The Lancet appears to have had a change of heart on the lab leak theory, having published an article calling for an “objective, open and transparent debate” on Covid’s origins – a whole 19 months after writers “strongly condemn[ed] conspiracy theories suggesting that Covid does not have a natural origin“. The idea that the evidence points away from the lab leak theory and towards a natural origin “could [now] literally be reversed”, say the authors of the new article. “There is no direct support for the natural origin of SARS-CoV-2, and a laboratory-related accident is plausible.” The Mail on Sunday has more.
It was revealed earlier this year that Peter Daszak – a British scientist with long-standing links to the Wuhan Institute of Virology – had secretly orchestrated a landmark statement in the Lancet in February 2020 which attacked “conspiracy theories suggesting that Covid does not have a natural origin”.
The now-infamous letter, signed by 27 leading public health experts, said they stood together to “strongly condemn” the theories which they said “do nothing but create fear, rumours, and prejudice”.
They also lavished praise on Chinese scientists who they said had “worked diligently and effectively to rapidly identify the pathogen behind this outbreak… and share their results transparently with the global health community”.
Now, the Lancet has agreed to publish an alternative commentary which discusses the possibility that laboratory research might have played a role in the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
It also directly confronts the efforts of science journals to stifle debate by labelling such theories as “misinformation”. …
[The authors say] the February 2020 statement “imparted a silencing effect on the wider scientific debate”.And they say scientists, “need to evaluate all hypotheses on a rational basis, and to weigh their likelihood based on facts and evidence, devoid of speculation concerning possible political impacts”.
Science itself, they go on, should “embrace alternative hypotheses, contradictory arguments, verification, refutability, and controversy” and rather than congratulating China on its supposed “transparency”, they call on the secretive superpower to open up.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
What heresy is this – science should embrace alternative hypotheses …..?
Don’t they understand that in science it is the consensus that rules.
We’ll keep our eyes on Peter Daszak PhD and his friends at the Big Pharma friendly Lancet for the next 3 years at least.
Until Nuremberg 2.0 begins anyway.
Well – I guess its progress.
None of us are qualified to judge with certainty, but it has always seemed to me that the identification of Wuhan as the origin was a supreme geographical coincidence. The staged dramas of collapses in the street also suggested, early in the shit-show, that something smelly was afoot. Like finding dog shit on the shoe.
It has also always seemed possible :
(a) that there is a lot of global shady dealing around ‘gain of function’ research
and
(b) that an intelligence report of a lab escape could be a fortuitous scare to initiate the hysterical reaction across the globe, then transmuted into an opportunist’s wet dream
Essentially they’ve seen which way the wind is blowing (as elements at the Telegraph are now doing, in my opinion) and have changed their tune. No wonder they fit in with the political elite and MSM.
Both the original letter and the change of heart are correspondence not articles. As such they are not peer reviewed and do not represent the views of the Lancet any more than a letter to the Times represents the views of the Times.
I do not think that “letters” to any publication are routinely peer reviewed before publication. The letter in question contained some statements that were unfortunate to say the least and now look very biased, simplistic, self serving very unprofessional, and very wrong; the “undersigned” were organised by, so it seems, at least 2 if not more people who were severely conflicted – an originator of US taxpayers funding, a recipient thereof and at the same time a sub funder of the Wuhan lab research – I take the research that 27/28 co-signees have some links to China at its face value – I have no way of independently verifying these links.
It increasingly looks like a desperate attempt to deflect serious scrutiny of the circumstances of GoF/SARS etc – and that inevitably invites the comment “what are you trying to hide”; if nothing else, it was very ill advised and the scrutiny they want to avoid is taking place.
This is not a trick question – did the Lancet disassociate themselves from the contents of the letter when they published it – if not, whilst that does not mean they agreed with the statements it contained, it may have laid them wide open to criticism? Another error of judgment imho.
It is perfectly obvious what happened – it was perfectly obvious in February 2020 – and beyond reasonable doubt. It does not require further investigation to find out what happened, only to fill in the details.
https://www.ageofautism.com/2020/01/center-for-health-security-coronavirus-pandemic-event-201-highlight-video.html
So tell me again how we prevent the next pandemic? I take it we have shut down such labs as a first step? No? Still the anti vaxxers are the problem then…wake me up when you can pull your heads outta yer holes thanks.
The Lancet were openly supportive of the John Snow memo. That’s being dissected in this thread…
https://twitter.com/Dr_ScottMc/status/1439474976705466369
I think it’s absolutely a key element to this whole scam to unpick those that initiated this rear guard and their backers. By doing so, we can open people’s eyes to the rest of the capture that has undermined science and public health all our lives. Vested interests need weeded out.
“Scientists” need to be reminded that science is not a beauty contest. Participating in such “give us likes” sort of petitions says more about the participants than about the subject matter (of course, this also applies to the opposing camp).
Remember when any suggestions of lab origin were Tinfoil hat, David Icke conspiracy theorist lunacies?
Now its gone awfully quiet.
Precisely.
I would love to see this as some kind of sea-change, but I’ve been so disappointed so many times before.
The Lancet -“Objective Open and Transparent” do me a favour…….
A bit like The Groan then?
Is it possible that the 27 ‘leading public health experts’ (or at least 26 of them, presumably excluding Peter Daszak) have gone public with their change of heart on the culpability of the Chinese in the release and/or spread of COVID-19?
The Lancet exposed itself as a criminal organisation – along with other disgraced criminal organsations such as Oxford University, Imperial College, the BBC etc – when they did a number on HCQ and ran sham articles/studies using made up/fraudulent data, which were subsequently retracted after they got found out and exposed.
The people in the press who have facilitated this scam and spread lies and misinformation, plus members of the medical establishment – their days in court are coming and there is nowhere to hide for them because their lies are a matter of public record. People in the media were prosecuted under Nuremberg and the same fate awaits these snakes.
The Lancet Retracts Hydroxychloroquine Study
https://www.webmd.com/lung/news/20200605/lancet-retracts-hydroxychloroquine-study
Pure criminality from these lowlife scumbags.