- A hospital in Israel has reported that 80% of serious Covid cases are amongst the fully vaccinated.
- Data from Rambam hospital in Haifa, Israel reveal a stillbirth, miscarriage and abortion rate 8% among women who were vaccinated with at least one dose of Covid vaccine compared with 6% among women who never received it.
- A new study in Israel shows 133 times risk of myocarditis after Covid vaccination (comparisons with myocarditis rates following infection are irrelevant as vaccination does not prevent infection).
- There is evidence of natural immunity in unvaccinated healthy U.S. adults up to 20 months after confirmed COVID-19 infection.
- Ex-footballer Matt Le Tissier talks about the recent increase in football player deaths.
- VAERS – the American version of the Yellow Card reporting system – as of February 4th reports a total of 1,103,893 reports of adverse events following Covid vaccines, including 23,615 deaths and 188,135 serious injuries.
- DAEN Australia – the equivalent of the Yellow Card reporting system – has logged (up to February 1st) 107,543 reports of adverse events, including 758 deaths.
- Children (Under 18) Adverse Events UK – up to February 2nd, the MHRA reports a total of 3,252 adverse event reports, comprising 2,962 Pfizer, 254 AstraZeneca, 18 Moderna and 18 unspecified from 3,114,400 children vaccinated. This includes 59 reported cases with Pfizer and one with Moderna of myocarditis/pericarditis, suggesting a current risk of 13 cases per million first doses and 12 per million second doses for this age group.
- Booster Doses – 44,763 adverse events have been reported across all vaccines up to February 2nd from 37,419,104 people vaccinated, suggesting a reporting rate of one adverse event per 836 doses.
Summary of Adverse Events in the U.K.
According to an updated report published on February 3rd, the MHRA Yellow Card reporting system has recorded a total of 1,453,605 events based on 443,799 reports. The total number of fatalities reported is 2,010.
- Pfizer (25.8 million first doses, 22.9 million second doses, 28.7 million third doses) now has one Yellow Card in 158 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 36,467 people vaccinated (717).
- AstraZeneca (24.9 million first doses, 24.2 million second doses, 53,000 third doses) has one Yellow Card in 102 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 20,750 people vaccinated (1,218).
- Moderna (1.6 million first doses, 1.4 million second doses, 8.7 million third doses) has one Yellow Card in 45 people vaccinated. Deaths: 1 in 48,485 people vaccinated (37).
Overall, one in every 119 people vaccinated (0.84%) have experienced a Yellow Card adverse event. The MHRA has previously estimated that the Yellow Card reporting rate may be approximately 10% of actual figures. Note that sometimes in Yellow Card reporting, the numbers of adverse events (including fatalities) will be lower than the previous week. The Yellow Card system is a passive reporting system, so in theory this should not happen as all reports should be cumulative. However, the MHRA say they analyse the data prior to publication, with deaths and pregnancy conditions being notably investigated. They do not state criteria by which reports would be removed and to date have not clarified why this data varies. It is therefore unclear how many reported adverse events have been removed from the reports since reporting began in February 2021.
- Blood Disorders = 26,948
- Pulmonary Embolism & Deep Vein Thrombosis = 4,022
- Anaphylaxis = 1,607
- Acute Cardiac = 26,242
- Pericarditis/Myocarditis = 1,941
- Eye Disorders = 24,004
- Blindness = 504
- Deafness = 760
- Spontaneous Abortions = 759 miscarriages
- Nervous System Disorders = 280,314
- Strokes and CNS haemorrhages = 3,096
- Facial Paralysis incl. Bell’s Palsy = 2,240
- Vertigo & Tinnitus = 11,645
- Seizures = 3,374
- Paralysis = 1,467
- Disturbances in Consciousness = 20,301
- Infections = 33,745
- Herpes = 5,073
- Skin Disorders = 98,871
- Respiratory Disorders = 54,512
- Reproductive/Breast Disorders = 55,683
- Psychiatric Disorders = 30,500
- Vomiting = 18,506
- Tremor = 12,707
Further analysis can be found via the U.K. Freedom Project.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Please stop using the term vaccines
THEY ARE NOT VACCINES
If you need some help here are some suggestions
‘What the regime refer to as vaccines’
‘What state controlled media refer to as vaccines’
‘What the Covidians refer to as vaccine’s
etc, etc
Please do not use the words handed down to you by the tyrants
The Swiss Doctor says “vaccine” is accurate ( https://swprs.org/covid-vaccines-a-reality-check/ ):
“Are covid vaccines ‘vaccines’?
“Yes, because they induce an antibody immune response.
“But didn’t the Merriam-Webster dictionary have to change its definition of “vaccine” in January 2021 to include covid vaccines?
“Yes, but their previous definition was outdated and wrong: it referred to a “preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms”, which didn’t include toxoid vaccines (like the tetanus vaccine) or protein-based vaccines (like the hepatitis B vaccine) or of course mRNA or DNA vaccines (like some of the covid vaccines).
“But covid vaccines don’t provide lasting protection, so aren’t they more of a drug than a vaccine?
“The flu vaccine and some other vaccines don’t provide lasting protection, either. The ‘vaccine’ definition is about the mode of action, not about the medical success.
“Are covid mRNA and DNA vaccines ‘gene therapy’?
“Yes, mRNA and DNA vaccines have always been regarded as an application of gene therapy, simply because they are based on genetic technology (DNA or mRNA). The European Union even had to suspend some of its GMO regulations to fast-track covid vaccine development and manufacturing.”
I for one don’t regard the Swiss Doctor as a “tyrant.”
Please watch https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcwg-Vzg9NU regarding non-specific vaccine effects to understand that the abysmal understanding of the method of action of vaccines and the immune system among vaccine manufacturers is why we are in the mess we are now in.
“When I use a word,” Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, “it means just what I choose it to mean—neither more nor less.” “The question is,” said Alice, “whether you can make words mean so many different things.” “The question is,” said Humpty Dumpty, “which is to be master—that’s all.”
This excitement about the word “vaccine” reminds of the tedious anoraks we have here in the US who are always eager, in their defense of liberty, to buttonhole anyone they can lay hands on and remind them the United States is not a democracy, it’s a republic.
I have never quite understood how this accomplishes anything.
The term ‘vaccine’ used relative to experimental mRNA technology endows it, by association, with the properties of being a well understood and safe (in the long term) technology.
In the mind of the public it induces a false sense of security in that, there is little need for informed consent because of the association.
The last time I rolled up for an influenza vaccination I didn’t think of asking any questions, nor was I given full information on the vaccine used because of the security of historic use.
There can be little doubt the association made between mRNA technology and vaccines was deliberate and wholly misleading, with the single purpose of getting as many jabs in arms as possible, with no questions asked.
That’s why words, distinctions and definitions are important when it comes to medical procedures at least.
However, if you had rolled up for an influenza vaccine jab in the early days of influenza vaccines, you would have been assuming a not insignificant risk to your health. This has been true of most vaccines, in fact.
That vaccines have sometimes been relatively dangerous does not make them any less vaccines. Nor does the relative ignorance of the history of vaccines on the part of the public and the media.
Anyway, I’m obviously not going to convince anyone whose mind is already made up, but I appreciate the Swiss Doctor’s clarification from a medical point of view, and thought I should share it. Swiss Doctor is/are on our side.
All other previous ‘vaccines’ inject a specific amount of the protiens that your body reacts to. The mRNA give instructions for your bodies cells to produce the protiens, the level and location of which is uncontrolled. There is evidence showing spike produced and still in the system 60 days after injection in areas they shoud never be. To compare it to conventional vaccines is nonsense. They have only been used because they are cheap and easy/quick to make and dont have the problems with variance batch to batch (in theory). They really dont care what damage they do.
I did read somewhere they can penetrate the blood-brain barrier. I have heard of other vaccines in the past doing this.
They’re not remotely conventional, but they are designed to work as a vaccine (make antibodies to a target antigen from a pathogen). They are also gene therapies. They also don’t work.
Im not bothered about the terminology, but them I am surprised that everyone thinks the term vaccine connotes something safe. Vaccines need a better safety profile than drugs, as they’re given to healthy people – which is why these should never have been used (under normal circumstances the preclinical work would have stopped them in their tracks).
I call them failed vaccines. They clearly don’t work at all, and are not safe.
I read the Swiss Doctor round up you provided a link for and was impressed by it (as I have been with many previous SPR articles). It’s finely balanced and would be particularly useful to show to someone who was on the fence or beginning to become sceptical about the… products we’re discussing.
I have heard a number of doctors and experts say they shouldn’t really be referred to as vaccines and I agree with RedhotScott that the term has created far too much public trust, not to mention a lack of regulatory oversight. It is just semantics really but on balance, even though I really appreciated the no nonsense and authoritative tone of the Swiss doctor, I think I’ll continue to put inverted commas around the word when referring to them!
He’s not a tyrant. Simply misinformed. The so-called immune response is nothing more than the body’s response to the trauma which is the jab.
That is probably why a Dr on five live talking about vaccinating kids said, a small dose gives a really good immune response. WTF would it normally do!
It’s merely a shorthand.
Confidential Pfizer trial report obtained by Strong and Free Canada shows the death of more than 1,000 trial participants in the first three months – a 3% death rate.
When I click on the link to Joel Smalley’s site, I find the statistic of 3% refers to the 30% of adverse reactions that were resolved. So, firstly, it refers only to the adverse reactions (many participants will not have experienced adverse reactions) and, secondly, to only 30% of them.
I think the report above should be corrected as it appears to say that 3% of all participants died. That surely can’t be right.
Having now looked at the Pfizer document itself, I can say that it refers to adverse effects reported to Pfizer. These totalled 42,086 of which 1223 proved fatal. Of the 42,086 whose sex was known, 77% were female.
The document is here.
Sex
Female 29914
Male 9182
No Data 2990
Age
≤ 17 175
18-30 4953
31-50 13886
51-64 7884
65-74 3098
≥ 75 5214
Unknown 6876
Info on how the females and males break down by age might be interesting.
From a depopulation point of view the least costly strategy is to target females aged between 0 and 40.
It’s 3% of 30% but yes it should be clarified
As I understand it, where a report of an adverse effect is not resolved, that means we don’t know the outcome, including whether the person died or not. There were 9400 unknown outcomes. The 1223 fatalities therefore refer to 42086 minus 9400, or 3.7% of resolved adverse case reports (158,893 events).
I note that the DS report has now been corrected.
Thank you once again for this round-up. That disclaimer at the start about the Daily Sceptic reporting ‘both encouraging and not so encouraging developments’ rings hollower each week though, doesn’t it?
It has a quality of ‘asking for a friend’ about it!
To be fair though, they can’t make statements that seem to recommend a course of action. It is their position to compile the information, it is the readers’ responsibility to draw conclusions for themselves.
But look! Prince Andrew!
I don’t know how much longer the Gov can ignore these figures for. And now I see that vaccines are being rolled out to 5-11 year olds. On whose advice?!
Jesus wept.
‘A plan to expand Covid vaccinations to all children aged 5-11 is delayed amid an impasse between the Government and its vaccinations advisory committee (JCVI).’
I assume that means they can’t agree on a PR angle and/or are worried about repercussions. The justification for 12-15 was sketchy, nonsensical and non-medical; What on earth will they use for children even younger? Maybe they’ll just have to say, “We’re recommending the jab for very young children to make it easier go on holiday.”
Yes they could easily say that about holidays. They could ban unspiked small children from nurseries etc. too.
That is the fear they are trying to create in parents. Anyone urging this is morally repugnant.
Well for the 12-15 year olds the main justification was ‘to stop school disruption’…..
to say it’s pathetic is an understatement…
But the vaccination of schoolchildren is itself a disruption…then there are the adverse reactions among the children..another disruption…..no benefit in terms of transmission to others or catching the virus….what benefit?
It is an understatement. It’s a war crime, and will be considered as such very soon I’m sure.
Just wondering if they carry it out in schools again, away from the parents. I’m worried that they may coerce the kids by rewarding the ones that have it, giving a badge etc. Or like in US just literally segregating them. That pic of that big fat black bitch (no racism intended) sat without a mask with a room full of infants muzzled up comes to mind.
Krankie & Dungford are going ahead with vaxxing 5-11 year olds.
Good socialists like them will see children as sacrificial to their agendas.
I wonder who is being lined up as the stooge for those decisions, it wont be the first ministers that’s for sure.
“In the Welsh Parliament, Plaid Cymru health spokesman Rhun ap Iorweth said he was “aware of calls from parents, from staff in education, from health professionals and care workers to push this option of vaccination forward as soon as possible”.
This was because of “concern that the virus is spreading most among children and the impact that that has on family members who are unable to work and the impact that remains in terms of children’s education, where there they do lose large amounts of school time”, he added.”
This is the angriest I’ve felt for the entire two years of this Scamdemic. Demonic Satanist scum. Jab my child over my dead body, you evil filth.
Let them say what they want, all they are doing is implicating themselves ahead of future war crime tribunals.
At my mates school the teachers seem like nice people, but we know many have this blind spot when it comes to the jab. Mass formation etc.
if they use schools to carry out this mass vaccination, maybe they can be held liable?
I started work at an FE college today and first conversation was why I wasn’t wearing a mask in communal areas. I just said I am exempt.
Oh. But the students have to wear masks and if the staff don’t wear them how can we tell the students off for not wearing them.
I hope enough 16 to 18 year olds can recognise what a silly game this all is. I am not playing.
Someone needs to stop the game before 5 to 11 year olds get jabbed.
I’m a high school teacher who has never ever worn one, because I emailed the head the day before the initial announcement with an emphatic explanation as to why I wouldn’t be participating in ritualistic pseudoscience that would harm children. In some schools that might not have gone down so well! But the result at mine was that they left me the hell alone. I think one of the secrets to navigating this appalling period of history has been to know your own mind and be confident in your decisions. I’ve found this has meant I have never really been challenged in any setting. I hope you didn’t buckle; you’re in the right.
I held the line
Good for you, I’m at a college too and an officious colleague pulled me up for not wearing a mask, then said ‘oh, but you don’t wear a one, do you?’. I was wearing my college issue ‘mask exemption’ yellow badge at the time…
Pleased to hear it
Does that include Wales though, or just England?
I heard some educationally subnormal woman (very obviously so) on LBC this morning complaining that she wanted to vaccinate her little children like the Welsh could, because she was vulnerable and had already had COVID twice and the vaccine would stop them from giving it to her. She was herself vaccinated, of course,
Quite what mental contortions she had gone through to reach that conclusion, I cannot fathom. But regardless, I think the government are permitting use in this age group to (1) shut people like this up (2) potentially sterilise them. This woman’s genes are an evolutionary dead end, I’m afraid to say.
It’s just impossible to fathom isn’t it. What benefit do these people think their children are getting? Or is it about using their children as some sort of protective spell? There’s no hope for these people, as you say they are so cognitively dissonant and brainwashed that they’ve lost all connection with reality. What’s tragedy to be a child growing up with parents who’ve gone mad. Similarly I was forwarded an email at school today from the mother of a child I teach with high functioning autism. Although it was ostensibly about him struggling in my subject, I scrolled down through the chain to find that the source of the problem was that he had become extremely distressed by his mothers repeated attempts to have him injected, screaming whenever the needle got close to him. It was so upsetting to read. There was no self awareness, no questioning of whether it was worth it. He just had to be ‘vaccinated’. He was recently off for two weeks with, you guessed it, covid. He’s such a lovely kid too. Being raised by fucking morons.
The synonyms for the forthcoming murders should be interesting.
Stop press: No PR, no justification, just a quiet announcement late at night. Disgusting.
I note that the 2,000 deaths (apparently vastly unreported) milestone has been reached.
Will that be on the BBC.
What I find amazing is that it is estimated by the MHRA that eporting is understated by a factor of ten.
Now I ain’t no mathematical genius but if the real death rate from the jabs is nearer to 20,000 rather than 2,000 then it makes the jabs more dangerous than the actual disease which is 17,500 with Covid only reported on the death certificate.
I am happy to be corrected if I have read the stats wrong but I do believe this happened in Taiwan – 8 deaths from covid but 9 deaths from the jab.
Two more people in my circle have had life-changing vaxx symptoms/reactions in the last month. Both (again!) fit and strong men between the ages of 40-45.
That makes four people we know personally who have had life changing reactions and several with more minor obvious symptoms.
We simply cannot be that unlucky if the official data is to be believed. I’m now sure that most people have actually been vaxx injured, only their symptoms and reactions are subclinical for now. My theory is the fittest and strongest are presenting first because their lifestyles push them to physical extremes (in our circle two are firemen, one is a boxer) more often so heart damage and clotting issues come to the fore quickly. Others’ injuries are going to remain more insidious but no less dangerous in the longer term IMO.
In our workforce of 135 (not all vaccinated) we have had 3 serious adverse reactions. Two men in their 30s with myocarditis, and although back at work now both concerned about their health, probably forever. One played football to a high standard but has given it up. One bloke in his 40s had a stroke and seems unlikely to work again.
If I assume 100 vaccinated then that is a 3% serious adverse reaction rate.
I know of nobody that has been seriously ill with Covid.
I did read somewhere that there has been an increase of deaths in younger people last year compared to the last few years ACM.
I’ve lost count. Three injuries in my family; along with injured colleagues and friends. Nobody I know asks me any more about why I have refused the jab.
One friend had a severe reaction to the jab (pretty much like what you get by actually having a severe bout of Covid, but without getting the natural immunity). The daughter of another friend has horrendous difficulty standing up without losing balance and has to lie very still, for weeks now – sounds like a neurological adverse reaction caused by he vaxx – but he maintains the problem is caused by – wait for it – Covid. So much self-deception going on!
I think that everyone who has had the jab has been injured by the jab but that any symptoms or overt damage are yet to manifest themselves. A bit like metal fatigue, for example, affecting a crucial part of an airplane which continues to operate very well, perhaps for quite a while – until, that is, it doesn’t.
My friends 56 yr old husband (slim, pre jab very fit) had 2 AZ and 1 Pfizer booster. 4 weeks after the booster he had a massive heart attack – blood clots. She was warned he may not live, but did and was released from hospital to recover. He was re-admitted last week with arrhythmia, palpitations, chest pain …. and what sounds like myocarditis. Back home again but at the moment is to all intents and purposes, disabled.
I know two previously fit men in their 70s, fully jabbed, who developed cancerous tumours last year and were given only a few months to live. Almost a year on and both are still with us and doing very well on chemo treatment. I just have a gut feeling that the jabs gave them a form of cancer that, though serious, has turned out to be more treatable than most hepatic cancers. I suppose only time will tell.
Went to lunch with a friend yesterday, he is a classical music enthusiast, says he now has tinnitus. I mentioned that it is a common side effect of the vax. This never occurred to him, even tho symptoms began after the injection
How much more evidence does THE SCIENCE require in order to get its backside into gear and stop the programme, is there an agreed threshold of the number of people who must die or be damaged before they actually do something.
Okay, I have a question for everyone. My son, now 18 and finishing up his A Levels, has not been vaccinated. He had Covid in March 2020, and barely yawned. He has no reason to get jabbed. However, next Fall he is likely to be required to show his vaccine status. So, is there some way out of this (yes, he needs to go to uni because he wants to be a statistical economist – econometrics – which requires university education)? Some waiver we don’t know about? Is the fact my dad died of a heart attack warrant for avoiding the potential myocarditis the jab could cause? He doesn’t want to get jabbed. I sure don’t want him too (I had my two, so not anti-vax entirely). How do we avoid him undergoing a medical procedure he doesnt need?
Or is this simply insane world we must navigate.
Just say you’ve jabbed him, doctor! OK – I know this is probably not a solution; here’s the thing though: for universities to mandate injection with an unlicensed novel medical device with unknown risks and alarming safety signals easily provable in multiple jurisdictions in multiple official reporting systems and over 1000 peer reviewed studies is abhorrent, disgusting, an insult to reason, an insult to young people, a dereliction of care, and, frankly a crime. I have children and I would not wish them to attend an institution guilty of this. So get him a fake pass if you want, they’re readily available but I really think you should be asking yourself why you’re collaborating with this.
An unenviable position to be in – my sympathies. I don’t know the UK situation and whether you might be able to get around rules over there with exemptions. Otherwise, what about distance learning as a last resort and your son continues living at home? Might also make the course a bit cheaper.
Indeed – does the OU run such a course? Or does it offer an undergraduate course which will allow progression onto a relevant pg degree a few years down the line (by which time we can hope that sanity has been re-established in HE!)?
It’s worth exploring. Full disclosure, I grew up in Somerset, eventually went to Nottingham University 20 years ago. In a way I wish I’d stayed in at home and gone to Bristol – living and studying at home – as it was fairly nearby. All I’m saying is that the much-vaunted freedom from Mum and Dad wasn’t all that (by that time I had a car and some independence anyway). Plus, I always regretted the fact that I lost contact with a lot of my sixth form friends…
Indeed, I see a lot of students who are many miles from home, and they would benefit from being a little bit closer. 10 miles away from mum and dad allows for as much independence as 200, but when life gets complicated, it’s a boon to have the emotional support close by and, as you state, older friends are accessible, too.
You could try using these templates letters:
https://www.no-vaxx.org/product/schools-and-college-legal-packs/
I can’t vouch for their effectiveness but I have seen evidence from the US where school boards have backed down when faced with the same requests for information, which, obviously, they cannot meet because some or all of it does not exist. They are relying mostly on coercion, not proof, and most people seem to fall for this.
Whether or not your son is successful in using the legal template letters to get into Uni without being jabbed, he might like to consider an alternative career starting with mounting a crowd funder to take legal action against the university. That might be more empowering than becoming a statistical economist. My concern, with a somewhat jaundiced eye as a retired corporate scientist, is that he could end up being used to back up the ‘lies, damned lies and statistics’ school of persuasion.
I wish your son every success with whatever path he chooses.
Have him take a year out and offer his services as a gardener or something.
My wife was, up until very recently, a University lecturer and doesn’t understand why there is a mass panic amongst school leavers to jump straight into higher education.
By autumn 2023 this will all be just a bad memory.
This is a good point – there are still some universities out there offering a shockingly substandard product ‘due to Covid’ – this situation will surely become untenable?
INMO if you can’t find a legal way round it then I would break the non-sensical mandate and buy a fake one.
I appreciate your disclaimer, when discussing post-vax myocarditis, that “comparisons with myocarditis rates following infection are irrelevant as vaccination does not prevent infection.”
But there’s another important point I think is forgotton: not everyone will become infected with COVID; while in a world of mandates everyone will have a potentially dangerous vaccine forced on them. So the risk of myocarditis is even higher post-vax when including the never-infected in the control population.
Another reason it is inexcusable to force this on young men and especially children.
It is inexcusable to force it on anybody.
Are you suggesting that it’s ok to force it on young women and people you don’t define as young?
No. If I was suggesting that I would have said that.
This is a vital resource for which we are thankful.
However, this is the second one in a row that has omitted the data from Eudravigilance – the European version of the Yellow Card Reporting system.
Has everyone seen this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xcwg-Vzg9NU ? It explains why these artificial non-live mRNA ‘VAXINES’ are damaging immune systems leading to VAIDS and should never have been authorised for emergency use.
This is the 26th Vaccine Safety Update … each week, more horrendous ‘side effects’, harms, deaths reported here, and yet not one single mainstream ‘journalist’ has asked one single question about their safety of anyone in ‘authority’ here, or the USA, or Australia, or even any of the seemingly-more-sensible Scandi countries.
No-one with access to the internet can’t not know now.
Ergo? Vaccines are crap. Fools have taken them. We are right. They will never admit they are wrong. Case rests.
Why bother going on?
The phantom down-ticker has arrived again. What a sad sack!
I wonder who the person is down voting every comment? Somehow they must be enjoying their tedious task.
I don’t know about you but that single red down thumb is really making me question my views.
“compiled by a group of medical doctors who are monitoring developments but prefer to remain anonymous “
This is because they either …
a. don’t exists.
b. Are not medical doctors.
c. Don’t have any foundation for their views.
It’s a long and comprehensive list of links. If you object to any of the points made or the reports or studies to be found by following the links, then state your objections. Otherwise you sound like a looney, dismissing everything wholesale because it goes against the tenets of your own beliefs, whatever they are.
Still persisting in the with the anti-vaxx nonsense?
Who are you trying to convince?
The boat sailed…. the benefit is obvious, there is not point in your campaign…
Only the DS regulars are reading your rubbish. They are already wrong, so you can’tt make them any more wrong.
All bullet points link to external information including official reporting systems. What on earth are you talking about?
So why are you here?
.84 per 119 translates into 7% per thousand & thats 70 people per thousand , thats 70,000 people per million & if that’s ONLY 10% reported, then the real Number for advert effects is : 700,000 per Million!! is that right!?