The anniversary of the start of the pandemic has occasioned a rash of review pieces, replete with all the standard lockdowner myths that have become part of the Official Narrative in the past year. Not least of which is that lockdown came too late, as Boris has apparently now admitted according to Telegraph sources, which bodes ill for the future.
One of these review pieces, by Telegraph Associate Editor Gordon Rayner, takes a look back at the road to lockdown last March, and includes new insights from insiders, including several ministers.
It rehashes several myths, half-truths and clangers, which we will do our best to debunk.
By mid-March last year new Covid cases were running at an average of 271 per week, though the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) was estimating there were 5,000 to 10,000 cases nationally.
Questions over why Britain was not following other nations, such as Italy, into lockdown were rebuffed because government modelling suggested Mr Johnson’s “squash the sombrero” strategy of flattening the peak would prevent the NHS being overwhelmed.
Suddenly, on Friday, March 13th, everything changed. It was Gold Cup day at the now notorious 2020 Cheltenham Festival, which had been allowed to go ahead despite well-founded concerns that it would become a super-spreader event and SAGE realised it had underestimated the numbers.
Meeting in a conference room at the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy in Victoria Street, London, the scientists decided a 5-7-day lag in data provision meant the country was “further ahead on the epidemic curve” than they had thought, though SAGE did not at that stage recommend an immediate lockdown and warned that “measures seeking to completely suppress spread of COVID-19 will cause a second peak”.
Five hundred yards away in Downing St, Ben Warner, a young data specialist who had been No 10’s eyes and ears in SAGE meetings, conducted his own analysis of the numbers and concluded that the NHS would “fall over” in a matter of weeks because the virus was spreading exponentially.
Mr Warner took his findings to Mr Cummings, and at an emergency meeting in the Prime Minister’s Downing Street office the next morning, March 14th, Mr Cummings wrote Mr Warner’s projections on a whiteboard and said the course the Government was following would result in potentially tens of thousands of additional deaths.
“The PM was stunned,” said one source. “That was the key meeting in deciding we had to go into lockdown.”
“Our priority had always been to make sure the NHS could cope,” said another, “but the new analysis showed Covid wasn’t going to just pass that line on the graph, it was going to really smash through it.”
Reassuring to know the Government was being advised by a broad range of the best scientists in these crucial decisions, with Professor Cummings and Professor Warner drawing wobbly red lines on white boards…
Last June, Imperial College’s Neil Ferguson, who became known as “Professor Lockdown”, controversially told MPs that “had we introduced lockdown measures a week earlier, we would have reduced the final death toll by at least half”.
The accuracy of Prof Ferguson’s suggestion can never be proven, but one insider said: “We lacked the confidence in the public being prepared and able to react quickly, that’s why we waited days and weeks sometimes to implement things.
“There was a strange preference for giving people notice, which seemed bizarre. People were saying to us ‘if you’re going to do this, why not do it now?’
“It was a major misstep not to do lockdown a week earlier. There was a false hope that a few extra days would give us more time to prepare, when in fact it contributed to the whole year progressing as it did.”
Fears of rioting also troubled Downing Street. “There were conversations going on in Government about whether the summer could end up like August 2011 if we locked the country down,” said one minister.
SAGE had also warned the Prime Minister about the danger of “lockdown fatigue”, which has been blamed in the past for the decision not to lock down earlier.
In truth, Downing Street had plenty of evidence that the public was ready and willing to take the sort of tough measures that were being seen abroad.
“We had bags of data that said the public was hugely behind the idea of lockdown,” said one senior source. “We were never going to lose by going in hard. The more extreme the measures we took, the more the public were behind us.”
One source who worked with the Prime Minister said: “There are times when he listens to everyone around the Cabinet table and he will put his fist on the table and say ‘this is what we’re going to do’, like when the testing programme was going wrong. But he definitely dithered when it came to massive decisions that meant curtailing freedoms.”
“The accuracy of Prof Ferguson’s suggestion can never be proven” – this is one of the most persistent and pernicious lockdown myths. It’s as though Sweden doesn’t exist. We know Sweden didn’t lock down and fared better than the UK. And we know that places which didn’t lock down this winter often fared better than those that did. We also know that deaths in the UK peaked on April 8th, which, it was pointed out last April by leading Oxford epidemiologist Professor Carl Heneghan, meant that new daily infections had peaked around 23 days earlier on March 16th, eight days before the national lockdown was imposed. Thus contrary to pro-lockdown mythology there is ample evidence disproving Professor Ferguson’s claim that the UK death toll could have been halved by locking down a week earlier. Lockdown simply isn’t that effective and COVID-19 simply isn’t that deadly.
Then on March 23rd SAGE told Boris Johnson that the reproduction rate of the virus – the R number which would quickly become part of the national lexicon – had risen to between 2.6 and 2.8, meaning each infected person was passing it on to almost three others.
Advisers had been dismayed by pictures of crowded Tube trains in London and people ignoring social distancing advice by flocking to public spaces.
The death toll had leapt threefold to 335, with 6,650 cases. Mr Johnson decided he could delay no longer, and arranged a TV broadcast in which he told the nation: “From this evening, I must give the British people a very simple instruction – you must stay at home.”
Again, it has been known since mid-April 2020 that this estimate of R on March 23rd was way out. A straightforward analysis of the deaths data suggests R had fallen below 1 by around March 16th. Chris Whitty even admitted as much to MPs in July, when he said that R had gone “below one well before, or to some extent before, March 23rd”.
The deepest roots of the delay took hold long before Boris Johnson was Prime Minister. For years, all of the Government’s pandemic planning had been for an influenza outbreak, even though countries in the Far East had experienced the highly deadly Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (Sars) in the recent past.
David Cameron admitted in March 2021 that his own Government’s failure to plan for a respiratory illness pandemic was a mistake, though Jeremy Hunt, the Health Secretary in 2016, told the Telegraph: “I don’t feel personally to blame because as a Cabinet minister you take advice from your scientists and there was no advice to do otherwise.”
Exercise Cygnus, a nationwide planning exercise to simulate a flu pandemic in 2016, had given civil servants a false sense of security, as they believed they had rehearsed for what was now upon them, without fully understanding they had rehearsed for the wrong thing.
One Whitehall source said: “They had a plan for flu but they didn’t have a plan for this. Even though countries in the Far East had experienced Sars, we never prepared for that. That was the fundamental problem in the early days.”
Cygnus’s findings contained no mention of testing, for example, because flu is only spread by people who have symptoms, unlike coronavirus, which can be spread asymptomatically.
The same source said: “Dominic Cummings was asking questions of [Cabinet Secretary Sir Mark, now Lord] Sedwill around 4-6 weeks in, they were being waved off because people were saying ‘we’ve got a plan for this, don’t worry’.
“The question for the future is whether those lost weeks were fundamentally critical and would we not now be talking about 125,000 deaths. What did those weeks cost us? It’s important to know because it could happen again.”
The claim that the UK’s Pandemic Preparedness Strategy did not envisage a coronavirus outbreak that could kill upwards of 125,000 people is yet another clanger. In fact, the document prepared in 2011 explicitly envisages the possibility of a SARS-like pandemic and up to 315,000 additional deaths. The COVID-19 pandemic has been well within these anticipated bounds – no country has yet experienced an equivalent death toll of 315,000, and the UK (as one of the worse hit countries in the world) is nowhere near it. Nonetheless, the strategy did not recommend lockdowns in any circumstances, questioning whether they were effective or ethical.
However, here is what lockdowners claim made the real difference with COVID-19: asymptomatic transmission.
The issue of asymptomatic transmission – and ministers’ lack of knowledge of it – has been cited by Mr Johnson almost every time he is asked about why Covid was able to spread in the UK.
It is a narrative that has gone largely unchallenged, yet some scientists on SAGE did try to raise the alarm.
On Jan 28th SAGE noted that “there is limited evidence of asymptomatic transmission, but early indications imply some is occurring”.
Then on Feb 21st last year the Italian village of Vo’Euganeo near Venice went into quarantine after the country’s first recorded death from Covid, and almost all of its residents were tested for the virus.
Around 40% of those who tested positive were asymptomatic, strongly suggesting asymptomatic transmission was occurring.
Members of Sage were so struck by the findings that they raised them with the Chief Scientific Adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, and with Prof Ferguson, only for their concerns to be dismissed.
One scientific adviser said: “Neil Ferguson’s response was that it doesn’t really make that much difference to the models, which seemed a bit strange, because it certainly made a bloody big difference.”
Tests on passengers on the Diamond Princess cruise ship in Japan, where hundreds of people became infected and were quarantined, including Britons… also raised questions in February about whether the virus was being transmitted asymptomatically.
Nice to see a rare criticism of Ferguson’s modelling, if for the wrong reasons. In fact, asymptomatic transmission is another big fat lockdowner myth. The presence of a high proportion of asymptomatic PCR-positive individuals, as in Vo, is just a reflection of how sensitive the PCR test is in picking up viral material long after a person is infectious. As with other viruses, asymptomatic carriers of SAR-CoV-2 are barely infectious, with one recent study finding they account for just 0.7% of transmission. The fact that 40% of those who tested positive in Vo doesn’t “strongly suggest” asymptomatic transmission was occurring. All it shows is that almost half of those infected are asymptomatic. It tells you nothing about how they caught it.
In mid-March, Sir Patrick spoke of the need “to build up some degree of herd immunity” which would mean that “probably 60%” of the population would have to get the virus.
One health source said: “He was talking about herd immunity because that’s what you do with flu. What’s been forgotten in all of this is that herd immunity was what SAGE wanted at the beginning.”
One senior MP said: “They definitely had a view early on that allowing it to spread to build up immunity was necessary. They were saying privately ‘this is going to be like chickenpox, we are probably all going to have to get this’.”
Sir Patrick later denied herd immunity had ever been the preferred policy of SAGE, and it was never taken up by the Government.
It is nonsense to suggest that herd immunity is possible with flu but not with COVID-19, which is why there are so few reports of people being reinfected, even with all the new variants that are getting so much press coverage.
Should have stuck with the original plan, Boris.
To join in with the discussion please make a donation to The Daily Sceptic.
Profanity and abuse will be removed and may lead to a permanent ban.
Didn’t they have some riot police beefed up by foreign thugs when they wanted to duff up peaceful anti-lockdown protesters?
A different story though when they’re told to enforce actual laws South of the river. Crooks.
No longer called the Boy Scouts as it is now open to girls (though the ‘Girl’ Guides seems to have survived). Oh well, there’s always the Boys’ Brigade.
I wonder what these groups will have to do about the “trans” business…
Brown Owl becomes Rainbow Owl?
They already have Rainbows…. then Brownies…. Wonder how long Brownies will last before they are accused of being wascist??
The Scout group in the village has had a long history of taking girls as there wasn’t & still isn’t a guide pack within walking or short driving distance.
This was instigated to meet a need for the children of the village. Met & still meets the need for children to make bangs, dirty, learn critical thinking skills & enjoy being children.
“The CDC is pushing it [child ‘vaccination’] much more strongly [than ‘JVC’ (sic) ]”.
The CDC that is in bed with big pharma. They’re all following “the science” though…
I spoke with Dr Kat Lindley last night, a press release has already gone out re this yet the meeting to make the decision is later today. She’s speaking against this & presenting evidence to support this position.
It’s to tag every man, woman & child in preparation for the control grid & to reduce the population to their desirable level. Plus there will be no control group if every child is tagged.
This article just published today makes one weep for the innocent children & the utter depravity of the parents who allowed their babies to be trial participants.
https://www.conservativereview.com/horowitz-pfizer-data-shots-2657512798.html
Ooh, Whitby has voted to limit second homes (Patrick Chrystis, GB News)!
I seem to remember that this has been done in other places (the Yorkshire Dales?). Whilst the libertarian in me does balk somewhat at this (the same as with restrictions on what country people can live in), the trouble is that people sometimes buy a second home but only visit occasionally, thus not contributing much to the local economy, and also forcing housing costs up to unacceptable levels if too many people do it. Thus I have been moving towards the position that these rights must necessarily be conditional, rather like with Gordon Brown’s five tests for joining the Euro. Thus if you want to have a lot of second home owners coming into a certain area, take measures to ensure that housing is still available to local people below a certain price – and if it threatens to go above this price it has to be suspended. Obviously things will be different for different areas, but in general, there should be a principle of consent from the majority of people affected so far as possible. Likewise with immigration, it should both be beneficial and be seen to be beneficial. And if it is a matter of saving people from persecution, it should be proven that this is indeed necessary to save people from persecution (thus it might be reasonable for us to take in a certain amount of people from Hong Kong or the Ukraine)
In a similar vein, the UK should be free to deal with people entering the country illegally in a way that it sees fit (eg Kigali). If the ECHR wants to stop this, perhaps they can arrange for them to go to a processing centre in Strassburg? No? I thought not…
Mmmmm, I think the devil is in the detail. The non-binding vote in Whitby relates only to new-builds. 2nd home owners are not known for buying new homes on new estates. I doubt there is competition between 2nd home owners & locals for the properties covered by this vote.
On the BBC yesterday they interviewed a 19 year old hairdresser who seemed to be blaming 2nd home owners for her inability to buy locally, I’m not sure I’d agree.
Inevitably 2nd home owners push up prices but I doubt that this vote does anything to address the problem.
Whitby is the nearest town to me…about 3-4 miles away. I assure you people do buy second homes here, even ones on estates..usually because they are small estates, or in town, or near the sea/beach. I don’t have strong feelings one way or another to be honest, but I do know that one of the effects people don’t mention is that some smaller schools have had to close, over the years, and children have to be bussed to central schools…because obviously the people who buy second homes are often retired with no young children….……
……my friend lives on the West Cliff, and it’s like a ghost town in the winter when people don’t visit their houses as often…but I don’t know if you can do much about it.
I buy all my meat and veg locally, we have fantastic butchers near us…so I’m not sure what that’s about…in my village we have an ‘award-winning’ butcher…people travel for miles to go there….
…..but I think this a problem everywhere isn’t it…young people unable to get on the housing ladder? What can be done about it I’m not sure…
Lucky you living where you do!
The village where I live doesn’t have a second home problem, second homes tend to be moored in the Marina, but house prices are obscene which is a barrier for people wanting to stay in the village as it’s a lovely place to live & raise children – why I moved here. The solution to this agreed on by consultation with all the village residents was to identify a part of the village where housing could be built purely for folk with a connection to the village to rent or to part own. The prices are about 2/3rds of other comparable property in the village would go for. It has bungalows, 2, 3 & 4 bed houses. The plan was such that the area could be extended for more houses to meet future needs. It is in one of the best spots on the edge of the village & is a lovely community in itself. Children playing out etc.
Local solutions required for what is a local problem.
All beautiful rural areas are plagued by this; it’s not helped either by useless Housing Associations, which seemed to have changed their role from Social Housing agents to Property companies. We live in a gorgeous village in Somerset, with the usual number of – as they are known here – “Down from Londoners” who contribute nothing to the village. We have quite a lot of social housing, controlled by Aster. When a lease ends or a tenant moves, they almost always flog the property. claiming it would not be worth doing it up for rentals. Why? Because they do next to no maintenance unless you are a mardy tenant, like our lovely neighbour, a Yorkie, who doesn’t take no for an answer.
Result? No housing for young villagers. Nice AirBnB properties for people who don’t live here to rent.
As for Cornwall.
It can be dreadful living next to an airb&b or a holiday rental. Relatives who live and work in Cornwall decided to move when the house next door became a holiday let, and they had to put up with constant noisy bbqs and parties every week from the different holidaying residents.
“We have quite a lot of social housing, controlled by Aster. When a lease ends or a tenant moves, they almost always flog the property.”
The original purpose was always to sell. To get to that point they serve a limited time as rentals – “Well we tried -” and then the profits come in.
In reality this is building private property by the back door. Difficult to argue against social housing developments for fear of the ‘nimby’ label.
When you see that photo of Blair talking to Soros in 1996 it looks like he’s selling his soul to become Prime Minister.
**
Nearly everything Boris Johnson wrote before was a complete lie to make Telegraph readers think he was Conservative. Instead we have the most left wing, spineless. globalist Prime Minister in history. His only priory is to destroy Britain as part of a Grand Plan to destroy the West.
**
Stand in the Park Sundays 10.30 -11.30am
make friends & keep sane
from the globalist covid & climate propaganda
*
Wokingham
Howard Palmer Gardens Sturges Rd RG40 2HD
*
Telegram astandintheparkbracknell
He’s his father’s son
The Covid jab has been quietly added to the list of childhood vaccines. Along with an annual flu jab “if necessary.”
They are creating children who effectively have no immune system and will be vulnerable to every germ they come into contact with.
Apologies, have linked this before and most on here must have seen it, but it’s so close to the truth it’s scary.
Imagine anyone nowadays letting their children “swim in the Hudson River”, (obviously the local alternative applies), the phone to the do-gooders at SS (Social Services), would be red hot.
BTW, this is in direct comparison to my generation….outside all day playing in the dirt, no real handwashing culture at home, weekly bath at my grans as we didn’t have one, use of filthy communal outside toilet in early childhood, and hardly a days illness in my life!**
** No, you’re not reading the MP “lived in a shoe sketch”!
Today’s kids are having their immune systems destroyed; and hardly anyone gives a fig.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X29lF43mUlo
Childhood autism has gone from around 1 in 150 in 2000
to 1 in 44 in 2018…according to the CDC
But it is not…most definitely not to do with vaccination……
In 1962 children got five vaccinations, by 1983 it had risen to 24, by 2018 it was 72 doses by the time you are 18!…I think they get around 22 before they are 12 months old…..
I’d upload a graphic but just realised that the app isn’t there!!
“They are creating children who effectively have no immune system and will be vulnerable to every germ they come into contact with.”
And probably sterile.
The flu jab is also mRNA based now!
This generation’s Thalidomide
As was frequently posted on this site by many “it’s not over.“
We have got at least one and possibly more very sick downtickers on the site.
Every comment deploring the addition of a C1984 injection to childhood vaccines has received at least one downtick.
Very sad that individuals with no empathy, obviously no children and not a warm nerve in their bodies can condone such a move.
Ordinarily I would wish them a Foxtrot Oscar but they are not even worth that they are simply first class rubbish.
A cracking piece in TCW by Frank Wright:
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/were-the-losers-in-this-global-game-of-charades/
Basically we are in a state of chaos that is out of control.
I don’t know if I agree or not. Chaos for sure but whether it is now out of control I’m not yet convinced. The situation is certainly going to escalate before Christmas and probably dangerously.
If civil unrest breaks out who knows where we end up.
Have the Davos mob lost it? Possibly. Russia is digging in and I don’t mean militarily. China, as ever is going its own way and India is flexing its muscles – understandably. Brazil and 42 African nations won’t bend the knee, rightly.
The dollar’s collapse is inevitable and probably will take the pound with it. The US and Europe appear to be turning themselves in to a Third World hell hole.
It’s going to get very bloody nasty.
It is. There is some hope in the UK though. A very high ranking army officer has served notice on every MP & every servant of the Crown who heads up a department. They have excuse that they don’t know.
The government & army are surprised that things haven’t kicked off sooner, which they’re prepared for. There is a network of veterans who are prepared to uphold their oath to the Queen to protect her subjects.
With normal folk in our communities, dealing with them with kindness, calmness & compassion works as it defuses volatility. The psycho & sociopaths need to be treated with the same type of behaviour as they’re dishing out.
Yesterday evening’s zoom meeting & then a smaller discussion was very interesting! Dr Tau Braun is an expert in counter terrorism & the cabal are frightened of him as he has more knowledge than they on countering their terrorist acts.
The following Biblical passage seems to be a good place to seek inspiration from, if not religious, think of it as a metaphor for what & who we’re battling & what you can do to strengthen your resolve & the tools to use in this war.
Ephesians 6:10-18 KJV
Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord, and in the power of his might. Put on the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places. Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness; and your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God: praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, and watching thereunto with all perseverance and supplication for all saints
Out of interest, where did you hear this? Who is it?
Thanks
I didn’t make a note of his name & it has been consigned to my forgettory but I heard it from a credible legal source who helped with the drafting of the notice. It was in a discussion yesterday evening.
I’m not going to put my source’s name out there as it isn’t my place to do so.
The guy who’s served notice has no fear.
Can anyone point me in the direction of data showing sea level rises around the coast of Britain since 1980 or so? My understanding is that it’s 1.4mm/year, but has that actually happened?
The reason I mention this is due to a report the BBC are bigging up about 200,000 being abandoned by 2050. They did a piece from Norfolk about homes being abandoned, of course the reason is coastal erosion not sea level rises, but I’m struggling to get decent data on actual sea level rises. By my estimate, by 2050 sea levels may be just over an inch higher than they are now, not enough to cause widespread panic I would have thought?
I don’t know where to direct you for that information. Sorry.
I vaguely recall watching a programme aeons ago when the BBC had credibility about the British Isles & how coastal towns, villages etc had suffered from the sea. One point they made was that it wasn’t the sea levels that were rising in the south but the land mass was pivoting in the middle of the British mainland with the south sinking & the north rising.
I may be wrong & if any of you can support or challenge this, I’d appreciate it!
Browsing for the term “mean sea level changes” came up with this entry: https://academic.oup.com/gji/article/176/1/19/2019967?login=false It contains a lot of historic records over the last century. If you just read it’s summary, you will see that they were (in 2009) sceotical about the accuracy, and interpretation of the results obtained.
Don’t know if you can access Twitter, but I like Latimer Alder for his climate sanity…·
From my postbag: June 10th.
‘Dear Latimer
I’m in UK and can’t swim. I’m terrified that the sea will rise because of Climate Change and drown me.
How many people have drowned around the world because of climate change?’
A: None.. Sea’s rising at only 1 foot (34 cms) per 100 years.
LOL!
That report on the BBC was almost criminal in the way it was presented.
It suggested that coastal erosion was due to climate change and rising sea levels.
I come from the East Coast of Yorkshire where there are houses falling into the sea and further south there is a lighthouse almost a mile away from the receding sea. The sand has simply moved over the years. Nothing to do with the sea level.
What was irritating was the way the presenter kept saying, time after time, that the sea level was the cause of the problem.
Yes, I saw an article in the Telegraph recently about a woman who’s house is getting ever nearer to falling into the sea in Happisburgh, Norfolk. All caused by climate change…..As I know the area I know this isn’t a recent thing, but when I looked it up I found it had been going on since the 1800’s, so what did they blame it on then?
1845 A twelve-acre field at Happisburgh was drilled with wheat. A north-west gale raged all night, and by new morning the field had disappeared.
1854 White’s Directory for this year reported that the sea had encroached 250 yards in the last 70 years at Happisburgh.
1855 Doggett’s Farm -the house. a large barn and the premises – were lost to the sea.
1883 The Low Lighthouse was threatened with erosion. It was withdrawn from service and demolished.
and on and on…..!
How I hate these fuc****s….
Today, the Biden Administration is announcing an operational plan that will ensure that vaccines—if authorized by FDA and recommended by CDC—are readily available for our youngest kids and that we continue the critical work of ensuring that all families know the benefits of getting their children vaccinated against COVID-19.
re the story ATL about baby vaccination in the US…
https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/urgent-omg-the-pfizer-data-for-kids/comments?s=
Urgent:OMG the Pfizer data for kids under five….
Alex Berenson
June14
That 80 percent figure for efficacy you’ve seen reported is worse than a joke, it’s essentially a fabrication.
Here’s what the Food and Drug Administration and Pfizer did; they only counted cases after the THIRD mRNA dose.
But of the 375 Sars-Cov-2 infections in the trial, 365 occurred before the third dose. Only 10 occurred after the third dose.
Yes, you are reading that right. The efficacy figure is based on 3 PERCENT OF ALL THE INFECTIONS IN THE TRIAL. (Which is why the confidence intervals are so large.)
Count the other 97 percent of the infections, and the vaccine was roughly 20 percent effective over the entire trial – far, far below what the FDA said was approvable in 2020. The confidence intervals went below zero for kids under two, meaning the possibility that the vaccine increased the risk of infection cannot be excluded. And cases of severe Covid – including one two-year-old who was hospitalized – were mostly in the mRNA group.
Great interview with Naomi Wolf (on the Pfizer papers)…On The War Room,
don’t watch it if you don’t like hearing about deaths and injuries to babies by the vaccine death dealers….
https://rumble.com/v18dfcj-dr.-naomi-wolf-on-infertility-and-the-who-and-dealing-with-censorship.html
Brilliant article explaining how the Pfizer trial was gamed to get approval. All fraudulent. If fraud is upheld by a court, then it renders the bioweapon injection manufacturer liable for any harms caused by their toxin.
Evil barstewards springs to mind.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/did-pfizer-perform-adequate-safety-testing-for-its-covid-19-mrna-vaccine-in-preclinical-studies-evidence-of-scientific-and-regulatory-fraud/
First I’ve heard of the Sainted Jacinda’s father sanctioning house arrest for inhabitants of an island in the Pacific for asserting their bodily sovereignty to not be injected with the toxic bioweapon. Seven months of house arrest!!!
https://www.thedailyexaminer.co.nz/new-zealand-citizens-under-house-arrest-for-pfizer-non-compliance-ross-ardern-suddenly-resigns/
This generation’s Thalidomide.
Any other suggestions for yet to be written investigative journalism?