It’s been less than a week since reports suggested Pfizer was preparing to seek approval from U.S. and European medicines agencies for its vaccine in 5-11 year-olds. The pharmaceutical is now seeking authorisation for the vaccination of American babies as young as six months this winter. MailOnline has the story.
In a move likely to cause international controversy, the company intends to apply for authorisation to immunise American infants within the next two months.
The timeline will depend on the findings of in-house trials looking into whether the vaccines are safe and effective in youngsters aged six months to five years.
Frank D’Amelio, Chief Financial Officer at Pfizer, told an industry conference yesterday that the firm plans to “go file” by November, the Financial Times reports.
“We would expect to have… data for children between the ages of six months and five years old that we would file with the FDA,” D’Amelio said at the Morgan Stanley Global Healthcare Conference. “I’ll call it in the weeks shortly thereafter the filing of the data for the five to 11 year-olds.”
Pfizer was already planning to seek approval from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the jabs to be given in children aged five to 11 by October.
But the latest comments confirm the firm’s intention to work its way down much younger age groups. They will be given a lower dose than adults. …
Scott Gottlieb, who headed the FDA under former President Donald Trump and now sits on the board of directors at Pfizer, says that the emergency use approval process for vaccinating young children could be done in a matter of weeks.
Gottlieb says the pharmaceutical giant is expected to file the paperwork with the federal government requesting authorisation to vaccinate kids as early as September.
Worth reading in full.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Hey! Pfizer!
Leave them kids alone!
…you odious bastards
Evil Evil Evil
Unmask … and make life smiles better for the deaf By Dr Gary Sidley
-https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/unmask-and-make-life-smiles-better-for-the-deaf/
***********************************
Stand in the Park Bracknell South Hill Park
Sundays from 10am
Wednesdays from 2pm
Make friends – keep sane
Telegram http://t.me/astandintheparkbracknell
Stand in the Park Reading River Promenade Reading
Sundays from 10am
Telegram https://t.me/standindparkreading
*********************************
Upcoming peaceful anti lockdown events
Saturday 18th September 12pm
at Chequers meet up point as below
Coombe Hill Car Park
Lodge Hill, Aylesbury HP17 0UR
yellow boards with other banners and maybe a little protest outside BJ mansion
Saturday 18th September 11:30am
Grand Stand in the Park
Grove Park (nr basketball court),
21 Mill Ln, Carshalton SM5 2AN –
Dr Niall McCrae (Workers of England Union)
Anna De Buisseret (Lawyer) Kate Shemirani
Sunday 19th September 2021 12pm to 3pm
Surrey’s Super Stand in the Park ,
Stoke Park,
Nightingale Rd,
Guildford GU1 1ER. – after your local Stands!!
Monday 20th September 5pm
Big Yellow Boards roadside event
Pavement outside (Morrisons The Peel Centre),
Skimped Hill Ln, Bracknell RG12 1EN
Saturday 2nd October 2pm
GRAND STAND IN THE PARK BERKSHIRE
– with a couple of guest speakers and a stroll thought the town centre at the end
Reading River Promenade
Reading RG4 8BX
Saturday 16th October 1pm
Combined Berks/Bucks/Oxon/Surrey MEGA Yellow Board-Hold the Line
Stafferton Way
Maidenhead
SL6 1AY
This just in from Alex Berenson..
Pfizer basically hasn’t bothered to test the booster AT ALL in the people actually at risk – it conducted a single “Phase 1” trial that covered 12 people over 65. The main Phase 2/3 booster trial (beware efforts to cover multiple “phases” of drug research at once, you want it bad you get it bad) included no one over 55.
No one.
As in NONE.
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/are-you-kidding-me-pfizer-volume
So I’m guessing the trials for babies will be equally detailed..not
An interesting quote in Berenson’s article was:
“An additional analysis appears to indicate that incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study participants with increasing time post-Dose 2 at the start of the analysis period.”
Speaking of boosters.
A study of vaccinated people has shown how quickly immunity fades, with those receiving Moderna shots from last year already TWICE as likely to get sick from coronavirus – the pharma giant’s own data showed.
No coincidence then that the firm currently developing booster shots, has revealed that boosters are needed…
Subscribe to RT t.me/rtintl
So, just so that I am reading this correctly, does this mean that my elderly double jabbed parents (well over 65), who have got god knows what brand already, if they get a booster and it is Pfizer, then no one knows before they get it what it is going to do to them and the potential for ANY harms or side effects?????
Clinical trials? 2023?
Cost/benefit?
This is a world sicker than I ever thought possible.
We’re all disposable in this war to centralise all power, and control every aspect of our lives. What is being done to children is truly inhuman, I am having trouble believing at this point that it not about radical population reduction.
Nothing else makes much sense, does it?
That’s what Yeadon thinks now. He used to say that anything could be delivered via rna jabs, and the degree of lying and coercion going on made him think what was coming was probably sterilisation. ie towards a climate change agenda. Now he thinks that eventually, say the eighth jab, will just kill. With vax id it would be possible to do that selectively, of course.
There aren’t any good explanations for what is going on, certainly.
Yes, broadly that is what I think.
There’s clearly full on international coordination because the fictions being maintained are so badly wrong that they couldn’t have been reached by luck.
On boosters, it simply doesn’t stand up from an immunological standpoint.
If the two-dose vaccination worked at all, it cannot “wear off” in a few short months.
Measuring antibodies in blood alone isn’t a test of immunity. In any case, in most cases you do expect a fall off because that’s what happens if you’re not continually being exposed to the virus.
Worse is that any degree of immunity you now have will be turned on, FULL FORCE, to attack any tissues expressing the virus spike protein.
So I find it genuinely terrifying that they’ve blithely announced its booster time.
Steve Kirsch, an MIT trained PhD & entrepreneur, has assembled a highly experienced team & they’re arguably the experts at reviewing the adverse events filed to VAERS. His team is very concerned about boosters.
Blimey the last 18 months have really opened one’s eyes – and I used to think I was a cynical pessimistic misanthrope
I doubt they’ll be more diligent than with the booster trials.
300 people in the trial only. Only 12 over 65. No control group.
That’s what Berenson writes about it:
“The FDA just released its briefing book for Pfizer’s request for a third dose of Comirnaty (or is that BNT162b2? No matter! It’s approved either way, sorta).
It is every bit the mess we all expected.
Let’s go to the highlights:
Pfizer basically hasn’t bothered to test the booster AT ALL in the people actually at risk – it conducted a single “Phase 1” trial that covered 12 people over 65. The main Phase 2/3 booster trial (beware efforts to cover multiple “phases” of drug research at once, you want it bad you get it bad) included no one over 55.
No one.
As in NONE.
Which makes total sense – why test the booster in people who actually need it because they’re at high risk from the ro? Nothing good can come of that.
So that’s our trial design.
Now safety:
Of the 300 people who received the booster, one had a heart attack two months later. No worries, Pfizer concluded it wasn’t related. Yay!
Five percent of recipients had enlarged lymph nodes.
How about effectiveness?
Well, we don’t have enough data – or any data, really – telling us how well the booster will work.
But the FDA made Pfizer go back and review its data from the pivotal clinical trial from last year. Pfizer compared people who received the vaccine with those who received the placebo and THEN the vaccine (the best we can do at this point, since Pfizer blew up the trial by giving placebo subjects the vaccine, double-yay!)
Pfizer concluded that your annual risk of getting Covid-19 IF YOU ARE VACCINATED is about 7 percent.
Further:
“An additional analysis appears to indicate that incidence of COVID-19 generally increased in each group of study participants with increasing time post-Dose 2 at the start of the analysis period.”
Oh.
But don’t worry, Uncle Joe already told you you can get your booster on September 20. If it’s good enough for our fearless leader, it should be good enough for the FDA, amirite?”
SCIENCE!
SOURCE: https://www.fda.gov/media/152176/download
Posted at the same time. Same point made though
Worth subscribing to Berenson’s Substack. Get him back to the number of followers he had before Twitter shut him down… let’s annoy Twitter.
Pure evil
Disgusting.
Does anyone know if the posts on Twitter about a pregnant woman coerced into double jabbing late on, baby delivered with severe neurological problems, in Gt Ormond St, are true? There’s film around, I hear.
Severe neurological problems as a result of the rna jabs are being described in detail in the States, but not I think yet admitted by our overlords. Too easy to dismiss tremors, headaches, pain, as psychological. But since there was a case in the Pfizer child trial, I imagine it could soon become more difficult to ignore.
This is more about the case you are referring to – begins at about 19 minutes 40 seconds on this link. Note that the video footage of the baby is repeated in the one segment but that is neither here nor there. If it is genuine, it is extremely disturbing.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/CRoFalm8mfSO/
20 mins into this – whole vid is good especially the wall projections organising protests following the social media ban in Aus
THE CROWHOUSE – THE AWAKENING IS GROWING
https://www.bitchute.com/video/hlxor1DpIhKC/
Who the fuck is putting their babies forward for trials? Beyond wrong.
That’s the New Normal – isn’t it just the best!
There is an urgency to all this now which is not just beyond sinister but beyond evil.
First, they pick on under 18’s who statistically face zero risk from C1984, absolutely ZERO and now its babies.
Babies for God’s sake. So not withstanding the children they will inevitably kill they want to totally F.ck the immune systems of these poor, helpless children leading to slow and painful deaths in later years.
If people cannot see the depopulation agenda being played out before their eyes then what is required to wake them up?
Toby, your previous short essay advocating cock-up theory is now quite clearly blown apart. It’s in BITS never to be resurrected.
F.kin Hell.
God Help Us.
Slaved zombies from cradle to the grave, hooked on boosters and patches for life, if they live that long. Why are we rubber stamping these SS Dentists?
All completely above board nothing to see here.
“Scott Gottlieb, who headed the FDA under former President Donald Trump and now sits on the board of directors at Pfizer…”
Although on the surface this appears as evil as hell (and it is) I think there’s something else intended here. In a word division. It seems highly plausible to me that the aim of all this is to create a dangerous schism through society, and ultimately social unrest. Those not willing to participate are being ‘othered’ and we see the emergence of two tribes, who each see themselves as biologically superior. A recipe for the worst excesses of human behaviour. In other words disaster capitalism. I think that civil war is what is intended for western society. This seems more plausible than the other apocalyptic alternative: depopulation. A great way to distract the masses from an impending financial collapse perhaps.
It’s depopulation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jY4Wahyo5n0
Will the baby need parental approval or can it make its own decision?
It can overrule its parents in order to choose to be jabbed, but not in order to refuse to be jabbed. Just lime its pitiful siblings.
Big Pharma rakes it in.
Pharma sponsors advertising revenue for the MSM – MSM sings Vax praises.
Socialist BBC pursues globalism, big government agenda.
Government retains full control and plans its digital ID rollout aka V Passports.
People rebel.
Stop their fun.
Enough is enough.
“If you tolerate this then your children will be next.”
This is utterly depraved. For crying out loud this shit is EXPERIMENTAL!!
The next injection will go right into the nuts so that your kid can be conceived already vaccinated.
No surprise this is happening. If it has a pulse, they want it jabbed !!!
Harm a hair on a child’s head and wait to see how fast the touch paper will burn the whole house of cards down
Jesus Christ.
Not a blasphemy, an invocation.
Save the children.
This is related to the preceding article in which Toby states it’s all just a big cock up!
NO TOBY! WAKE UP MAN!
This is out and out profiteering. Pfizer is making billions, they practically run the FDA, they have their fingers in every Government, Media outlet, tech company, academic institution, there is nowhere outside of their reach.
They have squashed any mention of early treatment, to the point that in most people’s minds there is no treatment other than the poison clot shot, they are lobbying Governments to the tune of millions, that everyone must be vaccinated
AND THEY ARE COMING AFTER OUR CHILDREN.
But that’s all just coincidence!
I’m sorry Toby but you are officially a
lamb to the slaughter.
Big Pharma is profiteering. That’s what they do. They’ve been corrupt for years. And as I say, there appears to be a coup d’etat now.
No further comment
I think this is the point at which those of us who have previously eschewed the term ‘anti-vaxxers’ need to embrace it.
We are all anti-vaxxers now.
NO, NO, NO
This is criminality of the highest order.
Any parent who subjects their child to this totally unnecessary procedure should face charges of child abuse.
Where is the proof of an Emergency? The not-vaccines are licenced for Emergency Use Only and there is no Emergency, there never has been. This is completely and utterly insane. Nobody knows what the long term issues of these evil drugs will be yet it seems everybody on the planet will eventually have them except myself and my wife.
And me!
Me Too!
Don’t worry! You’re definitely not alone, even thought it might seem like it. There are far more of us than the powers-that-be want to admit.
Babies will be able to give informed consent will they? For experimental medication?
It’s looking more and more like Mike Yeadon is right. Depopulation is in full effect. Evil bastards!
But we are certain that Pfizer has nothing but grace and light in their heart, not profit.
Ive never has an issue with approving the medicine (with appropriate data) for immuno compromised children. But since 98%+ of all children don’t call into that count, it’s not something they should be pushing. Sorry, I’m a capitalist and anti-conspiracy theorist but, Pfizer’s motives do begin to see a bit unseemly as they seek to alley fears parents have that are not grounded in any reality.
Who has shares in Pfizer? You’ll be laughing all the way to the bank…why don’t you also invest in weapons/arms…? You already have…injecting poison into babies ‘arms’. Absolutely grotesque
Bill Gates’ wet dream has come true. The American Way.
Words simply fail me. When I hold my grandaughter in my arms, perfect as given by God, the idea of injecting her with a gene altering poison is incomprehensible.The total breaking of trust and responsibility that would entail. Fu** off you bastards..
Ask TY, I’m sure it must be a cockup.
The so-called clinical trial is no such thing. A trial seeks to determine whether or not the test article protects the recipient & also whether or not it’s safe.
Such trials are no less onerous just because we’re dealing with young people.
the Phase 3 trials involved >40,000 individuals. I read the trial in children recruited 300 people.
Its entirely possible, likely perhaps, that no one in either the active group nor the placebo group will acquire the virus.
Even if a tiny number did, effectiveness couldn’t be judged because kids just don’t get ill with this virus.
Even worse is the sleight of hand on safety. If there was a serious adverse effect which occurred 1 in 3000 people, the chances are that it would be missed.
Thank you for posting Sir, it is much appreciated. The simple fact that you come on here and TCW gives a big lift to me and I am sure many others.
God bless.
Roughly 6% of us have ditched the masks.
From little acorns, etc.
So what happens after Pfizer finally runs out of people to vaccinate? Will it be domestic pets next? Then trees? Human greed knows no bounds.
It’s impossible to know the long term damage that could be caused by any of these new vaccines, which have not been tested for long enough. Its obvious that the objective of drug companies is the profit they can make by selling more and more vaccine. Do they still have government immunity from prosecution if their vaccines cause death or health damage? If they do now is the time to remove it. The next drug company con will be vaccinating pets.