• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Has the Government Been Undermining Social Norms by Imposing Inconvenient Rules It Cannot Enforce?

by Noah Carl
26 July 2021 8:46 AM

Since the start of the pandemic, the Government has introduced a plethora of rules concerning when we can and cannot leave our homes.

Anyone with symptoms is meant to self-isolate at home. Ditto for anyone who tests positive or who comes into contact with someone who’s tested positive. People travelling to Britain from overseas must self-isolate too (except football VIPs). And during the lockdown last year, we weren’t supposed to leave our homes for any reason other than work, exercise or food shopping.

Needless to say, these rules have made life difficult for a lot of people – particularly those who travel regularly, or who manage a small business. The current ‘pingdemic’ is wreaking havoc on Britain’s economy, as service-providers struggle to meet demand for lack of staff.

While asking symptomatic people to self-isolate arguably makes sense, it’s less clear whether all the other rules and regulations can be justified. In a 2019 report on pandemic influenza, the WHO recommended things such as ventilation of indoor spaces and isolation of symptomatic individuals. However, it classified “quarantine of exposed individuals” as “not recommended in any circumstances”.

Aside from the considerable inconvenience they cause, there’s another potential downside of the lockdown rules. Because they’re so difficult to enforce, large numbers of people are simply ignoring them. And might this, in turn, be undermining general norms of law-abidingness?

A major study published in The BMJ back in March found that only 43% of symptomatic people fully adhered to self-isolation – and that was based on data from last year, when the disease was seen as much more of a threat. It’s likely that a similar or even lower percentage of people have been complying with all the other rules.

Why does this matter? Studies have shown that when people observe norms being violated, they become more likely to violate norms themselves, leading to the gradual erosion of norm compliance. For example, a 2008 paper found that people were more likely to litter when there was graffiti next to a “No graffiti” sign than when there were no obvious signs of norm violation.

Regarding the pandemic itself, there’s already evidence that the scandal surrounding Dominic Cummings’ trip to Barnard Castle had a negative effect on adherence to lockdown rules. People reasoned, “If he’s not following the rules, then why should I?”

But the effect might be even more general than that. After witnessing so many examples of lockdown violations over the past year and a half, might people have become more likely to break other rules in society as well? I’m not aware of any evidence of this at the present time, but it doesn’t seem at all implausible.

Of course, one might say: even if the lockdown rules have slightly undermined law-abidingness, they were worth it to control the epidemic. Given the lack of evidence on stay-at-home orders, I am rather doubtful of this. But at the very least, there’s yet another potential cost of lockdown for us to consider.

Tags: LockdownsSocial normsTest and Trace

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

News Round-Up

Next Post

Minister Confirms Government Not Ruling Out Barring University Students From Lectures and Halls

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

65 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

The Sceptic | Episode 43: William Yarwood on Labour’s Welfare Farce, Niall Gooch on Catholicism vs Lib Dems and Much More

by Richard Eldred
4 July 2025
0

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Introducing POTS: The Next Social Contagion to Grip Miserable Teenage Girls

7 July 2025
by Mary Gilleece

This Is How Mass Migration Will Change Britain Beyond Recognition

6 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

7 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

Angela Rayner to Put ‘Banter Police’ in Your Office

6 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

Another Oil Refinery Bites the Dust

7 July 2025
by Ben Pile

This Is How Mass Migration Will Change Britain Beyond Recognition

31

Introducing POTS: The Next Social Contagion to Grip Miserable Teenage Girls

28

Another Oil Refinery Bites the Dust

27

Met Police Commissioner: “Non-Crime Hate Incidents Are Poor Policy”

26

Angela Rayner to Put ‘Banter Police’ in Your Office

42

Introducing POTS: The Next Social Contagion to Grip Miserable Teenage Girls

7 July 2025
by Mary Gilleece

Another Oil Refinery Bites the Dust

7 July 2025
by Ben Pile

The Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion Cannot Save Multiculturalism

6 July 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Germany is Not Being Honest About Who is Assaulting Children at Swimming Pools

5 July 2025
by Eugyppius

Defunding Gavi is Good for Public Health

5 July 2025
by Dr David Bell

POSTS BY DATE

July 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jun   Aug »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

POSTS BY DATE

July 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
« Jun   Aug »

DONATE

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Most Read
  • Most Commented
  • Editor’s Picks

Introducing POTS: The Next Social Contagion to Grip Miserable Teenage Girls

7 July 2025
by Mary Gilleece

This Is How Mass Migration Will Change Britain Beyond Recognition

6 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

News Round-Up

7 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

Angela Rayner to Put ‘Banter Police’ in Your Office

6 July 2025
by Richard Eldred

Another Oil Refinery Bites the Dust

7 July 2025
by Ben Pile

This Is How Mass Migration Will Change Britain Beyond Recognition

31

Introducing POTS: The Next Social Contagion to Grip Miserable Teenage Girls

28

Another Oil Refinery Bites the Dust

27

Met Police Commissioner: “Non-Crime Hate Incidents Are Poor Policy”

26

Angela Rayner to Put ‘Banter Police’ in Your Office

42

Introducing POTS: The Next Social Contagion to Grip Miserable Teenage Girls

7 July 2025
by Mary Gilleece

Another Oil Refinery Bites the Dust

7 July 2025
by Ben Pile

The Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion Cannot Save Multiculturalism

6 July 2025
by Laurie Wastell

Germany is Not Being Honest About Who is Assaulting Children at Swimming Pools

5 July 2025
by Eugyppius

Defunding Gavi is Good for Public Health

5 July 2025
by Dr David Bell

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

wpDiscuz
You are going to send email to

Move Comment