Covid vaccines saved far fewer lives than first thought, a major new analysis from Stanford's Professor John Ioannidis and team has concluded – closer to 2.5 million than the 14 million claimed by the WHO in 2022.
Imperial College London scared the world into locking down with death projections based on fatality estimates that the latest data suggest are up to 20 times higher than the reality.
A leader in today’s Telegraph says the question the Covid inquiry must ask is whether we should have locked down at all. People are beginning to conclude it was a calamitous mistake.
Professor John Ioannidis has written a paper for BMJ Open Research exploring how pro-lockdown scientists used social media to smear sceptical scientists, thereby shutting down debate.
How deadly is COVID-19? Last year Prof John Ioannidis published an analysis of antibody studies which concluded the IFR was around 0.15% globally. Now he's brought out an update – and the IFR has gone down.
Why does Wikipedia's COVID-19 page claim 14% of infections are "severe" and 5% are "critical"? Worse, why does the US CDC say the same? Why aren't they following the up-to-date data, which puts global IFR at 0.15%?
No surge as schools open in the UK, no surge in free states like Texas and Florida – is anyone in Government watching the real world or are they too busy gawping at the huge bell curves in Neil Ferguson's latest model?
