• Login
  • Register
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In
The Daily Sceptic
No Result
View All Result

Britain Will Achieve Herd Immunity on Monday

by Toby Young
7 April 2021 11:10 PM

According to a Telegraph exclusive, the number of people with protection either through vaccination or previous infection will hit 73.4% on April 12th – the herd immunity threshold. Sarah Knapton, the Telegraph’s Science Editor, has more.

Britain will pass the threshold for herd immunity on Monday, according to dynamic modelling by University College London (UCL), placing more pressure on the Government to move faster in releasing restrictions.

According to the UCL results, published this week, the number of people who have protection against the virus either through vaccination or previous infection will hit 73.4% on April 12th – enough to tip the country into herd immunity.

The number is in stark contrast to the modelling released by Imperial College this week, which suggested there was just 34% protection by the end of March.

Last week, antibody testing by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) suggested that, in the week ending March 14th, around 54% of people in England already had antibodies to the virus, and slightly less in the devolved nations.

Since then, a further 7.1 million people have received a first dose of vaccine and nearly 100,000 have tested positive for the virus, with many more acquiring a silent, asymptomatic infection.

It is thought about one in 10 people also have some innate immunity through infections with other coronaviruses – pushing population-level protection up further – while others may be immune through T-cells, which would not be picked up in antibody testing.

Worth reading in full.

Stop Press: At the end of this story there is a very encouraging note about the Government’s unhappiness with the models SPI-M is relying on for the latest advice it’s feeding the Government via SAGE. Interestingly, almost all the points the Government has raised are points raised by Glen Bishop and others on Lockdown Sceptics.

The Telegraph understands that the Government is unhappy with the pessimistic tone set by models produced by SPI-M, released earlier this week, and has asked other groups to critique the work. The SPI-M summary, presented to SAGE, suggested the roadmap out of lockdown was “highly likely” to lead to increased hospital cases and deaths this summer.

The models were criticised for using out of date and flawed assumptions about levels of population immunity and effectiveness of the vaccine as well as failing to factor in reductions in transmission due to vaccination and seasonality.

Prof Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine at Oxford University, said: “In my 20-plus years as a doctor, I’ve never come across a summer surge in a respiratory infection in the UK. The modelling now keeps changing dramatically, so it’s hard to see how it helps us. What we really want to do is look at the real-world data and make decisions from there.

“One of the problems is nobody is going back and checking whether the modelling matched up with the reality. We know that modelling in schools has not helped us because it was incorrect. So we need to have a reality check.”

Stop Press 2: Matt Hancock has dismissed claims that herd immunity will be reached next week. The Times has the story.

[The Health Secretary] appeared unmoved by the optimistic claims. “I was told by some scientists that we were going to have herd immunity in May and then in June and then after that,” he told LBC.

“What I prefer to do is watch the data. We’ve set out the roadmap, the roadmap is really clear. It is our route back to normal. We’re on track to meet the roadmap and that is our goal.”

Pressed on why he was not accepting UCL’s claims, Hancock replied: “I think we have taken the right course in plotting our way to freedom and doing it carefully because we want it to be irreversible. We have seen what happens when this virus gets going and we are seeing it getting going right now on the continent and other parts of the world – some of the scenes are really appalling.

“We want to get out of this safely and irreversibly and that’s why we set out the roadmap.”

Also worth reading in full.

Tags: Herd immunityUCL

Donate

We depend on your donations to keep this site going. Please give what you can.

Donate Today

Comment on this Article

You’ll need to set up an account to comment if you don’t already have one. We ask for a minimum donation of £5 if you'd like to make a comment or post in our Forums.

Sign Up
Previous Post

HSBC Moves More Than 1,200 UK Staff to Permanent Home Working

Next Post

News Round Up

Subscribe
Login
Notify of
Please log in to comment

To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.

Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.

66 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Grahamb
Grahamb
3 years ago

So not safe and effective. Difficult to argue against people being lied to. Either things like this were not known and the trial status was over used or a small group of people knew and let it happen. Neither are good.

90
0
dante
dante
3 years ago
Reply to  Grahamb

I imagine this study will be ignored like all the others. Anyone want their children jabbed? We are happy to accommodate that 🤯

37
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Grahamb

“At this stage, we do not know if DNA reverse transcribed from BNT162b2 is integrated into the cell genome,” the authors wrote. “Further studies are needed to demonstrate the effect of BNT162b2 on genomic integrity, including whole genome sequencing of cells exposed to BNT162b2, as well as tissues from human subjects who received BNT162b2 vaccination.”

Surely, before this crap was injected into the arms of almost 2 thirds of the people on the planet – perhaps more – and in some cases by mandate, these studies should already have been done beforehand and this should have been categorically ruled out – no?

And this is what is now referred to as “the science”.

Last edited 3 years ago by Milo
24
0
Bolloxed Britannia
Bolloxed Britannia
3 years ago

😐 Are there any conspiracy theories left?
The train now leaving 1984 is destined for the Brave New World….
“Politicians are not born;
they are excreted”.
Marcus Tullius Cicero

78
0
mariawarmth
mariawarmth
3 years ago
Reply to  Bolloxed Britannia

😅ha ha you made me chuckle … but it is so wrong if this is true!!
I am going to work shortly training day and we have been told by text to test… but no proof now needed. I have no sump but apparently I have to test ..
i will have to bite my lip because I want to tell them they need to stop this nonsense.. but need my job
have a good day all x

46
-1
VeryLittleHelps
VeryLittleHelps
3 years ago
Reply to  Bolloxed Britannia

1984 and Brave New World were meant to be a warning, not a bloody instruction manual.

47
0
Bolloxed Britannia
Bolloxed Britannia
3 years ago
Reply to  VeryLittleHelps

I concur…

11
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  VeryLittleHelps

seems that they should have come with a “burn after reading” warning lest they fall into the wrong hands

2
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago

I read lots about viruses, exosomes etc, in 2020 and one thing that really struck me was how much of our “own” DNA is actually made up of old viruses that our cell nucleii for some reason incorporated into themselves.

So it doesnt surprise me that a “vaccine” which is actually a kind of virus, ie is made up of mRNA that instructs our cells to produce a protein just like a “real” virus does, might also become part of human DNA …

… the question is what is it going to do and it doesn’t sound good. 🙁

Last edited 3 years ago by Amtrup
50
0
dante
dante
3 years ago
Reply to  Amtrup

The mind blowing aspect is that they have injected this into people not knowing, there are too many unknowns! This should be pulled NOW, no wonder people turn to conspiracy.

Last edited 3 years ago by dante
48
0
twinkytwonk
twinkytwonk
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

Oh, they knew. Release of official Pfizer data from Australia

https://youtu.be/WmeWdc6-mwg

7
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

“turn to conspiracy”??

The “conspiracy” has been proved to be true almost 99% of the time and it is the “narrative” which has been shown to be nothing more than falsified data, junk science and a tissue of lies.

Last night on his GB NEWS programme Mark Dolan as his opening monologue urged his viewers to “question everything”

No 2 more true words were ever spoken.

18
0
Jon Garvey
Jon Garvey
3 years ago
Reply to  Amtrup

Let’s conjecturethat it can also get into germ cell lines, and that when expressed it causes some harmful diseases. It could then be inherited.

You might hope that it would become extinct by natural selection, but that’s another over-simplification of Attenborough-type Darwinism. It could, instead, easily spread through the population by genetic drift according to near-neutral theory, even if deleterious, and cause harm to increasing numbers over generations.

Well done, you clever fellows.

33
0
BeBopRockSteady
BeBopRockSteady
3 years ago
Reply to  Amtrup

The virus itself, if you believe in such a thing, has been shown to do exactly that.

https://www.pnas.org/content/118/21/e2105968118

1
0
Freecumbria
Freecumbria
3 years ago
Reply to  Amtrup

Yes, likewise on the reading. I come at it as a layperson who has done a lot of reading.

I remember Zac Bush saying that 52% of the genes inside our body come from viruses that have been incorporated into our DNA.

The issue is that the incorporation of viruses into our DNA is one of the body’s most carefully controlled functions for obvious reasons. What we incorporate into our DNA defines our future existence as a species. To override those decisions through an experimental vaccine for a single virus and think that this meddling isn’t problematic is crassly stupid.

I’d never appreciated the symbiotic relationship we have with the virome. A lot of evolution apparently has come from viral transfer between species, so called horizontal gene transfer, rather than by classic gene mutations or sexual selection

I don’t properly understand what the potential problems are. But as Peter McCullough tweets

Side-by-side important reports reverse transcription, nuclear DNA code for Spike, both significant discoveries. Enormous implications of permanent chromosomal change and long-term constitutive Spike synthesis driving the pathogenesis of a whole new genre of chronic diseases.

Last edited 3 years ago by Freecumbria
12
0
Dodgy Geezer
Dodgy Geezer
3 years ago

What will the politicians do if this turns out to be a problem?

Ban any mention of it, I suppose…

56
0
RobbieT
RobbieT
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

They’ll put the blame onto jab-recipients for consenting to it. That whole “informed consent” thing that 95% of people ignored in favour of getting their facebook profile picture frame updated with “Thanks NHS for the vaccine”.

20
0
twinkytwonk
twinkytwonk
3 years ago
Reply to  RobbieT

Oh god those pictures whilst proudly displaying the sticker. Just a cringe fest

11
0
rtaylor
rtaylor
3 years ago
Reply to  Dodgy Geezer

Politicians are rats. They will turn against big pharmika the moment they have to save their own skins. Their issue will be the Covidians who took the poison, not us.

Last edited 3 years ago by rtaylor
12
0
Sforzesca
Sforzesca
3 years ago

They said this could not and would not happen – might have put a fair few off I’d say, so fact checkers trotted out what they had been fed by big pharma.
What the future holds for the mrna jabbed, I know not.

What the results of the study actually mean remains to be seen – thoughts on that any geneticists/experts on this?

33
0
BeBopRockSteady
BeBopRockSteady
3 years ago
Reply to  Sforzesca

Indeed

https://www.reuters.com/article/factcheck-coronavirus-vaccines-idUSL1N2PK1DC

https://factcheck.thedispatch.com/p/could-the-mrna-vaccines-permanently?utm_source=url

1
0
JeremyP99
JeremyP99
3 years ago
Reply to  BeBopRockSteady

“Fact” checking should be renamed “Ideology” checking.

13
0
scamdemic
scamdemic
3 years ago

As much as I’m sure this is factual, it goes against the narrative and thus is a waste of our thoughts.

6
0
refusenick
refusenick
3 years ago

… and then causes cancer: https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/dna-transcribed-from-pfizer-mrna?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo0NDU4MDkxMiwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDk0NTAzNTcsIl8iOiJ2TE5SZSIsImlhdCI6MTY0NjAzMzM2NiwiZXhwIjoxNjQ2MDM2OTY2LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNDQxMTg1Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.InFqIQ-Nna12cAy9vdw7NMt9UsQliDAa32EadypnGkw&utm_source=url

16
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  refusenick

Good grief. Thx for the link.

6
0
Occams Pangolin Pie
Occams Pangolin Pie
3 years ago
Reply to  refusenick

Blimey! Nothing to see here.

No wonder Russia / Ukraine has become the BIG ‘No, look over here’ spectacular.

Maybe they’ll have to keep it going forever à la Orwell.

13
0
JayBee
JayBee
3 years ago

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=245270
What it means….

13
0
Amtrup
Amtrup
3 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

Great explanation, thank you for the link.

3
0
dante
dante
3 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

Terrifying! This is head in the sand stuff.

“But we didn’t bother doing intermediate and longer-term study on the specifics of using mRNA (or, for that matter, a modified virus as with J&J) to deliver a partial viral payload in this regard before rolling it out. Instead, we just trusted that there’d be no integration. Indeed zero epigenic, mutagenic and teratogenic studies were done; they take years to do and we just flat-out didn’t bother. Where we had original control groups in the summer and fall of 2020 we intentionally destroyed them by giving the placebo arm of the original trials the drug three months later, making analysis on any sort of clean analytical basis impossible.”

Last edited 3 years ago by dante
33
0
Will
Will
3 years ago
Reply to  JayBee

I hope to goodness he is wrong…

2
0
BillRiceJr
BillRiceJr
3 years ago
Reply to  Will

He’s probably not.

1
0
dante
dante
3 years ago

Dr Been does a brilliant short video explaining this study for the non scientists

https://youtu.be/MjxlvduyJyc

10
0
Moderate Radical
Moderate Radical
3 years ago
Reply to  dante

There’s a poster in the comments section of that video (handle: Genesis Lung) claiming to be a molecular biologist, and he’s misrepresenting the paper. I’ve tried posting a rebuttal to his misrepresentations but YouTube keeps deleting my post every time I try, even after I’ve taken out all potential ‘sensitive’ words/terms. It’s a joke. He’s claiming the paper does not say what it clearly says, so I posted this. It’s a similar post to what I posted here when the paper was published:

@Genesis Lung

You’re misrepresenting the paper:

‘In the BNT162b2 toxicity report, no genotoxicity nor carcinogenicity studies have been provided. Our study shows that BNT162b2 can be reverse transcribed to DNA in liver cell line Huh7, and this may give rise to the concern [that] BNT162b2-derived DNA may be integrated into the host genome and affect the integrity of genomic DNA, which may potentially mediate genotoxic side effects.’

(My emphasis)

https://www.mdpi.com/1467-3045/44/3/73/htm

‘Genomic DNA, or gDNA, is the chromosomal DNA of an organism, representing the bulk of its genetic material.’

http://www.biocompare.com/Cloning-and-Expression/6772-Genomic-DNA/

‘Genotoxicity is defined as a destructive effect affecting the integrity of the genetic material of the cells (DNA, RNA).’

https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/pharmacology-toxicology-and-pharmaceutical-science/genotoxicity

So, this clearly raises the possibility that BNT162b2-derived DNA may affect the integrity of recipients’ genomic/chromosomal DNA which in turn may bring about genotoxic/destructive side effects.’

——————————

That’s it. Yet YouTube found something in that heavily moderated edit that it didn’t like.

There are narrativemongers popping up in different places saying one of two things, that the paper doesn’t say what it clearly says, or that it doesn’t ‘prove’ anything (which, of course, the paper never claims or sets out to do). These narrativemongers are evidently banking on people not having read the paper.

Last edited 3 years ago by Moderate Radical
11
0
BJs Brain is Missing
BJs Brain is Missing
3 years ago

This is what happens when man plays God. Who on Earth and who in their right mind thought that natural immunity, developed over millions of years, was inferior to a lab made concoction, developed over a few months and rushed into the marketplace?

‘Market’ being the operative word…

Last edited 3 years ago by BJs Brain is Missing
65
-1
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
TheyLiveAndWeLockdown
3 years ago
Reply to  BJs Brain is Missing

What market?, the jabs were coerced and funded by bureaucrats!

6
0
Free Lemming
Free Lemming
3 years ago

This won’t see light of day in MSM. Might get trashed by a ‘fact’ checker, but that’ll be about it. We live in wholly Orwellian times, but even Orwell didn’t foresee quite how many of the populace would be duped. Extraordinary.

38
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Free Lemming

I actually believe that this article might be just about one of the most important ever published by DS, as this might be one of the few sites prepared to carry it and explain it, as done by those of us BTL.

0
0
martinbritnell83
martinbritnell83
3 years ago

So that’s ANOTHER conspiracy theory that’s come true…. Damn we are good!

30
0
RobbieT
RobbieT
3 years ago
Reply to  martinbritnell83

I’m 8 out of 8 so far on my “spoiler alerts” (we re-branded from Conspiracy Theorists the accepted 7 year timeline for predictions to become accepted dropped to below 2 years). Not too much sign of Health Camps yet (though HMP Five Wells may be one) but Digital ID and Social Credit are no longer “hiding in plain sight” – indeed are passing through Canadian parliament imminently and there is now MSM chatter about CBDCs being linked to social credit. Next up, a supra-national governance of public health… yep, the WHO will be given over-riding control of “pandemic” response protocols.

Last edited 3 years ago by RobbieT
12
0
Rogerborg
Rogerborg
3 years ago

Expect a reverse-ferret from “This is dangerous fake news” to “We always said this was the intention of the mRNA therapies all along. Now rollup your sleeve for your DNA enhancement top-up”.

15
0
Anonymous
Anonymous
3 years ago

Genetic make-up of each and every person World over is mostly same and also tiny bit unique.
Unlike other animals we don’t have in-built automatic system that inhibits killing another of own species.
Thus, in other animals, numbers relate to genetic variety, but not so in humans.
Concern when numbers of other animals dwindle is insufficient variety for species to not become extinct.
When human genome elucidated, there was not as much variety as expected.
By how far can a person’s genetic make-up be modified (by mRNA jabs, organophosphate contaminated food, radiation etc) before cease to be genetically a human?
WEFetal started launching satellites 1000 at a time Feb 2020, been pouring organophosphates onto crops for decades and enforcing GM crops.
They firmly believe that we’re cause of all World’s problems and eradicating us will solve all problems. Frankly, it seems the other way round.

10
0
loopDloop
loopDloop
3 years ago

The Central Dogma of Evolution, that information only flows one way away from DNA. Turned out to be, errr, wrong. Oh you don’t understand. No, you don’t understand. So now every single person who took the vaccine has the code incorporated into their code whichever way you want to slice it. The floodgates have now been opened and mRNA vaccines have become normalised. We own your DNA. Your code is ours now. Scoff all you like, but this is why the mark of the beast in Revelations is specifically associated with the plague of the first bowl, greek word phialas, same as our word vial: the first vial which is poured out and mankind break out into sores and boils. That’s vaccine right there. And there’s association of the mark with the vaccine right there. Revelation 16:2. So we marched right in thinking we knew everything about how the immune system works and if we just give it a little tweak like that, oops, completely screwed up the genome now. No problem, we have a digital solution. Meanwhile Ezekiel 38 39. But sure, politics.

10
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  loopDloop

Well, I ain’t a Bible man, but I’ll take a look. I believe that “it’s all been done before, there is nothing new…”

I also believe Jesus was a very real guy who was sceptical and revealed the true nature of The Powers That Were. And in a very unenlightened move, they killed him, and created a martyr. I believe he died a human death. I believe that, if he were alive today, he would be dismayed that his fellow humans had turned him into a god. Just as he tried to free mankind by helping them take charge of their own destinies, and not by worshipping false gods…

9
-3
Deborah T
Deborah T
3 years ago

My son has had pretty much a closed mind since the start, believes that Yeadon etc are ‘conspiracy theorists’ and did say that he would not look at anything that wasn’t ‘peer-reviewed’. Well, this is peer-reviewed. But I don’t want to show him, as he’s been willingly triple-jabbed, along with his partner (both in their 20s, hoping to start a family…), as – what good would it do, other than introduce even more ‘cognitive dissonance’, and probably great unhappiness too. After all, he can’t get unjabbed can he? Anyone else facing this problem where in some ways we want those we love to know what the hell has been done to them, but in other ways we don’t?

Last edited 3 years ago by Deborah T
45
0
Marcus Aurelius knew
Marcus Aurelius knew
3 years ago
Reply to  Deborah T

Yes. My 74 yr old mother was pressured into having two jabs by a friend she was living with in urgent circumstances…

13
0
VeryLittleHelps
VeryLittleHelps
3 years ago
Reply to  Deborah T

Just found out a few days ago that my daughter got the jab so she could travel to Paris with her boyfriend. He had it a while ago and his parents are pro all this bollocks (they certainly had a hand in her decision).
Worse still my partner hid this from me and told me there was nothing she could do to stop her. My daughter definitely would have told her in advance, my answer was “well you could have told me for a start”.
I am still trying to come to terms with this, no idea what to do.

17
0
Mr Taxpayer
Mr Taxpayer
3 years ago
Reply to  VeryLittleHelps

My 19 year old son has been jabbed so he can go and work in the US. My wife made the choice to get jabbed too. My daughter went with my wife to get jabbed when she turned 16 before Xmas.
My side-effects sympathy-meter has been set to Zero for all of them. They have made adult choices, they can live with those choices like adults.

18
0
VeryLittleHelps
VeryLittleHelps
3 years ago
Reply to  Mr Taxpayer

She was coerced by his parents, they paid for the air fare. I understand her right to make decisions but for them to help her make it, I have a problem with that. I have never met them and probably best to stay that way.

9
0
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  Deborah T

My whole family! I tried to tell them, but for most it fell on deaf ears.

I got though to my BIL, not in time for him and his wife, but in time for him to reject the boosters, and any jabs for his 3 kids.

GVB shared a spike detox guide some mite find useful to share with family who woke up too late, I would add NAD to it (it helps repair DNA lots of reseach in the longevity field)

https://www.voiceforscienceandsolidarity.org/scientific-blog/spike-protein-detox-guide

7
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  ImpObs

great link!

0
0
rtaylor
rtaylor
3 years ago
Reply to  Deborah T

I’m British Indian and in our clan I’ve observed industrial scale mass psychosis playing out. It’s frightening to witness how many just comply with a TV suit who speaks slowly and has letters after their name. My cousins are far more successful in the their fields of work than myself and all with lovely families, but when it comes to health – I have to admit they just can’t see it. There is a strong case of go along to get along in our culture. For better… or worse.

Currently I’m forwarding actuary data from UK, US and German Life Insurers. Some of my relatives are bean counters so it speaks their language. With cousins who are looking to start a family I forwarded data on the rise of abortions, miscarriages. I am a family photographer at heart, so my profession doesn’t give my kudos and rank in my extended family circle, I’ll leave it there.

I’m always looking to see what can help though. Dr Zelenko has a protocol, Rumble and Bitchute videos are a good point to start. Also, attached is a note, but do not know how well it works at this point.

To be honest, I’m bracing myself for this winter’s flu season. Many people take the flu jab. This may lower the immune system leaving the covid shot to come in and do its damage. Always leave the door open for them, they may just be in denial because of the consequences are that the government are trying to kill us, which I suspect many of my relatives, when their head hits the pillow know.

image_2022-01-26_14-30-08.png
Last edited 3 years ago by rtaylor
16
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  rtaylor

I know the feeling rtaylor – I am similar position – with all my family I am the only one who has seen it and is speaking out so they perceive me as a lone wolf who has “got the wrong end of the stick”.

I can see that they perceive there is safety in numbers and would prefer to go along with what everyone else is doing because “all those people can’t be wrong can they? and after all, our government wouldn’t want to harm us? and look at all those scientific people on the podiums beside the prime minister – they can’t be wrong can they?”

I could go on but I am sure you get my drift. All I can do is continue to challenge the narrative on a regular basis, but a lot of my family have distanced themselves from me and while I know that they are wrong, that doesn’t mean it doesn’t hurt.

1
0
Judy Watson
Judy Watson
3 years ago
Reply to  Deborah T

I think all you can do is sit, wait hope nothing untoward happens and if it does lend a listening ear.

2
0
Milo
Milo
3 years ago
Reply to  Deborah T

Deborah I know exactly how you feel. The jabs cannot be undone and unless someone who is triple jabbed and suffering and wants a protocol to try to reduce that asks me for it I am now reduced to saying nothing about the jabs.

That doesn’t mean I don’t want to say anything to them – because I do believe that people do need to know how they have been duped, just how harmful the jabs are, what they are for, what they will usher in and all in an effort to stop people having any more of the jabs that are most definitely NOT designed to make people healthy.

I am afraid I am currently reading the Librarian of Auschwitz – a brilliant book and the parallels with the present day become more prescient with every day that passes. In 2022 it seems that the gas chambers have been replaced with the mass jabbing centres – the outcome is likely going to be broadly similar.

0
0
Joe 90
Joe 90
3 years ago

..

https _bucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com_public_images_148468ad-5f29-45a3-b0a1-eec3b76d52c2_830x798.jpg
24
0
BeBopRockSteady
BeBopRockSteady
3 years ago

You have to find it hard to believe these companies did not look at whether mRNA is transcribed into DNA in vitro.

Surely that’d be one of the top 5 questions that would be asked when messing with any new gene therapy?

If they just didn’t look for it, that’s just as criminal.

23
0
ImpObs
ImpObs
3 years ago
Reply to  BeBopRockSteady

They knew, look up recent papers from Ralph Baric’s lab (he’ll be a contibuting author) on how they’re trying to get round recombination in mRNA vax research.

Last edited 3 years ago by ImpObs
5
0
thinkcriticall
thinkcriticall
3 years ago

Those darn conspiracy theorists are right yet again!

13
0
RobbieT
RobbieT
3 years ago

Forgive my being behind the curve somewhat, but would somebody please confirm that the AZ job did not have this technology, but most of the others did?
Asking on behalf of jabbed family members.

0
0
bluewoody
bluewoody
3 years ago

Professor Delores Cahill was warning about this early on and explained why. Those who’ve been tracking this thing from the beginning will be aware. Naturally, the ‘fact checkers’ were all over it quoting ‘experts’ making sure that it was branded a conspiracy theory at the time.

The recent paper co-authored by McCullough indicates that the Pfzr effectively disregulates the human gene which acts as a cancer suppressor.

I have an ultra rare inherited genetic condition for which a mRNA gene therapy based drug platform is being utilised to develop a drug therapy. It passed through ‘proof of concept’ a few years back and then onto animal model protocols and has now moved into human trials. This has taken years. Knowing what I know about how long it takes a novel drug therapy to go through testing etc I was instantly aware that this c19 new drug could not possibly be declared ‘safe and effective’ in merely a few months.

Last edited 3 years ago by bluewoody
18
0
JXB
JXB
3 years ago

It seems like only yesterday anyone speculating or merely asking the question about whether mRNA was able to cause cellular change at DNA level was a conspiracy theorist, spreading mis/disinformation and fake news.

How odd that all the conspiracy theories, mis/disinformation and fake news have turned out to be true – and of course the previous naysayers are all claiming they were saying the same things all along. Funny old World.

8
0
Stephensceptic
Stephensceptic
3 years ago

I think there is about to be a Revolution in attitudes to this pointless “jab”.

Just looked at The Telegraph – even their news section now has a piece on vaccine compensation claims. The comments seemed to be 90% in the direction of the vaccines being dangerous and making no sense.

I would hate to be a government leader who told everyone to get “jabbed” when this Revolution gets into full flight. It will not be pleasant.

10
0
John001
John001
3 years ago
Reply to  Stephensceptic

I would like to see them meet the same fate as King Faisal II of Iraq did, 1958.

I hope that’s not ‘profanity’.

3
0
David Beaton
David Beaton
3 years ago

So exactly what the Conspiracy Theorists, shut down by Social Media Fact checker fascists were saying 18 months ago.

Looks like Dolores Cahill called it accurately from the very outset.

What have Pharma done to the world – and Gates wants more!

6
0
JudyRobinson
JudyRobinson
3 years ago

There Are Now 365 Studies that Prove the Efficacy of Ivermectin and HCQ in Treating COVID-19. Any hospital administrator who mandated the shots to employees to comply with the government mandate for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement and who refused to allow alternative treatments to be tried, doctors who pushed their patients to take the EUA drug without giving fully informed consent, anyone who forcefully administered the shot, the AMA, AAP, Boards of Health, CDC, FDA, NIH, WHO, scientists who participated in the development, Big Pharma (Pfizer, Moderna, J&J, Astra Zeneca, et. al.), anyone who pushed the sick into nursing homes resulting in deaths, all must be arrested, prosecuted, tried and if found guilty sentenced to prolonged imprisonment and fines or death for intentional homicide. Get your ivermectin before it is too late! https://ivmpharmacy.com

1
-4
Luis RCoelho
Luis RCoelho
3 years ago

Only now you are reporting this?
I’ve been hearing about this since april/may 2020

4
0
lyndar
lyndar
3 years ago

Another conspiracy theory comes true. I’m no longer even surprised, just sick to the core of all this.

1
0
marebobowl
marebobowl
3 years ago

This should have been your lead article today. Let’s have proper closure on covid before we start the next man made fugazi about Russia and Ukraine being at war. You have to know this isn’t real.

1
0

NEWSLETTER

View today’s newsletter

To receive our latest news in the form of a daily email, enter your details here:

DONATE

PODCAST

In Episode 35 of the Sceptic: Andrew Doyle on Labour’s Grooming Gang Shame, Andrew Orlowski on the India-UK Trade Deal and Canada’s Ignored Covid Vaccine Injuries

by Richard Eldred
9 May 2025
1

LISTED ARTICLES

  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

News Round-Up

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

9 May 2025

Sun-Dimming Quango has £800 Million of Taxpayer Money to Blow – and a CEO on £450k

8 May 2025

News Round-Up

27

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

22

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

18

The Sugar Tax Sums Up Our Descent into Technocratic Dystopia

26

What Does David Lammy Mean by a State?

13

News Round-Up

10 May 2025

BBC Quietly Edits Question Time After Wrongly ‘Correcting’ Richard Tice on Key Net Zero Claim

9 May 2025

Electric Car Bursts into Flames on Driveway and Engulfs £550,000 Family Home

9 May 2025

“I Was a Super Fit Cyclist Until I Had the Moderna Covid Vaccine. What Happened Next Left Me Wishing I Was Dead”

9 May 2025

Nature Paper Claims to Pin Liability for ‘Climate Damages’ on Oil Companies

9 May 2025

POSTS BY DATE

April 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930  
« Mar   May »

SOCIAL LINKS

Free Speech Union
  • Home
  • About us
  • Donate
  • Privacy Policy

Facebook

  • X

Instagram

RSS

Subscribe to our newsletter

© Skeptics Ltd.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password? Sign Up

Create New Account!

Fill the forms below to register

All fields are required. Log In

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
wpDiscuz
No Result
View All Result
  • Articles
  • About
  • Archive
    • ARCHIVE
    • NEWS ROUND-UPS
  • Podcasts
  • Newsletter
  • Premium
  • Donate
  • Log In

© Skeptics Ltd.

You are going to send email to

Move Comment
Perfecty
Do you wish to receive notifications of new articles?
Notifications preferences